EPT[MLG] Raleigh - Day 2 - Page 135
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
|
PulseSUI
Switzerland305 Posts
| ||
|
Darpa
Canada4413 Posts
| ||
|
Mattes
Germany1116 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:13 PulseSUI wrote: who made third? Socke | ||
|
Saekar
Germany28 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:13 PulseSUI wrote: who made third? Socke iirc. GZ Huk! | ||
|
SaikOuLighT
Canada742 Posts
| ||
|
Gaius Baltar
United States449 Posts
| ||
|
Twe3k
89 Posts
>.< >.< >.< >.< (words can not explain my displeasure) I watched the whole stream all morning!!!! and I saw the AMAZING game where huk comes back for a win with phoenix... But of course my Boss comes over as they start the final game, and she doesn't leave forever... Just so I can come back and see that Huk is indeed the victor. But of course I want to know what happened in the last game So I continue to watch the stream only to hear them talk about the Phoenix upset........................................ | ||
seanisgrand
United States1039 Posts
| ||
|
demonik187
United States575 Posts
| ||
|
BcGladiator
United States58 Posts
| ||
|
Donner
Germany91 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:13 SCC-Faust wrote: I'm in love with HuK. Such innovative play, so amazing. And he is really smooth and outgoing on camera. He has all the qualities I've ever wanted.  bad news my friend, huk already has a boyfriend. | ||
|
backtoback
Canada1276 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:13 SCC-Faust wrote: I'm in love with HuK. Such innovative play, so amazing. And he is really smooth and outgoing on camera. He has all the qualities I've ever wanted. smooth... he qualifies to be your BF? jk :D CANADA > USA in this tourney imo. | ||
|
Sigmur
Poland497 Posts
| ||
|
Infundibulum
United States2552 Posts
 | ||
|
FiWiFaKi
Canada9859 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:10 r33k wrote: I still don't understand why people find SC2 PvP repetitive and love BW PvP.... Because you always know the winner of the engagement, microing goons plays a big role, not to mention reavers and templars in PvP... It's still considered one of the worse mu nontheless. | ||
|
Deleted User 76781
101 Posts
| ||
|
Senx
Sweden5901 Posts
| ||
|
groms
Canada1017 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:16 Senx wrote: So few indepth interviews and live videos off the playareas etc though, kinda dissapointed by the coverage :s Hopefully they can learn from the communities suggestions and add more interviews with the players and give us a better sense of what the atmosphere over there is like. It can only get better from here . :D | ||
|
Iggyhopper
United States259 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:16 Skillz_Man wrote: Also, you could pull off a reaver drop in BW with some good micro. The warp prism doesn't get used much because all you have to drop is useless units. Colossus drop is good but way way too risky for its price.Because you always know the winner of the engagement, microing goons plays a big role, not to mention reavers and templars in PvP... It's still considered one of the worse mu nontheless. | ||
|
hihu
France64 Posts
On August 29 2010 07:04 Runnin wrote: It's pretty much the exact same thing. Try thinking about it next time before ignorantly whining. Here's a hint, bo7 ends up being the exact same as first to 2 bo3. You're totally wrong. First of all, because he got out of the winner bracket ahead, HuK should have a full set advantage (bo3 in this case) against kiwikaki who lost a match already and not just a mere game advantage, and HuK should be required to win only one bo3 again while kiwikaki should have to win 2 to make up for his earlier loss in the tournament. This loser bracket style has been used for like 10 years in professional FPS tournaments and it always worked like this. Also, if there weren't any advantage for HuK and both had to win 2 bo3s, it wouldn't be the same as a bo7 anyways. Say HuK wins first 2-1, loses second 1-2, and wins 2-1 the third... wait, kiwikaki won 4 games and still lost the series? doesn't sound like a bo7 to me. Unfortunately this kind of bracket doesn't work too well for RTS games imo and I think double group stage > single elimination bracket is better. | ||
| ||
