EPTOn August 29 2010 00:58 Brad wrote:
SjoW vs. SeleCT
TTOne vs. Socke
Coming up.
SjoW vs. SeleCT
TTOne vs. Socke
Coming up.
Thanks a lot for these great LR threads man.
[MLG] Raleigh - Day 2 - Page 12
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
JWD
United States12607 Posts
Thanks a lot for these great LR threads man. | ||
|
jtbem
Canada1404 Posts
| ||
|
nekuodah
England2409 Posts
| ||
|
Nokeboy
United States1009 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:59 Shikyo wrote: Happened in multiple threads multiple times before, he's just like FireGuyX imo. Who btw just got banned for this. Funny how you did the same in past threads but because I don't have 6000 posts I am not as cool  | ||
|
theqat
United States2856 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:58 gillon wrote: Sure is shitters dissing on LastShadow. He won, he played better. End of. Haha, yes, he didn't win because his macro mechanic allows stacking or because he doesn't need workers to continue playing the game Terran apologists boggle the mind | ||
|
ChThoniC
United States536 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:58 Cranberries wrote: All these "tip top" Terran players: -Drewbie -QXC -LastShadow -LZGamer -Painuser Clearly on the same level as: -Dimaga -Whitera -IdrA I think there's a pretty legitimate reason all there are more "tip top" Terran players than Protoss/Zerg players .. It's because the Terran race is easier. That's not a very good list of tip-top Terrans, unless you're pulling them from only this tournament. | ||
|
JWD
United States12607 Posts
On August 29 2010 01:00 Sadistx wrote: He's definitely top tier in SC2. Not the same tier as IdrA/Morrow/Dimaga obviously, but definitely up there with EG and Root guys. You're probably right. I'm not a fan of LS is all  | ||
|
Redmark
Canada2129 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:55 Stratos_speAr wrote: Being better at something with absolutely no drawback to it in any way isn't really "different", it's just poor design. The drawback doesn't have to be in the mules, but in the other facets of the race. Of course, it could be in the mules, if they really are too good, but you can't just say that mules are good and so they should be nerfed. By that logic, if you have a race that's good at macro but has weak units, and a race that's bad at macro but has strong units, you'd make them all the same. I'm not saying that mules are necessarily fine, but that you can't just say that they're not okay just because they do something that the other races can't. | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:57 Shikyo wrote: He needed to mass spine crawlers above his main ramp and fake that he was trying to save his natural and try to gain time... what he did really wasn't a good thing to do. Also his Roaches needed to focus the Marauders, he was just a-moving which makes him auto-target workers. Was just poor play. Although mules are just absolutely ridiculous, Terran can support like 4 barracks off 2 bases with 0 workers on minerals because of them. I was actually thinking of this just as the T's army was scouted, "He's going to lose and people are going to say he should've built Spine Crawlers". Spine Crawlers take forever and a damn day to build. You cannot build Spine Crawlers when you see an incoming attack - you NEED to build them ahead of time or else they'll just die while morphing because of the completely ridiculous build time. It wouldn't have helped much, if at all, maybe delaying for a second or two. And what delaying could Slush have done? You literally just A-move up the damn ramp. There was no delaying that army could have done. | ||
|
wuddersup
United States228 Posts
| ||
|
Jukebox Joe
United Kingdom358 Posts
| ||
|
BigBadSkathe
United States234 Posts
On August 29 2010 00:58 Cranberries wrote: All these "tip top" Terran players: -Drewbie -QXC -LastShadow -LZGamer -Painuser Clearly on the same level as: -Dimaga -Whitera -IdrA I think there's a pretty legitimate reason all there are more "tip top" Terran players than Protoss/Zerg players .. It's because the Terran race is easier. None of those Zergs were in the tournament if that's what you're trying to say. The fact is there were far less Zerg players entering the tournament and it stands to reason that there would be far less left to this point. This thread is devolving into a Zerg whinefest pretty fast which is sad, theres a million threads on the SC2 forum for this do we really need another one here? | ||
|
Crissaegrim
2947 Posts
On August 29 2010 01:00 Sadistx wrote: He's definitely top tier in SC2. Not the same tier as IdrA/Morrow/Dimaga obviously, but definitely up there with EG and Root guys. Haha, thats "debatable". Need to see more games by him though. On August 29 2010 00:59 Jyvblamo wrote: Looks like Nadagast finally got taken out of winners by Kiwikaki. Yay, good news, as we've yet to see Kiwi play. | ||
|
Shikyo
Finland33997 Posts
On August 29 2010 01:00 Nokeboy wrote: Funny how you did the same in past threads but because I don't have 6000 posts I am not as cool As if that matters in the slightest. | ||
|
TymerA
Netherlands759 Posts
| ||
|
DarkspearTribe
568 Posts
| ||
|
RaptorZ
United States155 Posts
| ||
|
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
This will be interesting =D | ||
HeIios
Sweden2523 Posts
On August 29 2010 01:03 DarkspearTribe wrote: Day9 and Husky O.O!!?? Hurray :D | ||
|
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On August 29 2010 01:01 Redmark wrote: The drawback doesn't have to be in the mules, but in the other facets of the race. Of course, it could be in the mules, if they really are too good, but you can't just say that mules are good and so they should be nerfed. By that logic, if you have a race that's good at macro but has weak units, and a race that's bad at macro but has strong units, you'd make them all the same. I'm not saying that mules are necessarily fine, but that you can't just say that they're not okay just because they do something that the other races can't. That's what I'm saying. What other weaknesses does the Terran race have to make up for this? Pretty much none. | ||
| ||
