Razer King of the Beta by Day[9] - Page 90

On July 23 2010 01:22 Roffles wrote:
I'm pretty convinced that if someone goes 2-0 in a Bo3, then the third game won't be played simply because it's pointless to do so.

On July 23 2010 01:16 DC Elite wrote:
I still completely stand by my theory, most pros would know to submit all 3 replays if game 3 was in fact the rubber match. It makes more logical sense than a game 1 or 2 Huk victory, use your head. Notice the lack of details Huk didnt provide when he said he won a game. Wouldnt it have been easy for him to say, I won game 1/2? Hes not even piping in on the conversation to put this all to rest.

Back on topic, however, i'm excited to see TLO play Tester now. Will Tester play his hardest since he is already likely to move on? This set could be the best in the round robin portion.

On July 23 2010 01:22 Roffles wrote:

Tester easily could have misunderstood the rules and simply submitted the two games he won, thinking that it didn't matter if he submitted the one he lost because well, he won the series. Miscommunication could have occurred, as well as a lot of other things, but if I were a betting man, I would never put my money on Huk's win as a meaningless Game 3.

On July 23 2010 01:22 ChaosFury wrote:


"if sean really wants me to i will, i dont see point tho even if i win ill probably still get bashed for something"

HuK's post is full of self-pity. I would consider this a piss-poor attitude. This is not the attitude of a true winner.

But I suppose I know nothing, because I don't post regulary on TL.net. Therefore (supposedly), I have zero worth and zero credibility. I admire your logic.

This. If the HuK who posted is indeed the real HuK, then I certainly have lost respect for him.

On July 23 2010 01:34 DC Elite wrote:


Maybe, but if you just played 2 quick games and one person simply says, lets play the 3rd anyways, most people would agree to it just for the experience.

On July 23 2010 01:19 papaz wrote:


TLO the last hope of the world vs south korea. I am too excited, hope he beats Tester.

Man if South Korea goes to win this without losing to anyone but their own players

On July 23 2010 01:16 DC Elite wrote:
I still completely stand by my theory, most pros would know to submit all 3 replays if game 3 was in fact the rubber match. It makes more logical sense than a game 1 or 2 Huk victory, use your head. Notice the lack of details Huk didnt provide when he said he won a game. Wouldnt it have been easy for him to say, I won game 1/2? Hes not even piping in on the conversation to put this all to rest.

Back on topic, however, i'm excited to see TLO play Tester now. Will Tester play his hardest since he is already likely to move on? This set could be the best in the round robin portion.

On July 23 2010 01:55 ashaman771 wrote:
It's not just the wins, but i'm finding the way they're winning to be great (tester in ITR). They switch things up, they're aggressive in their play, it's so fun to watch. TLO is that way too, which is why he's one of my favs.

But it just goes to show you, it's less about the tactics or units, it's about the guy ordering the stuff around.

On July 23 2010 01:38 Piski wrote:


My logic is that if you can't come up anything better than just accuse people of lying, maybe you should post even less regulary.



It's the real HuK.

On July 23 2010 02:01 ChaosFury wrote:
And my logic is that I do not accept something as true until solid evidence or proof has been presented. Unfortunately, HuK's word alone, is not evidence enough. But you may continue to blindly accept what others say as fact, in the ignorant fashion you have been.