Razer King of the Beta by Day[9] - Page 130
Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Tournaments |
Jyvblamo
Canada13788 Posts
| ||
st3roids
Greece538 Posts
| ||
Badjas
Netherlands2038 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 UltraVires wrote: The stream failing for anyone else? ![]() Yeah ![]() Edit: Now I wish he had done the huk lost chronicles match afterwards. | ||
figq
12519 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:28 holy_war wrote: You were right! I bet HuK wins! ![]() So, I'd say qxc and HuK completely smashed their haters. All players deserved their place in this tournament, and no one is going home entirely empty-handed. | ||
FiWiFaKi
Canada9858 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 UltraVires wrote: The stream failing for anyone else? ![]() Yes! ![]() | ||
ckw
United States1018 Posts
Yeah dude, floor your a complete idiot, HuK is the cheesiest player around. He just got beat by his own game. | ||
blade55555
United States17423 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 buKe wrote: looks like tester was experimenting in game 2 and huk took adv. of it Tester did the same thing in game 1 just zealots instead... | ||
REDBLUEGREEN
Germany1903 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 UltraVires wrote: The stream failing for anyone else? ![]() sadly, yes :/ | ||
Warrior Madness
Canada3791 Posts
| ||
Adsee
United States221 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 buKe wrote: looks like tester was experimenting in game 2 and huk took adv. of it I doubt he would experiment with $3000 on the line. | ||
Stratos_speAr
United States6959 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:37 Entropic wrote: People seriously forget how BW was 2001-2004..... Most definitely. This perfect image of BW gets to everyone's heads. Stream is also failing for me, btw. | ||
Gridlock
United Kingdom517 Posts
| ||
Mr.Eternity
United States143 Posts
| ||
FindingPride
United States1001 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:39 Mr.Eternity wrote: By now you'd think Day[9] would have figured this out it has nothing to do with day9.... its just the high demand | ||
onmach
United States1241 Posts
| ||
SubtleArt
2710 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 I_Love_Bacon wrote: I agree somewhat. While this game does have many more viable 1 base builds, there are not as many that will remain viable after timings and counters are really thought about. Further, arguing that we've been playing for 4 months is meaningless given how large many patch changes were. People will really learn how and when cutting workers is necessary, timing windows for failed attacks will mean people will stop doing earlier strategies as well. This kind of talk happened for years in BW and strategies kept evolving and ones that were once standard are outdated. Just because we have more experience in RTS now doesn't mean all of the top players are simply gods and have worked out all of the kinks in their game and strategies. Of course they haven't but theres quite a few reasonable and stable builds out right now. To summarize my argument really quickly: 1 base builds are much more common now because of lack of highground advantage. Whereas in BW you could expand / tech while surviving with fewer units than the oppoent, in Sc2 the only way to survive is to match his unit count. this is obviously a bit of an oversimplification but I feel that's what it boils down to, and thats why 1 base builds are so good now. | ||
Skullflower
United States3779 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:37 ckw wrote: Yeah dude, floor your a complete idiot, HuK is the cheesiest player around. He just got beat by his own game. You seem to have misunderstood what was happening there. | ||
kzn
United States1218 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:35 buKe wrote: looks like tester was experimenting in game 2 and huk took adv. of it He got his gas stolen and tried to transition from that into an in-base pylon 3gate all-in. It was a bad decision, especially since HuK saw that he transitioned to 3gate and checked for pylons with his first Stalker. You can't pull that transition off effectively except off of a gas steal that takes your first gas instead of your second - otherwise your warp tech is delayed too much to overrun the other guy, let alone when you're trying to win with a 1 warpgate disadvantage. | ||
knyttym
United States5797 Posts
On July 24 2010 11:37 figq wrote: You were right! ![]() So, I'd say qxc and HuK completely smashed their haters. mmm I didn't really see much qxc hate. As for the huk hate he kind of played to the expectation but that isn't really a big deal. Several of the games have been one base shit (tester's korea style 4gate, dimaga banelings) because that seems to be the least risky of the current strategy pool. | ||
damore
Norway11 Posts
| ||
| ||