EPT[G] TvP Hammer 111 Expand (80% Win Ratio) - Page 10
| Forum Index > StarCraft 2 Strategy |
|
crocodile
United States615 Posts
| ||
|
crocodile
United States615 Posts
On April 11 2012 02:57 HammerSC2 wrote: How did I "write it off"? Your logic is FLAWED. You need to relax and settle down little guy LOL, it was just a question. My using thors has nothing to do with asking how BC's are an appropriate counter to scouting HT tech. LOL You're the one who needs to calm down, with condescending statements, words in all caps, and defensive arguments. I'm not upset. I used a curse word and you assumed I'm frothing at the mouth ಠ_ಠ I'm not trying to start an argument here, I just cannot believe that you can simultaneously argue that feedback doesn't hard counter your entire build, and then say that BC are not a good choice due to feedback. It's contradictory, especially since BC are far less susceptible to feedback than Thors and Banshees. By the way, a much better reason for explaining why you can't transition to BC is that you don't have upgrades (because your build is an allin). A transition to BCs will not save you from any composition that defeats your initial push. It's not like the transition in the thread you posted because in that thread, the OP mentions that when you're playing standard MMMGV play you'll have started getting air upgrades and Starports anyway, which is why the transition can work. I merely pointed out that instead of explaining the flaw using the good reasoning I posted above, you argued that feedback is the reason BCs will not work, which I find more hilarious than appalling now that you've gotten all defensive | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 03:19 crocodile wrote: You're the one who needs to calm down, with condescending statements, words in all caps, and defensive arguments. I'm not upset. I used a curse word and you assumed I'm frothing at the mouth ಠ_ಠ I'm not trying to start an argument here, I just cannot believe that you can simultaneously argue that feedback doesn't hard counter your entire build, and then say that BC are not a good choice due to feedback. It's contradictory, especially since BC are far less susceptible to feedback than Thors and Banshees. By the way, a much better reason for explaining why you can't transition to BC is that you don't have upgrades (because your build is an allin). A transition to BCs will not save you from any composition that defeats your initial push. It's not like the transition in the thread you posted because in that thread, the OP mentions that when you're playing standard MMMGV play you'll have started getting air upgrades and Starports anyway, which is why the transition can work. I merely pointed out that instead of explaining the flaw using the good reasoning I posted above, you argued that feedback is the reason BCs will not work, which I find more hilarious than appalling now that you've gotten all defensive Ummm ya.. I think you're one of those nerdtards lookin for a fight on forums.. look at your other posts on this thread alone  YOU need to RELAX (in caps). What he said was nothing to do with my build and I was just looking for an explanation on why BC's are something to produce in order to counter discovered HT tech. Get a life nerd.User was warned for this post | ||
|
crocodile
United States615 Posts
And you still haven't addressed my point, you've just been trolling. That's not to mention the shameless attention whoring you've been doing by bumping your thread every couple of days when it disappears off the front page of the strategy forum. What a joke. Now, would you like to address my point about feedback and explain why it counters BCs but not Thors or Banshees, or would you like to keep acting like a child? | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:15 crocodile wrote: How can you call someone a nerd as an insult when you are on a forum site talking about a video game, displaying your multiple youtube videos (and youtube channel) where you explain your strategies for that video game? You've meticulously prepared a build order and tested it over the course of what I can only assume is a large number of games and written a guide to share it with others, and you're calling me a nerd? Are you fucking serious? And you still haven't addressed my point, you've just been trolling. That's not to mention the shameless attention whoring you've been doing by bumping your thread every couple of days when it disappears off the front page of the strategy forum. What a joke. Now, would you like to address my point about feedback and explain why it counters BCs but not Thors or Banshees, or would you like to keep acting like a child? It is a counter, among many, to Thors and Banshees, I was asking the other poster why BC would be the response to scouting HT's. Why are you so obsessed little guy... LOL | ||
|
Strumpsven
6 Posts
OP is obviously not reading the posts in his own thread. And on the contrary.. a protoss in master that floats 4k minerals. Are you sure you are in masters? | ||
|
Strumpsven
6 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:15 crocodile wrote: How can you call someone a nerd as an insult when you are on a forum site talking about a video game, displaying your multiple youtube videos (and youtube channel) where you explain your strategies for that video game? You've meticulously prepared a build order and tested it over the course of what I can only assume is a large number of games and written a guide to share it with others, and you're calling me a nerd? Are you fucking serious? And you still haven't addressed my point, you've just been trolling. That's not to mention the shameless attention whoring you've been doing by bumping your thread every couple of days when it disappears off the front page of the strategy forum. What a joke. This is how I feel about OP.. :p | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:25 Strumpsven wrote: I do not like OP's behaviour in this thread, even if the build is somewhat decent. OP is obviously not reading the posts in his own thread. And on the contrary.. a protoss in master that floats 4k minerals. God-forbid posters stands up for themselves to dorks on forum Thanks for the bump & check the replays for non-floating 4k min opponents  | ||
|
iAmJeffReY
United States4262 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:25 Strumpsven wrote: I do not like OP's behaviour in this thread, even if the build is somewhat decent. OP is obviously not reading the posts in his own thread. And on the contrary.. a protoss in master that floats 4k minerals. Are you sure you are in masters? Well to be honest, he's mid masters, at best, playing trashy protoss players with a fluke build. Don't be too hateful at him. I watched a few of the reps, and they were just insanely bad players. He uses a game against a diamond protoss as the 'example' He defends it to the death, and habitually self bumps to make sure his thread is on the front page. When he played a good protoss (haz) and got crushed, he blamed it on the 'you know what I was going to do' hence it's a ladder build, or a BOx series build. I wouldn't make it standard, but it isn't to be written off, at least, by any means. On April 11 2012 04:38 HammerSC2 wrote: God-forbid posters stands up for themselves to dorks on forum Thanks for the bump & check the replays for non-floating 4k min opponents =) putting a smile =) every third line =) doesn't make your awful post any less awful =) or self bumping like =) The only person standing up for this is you, if anyone else says a cross word you just look past it, and go right for personal accusations. On April 11 2012 04:49 HammerSC2 wrote: A lot of my games are builds I'm trying for my channel. Even though I play a fair amount I don't take the game, or little nerds like you, too seriously (the old double wink). I have some ridiculous builds that I use, and I play them on ladder for fun. I'm not that good! I have lower apm, I'm between diamond/masters level. And even then.. who gives a sh** lol. It's a game buds. Stop bein a little online creeper.. lol. I'm sorry to be so rude, but just reading through this last page is just awful. You're not at all trying to TALK about strategy, just jump down peoples throats. Doing nothing but calling people names, and attacking peoples character when they say something cross or want an answer to YOUR strategy page. You need to revamp your image, and the way you treat people before coming back to TL and talking strategy. | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:40 iAmJeffReY wrote: Not to mention, 80% win rate is a joke of all jokes. 300-295 record at 590 or so points masters. That means your TvT and TvZ must be GOD AWFUL if you REALLY have an 80% win ratio. Why don't you sc2 gears your last 595 games, and take your real win rate, and show that instead of lying. A lot of my games are builds I'm trying for my channel. Even though I play a fair amount I don't take the game, or little nerds like you, too seriously (the old double wink). I have some ridiculous builds that I use, and I play them on ladder for fun. I'm not that good! I have lower apm, I'm between diamond/masters level. And even then.. who gives a sh** lol. It's a game buds. Stop bein a little online creeper.. lol. (nerd voice) iamjeffrey: "Hmm I'm gonna check his profile, now I'm gonna check some stats, hmmm now I'm gonna write a short story, cause I'm angry and life outside my computers sux." | ||
|
Strumpsven
6 Posts
And there it went down the toilet, my respect for the OP! I'm out of here.. (I'm a nerd.. indeed.. and F*ing proud over that.) | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:56 Strumpsven wrote: And there it went down the toilet, my respect for the OP! I'm out of here.. Oh goodness no!! | ||
|
SheaR619
United States2399 Posts
Seriously OP? This is your post and you are going to continue to degrade it? Even if people are talking back, you shouldnt be provoking them to farther degrade your tread. You are posting this thread to try and get better to be aware of your build right? Your credibility drop quiet a bit imo from your action. Lets try and keep this civil guys. | ||
|
crocodile
United States615 Posts
http://www.cracked.com/blog/5-dismissive-arguments-that-you-only-use-when-youre-wrong/ I never thought I'd be agreeing with IamJeffrey after that fight we had earlier, but holy shit man, I made a light criticism and you jumped all over me. You're really destroying all of the credibility you might have had, and pissing everybody off by calling people who disagree with you 'nerd' as though it's a bad thing. You're on Teamliquid. If you're not a nerd, what the fuck are you doing here? On April 11 2012 04:56 Strumpsven wrote: And there it went down the toilet, my respect for the OP! I'm out of here.. (I'm a nerd.. indeed.. and F*ing proud over that.) Right on. 1000x this. | ||
|
Silent12ill
United States358 Posts
| ||
|
aznkukuboi
120 Posts
I still lose to 1-1-1 like redic amount as toss. I can't defend it. | ||
|
HammerSC2
Canada103 Posts
On April 11 2012 09:07 aznkukuboi wrote: Hammer is now in diamond, I wonder if he still has the credibility. I still lose to 1-1-1 like redic amount as toss. I can't defend it. Protoss isn't my problem | ||
Ares[Effort]
DEMACIA6550 Posts
On April 11 2012 04:38 HammerSC2 wrote: God-forbid posters stands up for themselves to dorks on forum Thanks for the bump & check the replays for non-floating 4k min opponents You can't be serious with this attitude, this thread has run its course. | ||
| ||
