EPTPower Rank 06/06/2008 - Page 10
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
Phradamon
Romania191 Posts
| ||
|
TarsTarkas
United States169 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + Pure > Lucifer in pro league! FakeSteve is vindicated - that game was really not close at all, and showed the great disparity between them | ||
|
Tinithor
United States1552 Posts
| ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5679 Posts
On June 14 2008 00:05 Phradamon wrote: So what? It was a victory. Period. If people praise fast carriers for Best, why in the hell is something bad for Lucifer when he goes dt's? @ FakeSteve Yes, i watch and i have arguments for my posts, Your only answer is questioning me if i watch Starcraft games? Lol I dont give a damn for counting posts, please make TL to show me with zero posts if its possible. You didn't even get what FakeSteve was trying to say with the numbers in TLPD . It has nothing to do with the number of your posts ..... | ||
|
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
Pure did rape Lucifer. I still do think Lucifere has better PvT than Pure, but Pure's PvP just seemed to be on another level. I could come up with some bullshit argument about how it was just one game, but Pure outclassed Lucifer. He didn't rely on BO advantages or anything, just superior play. Further, Lucifer's PvZ is on a 3 loss streak with games down to JD, Luxury and Kwanro. Who has he beaten? Calm and Shark, neither of whom is spectacular. It seems like every decent Zerg is walking all over him. Well, I took a flier on him. His play looked good. I commented in last months thread that I wanted to see more of his vs Z and more of his vs P, that he wasn't very well tested in either of those MU's, but what I saw of him looked better than what we are seeing. Or maybe it just seemed that way because he was winning. On an unrelated note, I think I said this earlier, but I'm calling Best to win OSL. I don't think it will surprise anyone if he does, but god damn is he solid right now. | ||
|
Nick_54
United States2230 Posts
Edit: By the way there is a really ogod arguement that he could be ranked. And yes, I know this was done around June 4th. | ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5679 Posts
On June 15 2008 02:34 Nick_54 wrote: Could someone tell me why Jangbi is not on CBNC. It does not seem right in my opinion. Edit: By the way there is a really ogod arguement that he could be ranked. And yes, I know this was done around June 4th. I would have ranked BackHO back then him :p | ||
|
Mortality
United States4790 Posts
Lucifer seemed to deserve it -- or so I thought anyway -- but he's just been totally falling apart, if he ever "had it" to begin with. I'm quickly coming to see that while his PvT is okay, beating Kal in PvP and beating Calm and Shark in PvZ are basically the limit of his capacity in those MU's. I wouldn't have rated Much, but right now he is unbelievably hot. He turned it on right at the correct time, I've got to hand it to him. Now he's starting to show me that he really is the same Much he was in January. I really, REALLY had my doubts. I would have ranked Free and I firmly believe that FakeSteve is biased against him because of his boring style, but Much's 3-1 over Free is proof that Much deserved it and Free didn't. Well, predictions wouldn't be any fun if you never got them wrong. Of course we like to brag about our good calls (I will freely brag about how I noticed Best before he had even played 10 games, how I noticed Casy long before he won an OSL, how I knew Savior would become #1 in the world the moment he beat Nada so utterly), but I think it's actually our bad calls that make bettering interesting. I thought Rumble would show himself to be a solid Zerg we'd see a lot of. I thought Shudder would be SKT-1's next big Terran. I knew Flash was good, but I never would have guessed that he'd become this dominant. I thought Pusan would go further than Anytime. It's those kinds of calls that make betting interesting, IMO. | ||
|
Phradamon
Romania191 Posts
HerO> Flash and is not. Shit happens, even to the best... | ||
FakeSteve[TPR]
Valhalla18444 Posts
On June 15 2008 06:56 Phradamon wrote: Now really, PUre> Lucifer. So what? Mind > Best and was rated lower on PR. HerO> Flash and is not. Shit happens, even to the best... I'll credit you for realizing that one game doesn't mean the world, but if you still genuinely think Lucifer is better than Pure you need to re-examine what you think you know about StarCraft | ||
|
Nightmarjoo
United States3360 Posts
| ||
|
ScarFace
United States1175 Posts
 Was Flash beat straight up, or was it a proxy or some crap? Pleeassse be a proxy | ||
|
Wasabi
United States3085 Posts
| ||
|
raga4ka
Bulgaria5679 Posts
 | ||
|
SuperJongMan
Jamaica11586 Posts
What can't you find here? Everything from CIA secrets ot the Holy Grail! I just came here to say Nada and Lucipher suck. Nada, not so much, but I don't think he's honestly PR material. GRUNCH GRUNCH GRUNCH | ||
|
Spenguin
Australia3316 Posts
| ||
|
ShloobeR
Korea (South)3836 Posts
| ||
|
kirtar111
United States72 Posts
| ||
|
G5
United States2921 Posts
On June 15 2008 07:46 FakeSteve[TPR] wrote: I'll credit you for realizing that one game doesn't mean the world, but if you still genuinely think Lucifer is better than Pure you need to re-examine what you think you know about StarCraft lololol ya lucifer seems to rely on a lot of risky strats whereas pure plays solid and more intelligently to simply out play his opponents. | ||
|
G5
United States2921 Posts
On June 17 2008 07:22 kirtar111 wrote: when will July be on this list? when he deserves it getting top 8 osl doesn't make u top 10 in the world. Especially when your out of the MSL and haven't even been being picked for proleague by your team. | ||
| ||
