EPTPower Rank 11/21/2006 - Page 3
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
In)Spire
United States1323 Posts
| ||
|
Pika Chu
Romania2510 Posts
| ||
|
Kennigit
Canada19447 Posts
Having a team vote on would a) lead to hours and hours of debating over who goes into the positions of 4-10 b) end having an executive decision probably being made and we'd probably see Dj's result anyways  Overall i like it alot | ||
|
puLs.ReADy
Bulgaria1301 Posts
| ||
|
greatmeh
Canada1964 Posts
this is a awesome new feature ^^ | ||
|
~chut~
France1317 Posts
At least, when i look it that way, it makes more sense. There were a lot of people saying Sea or GGPlay were really on fire and able to win the last OSL, they had impressive records, Bisu showed excellent performance in group stage too. And MSL, despite its excellent players pool, was a bit disapointing. Ra lost to Boxer really easily in a game everyone was waiting for, Silver got far but his wins were not spectacular at all and in the end, Savior as the monster he is, came and crushed everyone. In terms of show, OSL was better, so i guess OSL players got rewarded for that! | ||
Xeofreestyler
Belgium6755 Posts
READ THE NEWS | ||
|
PhilGood2DaY
Germany7424 Posts
Whatever.. i dont mind the rankings at all, especially cause it's not even the question if the ranking is accurate or right, after all it's only the creators opinion, so i dont even know why we should all discuss it, you can barely change someones mind.. | ||
Nyovne
Netherlands19125 Posts
Put some smiles on my face too ;P. | ||
|
CTStalker
Canada9720 Posts
| ||
IntoTheWow
is awesome32269 Posts
but you bash some players for not getting results, and you put anytime over NaDa who is exactly getting results. His way to the final was easier, sure. But he won when it matters, against anytime (who we agree is a monster P). Too bad you cant use DTs in all games in a bo5 series lala. ps: im smarter than you : D | ||
|
jtan
Sweden5891 Posts
Anytime is not THAT good atm imo | ||
|
Danka
Peru1018 Posts
Edit: a lot of these quotes had positive remarks as well, i just selected what i thought showed a problem. On November 22 2006 01:37 humblegar wrote: I think parts like "I hate ra" and "good-fucking-friend" make your otherwise excellent ranking look worse than it could have. A front page feature should be well mannered in my eyes. On November 22 2006 01:49 Red_Dragon wrote: If this list, like this site is serious, then you shouldn`t have said it. It is totally disrespectful (IMO). On November 22 2006 01:59 Card5hark.cF- wrote: And I kinda agree on keeping your personal feelings out of it...It just makes it lame. On November 22 2006 03:05 Lukeeze[zR] wrote: I think the ranking was bad and the descriptions were neither relevant nore funny. But maybe it'll go better with time On November 22 2006 03:20 pyrogenetix wrote: and your comments make it so much more disgusting. On November 22 2006 04:04 Mynock wrote: And I also think personal remarks dominating the analysis aren't giving it due honors unfortunately. -Mynock | ||
|
Sadir
Vatican City State1176 Posts
seriously, it's very difficult to set up a rating like this, especially the places 5-10 are not easy to rate | ||
|
SoMuchBetter
Australia10606 Posts
nada is twice the player anytime is though. you're only putting him as number 2 because youre a protoss fanboy and protoss players like to overrate their own kind. im almost surprised reach isnt on this list. if manablue wrote it he would be | ||
|
DJEtterStyle
United States2766 Posts
On November 22 2006 07:52 CTStalker wrote: I think you should compile the flames (posts and, if any, pms) and categorically mock them Oh, that's the plan. For now, however, I feel as if I have to clear up a glaring misconception regarding this feature: my personal opinions--as far as playstyle and entertainment value of a player--play a truly minimal role in how I rank the players. Obviously some bias is going to seep into the listing, because that's the nature of being, well, human, but I assure you that I am doing my best to give an objective list. I rank the players first; the snarky comments come later. I do, as I noted in the news post, examine much more than statistics. I look at what leagues those statistics came from, who was playing whom, what map was used, and my own assessment of the level of play. It's not science, by any means, but it should be pretty accurate. That said, let's consider the case of Ra. Many people claim that he doesn't deserve to be #9, and for now, I'll concede that point. But does he belong in the top 5? Not. A. Chance. Consider: he only advanced from his MSL group because Boxer joined the army. Otherwise, he was eliminated. He's not even in the OSL (and he didn't make the ODT this season, either), and KTF is an absolute joke in the Proleague this season. So are you really quibbling over whether he should be #6 or #9, or are you just angry over me not liking your favorite player? That is bias. I can concede that maybe some of you would rearrange the list a bit (Nada before Anytime, most notably) or add a particular player or swap one with the other. That's just the nature of something like this; differences will exist. But if you honestly see any glaring flaws, I would encourage you to do a bit more research into why you feel that way and, evidence existing, share those reasons with me. | ||
|
stuthedog
Burundi262 Posts
| ||
|
stuthedog
Burundi262 Posts
| ||
|
omgbnetsux
United States3749 Posts
On November 22 2006 09:00 stuthedog wrote: or some sort of starcraft column re: issues you find fascinating. but a "power rankings" where despite what you say IS mostly subjective is a farce All power rankings are subjective. | ||
|
Jathin
United States3505 Posts
| ||
| ||
