EPTooV will rush Boxer
Is Boxer A Pansy? - Page 2
| Forum Index > Polls & Liquibet |
|
TojsteR
16 Posts
ooV will rush Boxer | ||
|
Nal_Testie
Canada1257 Posts
Boxer has 0 pansiness. Everyone except me (because I don't watch reps) has surely seen his large balls. When you have balls the size of his, you are not allowed to be questioned as a panzy. | ||
|
AzuRE[LighT]
United States2 Posts
| ||
|
Elvin_vn
Vietnam2038 Posts
| ||
|
ahk-gosu
Korea (South)2099 Posts
boxer did something smart not somthing pansyish. yellow did not need to expand every single game. the standard build can be exploited. like rushing dragoon tech with marine medic. the only problem i had with boxer is that he is an entertainer as well as a competitor so he should have tried to entertain the crowd and not just think of winning. like his medic blinding observers. he lost the game but did something innovative which he was remembered for. winning isnt everything. boxer did need to win this game to be a hat trick but , although it worked nicely, he should have been more creative. btw i voted yes. | ||
|
1024MB
United States1455 Posts
He's not a "pansy" whether the people on here think so or not. GET IT IN YOUR HEAD PEOPLE. PROGAMER's FIRST PRIORITY IS TO WIN. IT's HOW THEY GET THEIR MONEY. IF HE TRIED TO ENTERTAIN AND LOST, YOU'D BE WHINING ON HERE. In fact, I find that just as entertaining as a longer more "played out" game. It shows BoxeR's true skill. BoxeR has been around playing SC for SO LONG. He's done SO MUCH stuff. He's been VERY ENTERTAINING. He's VERY GOOD. The fact that you would now call him a pansy just shows some real ignorance and bad manners here. I have an idea. First get up to the top 10. | ||
|
Elvin_vn
Vietnam2038 Posts
Boxer laid down on his bed, thinking "oh shit, i'll be playing yellow next several days and i didn't do shit". Then Boxer began to think of all the possible alternative strategies he could go against yellow "damn, there's no way I can beat this guy, the only way is to cheese him. Hmm the comp can do 8 rax, hey, i can do it better than the comp, let's perfect this strat" | ||
|
ChApFoU
France2983 Posts
| ||
|
ChApFoU
France2983 Posts
edit : all in all cheese is just part of the game, ok it was not entertaining, ok the maps blew for yellow but this is the results : 3-0, Boxer raped yellow period (and i'm a big fan of yellow so don't say it is biased  ) | ||
|
DevilZbOy
United States36 Posts
| ||
|
Slaughter
United States20254 Posts
| ||
|
1024MB
United States1455 Posts
"Oh no, BoxeR, one of the TWO players, didn't risk his chance of survival (in which case if he lost you'd all be mad too) to stretch the game out so I could spend 20 more minutes of my life watching a VOD. So this means he's a pansy!" How selfish is that? | ||
Legionnaire
Australia4514 Posts
On November 12 2004 10:19 1024MB wrote: A Pansy? What the!?!?!? Now we're on to degrading BoxeR because of the fact he chose victory over risking loss just to entertain? How low can you go? He's not a "pansy" whether the people on here think so or not. GET IT IN YOUR HEAD PEOPLE. PROGAMER's FIRST PRIORITY IS TO WIN. IT's HOW THEY GET THEIR MONEY. IF HE TRIED TO ENTERTAIN AND LOST, YOU'D BE WHINING ON HERE. In fact, I find that just as entertaining as a longer more "played out" game. It shows BoxeR's true skill. BoxeR has been around playing SC for SO LONG. He's done SO MUCH stuff. He's been VERY ENTERTAINING. He's VERY GOOD. The fact that you would now call him a pansy just shows some real ignorance and bad manners here. I have an idea. First get up to the top 10. A simple "No" would suffice. | ||
|
1024MB
United States1455 Posts
A simple "No" wouldn't show people how silly it is to even be considering to call him a "pansy." I would do the same if someone called you a "pansy" if you beat someone fast as well. | ||
|
Radule
Serbia15 Posts
| ||
|
PoP
France15446 Posts
| ||
|
1024MB
United States1455 Posts
GAH. The more I look at that definition, the more I see how stupid some people can be. | ||
|
Geval
788 Posts
 | ||
|
taDa
575 Posts
BoxeR is too skilled to be called a pansy. | ||
|
Geval
788 Posts
On November 12 2004 10:12 ahk-gosu wrote: well yellow didnt expect to get rushed by the same thing 3 times but thats why it worked. boxer did something smart not somthing pansyish. yellow did not need to expand every single game. the standard build can be exploited. like rushing dragoon tech with marine medic. the only problem i had with boxer is that he is an entertainer as well as a competitor so he should have tried to entertain the crowd and not just think of winning. like his medic blinding observers. he lost the game but did something innovative which he was remembered for. winning isnt everything. boxer did need to win this game to be a hat trick but , although it worked nicely, he should have been more creative. btw i voted yes. Come on. this time Boxer Aimed for the time record. the shortes bo5 ever. Thats why I love him. Hes unexpected. A true master of sc | ||
| ||
