EPT
Panasonic OGN Starleague Final- RESULTS - Page 2
| Forum Index > News |
|
NoNameLoser
United States1508 Posts
| ||
|
ObtuseLogic
United States72 Posts
| ||
|
Capn
United States539 Posts
 Poor Chojja. | ||
XaI)CyRiC
United States4471 Posts
On February 20 2003 16:00 Skeptix wrote: lol nada rapes gj chojja you got pissed on cry it up fat ass u suck dick Is there any reason for this post other than to see if you can offend people? Don't think you could sound more like an ass. | ||
|
Sweden-Celidar
Sweden484 Posts
 GW mensrea | ||
|
X))Benny
France9 Posts
We could have a model where a player has a 60% winning chance for each game. That would include relative strenght of the players. Then each branch of the tree wouldn't weight 1/32 but p^w*(1-p)^(5-w) where p is win proba for player A and w number of games won by player A.  And a even better model where the player winning a game gets a bonus on his chances of wining the next one, 'because he's on a roll' and gets a psychic advantage.  But that is not of a great interest...  Anyway, no matter how you put it, the winner of the first game is more likely to win. And I forgot: thx mensrea, you made that supposedly boring first game sound great!  | ||
Klogon
MURICA15980 Posts
Lost twice to nada in two different tournements... ouch | ||
|
PheaRSome
United States584 Posts
| ||
|
VaNille
Canada204 Posts
On February 21 2003 03:37 Justin wrote: haha he cried! haha you're american. | ||
|
PheaRSome
United States584 Posts
| ||
|
Napoleic
Canada356 Posts
I knew Chojja was raped from day 1. He's a choke artist, always has been. Some people are championship material, and some people, no matter what their natural talents, just aren't. I doubt we'll hear much from Chojja again. | ||
|
LOcDowN
United States1015 Posts
On February 21 2003 00:38 X))Benny wrote: Yeah ObtuseLogic you're right. In my assumptions I assume that for each single game, each player has a 50% chance of winning it. But it is not the case in a real best-of-5 serie. We could have a model where a player has a 60% winning chance for each game. That would include relative strenght of the players. Then each branch of the tree wouldn't weight 1/32 but p^w*(1-p)^(5-w) where p is win proba for player A and w number of games won by player A. And a even better model where the player winning a game gets a bonus on his chances of wining the next one, 'because he's on a roll' and gets a psychic advantage. But that is not of a great interest... Anyway, no matter how you put it, the winner of the first game is more likely to win. And I forgot: thx mensrea, you made that supposedly boring first game sound great! | ||
|
LOcDowN
United States1015 Posts
| ||
|
Nimed
Portugal82 Posts
 About the people who are saying "those who say ________ should be banished" (and are serious)... Well, I didn't expect the Spanish Inquisition.  | ||
|
X))Benny
France9 Posts
On February 21 2003 05:51 LOcDowN wrote: Oops, anyway, good job Benny Ha ha, I'm glad to see that was of some interest for some of you. Yes, maths can be fun. | ||
| ||
