|
ok vote time
for right now i suggest lynching vivi57 and Mandalor (edit)
laxercannon has said things so i don't think he's 100% mafia yet, also he's thinking so perhaps he's not a plexombie afterall. that and he never voted for plexa. vivi57 is just suspicious overall Mandalor matches a clue kind of, and is suspicious
So i'm going to use a random number generator to assign people to vote for each.
cgrinker KlassyK Lakrismamma waterghostclawdragon bugzltoonl double d scaramanga spetial tensai176 heros)pink qatol infundibulum cynanmachae spike softer truthbringer plexa mtf spiralarchitect faronel bluemanrocks t_co JeeJee trancestorm laxercannon timchi myheronoob mrbabyhands
Will vote for Vivi57
that means Folca Ver Joxxor delanzia elemenope Lenwe Caller ydg LucasWoJ clazziquai ulszz archaic hyperobla tube vivi57 artanis[xp] yubee fishball ninja4ever midnightgladius daba decafchicken ecomania mandalor mhugues therapy meegrean caelym rebirthoflegend revoluti0nx zbir rage empyrean camlito pokebunny shadowdrgn
will vote for Mandalor
any other votes will be shot.
|
On November 26 2008 12:15 LucasWoJ wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:07 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 11:59 MTF wrote:On November 26 2008 11:53 SpiralArchitect wrote: How does advocating Plexa getting elected make me suspicious? Besides I made some shitty photoshop of Arnold hitting a joint and labeled it to be Caller, I hardly see how that and some random posts saying "OMG PLEXA 4 MAYOR" are anything more than an attempt to stir the voters a bit. Because there was a huge movement against putting Plexa in at the time that you started your campaigning. Also, you campaigned not just for Plexa, but against Caller and I, in however a playful tone. If you didn't notice that at the time, then don't fault us for it. If anyone looked suspicious during the campaign stage it was you and Caller. The only two candidates that pretty much ran on the same ticket, trying to become elected together. Yet you still try and implicate Plexa after he made a one line post stating that he would like to become Pardoner. I fail to see where Plexa has doubt cast on him and where you guys don't. Absolutely false. Plexa's army of zombies looked far more suspicious than MTF and Caller during the election. He barely ran a campaign, he's still not really a part of this game (though, I guess he could be writing articles), and he managed to get considerable enthusiastic support. Caller wasn't at all suspicious from what I can recall; what are you specifically referring to? It almost seems like you're pointing back at things that never existed (or that I've most likely forgotten, in which case, enlighten me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" ) I think that the Plexa army of Zombies is A) Over hyped and B) Due to the fact that he is one of TLs most beloved writers and his name is red. Based purely on the fact that he is staff and a good writer I would vote for him rather than vote for somebody else who made a one line post about their candidacy.
Edit: Not to mention he has proven himself in past Mafia games to be a good clue analyzer. Thats just another thing that goes for him in an election that he doesnt have to campaign about, he has alot more base voters than Caller or MTF would have.
|
whoaaaa from what i read, taking pleasure in torture links to me? just to make sure i have this right actually that looks pretty good lol do the clues for BB match up in day 1 as well or are they a different set? edit: actually it seems brute strength is emphasized more in day 1 for BB. hmm
|
On November 26 2008 12:20 SpiralArchitect wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:11 Caller wrote:On November 26 2008 12:07 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 11:59 MTF wrote:On November 26 2008 11:53 SpiralArchitect wrote: How does advocating Plexa getting elected make me suspicious? Besides I made some shitty photoshop of Arnold hitting a joint and labeled it to be Caller, I hardly see how that and some random posts saying "OMG PLEXA 4 MAYOR" are anything more than an attempt to stir the voters a bit. Because there was a huge movement against putting Plexa in at the time that you started your campaigning. Also, you campaigned not just for Plexa, but against Caller and I, in however a playful tone. If you didn't notice that at the time, then don't fault us for it. But since when did Plexa become a bad guy, is he mafia? Am I missing something? As far as I can tell you and Caller have been working together to get into a position of power under the plan of destroying the mafia with your amazing clue analysis. As of yet 4/5 bodyguards are dead (AoCs fault) 2 paramedics and a DT are also dead. 3 Mafia died, including the AoC. Seems to me like the two of you are unfit for your positions aye? If anyone looked suspicious during the campaign stage it was you and Caller. The only two candidates that pretty much ran on the same ticket, trying to become elected together. Yet you still try and implicate Plexa after he made a one line post stating that he would like to become Pardoner. I fail to see where Plexa has doubt cast on him and where you guys don't. wait what does 4/5 bodyguards have anything to do with AoC there is no aoc the aoc can only work if he/she is in office. they cant just use themselves randomly, are you on crack and why would we kill our own bodyguards, we'd end up getting owned by mafia/freelance vigilantes (hahaha). Why would plexa not be posting? Why hasn't he said anything here? Why isn't he analyzing clues? this whole thing is very weird. I assumed since 4/5 died last night and teh AoC died on the same night that they died for that reason. I also was unclear since the description does not say "You can only do this if elected" It say the town may be in trouble if an AoC is elected to office. You would kill your own body guards to say exactly what you just said. Why would someone who is mafia need bodyguards eh? Operating under the assumption that you are indeed mafia or MTF is, or both of your are, everything that has happened so far is in your favor. Four out of five dying means nothing if you do not need to be protected, both paramedics are dead and a DT is dead. While the mafia has only lost one prominent figure, which was useless unless elected to office. Not posting is not a good reason to cast suspicion on someone. Especially when not a single clue has pointed to Plexa this entire game. He could be busy in RL or on TL doing things, either way not posting is not suspicious, its lazy and not good for the game but its clearly not suspicious. Plexa is very good at analyzing clues from what I hear and the two of you have advocated his guilt since the beginning of the game. Plexa dieing would be in your advantage, I find it funny that you are still trying to push for his guilt without ever really going all out about it. I think it is because you want Plexa to be dead but you want someone else to do the dirty work so you arent noticed as mafia. Clearly nobody really payed attention during the campaign because I have no idea how someone so blatantly clueless or someone is who obviously working towards mafia motives got elected.
an aoc has to be elected for it to work the aocs just died is all and the bgs happened to die unfortunately as well. The reason we need bodyguards, if we are mafia, is that the other mafia will almost certainly hit us without the bodyguards. this should be self explanatory. And we do need to be protected. the other mafia would kill us otherwise.
Not posting or inactivity is a good reason to cast suspicion, especially if people end up voting for Plexa in massive droves. He is good at clues, but he hasn't done any, and yet he's clearly been watching the thread as he posts every now and then to make an innocuous comment.
However, I'm not sure Plexa is guilty yet because he may be a blue. Instead, i'm focusing on people who randomly voted for him instead.
AND AGAIN, I CANT DO ANYTHING AT NIGHT, IM A GODDAMN PARDONER AND I HAVE NO ABILITIES AT NIGHT.
|
For my own part, I'm still not sold on Plexa being mafia right now. The people surrounding him and the people that voted me up at the end are those that are suspicious: calling them Plexazombies is by association, not by some strict "Plexa is mafia" code. :p
If the remaining DT's would please check up with Caller/someone at all and rolecheck myself and Plexa, that'd be greeeeat. Still waiting on that.
|
Caller, I think your lists are too large - narrowing down the votes from that many people would take too long (Mafia would kill everyone by then). I think some votes should be diverted to other perhaps confirmed innocent people.
|
On November 26 2008 12:22 SpiralArchitect wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:15 LucasWoJ wrote:On November 26 2008 12:07 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 11:59 MTF wrote:On November 26 2008 11:53 SpiralArchitect wrote: How does advocating Plexa getting elected make me suspicious? Besides I made some shitty photoshop of Arnold hitting a joint and labeled it to be Caller, I hardly see how that and some random posts saying "OMG PLEXA 4 MAYOR" are anything more than an attempt to stir the voters a bit. Because there was a huge movement against putting Plexa in at the time that you started your campaigning. Also, you campaigned not just for Plexa, but against Caller and I, in however a playful tone. If you didn't notice that at the time, then don't fault us for it. If anyone looked suspicious during the campaign stage it was you and Caller. The only two candidates that pretty much ran on the same ticket, trying to become elected together. Yet you still try and implicate Plexa after he made a one line post stating that he would like to become Pardoner. I fail to see where Plexa has doubt cast on him and where you guys don't. Absolutely false. Plexa's army of zombies looked far more suspicious than MTF and Caller during the election. He barely ran a campaign, he's still not really a part of this game (though, I guess he could be writing articles), and he managed to get considerable enthusiastic support. Caller wasn't at all suspicious from what I can recall; what are you specifically referring to? It almost seems like you're pointing back at things that never existed (or that I've most likely forgotten, in which case, enlighten me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" ) I think that the Plexa army of Zombies is A) Over hyped and B) Due to the fact that he is one of TLs most beloved writers and his name is red. Based purely on the fact that he is staff and a good writer I would vote for him rather than vote for somebody else who made a one line post about their candidacy.
lol thank you for emphasizing my point
and i didnt make a one line post and neither did mtf we both had pretty thorough posts about our candidacy
i'm going to do calculus hw now, please follow the voting plan pleaseeeeee
|
On November 26 2008 12:25 TranceStorm wrote: Caller, I think your lists are too large - narrowing down the votes from that many people would take too long (Mafia would kill everyone by then). I think some votes should be diverted to other perhaps confirmed innocent people.
we only have two votechecks left besides i know a lot of people will end up not voting. this way we ensure we get a good pool.
|
On November 26 2008 12:25 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:20 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 12:11 Caller wrote:On November 26 2008 12:07 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 11:59 MTF wrote:On November 26 2008 11:53 SpiralArchitect wrote: How does advocating Plexa getting elected make me suspicious? Besides I made some shitty photoshop of Arnold hitting a joint and labeled it to be Caller, I hardly see how that and some random posts saying "OMG PLEXA 4 MAYOR" are anything more than an attempt to stir the voters a bit. Because there was a huge movement against putting Plexa in at the time that you started your campaigning. Also, you campaigned not just for Plexa, but against Caller and I, in however a playful tone. If you didn't notice that at the time, then don't fault us for it. But since when did Plexa become a bad guy, is he mafia? Am I missing something? As far as I can tell you and Caller have been working together to get into a position of power under the plan of destroying the mafia with your amazing clue analysis. As of yet 4/5 bodyguards are dead (AoCs fault) 2 paramedics and a DT are also dead. 3 Mafia died, including the AoC. Seems to me like the two of you are unfit for your positions aye? If anyone looked suspicious during the campaign stage it was you and Caller. The only two candidates that pretty much ran on the same ticket, trying to become elected together. Yet you still try and implicate Plexa after he made a one line post stating that he would like to become Pardoner. I fail to see where Plexa has doubt cast on him and where you guys don't. wait what does 4/5 bodyguards have anything to do with AoC there is no aoc the aoc can only work if he/she is in office. they cant just use themselves randomly, are you on crack and why would we kill our own bodyguards, we'd end up getting owned by mafia/freelance vigilantes (hahaha). Why would plexa not be posting? Why hasn't he said anything here? Why isn't he analyzing clues? this whole thing is very weird. I assumed since 4/5 died last night and teh AoC died on the same night that they died for that reason. I also was unclear since the description does not say "You can only do this if elected" It say the town may be in trouble if an AoC is elected to office. You would kill your own body guards to say exactly what you just said. Why would someone who is mafia need bodyguards eh? Operating under the assumption that you are indeed mafia or MTF is, or both of your are, everything that has happened so far is in your favor. Four out of five dying means nothing if you do not need to be protected, both paramedics are dead and a DT is dead. While the mafia has only lost one prominent figure, which was useless unless elected to office. Not posting is not a good reason to cast suspicion on someone. Especially when not a single clue has pointed to Plexa this entire game. He could be busy in RL or on TL doing things, either way not posting is not suspicious, its lazy and not good for the game but its clearly not suspicious. Plexa is very good at analyzing clues from what I hear and the two of you have advocated his guilt since the beginning of the game. Plexa dieing would be in your advantage, I find it funny that you are still trying to push for his guilt without ever really going all out about it. I think it is because you want Plexa to be dead but you want someone else to do the dirty work so you arent noticed as mafia. Clearly nobody really payed attention during the campaign because I have no idea how someone so blatantly clueless or someone is who obviously working towards mafia motives got elected. an aoc has to be elected for it to work the aocs just died is all and the bgs happened to die unfortunately as well. The reason we need bodyguards, if we are mafia, is that the other mafia will almost certainly hit us without the bodyguards. this should be self explanatory. And we do need to be protected. the other mafia would kill us otherwise. Not posting or inactivity is a good reason to cast suspicion, especially if people end up voting for Plexa in massive droves. He is good at clues, but he hasn't done any, and yet he's clearly been watching the thread as he posts every now and then to make an innocuous comment. However, I'm not sure Plexa is guilty yet because he may be a blue. Instead, i'm focusing on people who randomly voted for him instead. AND AGAIN, I CANT DO ANYTHING AT NIGHT, IM A GODDAMN PARDONER AND I HAVE NO ABILITIES AT NIGHT. I never said you had any abilities at night, so take down your stupid capslock freak out session. In fact I never said you even made a move. I think you are pulling the strings on both ends and sooner or later either you or caller are going to be revealed as mafia. Worst case scenario you are both mafia and members of both families.
|
On November 26 2008 12:27 Caller wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:22 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 12:15 LucasWoJ wrote:On November 26 2008 12:07 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 11:59 MTF wrote:On November 26 2008 11:53 SpiralArchitect wrote: How does advocating Plexa getting elected make me suspicious? Besides I made some shitty photoshop of Arnold hitting a joint and labeled it to be Caller, I hardly see how that and some random posts saying "OMG PLEXA 4 MAYOR" are anything more than an attempt to stir the voters a bit. Because there was a huge movement against putting Plexa in at the time that you started your campaigning. Also, you campaigned not just for Plexa, but against Caller and I, in however a playful tone. If you didn't notice that at the time, then don't fault us for it. If anyone looked suspicious during the campaign stage it was you and Caller. The only two candidates that pretty much ran on the same ticket, trying to become elected together. Yet you still try and implicate Plexa after he made a one line post stating that he would like to become Pardoner. I fail to see where Plexa has doubt cast on him and where you guys don't. Absolutely false. Plexa's army of zombies looked far more suspicious than MTF and Caller during the election. He barely ran a campaign, he's still not really a part of this game (though, I guess he could be writing articles), and he managed to get considerable enthusiastic support. Caller wasn't at all suspicious from what I can recall; what are you specifically referring to? It almost seems like you're pointing back at things that never existed (or that I've most likely forgotten, in which case, enlighten me. data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/c81e3/c81e334f952fa6a3b77a0f55297a8c05972c04b5" alt="" ) I think that the Plexa army of Zombies is A) Over hyped and B) Due to the fact that he is one of TLs most beloved writers and his name is red. Based purely on the fact that he is staff and a good writer I would vote for him rather than vote for somebody else who made a one line post about their candidacy. lol thank you for emphasizing my point and i didnt make a one line post and neither did mtf we both had pretty thorough posts about our candidacy i'm going to do calculus hw now, please follow the voting plan pleaseeeeee I was explaining the Plexa zombies not trying to say you guys made a one liner. That only backs my point that you made long and extensive posts trying to get into office, since nobody knows you like they do plexa you have to work to get votes while he can just sit back and rely on his base. This is basic politics here and you used to it cast suspicion on a very good clue analyzer before even the Day 1 post was out, even still you are trying to have cast suspicion. Why? I believe its because Plexas death does nothing but good for you and the mafia.
|
I'm sorry Spiral but I'm getting more and more convinced that you're part of that mafia with each post that you make. Your continual use of the word "clearly" to cover up your deeply flawed and mostly lacking logic as an obvious fact is quite disconcerting, to say the least.
Not posting anyone is a very valid reason to arouse suspicions. Any counter-argument can sort of portray why the opposite's validity is not "clear." Say I'm being accused of being mafia. I do some good ol' fake clue analysis and temporarily throw the town off my back. Then I sit out for the entire game. That's suspicious.
Let's try another one. Take MTF last game: he hid himself in the topic and was found to be mafia.
Behavioral analysis generally serves as a better tool than clues in both online and RL mafia games.
I don't think they're pushing for Plexa's guilt at this moment. The implication is definitely there, but Caller isn't even voting to lyncg Plexa today.
|
On November 26 2008 12:32 LucasWoJ wrote: I'm sorry Spiral but I'm getting more and more convinced that you're part of that mafia with each post that you make. Your continual use of the word "clearly" to cover up your deeply flawed and mostly lacking logic as an obvious fact is quite disconcerting, to say the least.
Not posting anyone is a very valid reason to arouse suspicions. Any counter-argument can sort of portray why the opposite's validity is not "clear." Say I'm being accused of being mafia. I do some good ol' fake clue analysis and temporarily throw the town off my back. Then I sit out for the entire game. That's suspicious.
Let's try another one. Take MTF last game: he hid himself in the topic and was found to be mafia.
Behavioral analysis generally serves as a better tool than clues in both online and RL mafia games.
I don't think they're pushing for Plexa's guilt at this moment. The implication is definitely there, but Caller isn't even voting to lyncg Plexa today. That is why Plexas guilt is highly suspicious man. He even said he is having some RL issues lately and has been doing alot of work around TL. Not posting could mean a million things, yes one of those is that he is using it as part of his plan to make people think he is not mafia, but more likely than not hes just busy.
I fail to see where my logic is deeply flawed clearly Caller and MTF have been actively seeking a position of power and since then have used that position to do what? Absoloutely nothing besides pardon BloodyCobbler. Have the first two days events done anything besides benefit the mafia? Clearly not. Ill state this again, 4/5 bodyguards dead (without the AoC) wow thats some amazing luck? 2/2 Paramedics dead? Wow thats some even more amazing luck! 1 DT dead? WOW THE LUCK IS JUST OFF THE CHAIN AMAZING!!!!! 3 regular mafiosos dead? Doesnt hurt mafia and it doesnt help the town, but it casts suspicion elsewhere and gives Caller/MTF a good excuse to say hes been doing something.
|
ugh.
that's it we're changing the votes.
i dont think jeejee has been acting as suspicious lately so we're changing it to this:
Instead of voting for JeeJee, vote for Mandalor
|
On November 26 2008 12:40 SpiralArchitect wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:32 LucasWoJ wrote: I'm sorry Spiral but I'm getting more and more convinced that you're part of that mafia with each post that you make. Your continual use of the word "clearly" to cover up your deeply flawed and mostly lacking logic as an obvious fact is quite disconcerting, to say the least.
Not posting anyone is a very valid reason to arouse suspicions. Any counter-argument can sort of portray why the opposite's validity is not "clear." Say I'm being accused of being mafia. I do some good ol' fake clue analysis and temporarily throw the town off my back. Then I sit out for the entire game. That's suspicious.
Let's try another one. Take MTF last game: he hid himself in the topic and was found to be mafia.
Behavioral analysis generally serves as a better tool than clues in both online and RL mafia games.
I don't think they're pushing for Plexa's guilt at this moment. The implication is definitely there, but Caller isn't even voting to lyncg Plexa today. That is why Plexas guilt is highly suspicious man. He even said he is having some RL issues lately and has been doing alot of work around TL. Not posting could mean a million things, yes one of those is that he is using it as part of his plan to make people think he is not mafia, but more likely than not hes just busy. I fail to see where my logic is deeply flawed clearly Caller and MTF have been actively seeking a position of power and since then have used that position to do what? Absoloutely nothing besides pardon BloodyCobbler. Have the first two days events done anything besides benefit the mafia? Clearly not. Ill state this again, 4/5 bodyguards dead (without the AoC) wow thats some amazing luck? 2/2 Paramedics dead? Wow thats some even more amazing luck! 1 DT dead? WOW THE LUCK IS JUST OFF THE CHAIN AMAZING!!!!! 3 regular mafiosos dead? Doesnt hurt mafia and it doesnt help the town, but it casts suspicion elsewhere and gives Caller/MTF a good excuse to say hes been doing something.
Just a small correction, 2 DTs are dead
|
On November 26 2008 12:43 LaXerCannon wrote:Show nested quote +On November 26 2008 12:40 SpiralArchitect wrote:On November 26 2008 12:32 LucasWoJ wrote: I'm sorry Spiral but I'm getting more and more convinced that you're part of that mafia with each post that you make. Your continual use of the word "clearly" to cover up your deeply flawed and mostly lacking logic as an obvious fact is quite disconcerting, to say the least.
Not posting anyone is a very valid reason to arouse suspicions. Any counter-argument can sort of portray why the opposite's validity is not "clear." Say I'm being accused of being mafia. I do some good ol' fake clue analysis and temporarily throw the town off my back. Then I sit out for the entire game. That's suspicious.
Let's try another one. Take MTF last game: he hid himself in the topic and was found to be mafia.
Behavioral analysis generally serves as a better tool than clues in both online and RL mafia games.
I don't think they're pushing for Plexa's guilt at this moment. The implication is definitely there, but Caller isn't even voting to lyncg Plexa today. That is why Plexas guilt is highly suspicious man. He even said he is having some RL issues lately and has been doing alot of work around TL. Not posting could mean a million things, yes one of those is that he is using it as part of his plan to make people think he is not mafia, but more likely than not hes just busy. I fail to see where my logic is deeply flawed clearly Caller and MTF have been actively seeking a position of power and since then have used that position to do what? Absoloutely nothing besides pardon BloodyCobbler. Have the first two days events done anything besides benefit the mafia? Clearly not. Ill state this again, 4/5 bodyguards dead (without the AoC) wow thats some amazing luck? 2/2 Paramedics dead? Wow thats some even more amazing luck! 1 DT dead? WOW THE LUCK IS JUST OFF THE CHAIN AMAZING!!!!! 3 regular mafiosos dead? Doesnt hurt mafia and it doesnt help the town, but it casts suspicion elsewhere and gives Caller/MTF a good excuse to say hes been doing something. Just a small correction, 2 DTs are dead there are also 5 paramedics, not 2 and the bodyguards and mafiasos were all acting really, really dumb. really obviously dumb.
its not luck its about reading clues
and whos really good at reading clues and i see plexa in live reports all the time, and he posted in here earlier today in response to my first, playful accusation.
|
What thread are you even reading from, Spiral?
First off:
Five mafia from one single family died. Two DT's have died. Two (one of which was lynched by me upon election because of her behavior) out of five Paramedics have died. One Veteran died. Four Bodyguards have died.
Now, while I'm suspicious about the bodyguards, too, it doesn't make any sense for you to point the finger definitively at either me or Caller. First off, one bodyguard was killed by one family and the other three were killed by the other family. Several possibilities follow because of this:
- We're both mafia in different families. - Just one of us is and the other side got lucky with one or three hits. - Neither of us is and the mafia just got lucky. - Someone else got the list, though Caller claims he told nobody and I know I didn't.
Now, if you argue for either of the first two, you have to consider why we'd kill our own bodyguards. You seem to think that it's okay that we kill all but one off on the very first night. Not only is this an incredibly stupid move, as it casts suspicion on the people that everyone knows has the bodyguard list, but it also leaves Caller and I more exposed; being mafia is not equal to being safe, as was demonstrated by the demolishing of Yamaguchi-guri last night. Your reasoning in that matter is flawed.
Also flawed is your continued assumption that Caller and I "ran on the same ticket" for power. Let me say again: I voted for Ver and wanted Ver in, Caller voted for Ver and wanted Ver in. We both changed after the whole Plexa situation came about, which isn't invalid now just because the circumstances supporting it at the time no longer look appealing. They applied at the time.
You seem to be arguing from the position that me and Caller are tag-teaming here when it's been the opposite since the beginning, and that there's a witch hunt after Plexa just because of what was brought up during the mayoral election.
Now while Caller still clearly has his suspicions, this isn't the same thing you're running on about.
Honestly, I think you just enjoy stirring up shit.
|
United States17042 Posts
ace hasn't tossed up the vote thread/blog yet right?
|
|
|
On November 26 2008 12:58 MTF wrote: What thread are you even reading from, Spiral?
First off:
Five mafia from one single family died. Two DT's have died. Two (one of which was lynched by me upon election because of her behavior) out of five Paramedics have died. One Veteran died. Four Bodyguards have died.
Now, while I'm suspicious about the bodyguards, too, it doesn't make any sense for you to point the finger definitively at either me or Caller. First off, one bodyguard was killed by one family and the other three were killed by the other family. Several possibilities follow because of this:
- We're both mafia in different families. - Just one of us is and the other side got lucky with one or three hits. - Neither of us is and the mafia just got lucky. - Someone else got the list, though Caller claims he told nobody and I know I didn't.
Now, if you argue for either of the first two, you have to consider why we'd kill our own bodyguards. You seem to think that it's okay that we kill all but one off on the very first night. Not only is this an incredibly stupid move, as it casts suspicion on the people that everyone knows has the bodyguard list, but it also leaves Caller and I more exposed; being mafia is not equal to being safe, as was demonstrated by the demolishing of Yamaguchi-guri last night. Your reasoning in that matter is flawed.
Also flawed is your continued assumption that Caller and I "ran on the same ticket" for power. Let me say again: I voted for Ver and wanted Ver in, Caller voted for Ver and wanted Ver in. We both changed after the whole Plexa situation came about, which isn't invalid now just because the circumstances supporting it at the time no longer look appealing. They applied at the time.
You seem to be arguing from the position that me and Caller are tag-teaming here when it's been the opposite since the beginning, and that there's a witch hunt after Plexa just because of what was brought up during the mayoral election.
Now while Caller still clearly has his suspicions, this isn't the same thing you're running on about.
Honestly, I think you just enjoy stirring up shit.
You could kill your own bodyguard so that you can make that argument to deter suspicion.
You and Caller effectively ran together at the end when you said that you'd give all the info to caller if you won.
Go ahead and kill me if you want, but I'm still convinced that caller is mafia. The reason I switched my vote to mtf is so that caller wouldn't get mayor.
|
|
|
|