TL Mafia 2 [GG] - Page 84

On March 21 2008 08:35 Naib wrote:
French_Toast you misunderstood me again, I meant "general" as in: people who don't read / don't get it / don't PM.

I didn't mean general as "French_Toast's posts in general". You take everything personal

edit: the followup part of my post that you quoted can be misunderstood, too, and I think you took it on yourself: it's directed at Shallow[bay] to try to get him get his act together.

Well that's too much posting from me again: I'm off to sleep.

On March 21 2008 03:57 Showtime! wrote:
Empyrean was just aiming for power. Nothing wrong with that when you're stuck in a townie role.

On March 21 2008 06:18 French_Toast wrote:
Wow, Ace's plan is so stupid and cheap. I liked the bodyguard plan but this is a sign of desperation. Yeah, guys let's make this game even more cheap! Lets have everyone pm their roles so we know who's lying! Seriously, if you want to keep this game fun, avoid cheap exploits like that.

Do you really think i would be that stupid to go against the town if I was a mafia with a mafioso in the clues called Mr.Pink?

On March 21 2008 09:34 Empyrean wrote:


Thanks for noticing :/



Honestly, no townie would care if a plan was "cheap". It's like you being MM rushed in a PvT, having Reaver tech, but deciding against it because Reavers are "cheap".

Additionally, the Mr. Pink clue and the fact that heros)pink doesn't like the plan because it's too "cheap" as well gives some suspicion to him.



Yes. That's actually not too far from what we did last game. It's too obvious the clue points at him. Why would he incite more town anger? IT DOESN'T MAKE SENSE!!

I think the best course of action for next night is to have a detective PM Chuiu, asking if the Mr. Pink clue points at Heros)Pink. Hopefully, since no DTs have spoken up against Ace, we know that Ace is mayor. All of them should have PM'd Ace by now, so Ace knows all the DTs. He should assign each detective a certain "investigation" to ask Chuiu.

On March 21 2008 09:56 Empyrean wrote:
One DT will probably be assigned to CTStalker as well. Besides, if you want to prove your innocence to the town, you should have no reservations against using a DT to clear your name.

On March 21 2008 09:51 HeRoS)Pink wrote:

If that is good for the town do it... waste of a DT if u want my opinion. It would be better to have a DT on CTStalker's case

On March 21 2008 09:58 bumatlarge wrote:


I doubt you would need to waste a DT (kinda funny abbreviations), we could lynch him and not really care if he's a townie cause he isn't doing anything. Unless Ace can tell us otherwise...

On March 21 2008 05:25 OneBlueAugust wrote:
This may have been clarified earlier, but activity is judged not just by forum posts, right? I've been relatively active in PMs, as I feel that's the only wise way to express my thoughts at the moment, but I haven't posted here yet at all.

On March 21 2008 05:43 Fishball wrote:


All elements aside, just this specific case as an example.

If I were Mayor and Mafia, I could fake a claim that I got roleblocked so I don't use my double lynches.

On March 21 2008 10:09 AcrossFiveJulys wrote:


Stop making bad suggestions. Lynching a townie is bad because it both wastes a lynch that we could otherwise use to kill a mafia and it means one less townie the mafia has to worry about.

On March 21 2008 10:45 ~OpZ~ wrote:

But I don't believe you can hide your voting power. You can't spread your votes out so your vote would always be higher than other townies IF he wasn't roleblocked, meaning he would actually be roleblocked WITHOUT a DT confirming this would show he was targeted by a mafia member. So we wouldn't need a DT to confirm mafia targeted him, which would imply his innocence also.

I believe Ace now. 100%. In day, when he votes we will see him only having 1 vote and that should show us his true face regardless of a DT stepping forward. Thank you Saboteur.

On March 21 2008 10:51 Bockit wrote:


Unless he's lying about being roleblocked?

Not that I think that's the case, I'm just pointing out that the logic you applied there isn't perfect. We already have our methods to confirm he's a townie (bodyguards, dts), I'm giving detectives until day then I'll be pretty confident he's a townie and I'll be pming my role.

Meaning he tells me this before day starts and I disable that player from using their special role the following day and night.

On March 21 2008 10:51 Bockit wrote:


Unless he's lying about being roleblocked?

Not that I think that's the case, I'm just pointing out that the logic you applied there isn't perfect. We already have our methods to confirm he's a townie (bodyguards, dts), I'm giving detectives until day then I'll be pretty confident he's a townie and I'll be pming my role.