[M][N] I'm a cop you idiot! - Round 2 - Page 7

On September 29 2020 05:06 ShoCkeyy wrote:


Nah I was reading your post saying GB is mafia, and just wrote MAFIA instead of GB since I was correlating both of them. No slip here. I'm town man.

On September 29 2020 03:36 GlowingBear wrote:
Yeah, I guess we are well versed on the mechanics now.

On September 29 2020 04:28 Dadred wrote:
Like the more I think about it the more I like Shockeyy and GB reaction to me. They paid attention and saw what was wrong.

On September 29 2020 04:42 CopCake wrote:


You are not 100% clear in my books detective GB :p

On September 29 2020 04:54 ShoCkeyy wrote:
LOL INC RAYN VS MAFIA.

THIS IS THE BEST DAY EVER.

On September 29 2020 05:01 raynpelikoneet wrote:

I agree with this.

No. There are a lot of things that don't add up.

1) Me and Glowingbear discussed the setup and the changes before the game started. I find it kind of hard to believe he didn't know the doctor could not act on N0, which is furthermore even more likely because of his reaction to your claim. Like when we discussed the setup changes i clearly said "if cop claims exactly at the end of N0". The end of night doesn't matter if doctor can act, because obviously the correct play is to claim in your first post as a cop if that's the case.

2) This one:

Glowingbear is a smart person. He played incredibly well last game. We can probably all agree on that. Here's a problem; You wrote "rayn hasn't even had a reaction to the cop claim which is a bit interesting in of itself". You're entirely correct on that. Do you remember what was my reaction last game when shockeyy claimed? I immediately told him to shut up and post nothing more (until there is a cc). Why doesn't that difference in me interest GB a single bit this game?!?!?!? Actually i know and knew the doc cannot act N0 because i actually read the setup.... And what i did was the correct thing. I kind of believe GB knows that and that's why he didn't address this at all, and for whatever reason started pretending he doesn't know the setup after shockeyy said what he said.

3) This thing here he is the kicker:

I don't believe that and you shouldn't either.
Yeah i know for a fact GB rolled mafia before re'rolling because i was the other mafia. Hapa even gave us a QT and there is one post, that says: " My god, this was going to be such a good team ". Do you wanna guess who wrote that?

My first impression when the game actually started was "fuck why couldn't we just have played with the old roles". I don't believe GB's first post for one second, especially because of what he wrote into the QT.

So there is that.

On September 29 2020 05:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:

What did GB see as "what was wrong" as his initial reaction to your claim?

On September 29 2020 05:24 GlowingBear wrote:
Explaining:

1) Yes but I'm an oblivious person and I often forget things. I just posted whatever came to my mind and then got reminded the change in the setup.
2) I have no idea what you're saying tbh. I think cop shouldn't claim n0 if doctor can't protect.
3) I believed it was going to be a good team, but I prefer playing as town. I'm glad I'm not under the pressure of being mafia.

On September 29 2020 05:26 Dadred wrote:


I take it he knew the setup instantly

On September 29 2020 05:29 raynpelikoneet wrote:

1) Maybe you did maybe you didn't. That's up for everyone else to decide.
2) I am saying i acted completely different against an initial claim than i did in the last game with a "same" setup (as you claim you believed it to be), yet you take no action on my irrational behavior.
3) Maybe, i for sure don't believe that's what you would write as your first post, especially after your post in the QT.

On September 29 2020 05:31 raynpelikoneet wrote:

What do you mean?

My question is, at least at this point you didn't believe GB knew the correct setup and thought doc could act N0.

Why is questioning the correct play for a cop (which is also in line with your last game claim) reasonable?

On September 29 2020 05:34 Dadred wrote:


At the time GB initial attack under my assumption (same setup) is scummy. It's the right play to claim when I did early no fanfare and look for a 1 v 1.

With the knowledge that GB knew the setup and that's why he went for me, it's a bit towny that he would attack me for trying to bait the cop out if inwas scum in his perspective. However gb does hinder his cause by instantly not cop, if he truly believed I was scum he wouldn't say that as it would shrink the pool to shoot into for scum.

On September 29 2020 05:35 Dadred wrote:
That last thought just came to me and I think it's great.

GB why did you say not cop when you didn't believe me

On September 29 2020 05:38 GlowingBear wrote:


Sorry, I didn't understand your question. Did you ask why didn't I believe in your claim? If that's your question, it was basically gut feeling. Like "this post doesn't sound genuine". I basically do that every game to generate discussion while still being true to my intuition. I have no other reason to doubt your claim.