|
On April 10 2019 05:17 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2019 04:59 Mig wrote: I am fibonacci
I am looking for pythagoras. I can collaborate with them during the day time. If I am right. Both are removed at the end of the day. My role pm tells me I have a PI so if they are mine they should be able to verify that my power is collaborate and not differentiate like HF has claimed.
I was confused my HFs claim because it sounded like we had the same power but he typed in rayn and damdred. I can very clearly just name one person a day to check with. So wasnt sure if he was lying and his power did something else.
I would guess pythagoras is probably mafia. But if anyone wants to claim pythagoras then I can verify it.
Well sheeit According to my role, guess I am still the eye in the sky since I am not exactly your friend what does this mean?
|
On April 10 2019 05:22 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2019 05:18 Tumblewood wrote:On April 10 2019 05:17 Alakaslam wrote:On April 10 2019 04:59 Mig wrote: I am fibonacci
I am looking for pythagoras. I can collaborate with them during the day time. If I am right. Both are removed at the end of the day. My role pm tells me I have a PI so if they are mine they should be able to verify that my power is collaborate and not differentiate like HF has claimed.
I was confused my HFs claim because it sounded like we had the same power but he typed in rayn and damdred. I can very clearly just name one person a day to check with. So wasnt sure if he was lying and his power did something else.
I would guess pythagoras is probably mafia. But if anyone wants to claim pythagoras then I can verify it.
Well sheeit According to my role, guess I am still the eye in the sky since I am not exactly your friend what does this mean? I am not fibionacci’s friend well i got that. what is your role though, and why aren't you fibonacci's friend
|
allow me to elucidate sorry did i say elucidate, i meant euclidate sorry, did i say allow me to euclidate, i meant i am euclid + Show Spoiler +if HF collabs with me before the hosts tell me what happens in the case of multiple collabs, i will be very miffed
|
disfo if u didn't figure that out by now you are bad @ mafia
|
ok clearly we have to collaborate by EoD because we're all getting removed then anyway, but i would like to know whether it is possible for all three of us to win. and whether we are truly out of the game forever at that point.
|
TS, who will be removed at EoD, if any?
|
On April 10 2019 05:34 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2019 05:33 Tumblewood wrote: TS, who will be removed at EoD, if any? you and I and not mig bit convenient really if this is the case, i plan on collaborating with mig at some point in the next 24 hours. not yet, but might as well win for sure if i'm about to get removed anyway
|
the only people not claimed are sent, KSC, and grack. KSC and grack are almost certainly not mafia together, so at most this is a 3 man mafia team (in which case TS would be mafia posing as third party) unless each nation faction has at least 1 scum.
|
On April 10 2019 05:41 raynpelikoneet wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2019 05:40 Tumblewood wrote: the only people not claimed are sent, KSC, and grack. KSC and grack are almost certainly not mafia together, so at most this is a 3 man mafia team (in which case TS would be mafia posing as third party) unless each nation faction has at least 1 scum. what have palmar and vivax claimed? oh tru
|
if this is a 5 man team then we pretty much know all 5. i would hope the hosts are capable of making a game that doesn't get solved immediately by mass-claiming, but maybe we're just playing town of salem.
|
On April 10 2019 05:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: why are KSC and grack are almost certainly not mafia together? KSC claimed a role which is basically "remove this player from the game for a day cycle" which is an awfully strange role to use on your teammate. tbh not sure why town would get that role at all
|
##collaborate Mig i don't think i will survive till EoD, and mig won't either, so i might as well get a win. or at least i probably win, hosts won't say what will happen because closed setup
|
On April 10 2019 06:44 disformation wrote:i also find it hilarious that i was trying to be a bit sneaky with the euclid thing. SINCE I DIDNT KNEW PYTAGORAS WAS IN THE FUCKING GAME YO. fluff text all about italy. so im yo imma refer to the greek master of geometry like: Show nested quote +On April 06 2019 08:28 disformation wrote: am looking for a dude whos super into geometry and triangles btw. though if you dig real deep: Euclid's Elements: Books I–IV and VI discuss plane geometry. Many results about plane figures are proved, for example "In any triangle two angles taken together in any manner are less than two right angles." (Book 1 proposition 17 ) and the Pythagorean theorem "In right angled triangles the square on the side subtending the right angle is equal to the squares on the sides containing the right angle." (Book I, proposition 47) so since in my head there was no pytagoras in the game, i thought euclid would figure it out i did. did you notice when i said, "i'm disfo's guy"
|
On April 10 2019 06:49 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On April 10 2019 06:47 Tumblewood wrote:On April 10 2019 06:44 disformation wrote:i also find it hilarious that i was trying to be a bit sneaky with the euclid thing. SINCE I DIDNT KNEW PYTAGORAS WAS IN THE FUCKING GAME YO. fluff text all about italy. so im yo imma refer to the greek master of geometry like: On April 06 2019 08:28 disformation wrote: am looking for a dude whos super into geometry and triangles btw. On April 06 2019 08:35 disformation wrote: wasnt pythagoras greek? though if you dig real deep: Euclid's Elements: Books I–IV and VI discuss plane geometry. Many results about plane figures are proved, for example "In any triangle two angles taken together in any manner are less than two right angles." (Book 1 proposition 17 ) and the Pythagorean theorem "In right angled triangles the square on the side subtending the right angle is equal to the squares on the sides containing the right angle." (Book I, proposition 47) so since in my head there was no pytagoras in the game, i thought euclid would figure it out i did. did you notice when i said, "i'm disfo's guy" yeah i saw but i was slightly confused cause i thought hf was fibonacci and you said you are not hf's counterpart. Show nested quote +On April 09 2019 15:22 Tumblewood wrote: i am not the counterpart of HF. grack said i was HF's guy, i have no reason to believe i am that. if anything i am disfo's guy only figured it out earlier when i realized that hf is not fibonacci. there were a couple posts i made to try to distance myself from fibonacci, because i was trying to protect my identity. i also thought at the time there were two pairs of town trying to beat mafia to the punch. little did i know that the thread would explode for six hours straight
|
u are silly if you try to lynch into me/HF/mig/tube today because every one of us is likely to be removed from the game at the end of the cycle. the good lynch options are: vivax (duh) grack (duh) sent (duh) palmar (yuh) KSC (not a very pro town role for a "townie" to have)
the other roles might contain mafia but are not good targets for today
|
On April 11 2019 06:07 raynpelikoneet wrote: So why arent we killing him? he's gonna die at EoD anyway. or if he doesn't, ez lynch tomorrow
|
i'm here and willing to vote any of KSC, vivax, and sent today
|
thankfully also our top 3 votees
|
|
On April 15 2019 06:25 rsoultin wrote: Yeah we discussed later that if we kept the recruitment mechanic we'd offset it so there weren't so many recruited mafia.
Artanis has suggested maybe we should have made it a pm game (and probably given mafia a recruiter instead of have the recruiting mechanic be for the whole team). I forget why we didn't do that tbh. Maybe just concern that an early recruiter lynch would be super bad for mafia? But we probably shouldn't have been so concerned about that. i remember wishing very hard that this were a PM game around D2
|
|
|
|