|
On November 02 2017 01:00 Conversion wrote: Also, if I was trying to "make a play" between Damerion why would I bother calling out the fact that I don't like his play, get called out for it by two different people, and get pissed when it doesn't work? That doesn't look good for a Damerion/Conversion scum team at all.
Wait, I misread your post. You're saying I'm trying to make a play between YOU and me. Sorry.
|
I'm not answering because it's my entrance, what do you think?.... Like it's a bait question to try and "analyze" my own post, when I don't need to.
|
On November 02 2017 01:11 ShoCkeyy wrote: I'm not answering because it's my entrance, what do you think?.... Like it's a bait question to try and "analyze" my own post, when I don't need to.
In addendum to my previous post, you don't make sense anyways. Why am I trying to make a play between you and me? I have stated and literally am stating that the two easiest lynches are you and me, which you keep dodging for some reason.
You're an easy lynch because 2 votes are on you, your entrance is bad, and your subsequent posts are bad.
I'm an easy lynch because outbursts are a big no no and I was being toxic and yelling and hurling shit everywhere.
You have given me no real answer, you keep sidestepping my questions for no real good reason. Which is kind of funny that you can't understand what I'm asking you to do, since you seem to be above clarifying your stance earlier since "people should understand if they read"
Perhaps you should try reading and stop sidestepping
|
I'm voting ShoCkeyy until he stops dodging me for whatever reason.
|
On November 01 2017 22:59 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. The thing is, Shockey is the thread sentiment right now, I am not. People have me at a lazy null b/c they don't want to revisit my filter due to time or such, so it'd be a pretty safe push as a mafia. If I flip town, he could have said, "Well he was acting really scummy" or "I didn't like his tantrum/outburst" and no one would bat an eye until end game, really
Here, I'll make it easy for you.
How is this quote in any relevant way making people decide between you are me? I'm trying to explain to someone why I'm not that bad of a lynch to push to question happykrogan and ruxxar's point on DF's posts. I'm actually confused as to how you took the context of this post, and are calling it an attempt to make a play between you and me.
Also, what was the point of your inane call out that I got triggered? Is this because you somehow mistakenly are believing that the context of which I made this post is an attempt to make people lynch you over me?
|
On November 02 2017 01:24 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. The thing is, Shockey is the thread sentiment right now, I am not. People have me at a lazy null b/c they don't want to revisit my filter due to time or such, so it'd be a pretty safe push as a mafia. If I flip town, he could have said, "Well he was acting really scummy" or "I didn't like his tantrum/outburst" and no one would bat an eye until end game, really Here, I'll make it easy for you. How is this quote in any relevant way making people decide between you and me? I'm trying to explain to someone why I'm not that bad of a lynch to push to question happykrogan and ruxxar's point on DF's posts. I'm actually confused as to how you took the context of this post, and are calling it an attempt to make a play between you and me. Also, what was the point of your inane call out that I got triggered? Is this because you somehow mistakenly are believing that the context of which I made this post is an attempt to make people lynch you over me?
EBWOP for grammar
|
On November 01 2017 22:00 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 21:32 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 20:03 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 14:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 13:49 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of. what are you saying here? That darth is calling me scum and we could do less of that? or that darth calling me scum is scummy and we could do less of that? Did you read what I even posted? Wtf are you going on about? I wasn't even talking to you.... are you saying df is not scum for posting?? I’m confused as well I don't think I should have to explain myself, but definitely not... DF was calling Ruxxar's post lame, and I just said its better that he posted rather than not. I mean I don't think it's that hard to understand what I meant if people actually read before replying. So far DF, Damerian and Oats are on my watch list. Conversion is halfway there. I mean, df was talking directely to me and calling my post about his post about rux lame so maybe you should read before replying.
|
On November 02 2017 01:24 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. The thing is, Shockey is the thread sentiment right now, I am not. People have me at a lazy null b/c they don't want to revisit my filter due to time or such, so it'd be a pretty safe push as a mafia. If I flip town, he could have said, "Well he was acting really scummy" or "I didn't like his tantrum/outburst" and no one would bat an eye until end game, really Here, I'll make it easy for you. How is this quote in any relevant way making people decide between you are me? I'm trying to explain to someone why I'm not that bad of a lynch to push to question happykrogan and ruxxar's point on DF's posts. I'm actually confused as to how you took the context of this post, and are calling it an attempt to make a play between you and me. Also, what was the point of your inane call out that I got triggered? Is this because you somehow mistakenly are believing that the context of which I made this post is an attempt to make people lynch you over me?
You've actually compared myself and yourself a few times already. You're trying to push me with little to no value saying ##vote shockeyy while Damerion is doing the same thing from the get-go. I think I've provided enough value in my reads, with out having to repeat myself. By me pointing out you got triggered because that shows more "thread sentiment" than I do. I mean, I haven't jumped into cursing or yelling at people to "get the fuck out of my face" or call other posts "LAME" <- DF did that. So you definitely have sentiments towards the thread.
|
On November 02 2017 01:40 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2017 01:24 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. The thing is, Shockey is the thread sentiment right now, I am not. People have me at a lazy null b/c they don't want to revisit my filter due to time or such, so it'd be a pretty safe push as a mafia. If I flip town, he could have said, "Well he was acting really scummy" or "I didn't like his tantrum/outburst" and no one would bat an eye until end game, really Here, I'll make it easy for you. How is this quote in any relevant way making people decide between you are me? I'm trying to explain to someone why I'm not that bad of a lynch to push to question happykrogan and ruxxar's point on DF's posts. I'm actually confused as to how you took the context of this post, and are calling it an attempt to make a play between you and me. Also, what was the point of your inane call out that I got triggered? Is this because you somehow mistakenly are believing that the context of which I made this post is an attempt to make people lynch you over me? You've actually compared myself and yourself a few times already. You're trying to push me with little to no value saying ##vote shockeyy while Damerion is doing the same thing from the get-go. I think I've provided enough value in my reads, with out having to repeat myself. By me pointing out you got triggered because that shows more "thread sentiment" than I do. I mean, I haven't jumped into cursing or yelling at people to "get the fuck out of my face" or call other posts "LAME" <- DF did that. So you definitely have sentiments towards the thread.
You are literally taking my post, which said you are THE thread sentiment, and trying to tell me that I said you are THE ONLY thread sentiment. You don't get to fit my words into your narrative, that's not how it works. So yeah, I agree with you. I do have sentiments towards the thread. Bad post, yet again.
|
On November 02 2017 01:36 Oatsmaster wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 22:00 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 21:32 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 20:03 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 14:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 13:49 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of. what are you saying here? That darth is calling me scum and we could do less of that? or that darth calling me scum is scummy and we could do less of that? Did you read what I even posted? Wtf are you going on about? I wasn't even talking to you.... are you saying df is not scum for posting?? I’m confused as well I don't think I should have to explain myself, but definitely not... DF was calling Ruxxar's post lame, and I just said its better that he posted rather than not. I mean I don't think it's that hard to understand what I meant if people actually read before replying. So far DF, Damerian and Oats are on my watch list. Conversion is halfway there. I mean, df was talking directely to me and calling my post about his post about rux lame so maybe you should read before replying.
That's not what it seems like; I think you need to learn how to read
On November 01 2017 13:07 darthfoley wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 13:05 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 11:10 darthfoley wrote:On November 01 2017 08:49 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:34 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:28 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:17 Damerion wrote:On November 01 2017 08:04 ruXxar wrote:On November 01 2017 08:02 Damerion wrote: ##vote ShoCkeyy[/b
I ask and expect you all to follow me on this.
@Damdred especially you. Slow down hotshot. When did you go from being mr waffly scum reader to becoming sherlock holmes? Did the cohost of my first game forget the resounding hammer I put on the whole scum team? You have good reads, I'll give you that. You just gotta work on being more convincing. No I need name recognition, if I had a larger name associated with me I would be followed much easier. And if memory serves I did find scum last game a couple of times, just was to afk to oersue those links at the time. In any case HolyFlare is also coming across disengenous at this point. Name recognition help for sure, but it’s also about how you present yourself and your arguments. Perfect example is Lonelyclock last game. A newbie, but very solid town-read with a lot of credibility. Someone presenting themselves like that pushes a lot of weight around. Don’t get me wrong, I like your more confident approach, but it’s throwing me off because it’s so different from previous games, and it’s also a bit too much over the top and appears a bit forced. I dislike ruxxar's early game filter. Super fluff with no substance. Yea, sure, lots of people are posting fluff kinda. But ruxxar's gives me the vibes of feigning activity to seem interested. It's pretty easy to do early game especially, when people are dicking about. Besides that, I have no idea why he feels the need to dictate how Damerion votes, the aggressiveness of his vote, and the subsequent commentary Let me break down the bolded sentence for you 1) "Don't get me wrong" = apologetic, not trying to tread on anyone's toes, like scumversion last game 2) "I like your more confident approach" implies a town lean of some sort, with buddy potential 3) So he likes the confident approach, BUT it's throwing him off because it's so different from last game. So you like it... but it's throwing you off? 4) It's also "a bit too much over the top and feels forced" implying it's scummy. So to conclude, Ruxxar likes Damerion's aggressive and confident play even though it's throwing him off but it's over the top and feels forced. So why do you like the approach if you are going to call it scummy one line later? This is a whole lot of nothing burger You are a whole lotta nothing burger. What are you eving doing with this post. [b]Explaining why ruxxar's post is lame as hell and non-committal to the utmost. It's rather obvious what I was doing. Take your attitude elsewhere
He obviously thinks Ruxxar's post was lame.
|
Thanks for furthering my conviction that you're scum, honestly. Stop telling other people to learn how to read when you clearly can't yourself. Your above paragraph was garbage since I called out on the same page why I'm an easy lynch.
|
On November 02 2017 01:43 Conversion wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2017 01:40 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 02 2017 01:24 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:59 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:55 happykrogan wrote:On November 01 2017 22:37 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 22:36 Conversion wrote: the problemI have with the scumread of “DF is attacking anyone possible” is that he could have just saved himself the effort and pushed me exactly how he pushed me last game and most likely started a wagon. my play hasn’t differed too wildly (as pointed out by krogan), so why would he waste time throwing shade at other people when he has two very good lynch targets he can focus on (me/shockey) EBWOP The best explanation I can think of right now is that he doesn't want to follow thread sentiment because it could cause problems later in the game. The thing is, Shockey is the thread sentiment right now, I am not. People have me at a lazy null b/c they don't want to revisit my filter due to time or such, so it'd be a pretty safe push as a mafia. If I flip town, he could have said, "Well he was acting really scummy" or "I didn't like his tantrum/outburst" and no one would bat an eye until end game, really Here, I'll make it easy for you. How is this quote in any relevant way making people decide between you are me? I'm trying to explain to someone why I'm not that bad of a lynch to push to question happykrogan and ruxxar's point on DF's posts. I'm actually confused as to how you took the context of this post, and are calling it an attempt to make a play between you and me. Also, what was the point of your inane call out that I got triggered? Is this because you somehow mistakenly are believing that the context of which I made this post is an attempt to make people lynch you over me? You've actually compared myself and yourself a few times already. You're trying to push me with little to no value saying ##vote shockeyy while Damerion is doing the same thing from the get-go. I think I've provided enough value in my reads, with out having to repeat myself. By me pointing out you got triggered because that shows more "thread sentiment" than I do. I mean, I haven't jumped into cursing or yelling at people to "get the fuck out of my face" or call other posts "LAME" <- DF did that. So you definitely have sentiments towards the thread. You are literally taking my post, which said you are THE thread sentiment, and trying to tell me that I said you are THE ONLY thread sentiment. You don't get to fit my words into your narrative, that's not how it works. So yeah, I agree with you. I do have sentiments towards the thread. Bad post, yet again.
You literally said I am not the thread sentiment, and I literally said you were, then you got triggered again and told me to "get the fuck out of your face"... LOL common dude.
|
Are you so daft that you don't understand the differences between "ShoCkeyy is the thread sentiments" versus "ShoCkeyy is the only thread sentiment"
?
|
On November 02 2017 01:47 Conversion wrote: Thanks for furthering my conviction that you're scum, honestly. Stop telling other people to learn how to read when you clearly can't yourself. Your above paragraph was garbage since I called out on the same page why I'm an easy lynch.
You haven't posted anything worthwhile... So... I mean you've only backed DF, helped push Damerion's bandwagon on me, which it's only you two voting for me currently, which makes it look even scummier. Like what else do you want me to do? You're calling my post garbage, but at least I'm present and providing my reads on the current actives, and I think I provided enough value that I don't need to explain myself once again to you.
|
On November 02 2017 01:49 Conversion wrote: Are you so daft that you don't understand the differences between "ShoCkeyy is the thread sentiments" versus "ShoCkeyy is the only thread sentiment"
?
thats not what I'm referring too.... But you keep pushing it as that. I'm just calling you out on the "thread sentiment" when you clearly are, and have it. So for you to say "I'm not" is a fat lie.
|
Anyways, brb going to get some work done.
|
It's like I'm talking to a brick wall..
Your point is that I'm called you the thread sentiment back then when you had two votes and people generally did not like your posts.
Your point is that I called myself not the thread sentiment in that exact point in time, fair. But you completely ignore the fact that I told the thread that DF could have easily pushed me for being triggered and being un-towny, which contradicts your point of me trying to deflect myself from being the thread sentiment.
Then I literally, on the same page as we are on now, gave reasons why mafia could push me as a good lynch.
And now you're calling me a liar without taking any of my recent posts.
Brick wall stupid town, or scum is my read on you.
I'm going to read you as scum because I refuse to believe you're actually that thick.
I bolded it for you so you can easily see why I'm voting for you, by the way. You seem to have trouble reading things.
|
On November 01 2017 22:00 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 01 2017 21:32 Conversion wrote:On November 01 2017 20:03 ShoCkeyy wrote:On November 01 2017 14:55 Oatsmaster wrote:On November 01 2017 13:49 ShoCkeyy wrote:
I mean at least he posted. He could of easily not post and you would of still called it lame. Usually negative connotations like that give off a scummy vibe as well so we can do less of. what are you saying here? That darth is calling me scum and we could do less of that? or that darth calling me scum is scummy and we could do less of that? Did you read what I even posted? Wtf are you going on about? I wasn't even talking to you.... are you saying df is not scum for posting?? I’m confused as well I don't think I should have to explain myself, but definitely not... DF was calling Ruxxar's post lame, and I just said its better that he posted rather than not. I mean I don't think it's that hard to understand what I meant if people actually read before replying. So far DF, Damerian and Oats are on my watch list. Conversion is halfway there.
so now apparently you have DF/Damerion/Oats/Conversion as your scum reads. DF because why not, you don't actually do anything to push that, and the other 3 are scum because they voted for you. You don't actually answer as to why a Damerion/Conversion scum team makes no sense considering how I fucked up big time by pulling that "Damerion is suspicious" shit early in the game.
On November 02 2017 01:50 ShoCkeyy wrote:Show nested quote +On November 02 2017 01:47 Conversion wrote: Thanks for furthering my conviction that you're scum, honestly. Stop telling other people to learn how to read when you clearly can't yourself. Your above paragraph was garbage since I called out on the same page why I'm an easy lynch. You haven't posted anything worthwhile... So... I mean you've only backed DF, helped push Damerion's bandwagon on me, which it's only you two voting for me currently, which makes it look even scummier. Like what else do you want me to do? You're calling my post garbage, but at least I'm present and providing my reads on the current actives, and I think I provided enough value that I don't need to explain myself once again to you.
Also, it's DF/Oats/Me voting for you, so maybe you should learn how to read vote threads as well
|
On November 02 2017 01:57 Conversion wrote: It's like I'm talking to a brick wall..
Your point is that I'm called you the thread sentiment back then when you had two votes and people generally did not like your posts.
Your point is that I called myself not the thread sentiment in that exact point in time, fair. But you completely ignore the fact that I told the thread that DF could have easily pushed me for being triggered and being un-towny, which contradicts your point of me trying to deflect myself from being the thread sentiment.
Then I literally, on the same page as we are on now, gave reasons why mafia could push me as a good lynch.
And now you're calling me a liar without taking any of my recent posts.
Brick wall stupid town, or scum is my read on you.
I'm going to read you as scum because I refuse to believe you're actually that thick.
I bolded it for you so you can easily see why I'm voting for you, by the way. You seem to have trouble reading things.
You literally got mad for trying to defend yourself, I mean, you never know if mafia were trying to push you at the moment and stopped, turned to me instead. But the truth is you've been triggered since trying to defend yourself, and you still seem triggered for it. There's no contradiction other than you yourself.
|
Actually you know what.. Damerion isn't even voting you on the thread. Tictock is.
surprise surprise
|
|
|
|