EPTLiquidmania Qualifier #4 - Page 34
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
| ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
I'm not really sure how I should continue to defend myself because apparently, whatever I do, I get scumread for it. It's just dumb. | ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
| ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
| ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
On April 08 2017 01:51 beentheredonethat wrote: It's kinda fun though how pretty much everybody says "btdt is scum" yet everybody also goes like "btdt is bad town". At this point, there must be some scummers on me who're just following thread sentiment. I mean even in my posts on Tumble, people do not read them to see what I have to say on Tumble. Instead, they read them to find reasons to scumread me, see df's post for reference. Then again, there are no votes on me as of now, instead thread sentiment is going after calix. :/ still in for Tumble. tbh, I actually I agree with you on certain parts with tumble. I do think he is servely lacking content and honestly, he should have something of some form of original thought in his filter. That I agree with you on. I also think the AFK vote is damm sus. as well at this point as well. That I see common ground on. There is no reason he shouldn't have any at this point. This wasn't like earlier, where it was like 1.5/8ths of the way through the day phase. But I do have issues with the cases in certain parts when I read it. Hence why I pointed them out. Either for you or others to reflect on those and either defend or attack those points. Also if I felt you were def. scum I would of voted you as placeholder rn. You might of just inspired a thought tho so hold on. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
On April 08 2017 01:36 Shapelog wrote: Scanning BTDT case: I read it and went to BTDT's filter to check something out + Show Spoiler [wasnt vaild since I missed a post he m…] + From BTDT case on tumble: This is at least my perception of what Tumble is doing so far. My observations. I can see the initial banter coming from town or from at least a certain level of "I don't care how I look". From BTDT earlier: On April 07 2017 01:58 beentheredonethat wrote: Actually reading Tumblewood's filter: there is NO (absolutely no!) contribution to the game. Just banter. Besides that easily to be made up post. ##vote Tumblewood do something So banter back then wasnt ok but is now seen as something that can come from a townie? Also reading back he actually took my point about mafia being able to throw together that post lol. I dont understand the town circle comment looking back since he had tumble and calix in or around the scummy range a few posts back. Also If he followed thread sentiment, which implies he read the thread, wouldn't he already know calix wasnt scum reading him on that level based off of what. So I dont understand this logic from it. Carrying on. I agree with the last bit - that's why I put a "could be" in front of it. It's hard to back cases up properly without speculating, after all it's a guessing game. The town circle post came off the idea that if 5 out of 11 people are actively discussing without anyone hiding, it would be a good point to start a town circle. It's a nice idea but I didn't dare to form a town circle for obvious reasons, some of them being scumreads/leans. | ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
If your town, ik how it feels. Sometimes you get ML over a miscommunication or a thought being taken out of context. Part of the game. All you can do sometimes and post shit and hope people are listening post flip. Or keep making points and get ethos back. If your mafia, Please stop frailing around and clogging the thread. | ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
On April 08 2017 02:01 Koshi wrote: Dont be so negative btdt. This game has good players. We figure shit out. I do realize I'm being sensitive. It's weird, apparently I simply cannot handle a scumread. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
darthfoley
United States8003 Posts
On April 08 2017 01:55 beentheredonethat wrote: I will be mislynched anyways. There's no way to circumvent this. As we're all split anyways on 100 wagons, I suppose we simply lynch me right now. Then you don't have to argue about me being town or not. I really don't understand your line of thinking. Stop being so woe is me dude. You aren't even the top vote getter ATM yet oh make it sound like you have 7 votes for you. I do think the wagons need to be more solidified though cuz 2-1-1-1-1 is fuckey | ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
On April 08 2017 02:03 beentheredonethat wrote: I agree with the last bit - that's why I put a "could be" in front of it. It's hard to back cases up properly without speculating, after all it's a guessing game. The town circle post came off the idea that if 5 out of 11 people are actively discussing without anyone hiding, it would be a good point to start a town circle. It's a nice idea but I didn't dare to form a town circle for obvious reasons, some of them being scumreads/leans. I do actually have a question I want you to pitch in regarding tumble and thread sentiment. How does this post feel to you regarding thread sentiment? nah I'm pretty content with having three reads that I think are right with as little as has happened so far and what ever happened to that push on koshi Tbh, when you say town circle, everyone you mention automatically goes green for your reads in my eyes. | ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
On April 08 2017 02:10 Koshi wrote: 1 hour. and then I will be gone for 96 hours. I am not kidding about that one btw. Is that over like one whole phase? I.E. wont you get warned/replaced for inactivity/not voting? On April 08 2017 02:11 darthfoley wrote: I really don't understand your line of thinking. Stop being so woe is me dude. You aren't even the top vote getter ATM yet oh make it sound like you have 7 votes for you. I do think the wagons need to be more solidified though cuz 2-1-1-1-1 is fuckey I agree, usually means mafia isn't in threat of being lynched. | ||
|
darthfoley
United States8003 Posts
On April 08 2017 01:54 beentheredonethat wrote: This part is not scummy. A single town read is not alignment indicative. Dropping THREE townreads and placing the vote on the one player where it is the most easy to do so while not doing anything IS alignment indicative. You're misunderstanding my post or misrepresenting it. And OF COURSE I spend half my post talking about the meta research on Rels thing - because I think it's important. I tried to explain my thought process. You say it's an unimportant post but I find it highly important, especially in the context of the Rels vote. It has no other purpose then to put additional (uncnecessary) justification on his vote. I think this is mafia overjustifying a vote. Voting is mandatory and after all a commitment, and I and others already got called out for pressunring but not voting someone. I'm not misrepresenting you. You were specifically talking about his town read of Shapelog when you made the NAI comment. What am I missing? | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
Just got a message she will be here in 35 mins. And I thought I had 1 hour. So now I have -15 minutes to get ready. So bye bye. w00t. | ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
| ||
|
Koshi
Belgium38799 Posts
First Calix Second Shape. | ||
|
Shapelog
United States5184 Posts
Calix (2) - Koshi, darthfoley Tumblewood (1) - beentheredonethat Rels (1) - Tumblewood Sicklucker (1) - raynpelikoneet beentheredonethat (1) - sicklucker Not Voting (3) - Calix, Rels, Shapelog Actually might also be due to the fact 3 players havent voted as well | ||
|
beentheredonethat
2934 Posts
On April 08 2017 02:11 Shapelog wrote: I do actually have a question I want you to pitch in regarding tumble and thread sentiment. How does this post feel to you regarding thread sentiment? Tbh, when you say town circle, everyone you mention automatically goes green for your reads in my eyes. That bolded bit is related to my initial push on Koshi, right? If anything, I'd say it's tackling my initial comment on something being pushworthy, so subtly calling me out. | ||
| ||
