|
On January 29 2017 13:27 sicklucker wrote:
Wait Silverika voted yes. the same person who reminded me its the optimal strategy to never vote yes on the first two votes. nice
Quote where we ever said it was optimal strategy to never vote yes on the first two missions. Because if you were reading the game, you'd know that not only did I never say that, I was advocating the opposite.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 29 2017 15:09 Tumblewood wrote:
as nice as it would be to wait until the middle of the night to post my team so it could be 12 hours and a couple minutes after the start of the cycle, I'm not interested in people yelling at me while I'm asleep
this is temporary but not really cuz it's probably right
##nominate: tumblewood, grackaroni, vivax
You just made an official nomination.
I will be rejecting this straight up because one of our scumreads is on it. You.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 29 2017 18:16 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2017 15:00 Silverika wrote:On January 29 2017 13:32 sicklucker wrote:On January 29 2017 08:19 Superbia wrote:
Sharkie just seems like mafia agreeing with the team because its likely right and attempting to get get credits for that. Something like that. Could be completely wrong, but hey. :D ya sharkie could be mafia. is there a mafia qt in this game? ill be blunt, have yuou been reading? its been called out sharike is mafia already what does that have to do with me?
cus frankly your missing the part where we called it out and super called it our before this post
|
On January 29 2017 18:17 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2017 15:27 Silverika wrote:On January 29 2017 13:27 sicklucker wrote:
Wait Silverika voted yes. the same person who reminded me its the optimal strategy to never vote yes on the first two votes. nice Quote where we ever said it was optimal strategy to never vote yes on the first two missions. Because if you were reading the game, you'd know that not only did I never say that, I was advocating the opposite. ~SilverWolf77 i said you reminded me it is. never said you had the same idea
explain to me like i don't know anything why its optimal to auto-reject the first two even if you think its an all town team?
|
On January 30 2017 02:19 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On January 29 2017 15:29 Silverika wrote:On January 29 2017 15:09 Tumblewood wrote:
as nice as it would be to wait until the middle of the night to post my team so it could be 12 hours and a couple minutes after the start of the cycle, I'm not interested in people yelling at me while I'm asleep
this is temporary but not really cuz it's probably right
##nominate: tumblewood, grackaroni, vivax You just made an official nomination. I will be rejecting this straight up because one of our scumreads is on it. You. ~SilverWolf77 well fuck you too I guess
Glad that's settled.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 30 2017 06:35 sharkie wrote:
Oh god calix is next leader, can we afford that?
This is why I'm kind of annoyed the first one didn't pass. That said, Calix's complete lack of activity is unusual for her as either alignment and if we could get a replacement in, if needed, that would probably help a lot with reading that slot.
~SilverWolf
|
On January 30 2017 08:46 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2017 08:41 Silverika wrote:On January 30 2017 06:35 sharkie wrote:
Oh god calix is next leader, can we afford that? This is why I'm kind of annoyed the first one didn't pass. That said, Calix's complete lack of activity is unusual for her as either alignment and if we could get a replacement in, if needed, that would probably help a lot with reading that slot. ~SilverWolf Would you be fine with superbia/you/tumble?
Yes, we'd be o.k. with this team based on the fact most are townread on it and if it fails, we can look at Tumblewood. The thing we don't like about Tumblewood is they came in and discredited everyone on the first mission, then put up an entirely new team without any of the people who were townread by most of us. This is very fishy behavior if they are town. I don't think I've even seen an explanation as to why they did that in their filter anywhere.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 30 2017 13:40 Tumblewood wrote:
mhmm weird how someone would try and get a team without any of their townreads rejected, and then nominate a team with their townreads
Who are you referring to here?
|
On January 30 2017 19:34 RtaniSoul wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2017 17:56 Superbia wrote:
TW are you still mafia reading me?
I love how pretty much everyone is townreading both TW and myself and nobody gives a shit that we're scumreading each other.
Nice ANALysis. We figure you'll get your head out of your ass eventually xP Tumble is pretty damn town. He's just on it this game with lots of bretty good observations.
Please give me some quotes or something that shows he's made good observations. Are you o.k. with the fact he pretty much shit all over the original team that you made, including you, and then made an entirely different one besides the fact most wanted at least 2 of the originals still on it. I also have seen no deep observations whatsoever. They've all been surface level stuff. If you really have this deep of a townread on this slot, you need to convince others, because I don't see it. If you can't, I'm gonna assume he's on your team and you are both spies at this point.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 30 2017 19:43 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 30 2017 19:34 RtaniSoul wrote:On January 30 2017 17:56 Superbia wrote:
TW are you still mafia reading me?
I love how pretty much everyone is townreading both TW and myself and nobody gives a shit that we're scumreading each other.
Nice ANALysis. We figure you'll get your head out of your ass eventually xP Tumble is pretty damn town. He's just on it this game with lots of bretty good observations. He feels very floaty. Nothing he says seems solid and I have a feeling he has no actual reads. His interaction with vivax feels pockety at best. I find it weird that you townread him so hard even though he has put a lot of doubt (imo) on both myself and wolf, both of whom are your other townreads. He also put doubt on yourself. And then he mafia-reads into consensus reads + myself.
This is probably my strongest townread this game. They have pretty much mirrored my thoughts and concerns this game. The fact that both of us were knocked off the team by Tumblewood should give anyone that's town some concern and anyone strong townreading TW needs to give a good reasons besides "making great points" because he's not.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 31 2017 00:05 Grackaroni wrote:
Also Silver, Tumble knocking you/superbia off the team in favor of his own reads isn't "cause for concern." If he was scum he could add any 2 players and himself and still sabotage the mission.
Don't scum read people for having different reads than you.
we arent scum reading him for the diffrent reads, we scum read him becasue jsut about everyone was fine with the first team but he goes out and disregards the entire thing.
|
On January 31 2017 03:36 sicklucker wrote:
the fact im not trying early is a town read for me tbh. like is this my mafia game? where i blantantly try not to be town read??
Yeah, your self meta doesn't help me townread you. The fact that you aren't trying means you could be either a spy or resistance but you are doing absolutely nothing to help me get a decent read on you and at the very least, it's anti-town. I don't care if that's your standard play in mafia games. This isn't a regular mafia game and if you continue like this, you'll simply be kept off the missions and make it easier for spies to get on a mission in your place is you are indeed resistance.
~SilverWolf7
|
So, if the new team leader sends themselves, I'll just reject again.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote:
Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo
Nope
|
On January 31 2017 18:50 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2017 18:48 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote:
Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo Nope Care to elaborate?
If you were reading the game as you proclaimed you would already know why
|
On January 31 2017 18:50 emperorchampion wrote:Show nested quote +On January 31 2017 18:48 Silverika wrote:On January 31 2017 18:02 emperorchampion wrote:
Based on my probability estimates this team has a 105% chance of being approved, so let's gogogogo Nope Care to elaborate?
I think you should read up since we've discussed it already. Particularly the part where TW came into the game, cast shade on everyone in the original group, and then put up a new one with "this looks right."
You come into the thread, in a spot no one can read because Calix didn't do anything, and immediately put up a team without any discussion or any sort of posting that would allow us to read you or any sort of reasoning for the team you picked. I mean you gave a couple reasons on Grack but they weren't really that good.
And so far you've just been floating around not doing anything complaining the game is dead.
~SilverWolf77
|
On January 31 2017 17:59 emperorchampion wrote:Cause grack's a bro: Scum hunting: Show nested quote +On January 28 2017 09:35 Grackaroni wrote:I liked his confident (and correct) put down of Vivax's leader logic. On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani His follow up also seems genuine to me. If he had entered the thread with that comment as scum, I would have expected him to use that as justification for having more suspicion/uncertainty on Vivax. On January 28 2017 08:37 Tumblewood wrote:On January 28 2017 08:07 Vivax wrote:On January 28 2017 07:57 Tumblewood wrote:
can't even give you townie cred for winning an argument against vivax. come on, v, get a real reason to scumread rtani Reading between the lines this means that you're fine with superbia and swika but not fine with me not being fine with rtanisoul? no, I think you may be even townier for being this bad but I also politely request you be less bad also I am just examining super and swika, and rtani to an extent, just now Town circling: Show nested quote +On January 30 2017 18:22 Grackaroni wrote:On January 30 2017 18:15 Superbia wrote:
Gracky, who would you put on a team? I reread through your filter and you actually looked better than I thought. So I don't know lol. One spot would have to go to Ikawolf. I put my nomination early cause I'm pretty fine with any of my town reads: super/silver/grack
Can you explain all these towreads and why in particular you chose to exclude us from your team of the three you townread? Also, you townread three people but then put this post in:
On January 31 2017 20:30 emperorchampion wrote:
tumble/silver/super ?
Basically if the leader puts themselves or not, the question is about who get the more information. Leader putting themselves gives more info to the leader, otherwise gives more info to whoever they put in. So it's a question about who you trust. Not sure I fully trust 2 other people yet though.
So you townread three people and would be o.k. with any of them but get some heat and suddenly it's like, you aren't sure you fully trust two people?
~SilverWolf77
|
OK, That makes sense. I don't see any ulterior motives in your explanation. I could do either of those teams at this point.
~SilverWolf77
|
On February 01 2017 07:05 sicklucker wrote:
oh god so rejected
The fact that this doesn't like the team is a good sign since this is almost certainly a spy at this point.
~SilverWolf7
|
On February 01 2017 07:07 sicklucker wrote:
like under 10% these people are all town
Because?
~SilverWolf77
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
