EPT[M][N] Murder on the Cruise Trip Mafia - Page 22
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
Don’t think he was sick at the time and don’t think being sick makes the tone more inquisitive than usual. I’ve noted this too. It’s a not the best argument as he may be trying a new play style or approaching the game differently (before he got his rolecard). For instance, my play this game is nothing like any of the other games I’ve played before. You are right that you are a hypocrite though. I can tell you that much c: | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 07:33 Damdred wrote: Saying that my activity level is indicative of anything is folly at best and idiocy at worst. For example I,have several scum games that have 15-30 pages who or at the same time I have some scum games with 1-5 pages. And these happen in indiscriminate means as I see fit. The same can be said of my town game the range in which I post is high sometimes and low others. Trying to draw conclusions based off activity and any type of excuses (that I'm attempting to keep out of thread) is ludicrous. As such if you are town you should be happy I am here and will catch up. If you are scum keep being dumb. I’m not saying that nobody said that your activity was AI, but nobody said that your activity was AI. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 07:56 Damdred wrote: This post basically condemns me for activity without overtly stateing it. Read again. And your reads on me for the both of you are horribly bad as per usual. And might I add saying he's never inquisitive or the like is foolish as neither of you know anything of me past one game. So we cannot know anything about you for having played one game with you, but you can say our reads on you are bad as per usual? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 07:59 Damdred wrote: And it is sort of funny saying my play lacks x or y when I have only played for like 5 hours maybe? Which granted is changing but that's neither here or,there, and I am not shackled to one play style in any regards. ? What is X and what is y? I don't remember anyone saying your play lacked anything. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 08:32 Damdred wrote: Cause I hate being scum read for what I consider shifty reasons. You did not mind it last game. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 08:35 Damdred wrote: If you scum read me it honestly can only be for Poe (or should be). And that reasoning is somewhat ok, trying to,over explain and nit pick like what 8 posts to justify a lynch past policy isn't justifiable imo. But that's neither here or their. All of the cases I've seen so far were based on less than 8 'nit-picked' posts. There's no over-explanation in my filter dive of you. Why could someone tr you iyo? Who do you see as scum from where you're at? On October 10 2016 08:36 Damdred wrote: Than you are blind and I thought the reasons were so shifty that I ignored half of what was going on and attacked people? I don't recall you attacking anybody in that game. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
I've read Damdred's filter. He's lock scum to me. On October 05 2016 03:34 Damdred wrote: Stutters Bats Super Hf Is my scum pool currently. I'm somewhat more confident in almost everyone else being town. 3 flipped town, other is a guy who had made 4 posts from which 2 were questions. Scummiest player in the game? Awful scum pool. On October 05 2016 03:38 Damdred wrote: Like stutters feels more like a policy lynch with how sideline and active he is (or isn't in this case) so if we have to policy lynch we should do him. Bats I think is on the sideline and is just posting things to exist basically. His one tinfoil isn't enough and I don't really see him sticking his neck,out and he's super agreeable and right in the middle on certain subjects (hf I believe) he also asked several questions that seemed not to,go anywhere. I'd rather lynch bats atm Bats was one of the few to scum-read Damdred with me day 1. He has not been agreeable nor in "the middle on certain objects". What tinfoil? Bats was not posting things just to exist. That is actually what Damdred has done. Same goes for his point about questions leading nowhere. That is one bad scum-read. On October 05 2016 03:41 Damdred wrote: Hf probably going to rage on me to which will be sad and I do just do nit think super and hf will be on the same scum team with how super just name dropped him so easily. Also super even when using the lurker d1 stool had decent posts when we last played instead here kind of seems like he is wanting to poke marv to rage instead of doing anything interesting. Kind of think super is scum. Very hesitant in his read. Super's interaction with marv (re: "TMI'ing Calix as town") was in no way something that Super made in an attempt to make marv rage. On October 05 2016 05:25 Damdred wrote: I will say I've missed the marv sassiness in my life. Grack could be scum to,I guess he's not been to amazing yet, but I have a higher view of his scum game than his town game over all. Like as scum I generally see him as mire proactive and leading away while. I'm not sure lazy Grack makes me sad (and I think more likely town by my experience so far) Hesitation. On October 05 2016 05:28 Damdred wrote: Hi marv. Did you disagree with anything I've thought so far? Interesting that he chose to say DISAGREE over AGREE. As in he expected marv to disagree. Again, this shows how hestiant he is. On October 05 2016 07:08 Damdred wrote: You just do not have good taste then since even calix town reads me. Maybe I'm wrong about NU being town I'm unsure now based on him reading the game opposite how he would idk. "Even Calix town-reads me" What is this supposed to mean? It's as if he was trying to convince me to TR him because Calix did. Absolutely shit argument. What does he know about how I would read the game? Hestitant read. I've seen zero town motivation in his posts. I would like to hear why Koshi and Calix TR the guy. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
re:being hesitant: But the thing is you are unsure of every single read. As if you did not want to actually call someone mafia because you knew they were not mafia. In your response, you disagree with the points I make against you, but you do not disagree with the essence of the filter-dive which is that you are scum. At the very least, I find the way you state you don’t agree interesting. "which doesn't make me,scum." "This isn't really a point against me" "I don't really think it's a point against me" I do not understand why you have to downplay/discredit the « case » and me. It seems like you’re trying to shut down conversation and minimalize the points made against you rather than attempting to be understood. "Its a bad case but I still do not think you are scum just dumb." "That's a bad case tbh," "Overall your case is a narrative that lacks context and attempts to paint,me as scum,while,ignoring other moving,parts in,the thread." | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 09:07 Damdred wrote: And I mean dumb as I really do,enjoy you NU and Mean it in a loving way. o.o ? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 09:54 Oatsmaster wrote: I realised that Palmar is being lynhed for a lot of the same things Marv is doing but Marv isn't under any pressure lol. And why are you defending Plam exactly? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
Why is Damdred your 2nd and why is Plam your 3rd? Short answers please, watching the debate. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 07 2016 05:22 Holyflare wrote: Koshi Calix marvellosity Palmar justanothertownie Damdred Stutters695 NeverUnlucky Oatsmaster Superbia batsnacks, Vanilla town, lynched D1. Grackaroni This is my list of potential mafia. Even green flipped bats. + Show Spoiler + Calix marvellosity Palmar justanothertownie Damdred Stutters695 Maybe add oats for atrocious night posts but kinda like his style. Maybe remove jat if he goves me a frilly list post of mafia reads. A lot of townish reads can also come back, Superbia very very flimsy town read. On October 10 2016 02:06 Grackaroni wrote: This is incredibly rich. You have hard pushed all 3 flipped town so far. Mafia don't even need to be involved in anything because you are doing everything for them. At least 2 are mafia from the Marv/JAT/Koshi group because they are reading the game incredibly wrong. One of them is being clueless. The other mafia is between Damdred/Scott. Common scum-reads: Damdred/Scott/Marv/Jat. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 11:46 Oatsmaster wrote: I really don't like the way damdred re entered the game with him being all salty he got scum-read. Don't waste your time man, I couldn't take trump turning everything into what Hillary has done badly. It really was a waste of my time. I wish I could get a refund on that hour and a half I just wasted. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 14:45 justanothertownie wrote: Not true. HF actually went out of his way to say that he does not scumread me right after that. He was also the only player in the game who defended me against some of the sillier accusations against me (calix comes to mind) while basically everyone in the game was calling me mafia to some degree. The scumreads which the nightkills actually have in common are marv/damdred/scott. Maybe HF didn't scum-read you, but he still had you in his mafia list for "underwhelming play" to quote him. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 22:17 Damdred wrote: Basically if I say it both of you think it's a bad post, even if it is the truth. If someone else says something against me,it's a good post. Never case against me is bad I explained why. And I'd rather argue and take part,in the thread while I catch up than read 100 pages and disappear for most of the day. Also to point out something that calix says, he's trying to use against me (about the marv point) and well it's super important the context of the thread and how marv actually reacted. It matters a lot actually what others/marv himself states after I make my point. You have no intent to show that you are town. All you want to do is disprove the case "making you scum" (see bolded text and Point 3 of Calix's response) without making yourself appear as town. You show no intent to try and solve the game. | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
On October 10 2016 22:39 Damdred wrote: Also voting palmar cause I liked what marv had to say and think there is a decent chance he's scum. Still reading though What specifically did you like? | ||
|
NeverUnlucky
Canada1622 Posts
| ||
| ||
