|
On September 11 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:51 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote:
@Super just hypothetical what's the point of defending a 100% lynch as scum? It's instinctual to "bend towards the truth" when you have too much information. Like you're more likely to call town town. Especially if they're being scum read. I may actually be completely wrong on Calix btw. I need to re-read EoD1. Just follow with me for a moment as I'm working through this. Lets say that you are a mid to high tier player (as I think every one in this game is). You rolled scum, you already have a scum read on the person getting lynched. Its wifom partly, but what's the point to flipping your read bringing ore attention to yourself when your ere being 80% town read just for a I told you so at that point? Who are we talking about here specifically? Let's not nAMe names lets just answer honestly If someone scum scumread TT early on they're somewhat likely to join the waffling near EoD. Or dig in.
What about being super paranoid about halfway through d1 hating who's joining the wagon and thinks it's to easy? Scum or town?
|
On September 11 2016 06:57 Calix wrote:
Also I haven't used TT's mislynch as a "I told you so" thing. You people keep saying "Calix defended TT" but you haven't said what I would actually get out of it.
I'm not using TT's mislynch to push a scum-read on anyone. I'm not saying "I told you so". I'm not saying I am town for defending TT. I am not saying I am town for making this post "cuz WIFOM lul"
But fuck WIFOM for a second...what exactly would scum!Calix get out of this if not those things?
No, no.
What are you getting out of this as town, exactly?
|
We do do VCA lol.
We (as a site) don't typically do Night 1 however.
|
On September 11 2016 06:56 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 11 2016 06:44 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:37 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:36 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:35 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:32 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:31 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:28 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:27 Calix wrote:
Damdred had 2 votes. HF had 2 votes until I voted for him within the last 10 minutes.
Continue to mischaracterise the situation, why don't you? Did you actually try to convince people to go on damdred? I recall you actually being pretty quiet during the final (and most important) hour. Yes, idiot. And the overall response was "Damdred can be useful if he's town" and "TT is a better option, let's sheep his train" You said yourself that "TT would have posted if he was town" - how do I argue with such stellar reasoning exactly? I'll see when I reread EoD.  You haven't answered how I would have countered that kind of point. Your reasoning for joining the TT train is extremely weak and you have nothing to say about that when you were proven wrong, eh? TT is a good town who literally stopped posting when someone put pressure on him. Like I am expecting him, as town, to come in and defend himself or at least do fucking something. lol so the possibility of him being legitimately AFK never occurred to you? Calling bullshit. For an entire day and a half? Right at the point when pressure is applied to him? Was highly unlikely. The fact remains that TT was indeed objectively scummy and that people have defended him for completely shitty reasons. As it stands, we, as town, should always look at the people who defended him because: - There was literally no good reason to believe he is town as town because towns never know for certain. There simply is no(t enough) town-alignment-indicative information provided by TT to ever read him town, and all the reasons to put pressure on him and/or read him mafia. - Therefore; a town should never defend TT because they should never read him town. UNLESS it is strictly BECAUSE people are defending TT (mafia-defense etc.). - Also it is possible that a town null-reads TT but would much rather push his own target, but that's different from defending. If a train is utter shit, the trained player is in most cases TOWN. Calix and I have explained many times how the train was shit and that TT was most likely town given this. Do you not do VCA in TL? Also, we were pushing for Damdred, but it did not get attention because the scum were most likely drawing everyone's attention to TT, leaving our case in the shadows. What the fuck is a VCA.
Vote Count Analysis. What Calix and I did to show that TT's lynch was most likely a ML, 3 hours before he was lynched.
|
On September 11 2016 06:59 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:57 Calix wrote:
Also I haven't used TT's mislynch as a "I told you so" thing. You people keep saying "Calix defended TT" but you haven't said what I would actually get out of it.
I'm not using TT's mislynch to push a scum-read on anyone. I'm not saying "I told you so". I'm not saying I am town for defending TT. I am not saying I am town for making this post "cuz WIFOM lul"
But fuck WIFOM for a second...what exactly would scum!Calix get out of this if not those things? No, no. What are you getting out of this as town, exactly?
Showing that the scum-read on me for defending TT is shitty, duh.
I'm asking for what intent I would have, as scum, to defend TT.
Also if it wasn't obvious, I hate 'WIFOM' as a response. That's almost-always been a cop-out way of saying "I have no retort but I won't say as much" like seriously.
|
On September 11 2016 06:59 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:51 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote:
@Super just hypothetical what's the point of defending a 100% lynch as scum? It's instinctual to "bend towards the truth" when you have too much information. Like you're more likely to call town town. Especially if they're being scum read. I may actually be completely wrong on Calix btw. I need to re-read EoD1. Just follow with me for a moment as I'm working through this. Lets say that you are a mid to high tier player (as I think every one in this game is). You rolled scum, you already have a scum read on the person getting lynched. Its wifom partly, but what's the point to flipping your read bringing ore attention to yourself when your ere being 80% town read just for a I told you so at that point? Who are we talking about here specifically? Let's not nAMe names lets just answer honestly If someone scum scumread TT early on they're somewhat likely to join the waffling near EoD. Or dig in. What about being super paranoid about halfway through d1 hating who's joining the wagon and thinks it's to easy? Scum or town?
Depends on who and what. Also actually a hard question, definitely depends on the circumstance. More specifically, the second wagon.
Getting people off TT and onto a (nother) town wagon is so good for scum.
|
I like Super's recent posts.
|
On September 11 2016 07:02 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:59 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:51 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote:
@Super just hypothetical what's the point of defending a 100% lynch as scum? It's instinctual to "bend towards the truth" when you have too much information. Like you're more likely to call town town. Especially if they're being scum read. I may actually be completely wrong on Calix btw. I need to re-read EoD1. Just follow with me for a moment as I'm working through this. Lets say that you are a mid to high tier player (as I think every one in this game is). You rolled scum, you already have a scum read on the person getting lynched. Its wifom partly, but what's the point to flipping your read bringing ore attention to yourself when your ere being 80% town read just for a I told you so at that point? Who are we talking about here specifically? Let's not nAMe names lets just answer honestly If someone scum scumread TT early on they're somewhat likely to join the waffling near EoD. Or dig in. What about being super paranoid about halfway through d1 hating who's joining the wagon and thinks it's to easy? Scum or town? Depends on who and what. Also actually a hard question, definitely depends on the circumstance. More specifically, the second wagon. Getting people off TT and onto a (nother) town wagon is so good for scum.
I honestly don't think calix just rethinking on things is probably scum.
Shows paranoia about the lynch to well to be from scum (on a first look)
Is way to aggro and put themselves way to out there with Mich to hard a stance and to weird a turn to come from scum.
Just ny initial take,though I think,the scum reads are off this time even from myself.
|
On September 11 2016 07:02 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:59 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:57 Calix wrote:
Also I haven't used TT's mislynch as a "I told you so" thing. You people keep saying "Calix defended TT" but you haven't said what I would actually get out of it.
I'm not using TT's mislynch to push a scum-read on anyone. I'm not saying "I told you so". I'm not saying I am town for defending TT. I am not saying I am town for making this post "cuz WIFOM lul"
But fuck WIFOM for a second...what exactly would scum!Calix get out of this if not those things? No, no. What are you getting out of this as town, exactly? Showing that the scum-read on me for defending TT is shitty, duh. I'm asking for what intent I would have, as scum, to defend TT. Also if it wasn't obvious, I hate 'WIFOM' as a response. That's almost-always been a cop-out way of saying "I have no retort but I won't say as much" like seriously.
In general I would say that—and my point from me on you boils down to this as well—you defending TT gives you something "to do" and look townie. This coupled with me feeling you have no real direction (especially at EoD!) makes me believe you are scum.
Either way I will revisit your EoD (and maybe more) filter.
|
On September 11 2016 07:01 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:56 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 11 2016 06:44 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:37 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:36 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:35 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:32 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:31 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:28 Superbia wrote:
[quote]
Did you actually try to convince people to go on damdred? I recall you actually being pretty quiet during the final (and most important) hour. Yes, idiot. And the overall response was "Damdred can be useful if he's town" and "TT is a better option, let's sheep his train" You said yourself that "TT would have posted if he was town" - how do I argue with such stellar reasoning exactly? I'll see when I reread EoD. You haven't answered how I would have countered that kind of point. Your reasoning for joining the TT train is extremely weak and you have nothing to say about that when you were proven wrong, eh? TT is a good town who literally stopped posting when someone put pressure on him. Like I am expecting him, as town, to come in and defend himself or at least do fucking something. lol so the possibility of him being legitimately AFK never occurred to you? Calling bullshit. For an entire day and a half? Right at the point when pressure is applied to him? Was highly unlikely. The fact remains that TT was indeed objectively scummy and that people have defended him for completely shitty reasons. As it stands, we, as town, should always look at the people who defended him because: - There was literally no good reason to believe he is town as town because towns never know for certain. There simply is no(t enough) town-alignment-indicative information provided by TT to ever read him town, and all the reasons to put pressure on him and/or read him mafia. - Therefore; a town should never defend TT because they should never read him town. UNLESS it is strictly BECAUSE people are defending TT (mafia-defense etc.). - Also it is possible that a town null-reads TT but would much rather push his own target, but that's different from defending. If a train is utter shit, the trained player is in most cases TOWN. Calix and I have explained many times how the train was shit and that TT was most likely town given this. Do you not do VCA in TL? Also, we were pushing for Damdred, but it did not get attention because the scum were most likely drawing everyone's attention to TT, leaving our case in the shadows. What the fuck is a VCA. Vote Count Analysis. What Calix and I did to show that TT's lynch was most likely a ML, 3 hours before he was lynched.
It's like 60% efficient. In most cases I would be paranoid as well. ESPECIALLY given the defenses, but I really felt like we needed to actually see the flip before any conclusions could be drawn.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 11 2016 06:54 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:44 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:37 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:36 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:35 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:32 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:31 Calix wrote:On September 11 2016 06:28 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:27 Calix wrote:
Damdred had 2 votes. HF had 2 votes until I voted for him within the last 10 minutes.
Continue to mischaracterise the situation, why don't you? Did you actually try to convince people to go on damdred? I recall you actually being pretty quiet during the final (and most important) hour. Yes, idiot. And the overall response was "Damdred can be useful if he's town" and "TT is a better option, let's sheep his train" You said yourself that "TT would have posted if he was town" - how do I argue with such stellar reasoning exactly? I'll see when I reread EoD. You haven't answered how I would have countered that kind of point. Your reasoning for joining the TT train is extremely weak and you have nothing to say about that when you were proven wrong, eh? TT is a good town who literally stopped posting when someone put pressure on him. Like I am expecting him, as town, to come in and defend himself or at least do fucking something. lol so the possibility of him being legitimately AFK never occurred to you? Calling bullshit. For an entire day and a half? Right at the point when pressure is applied to him? Was highly unlikely. The fact remains that TT was indeed objectively scummy and that people have defended him for completely shitty reasons. As it stands, we, as town, should always look at the people who defended him because: - There was literally no good reason to believe he is town as town because towns never know for certain. There simply is no(t enough) town-alignment-indicative information provided by TT to ever read him town, and all the reasons to put pressure on him and/or read him mafia. - Therefore; a town should never defend TT because they should never read him town. UNLESS it is strictly BECAUSE people are defending TT (mafia-defense etc.). - Also it is possible that a town null-reads TT but would much rather push his own target, but that's different from defending. If a train is utter shit, the trained player is in most cases TOWN. Calix and I have explained many times how the train was shit and that TT was most likely town given this. Do you not do VCA in TL? Also, we were pushing for Damdred, but it did not get attention because the scum were most likely drawing everyone's attention to TT, leaving our case in the shadows.
If i recall you were concerned when people were jumping on tt who hadn't said much.
She qas concerned when she agreed tt wws scummy, the person voting for him and making the case(me) should be likely towny and the other 2 weren't particularly suspicious.
Literally 3 votes on a person and she called him town because of what mafia aren't doing even though 6 people were afj and any or all of them could be mafia.
|
On September 11 2016 07:05 Damdred wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 07:02 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:59 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:51 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote:
@Super just hypothetical what's the point of defending a 100% lynch as scum? It's instinctual to "bend towards the truth" when you have too much information. Like you're more likely to call town town. Especially if they're being scum read. I may actually be completely wrong on Calix btw. I need to re-read EoD1. Just follow with me for a moment as I'm working through this. Lets say that you are a mid to high tier player (as I think every one in this game is). You rolled scum, you already have a scum read on the person getting lynched. Its wifom partly, but what's the point to flipping your read bringing ore attention to yourself when your ere being 80% town read just for a I told you so at that point? Who are we talking about here specifically? Let's not nAMe names lets just answer honestly If someone scum scumread TT early on they're somewhat likely to join the waffling near EoD. Or dig in. What about being super paranoid about halfway through d1 hating who's joining the wagon and thinks it's to easy? Scum or town? Depends on who and what. Also actually a hard question, definitely depends on the circumstance. More specifically, the second wagon. Getting people off TT and onto a (nother) town wagon is so good for scum. I honestly don't think calix just rethinking on things is probably scum. Shows paranoia about the lynch to well to be from scum (on a first look) Is way to aggro and put themselves way to out there with Mich to hard a stance and to weird a turn to come from scum. Just ny initial take,though I think,the scum reads are off this time even from myself.
Maybe. I need to sleep on it first. HF has echoed my thoughts accurately too many times for me to believe he is scum. Someone has told me before that this is a trap, though HF was town that game.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On September 11 2016 07:02 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 06:59 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:57 Calix wrote:
Also I haven't used TT's mislynch as a "I told you so" thing. You people keep saying "Calix defended TT" but you haven't said what I would actually get out of it.
I'm not using TT's mislynch to push a scum-read on anyone. I'm not saying "I told you so". I'm not saying I am town for defending TT. I am not saying I am town for making this post "cuz WIFOM lul"
But fuck WIFOM for a second...what exactly would scum!Calix get out of this if not those things? No, no. What are you getting out of this as town, exactly? Showing that the scum-read on me for defending TT is shitty, duh. I'm asking for what intent I would have, as scum, to defend TT. Also if it wasn't obvious, I hate 'WIFOM' as a response. That's almost-always been a cop-out way of saying "I have no retort but I won't say as much" like seriously.
You get a mislynch and you appear to not be on the wrong wagon while you point out how bad people are for joining it when "it's obviously a mislynch" as you've done by pointing to a list of me/super/damd post lynch.
|
Blah blah blah, here's some self-meta because why the fuck not.
I wouldn't say that being aggressive is a town tell for me. I am naturally an irritable person who loses my temper easily.
Also I'm not aimless as scum because when I'm scum, I have a goal. (to mislynch X townies from a list of townies) However I'm aware of my meta so take with a pinch of salt.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
The general feeling i get from cal is "aggressively pushing 0 mafia reads" and instead "aggressively pushing points".
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Rapid dog missing its teeth.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
Rabid anyway drunk time bye
|
Damdred, Shapelog, and Palmar are my scum-reads. In this order.
|
I was scum-reading Damdred before the mislynch happened, was ambivalent about you and suspected Superbia when he said "if TT flips town, lynch Calix and TW"
And those reads have little to do with the fact that you guys were on the mislynch.
So no.
|
On September 11 2016 07:08 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On September 11 2016 07:05 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 07:02 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:59 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:57 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:56 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:54 Damdred wrote:On September 11 2016 06:51 Superbia wrote:On September 11 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote:
@Super just hypothetical what's the point of defending a 100% lynch as scum? It's instinctual to "bend towards the truth" when you have too much information. Like you're more likely to call town town. Especially if they're being scum read. I may actually be completely wrong on Calix btw. I need to re-read EoD1. Just follow with me for a moment as I'm working through this. Lets say that you are a mid to high tier player (as I think every one in this game is). You rolled scum, you already have a scum read on the person getting lynched. Its wifom partly, but what's the point to flipping your read bringing ore attention to yourself when your ere being 80% town read just for a I told you so at that point? Who are we talking about here specifically? Let's not nAMe names lets just answer honestly If someone scum scumread TT early on they're somewhat likely to join the waffling near EoD. Or dig in. What about being super paranoid about halfway through d1 hating who's joining the wagon and thinks it's to easy? Scum or town? Depends on who and what. Also actually a hard question, definitely depends on the circumstance. More specifically, the second wagon. Getting people off TT and onto a (nother) town wagon is so good for scum. I honestly don't think calix just rethinking on things is probably scum. Shows paranoia about the lynch to well to be from scum (on a first look) Is way to aggro and put themselves way to out there with Mich to hard a stance and to weird a turn to come from scum. Just ny initial take,though I think,the scum reads are off this time even from myself. Maybe. I need to sleep on it first. HF has echoed my thoughts accurately too many times for me to believe he is scum. Someone has told me before that this is a trap, though HF was town that game.
I think hf is town in this situation to.
Like I am in a weird position
Hf, super, grac, cal, UN, super, fuba are what ant I'd think are my town reads.
Paranoid of vivax but I'll,figure that out
I'm suspicious of tw
Palmar is Monday
Sky and shape to me votes look the worst but shapes sick so want to,give him a bit of time (<3)
So either its a super easy game or going to get,messy.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
