|
On September 09 2016 23:20 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 17:32 Superbia wrote:
Oh fuck me. Lynched towns get to be vigi? Fuck this game lmao. Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 17:46 Superbia wrote:
I think lynching town d1 is super good to create a benevolent spirit. He also forgot what he said 15 minutes earlier. Bleh. Not a fan of this what I think could be strategic spam. I employed something similar in my scum game, just with more condensed posts.
I just said benevolent spirit instead of vengeful spirit. x; I feel to see how this is alignment indicative, but please, do enlighten me. :D
On September 09 2016 23:20 Vivax wrote:Coincidentally starts the game having the same reads as HF, but doesn't talk about HF.
Calls Grack mafia on the go, then asks Calix a question about Never even though he's the guy she talked about the most and he's not within his range of suspects (TW, TT, Grack). Seems like a random question, or wants Calix to talk about the one she obviously has a strong opinion on already.
Regarding HF: I have not shared all of my reads. I had a townlean on him at that point, which has gotten somewhat stronger. But I'm interested to see how both TT and TW react.
I also ask Calix specifically about the one post from NU because it strikes me as the most alignment indicative (I also skimmed the first x posts, so I actually don't know what has been said between the two exactly).
On another note, do you seriously expect a town to be like "well, I have 3 suspects, I'm done!"? Because that's kinda what you are implying in your post.
On September 09 2016 23:20 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 20:41 Superbia wrote:On September 09 2016 20:37 Calix wrote:On September 09 2016 20:31 Superbia wrote:On September 09 2016 20:26 Calix wrote:Yo. Doesn't look like much happened. What I got was: - Superbia is really townie given his setup-spec talk and stream-of-consciousness style posting and I don't see scum ever entering the thread like that. Also I agree with the reads he's posted. Palmar's flippancy is also kinda town although that might just be his personality. He wasn't amazingly involved in the setup talk but the way the conversation progressed made me feel good about him. - Don't like Grackaroni. It feels like he's just hanging on the sidelines; he wasn't very involved in the discussion and most of the posts I read while catching up seemed like he was posting for the sake of looking active. Like there were a lot of places where he could have posted something substantial and he just made some joke comment instead. - I don't like Tumblewood still. On September 09 2016 14:03 Tumblewood wrote:On September 09 2016 11:00 Holyflare wrote:
You shouldn't expect a follow up from Tumblewood that guy is 100% free madia lynch bait.
i'm just not gonna waste 4 hours explaining myself to some scrub who thinks he's caught me in a lie On September 09 2016 10:23 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 09 2016 10:21 Tumblewood wrote:
pls stop making me explain myself It's kind of the point of the game. If you have reads but can't express them, no one's going to follow them, and you're as useless as town-Palmar. Explain them. see? it's not even my reads that are unexplained. it's my non-reads. like I have to waste my time explaining why you're all scrubs and I'm not scum for saying something but not drawing a conclusion from it The worst post of this game and I've only read like 8 posts. but that makes it seem less bad if it's only one of 8 posts you've seen On September 09 2016 11:33 fuba wrote:On September 09 2016 09:26 Tumblewood wrote:
fuba also seems pretty cool While I appreciate it, it always makes me uncomfortable when people town read me, especially D1 XD sorry nvm you're scum + Show Spoiler [in case you couldn't tell] +that was a j o k e and I still think he is town can I just complain about new players for a sec? cause I'm reading some posts by NU and he keeps attacking people for being lazy. I get the intentions and that may or not be valid on your home site but here on TL lazy is the meta. it's like a competition for who can look the laziest each game. I want to sheep you hf but after last game I'm paranoid I'll take "avoiding the main points being raised against me" for £200, Alex. Add a dose of unnecessary off-topic whining about Teh N00bs. Oh noes. That last line is really scummy. It's the classic "oh I'll give lip service to lynching X scummy person but then I'll give some bullshit excuse to not follow up on it" scum tactic when the scum feel compelled to talk about their scummy partners but don't actually want to bus them - there is literally NO reason to not vote for Ticktock at this point in time. Paranoia isn't a logical excuse - wouldn't you want to clarify your suspicions by pressuring Ticktock? Why is no-voting better exactly? - The only point of Holyflare's that I find compelling is Ticktock's contradiction ("I find setup spec boring, here's some setup spec") since it makes his point look like filler. Everything else is just background noise compared to that point imo. tl;dr: Grackaroni/ Tumblewood/ Ticktock are my scum-reads and the fact that they are low-key defending each other just makes me feel more confident that lynching among these three is the best option. So: - I'm town - My one townread is town. - All my mafia reads are mafia. Good reads.  In all seriousness, nice pocket regardless of your alignment. Townpass-ish! What do you think of NeverUnlucky? You've played with him before, right? I have. He's a scrub but he's town. He's more proactive and abrasive compared to his scum play. He gets mislynched a lot given he's presumptuous, arrogant, prone to trolling, has poor persuasion abilities, etc, so I am not surprised that he's under some suspicion. I am also 99% sure that he's read like, one or two past games on this site and that's why he's acting like he knows what everyone's meta is. Recently, he read one of my scum games from five months ago and now thinks he's an expert. That's how he rolls. Is he prone to be abrasive and yet form no actual opinion on someone? He calls TW 'lynchbait', which suggests he is TRing him, but nothing suggests he is reaching any actual conclusion. Seems weird to put seemingly that much energy/emotion into something but reach no real conclusion. This is one of the most misused arguments on the forum. Calling somebody lynch bait doesn't equal calling him town. It just means he's lynch bait. It's like he's trying to get Calix to scumread Never, but he isn't scumreading him either.
Ok? Then he hasn't reached any conclusion on TW at this point?
Also "trying to get Calix to scumread him". uwotm8? I'm asking Calix (whose alignment I do not know) to give a read on NU, a player which Calix is familiar with. Specifically regarding a post that I find scummy. And you're concluding I'm trying to manipulate Calix here? I am assuming NU and Calix are both town for you based on the conclusion you have reached here, yes?
On September 09 2016 23:20 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 21:27 Superbia wrote:Rofl this game has the potential to be amazing. Both HF and Palmar seem to be town. We'll see. They seem pretty null to me. HF opens like that as any alignment. Palmar only did some setup speculation. Super could just be handing out a few easy townreads to potentially dangerous players here.
I'm not a pussy. I'm perfectly fine with drawing temporary conclusions and see where they take me.
It seems to me like you have hastily drawn shitty conclusions from the interaction between Calix and myself regarding NU. This suggests to me that you were out to call me scum before you started reading your filter. Is this correct?
Feel free to say no and get lynched.
|
On September 09 2016 23:46 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 23:44 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 09 2016 23:41 Skynx wrote:
To give an update I've been procinasting this whole time playing overthrow, I'll start reading now. Right after being called out. Lovely example of proactiveness here. I check my subscriptions every now n then to see how the game is progressing cuz thats not much effort contrary to reading the thread.
You admit not having any intent pushing the game forward, rather preferring to "see how the game is progressing". Town's goal is to push the game forward to try and find the scum.
Your sitting-back and 100% reactive play show that you don't have town motivation.
[Vote Skynx]
|
before you started reading [b]my[/b ]filter.*
|
Definitely not having the confidence HF has on TT based on so little. Remains nullish for me.
|
Okay I'll expect a super townie response post-haste, Vivax. Thanks!
|
On September 09 2016 23:47 Skynx wrote:
Anyway I'll just comment on stuff as I go along the game, will answer stuff here aswell if u like.
Again, another scumtell (which I've explained in an answer to Grock's post).
|
Anyway heading home so brb.
|
On September 09 2016 23:47 Vivax wrote:Are HF and super actually willing to call skynx mafia? Cause that's what TT said too, who could also be mafia. Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 09:51 Tictock wrote:Contrast to Skynx here On September 09 2016 07:01 Skynx wrote:
Nothing good on tv/twitch and you guys are no fun, I'm offski to bed. First to post, been around, fucks off without saying anything and right about when things start happening. TT feels like he's imitating players from last game (trfel, Palmar). so far But certainly I don't see anything that looks forced like HF claims. Not really a fan of that wagon, while fuba is. But maybe fuba just doesn't know the context of the scum claim and the argument on skynx. And TT isn't that stupid to not expect people from last game to notice.
1. TT didn't say that Skynx was mafia. He just made a comment expressing suspicion about something Skynx had done. That's not the same thing. Also I already made this point earlier.
2. What is your point with fuba? I'm not sure what you are arguing here or why you mentioned him at all.
3. 'TT isn't that stupid' - Poor argument that implies that you subscribe to "too scummy to be scum". Get a better one please.
|
Jesus my reaction post has so many grammatical errors. Apologies.
|
Unfortunately you are objectively wrong. Pushing the game forward requires intentional time commitment. I decided to play overthrow while checking here every now and then as I said cuz i didn't feel like playing. You being here the entire time since the game started doesn't mean others have to do the same.
|
On September 09 2016 23:51 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 23:47 Skynx wrote:
Anyway I'll just comment on stuff as I go along the game, will answer stuff here aswell if u like. Again, another scumtell (which I've explained in an answer to Grock's post).
Okay I will ignore your posts here until I catchup if you wish so. Your push has no logical credit to it anyway.
|
Vivax fearmongering at 110% noted
|
On September 09 2016 07:02 NeverUnlucky wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 06:51 Skynx wrote:
New players: "Hmm I'm nervous about my entry post so lemme post some comments on game mechanics to be safe"
Where are you going with this? Do you scum-read us both? Posts without conclusions like this one aren't worth much.
Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 06:46 Tictock wrote:
Aw shucks, my streak of rolling town has come to an end.
Guess I wont be posting much so I don't accidentally give you guys info. Lel.
Oh man okay excuse my ignorance why didn't you tell you are a tryhard from the start so I could ignore you anyway.
So see the problem here. I pointed out the problem with your opener. You say if I don't scum read you based on it my post is worthless.
In meantime Vivax posted the same shit just writing a bit more stuff then you guys argued three pages over use of pronouns and shit.
|
On September 09 2016 23:52 Skynx wrote:
Unfortunately you are objectively wrong. Pushing the game forward requires intentional time commitment. I decided to play overthrow while checking here every now and then as I said cuz i didn't feel like playing. You being here the entire time since the game started doesn't mean others have to do the same.
Wrong, it just requires INTENT. You haven't even tried to contribute, that is the point. Fuba has been present less than you, but he still managed to make 1-2 comments that had some value. "Time commitment" has nothing to do with intent.
|
On September 09 2016 23:58 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 07:02 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 09 2016 06:51 Skynx wrote:
New players: "Hmm I'm nervous about my entry post so lemme post some comments on game mechanics to be safe"
Where are you going with this? Do you scum-read us both? Posts without conclusions like this one aren't worth much.
On September 09 2016 06:46 Tictock wrote:
Aw shucks, my streak of rolling town has come to an end.
Guess I wont be posting much so I don't accidentally give you guys info. Lel. Oh man okay excuse my ignorance why didn't you tell you are a tryhard from the start so I could ignore you anyway. So see the problem here. I pointed out the problem with your opener. You say if I don't scum read you based on it my post is worthless. In meantime Vivax posted the same shit just writing a bit more stuff then you guys argued three pages over use of pronouns and shit.
Ignoring players who scum-read you -- deflection/apathy.
You still don't answer the question.
Deflection.
SKYNX NEEDS MORE VOTES.
|
On September 09 2016 23:54 Skynx wrote:Show nested quote +On September 09 2016 23:51 NeverUnlucky wrote:On September 09 2016 23:47 Skynx wrote:
Anyway I'll just comment on stuff as I go along the game, will answer stuff here aswell if u like. Again, another scumtell (which I've explained in an answer to Grock's post). Okay I will ignore your posts here until I catchup if you wish so. Your push has no logical credit to it anyway.
Nice attempt to discredit me while refuting none of my points.
|
NU vs Skynx is getting dumb. All I'm seeing is NU conflating contribution with alignment and Skynx getting annoyed.
NU, maybe back off and see what Skynx does when they finish catching up/ are not playing Overwatch or what the fuck ever and then resume this.
|
But but... how can I read the thread if I have to answer your spam here while your only argument is i'm not trying?
Hmmmmm
|
On September 10 2016 00:04 Skynx wrote:
But but... how can I read the thread if I have to answer your spam here while your only argument is i'm not trying?
Hmmmmm
easy solution, don't read the thread.
I usually mostly read my own filter because I like reading clever things.
|
On September 10 2016 00:03 Calix wrote:
NU vs Skynx is getting dumb. All I'm seeing is NU conflating contribution with alignment and Skynx getting annoyed.
NU, maybe back off and see what Skynx does when they finish catching up/ are not playing Overwatch or what the fuck ever and then resume this.
Alright. In the meantime, what are your reads?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
