|
On September 26 2016 03:52 Calix wrote: lol why would anyone even talk about you when you hadn't said anything an said you'd be busy on Sunday? Legit thought you were getting replaced or modkilled.
Because last time I said I would try to lurk through d1 I was literally unable to.
|
On September 26 2016 03:55 Calix wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 03:53 Superbia wrote:On September 26 2016 03:52 Calix wrote: lol why would anyone even talk about you when you hadn't said anything an said you'd be busy on Sunday? Legit thought you were getting replaced or modkilled. Because last time I said I would try to lurk through d1 I was literally unable to. You never know. Well keep us updated with your thoughts and stuff. Have you said about the Lunatic lynch yet?
Nope. Didn't even know. :D
|
My presence may not be needed. Hmm.
|
DanelerH is new to forum mafia as well, yes?
|
On September 26 2016 03:58 DoYouHas wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 03:50 Superbia wrote: I am so fucking confused as to why no one has called me mafia yet this game and now everyone is reacting like this.
???
Oh well. Activity levels are low and there are better lynch targets than you, especially if your going to ramp up. DH's tunnel onto Luna is very contrived with no follow through. Pair that with his questionable early posting and it feels like scum to me. Maybe he brings something to the table before deadline now, but it feels like he tunneled just long enough to get the spotlight on someone else then disappeared. Luna made an anti-town play and has essentially shut down since coming under the displeasure of the thread, making him a very reasonable lynch and possible scum. I don't think making a meta read is in any way alignment indicative but I appear to be in the minority on that. Jealous started with fluff, then stirred the pot, and finished by being super non-commital. Townies should be trusting there own judgement over that of people's whose alignments are uncertain. Also potentially scum.
So uh.
Read on DH is pre-flip association or what?
|
Also I'm going to call DH Dane because DrHelvetica and stuff.
|
On September 26 2016 04:02 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 01:36 Calix wrote: This thread makes a snail look like it's moving faster than a sports car. At this rate I might actually be productive or some shit.
Got around to reading Stutters' ISO and I don't understand #236 whatsoever.
Stutters says that he would lynch SEQ for this one line alone and later asks why people haven't picked up on it...but I don't get what he means or why it's enough of a scum tell that no follow-up is needed. Stutters also did not vote in light of this supposed 'scum tell' and while he's been asking for SEQ opinions, he hasn't explained himself on this point.
For context, it's SEQ commenting on Xatalos saying:
'Interesting idea. What does this achieve? Last time I checked, voting for yourself is a lazy way of avoiding pressure, gives no info, doesn't get you reads. Unless you are schizo ^_^'
Don't get me wrong, that's not a great line because it's commenting on a mechanic that's not in the game (self-votes) in some detail. My interpretation is that Stutters is saying that SEQ hadn't read the setup but I don't see how that's AI, let alone lynch-worthy, and if that's not what Stutters meant then I'm lost. I don't understand nor do I relate to what Stutters has done this game so far tbh. It's not a great line because SEQ clearly hadn't been following the thread or would have caught that Xata and I were clearly joking. It came as just looking to post for the sake of being active.
We played 1 or more games together? What was the game?
|
On September 26 2016 04:04 DoYouHas wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 03:59 Superbia wrote:On September 26 2016 03:58 DoYouHas wrote:On September 26 2016 03:50 Superbia wrote: I am so fucking confused as to why no one has called me mafia yet this game and now everyone is reacting like this.
???
Oh well. Activity levels are low and there are better lynch targets than you, especially if your going to ramp up. DH's tunnel onto Luna is very contrived with no follow through. Pair that with his questionable early posting and it feels like scum to me. Maybe he brings something to the table before deadline now, but it feels like he tunneled just long enough to get the spotlight on someone else then disappeared. Luna made an anti-town play and has essentially shut down since coming under the displeasure of the thread, making him a very reasonable lynch and possible scum. I don't think making a meta read is in any way alignment indicative but I appear to be in the minority on that. Jealous started with fluff, then stirred the pot, and finished by being super non-commital. Townies should be trusting there own judgement over that of people's whose alignments are uncertain. Also potentially scum. So uh. Read on DH is pre-flip association or what? I don't think Luna and Dane are likely to be scum together, but taking there play individually I think either of them could be scum here. Is that what you meant?
Why not?
Also I think Dane is town.
|
If it's his first time playing forum mafia.
|
|
|
Giacomo I want to call you town but I'm not getting there. 
I checked your meta and it's really not helping either.
|
On September 26 2016 04:10 Stutters695 wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 04:03 Superbia wrote:On September 26 2016 04:02 Stutters695 wrote:On September 26 2016 01:36 Calix wrote: This thread makes a snail look like it's moving faster than a sports car. At this rate I might actually be productive or some shit.
Got around to reading Stutters' ISO and I don't understand #236 whatsoever.
Stutters says that he would lynch SEQ for this one line alone and later asks why people haven't picked up on it...but I don't get what he means or why it's enough of a scum tell that no follow-up is needed. Stutters also did not vote in light of this supposed 'scum tell' and while he's been asking for SEQ opinions, he hasn't explained himself on this point.
For context, it's SEQ commenting on Xatalos saying:
'Interesting idea. What does this achieve? Last time I checked, voting for yourself is a lazy way of avoiding pressure, gives no info, doesn't get you reads. Unless you are schizo ^_^'
Don't get me wrong, that's not a great line because it's commenting on a mechanic that's not in the game (self-votes) in some detail. My interpretation is that Stutters is saying that SEQ hadn't read the setup but I don't see how that's AI, let alone lynch-worthy, and if that's not what Stutters meant then I'm lost. I don't understand nor do I relate to what Stutters has done this game so far tbh. It's not a great line because SEQ clearly hadn't been following the thread or would have caught that Xata and I were clearly joking. It came as just looking to post for the sake of being active. We played 1 or more games together? What was the game? If memory serves, you vigged me in a student game when I was scum. I'm sure we've done more, but no clue which games.
Ah! Right. I thought you were in that game but I'm not sure what side you were on.
|
On September 26 2016 04:09 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On September 26 2016 03:45 Superbia wrote: Though I don't have any reads yet. I need a patient champion. STFU and play
Those are two opposing statements!
|
On September 26 2016 04:11 Calix wrote: who is giacomo?
DYH.
|
|
I actually feel vaguely confident in town so far.
|
|
On September 26 2016 04:15 Calix wrote:i'll mod you if you don't say your thoughts on my case 
Who? Me?
Who's your case on?
We should probably kill scott btw. Though Luna is probably a fine lynch as well.
|
I'll gladly accept the mod powers.
|
|
|
|