|
On June 16 2016 07:57 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:50 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:
Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion
Why would I do that though
Why would I have 'the correct' stance for a couple minutes then change my mind
Why wouldn't I put forth my current stance initially
Why wouldn't I just vote no-lynch and go semi-inactive for a cycle? It's not like I'd get punished for autoing.
There's just no scum motivation in what I did but you're acting like there is.
|
And if I'm scum I've effectively won already.
|
On June 16 2016 08:01 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 07:57 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:50 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:
Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion Why would I do that though Why would I have 'the correct' stance for a couple minutes then change my mind Why wouldn't I put forth my current stance initially Why wouldn't I just vote no-lynch and go semi-inactive for a cycle? It's not like I'd get punished for autoing. There's just no scum motivation in what I did but you're acting like there is.
I just explained the fucking scum motivation just because you scumread me doesn't give you the fucking right to not read what I've daif
|
And I think your flip flop on artanis / damdred was super townie. So no I don't think you're scum anymore
|
On June 16 2016 08:03 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 08:01 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:57 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:50 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:
Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion Why would I do that though Why would I have 'the correct' stance for a couple minutes then change my mind Why wouldn't I put forth my current stance initially Why wouldn't I just vote no-lynch and go semi-inactive for a cycle? It's not like I'd get punished for autoing. There's just no scum motivation in what I did but you're acting like there is. I just explained the fucking scum motivation just because you scumread me doesn't give you the fucking right to not read what I've daif
More calmly
Assuming you're town you don't realize sleeping is hard to do as scum. So you don't wanna sleep. But you don't want to no sleep because that's scummy. Ok
|
On June 16 2016 08:03 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 08:01 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:57 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:50 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:
Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion Why would I do that though Why would I have 'the correct' stance for a couple minutes then change my mind Why wouldn't I put forth my current stance initially Why wouldn't I just vote no-lynch and go semi-inactive for a cycle? It's not like I'd get punished for autoing. There's just no scum motivation in what I did but you're acting like there is. I just explained the fucking scum motivation just because you scumread me doesn't give you the fucking right to not read what I've daif
Rels, use your thinking brain here. If I'm scum, you said, I would want to look like I'm doing the right thing and then switch to lynching today so I can win immediately. I counter by asking why, if I'm scum, that would be the best play, because there are several options that are just as good.
|
On June 16 2016 08:07 Tumblewood wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 08:03 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 08:01 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:57 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:50 Rels wrote:On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote:On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote:
Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion Why would I do that though Why would I have 'the correct' stance for a couple minutes then change my mind Why wouldn't I put forth my current stance initially Why wouldn't I just vote no-lynch and go semi-inactive for a cycle? It's not like I'd get punished for autoing. There's just no scum motivation in what I did but you're acting like there is. I just explained the fucking scum motivation just because you scumread me doesn't give you the fucking right to not read what I've daif Rels, use your thinking brain here. If I'm scum, you said, I would want to look like I'm doing the right thing and then switch to lynching today so I can win immediately. I counter by asking why, if I'm scum, that would be the best play, because there are several options that are just as good.
Because playing scum is hard and it is hard to give up the to not sleep. Sicklucker baited me with this in that game where I was scum and you were my mislynch. I should have sleeper and I voted that actually but he just had to say "let's lynch tumble" for me to vote you
|
And actually the more I think about it the scummier it is. Maybe you just got baited in the exact trap I was baited in that previous game :D
|
On June 10 2016 14:09 Tumblewood wrote:Of the two tracker claims, Art is scum. There's a reason I preferred lynching Shape to lynching Damdred that I avoided saying earlier in the game: I was concerned that I was seeing Damdred's blue meta. Damdred as blue gets himself scumread to avoid a NK (source: Storm, Holyf***e). This is my scum meter for him: ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ylZVu2B.png) plus that whole thing about Kelsier tracking but being completely absent, Art is the scum. ##unvote##vote: artanis
But this followed by the whole doubts then going to damdred is super townie though ... jf you're scum these are some very good posts
|
Rels, my new scumread for you is calling people scum for bad reasons.
whoops did I say that
|
Ok I'm fired up and ready to analyse shit  will definitely reread the game tomorrow now. Good night!
|
On June 16 2016 08:15 Tumblewood wrote:
Rels, my new scumread for you is calling people scum for bad reasons.
whoops did I say that
Motherfucker just because your brain can't comprehend others doesn't mean you're right
|
Probably should only do that once you flip, in truth, but I confess I'm a little eager.
|
On June 16 2016 08:16 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On June 16 2016 08:15 Tumblewood wrote:
Rels, my new scumread for you is calling people scum for bad reasons.
whoops did I say that Motherfucker just because your brain can't comprehend others doesn't mean you're right
|
On June 16 2016 06:43 VisceraEyes wrote:
Incredible, someone else who was probably never ever voting for VE! :OOOOOOOOOO
i think he had you as palmar as mafia with maybe me if I read chezina langauge right. But to be honest I had no idea what his reads were and you might be right making his nk really weird. Even weirder was he was around at deadline to post like he expected it lol
|
anyway it looks like chez posted his read list just as he died. I doubt mafia changed their nk or could even do it last second because of that. so im more curious what chez known reads were before those last posts he made for example I dont think he suspected me at all untill that post
|
On June 12 2016 06:10 Chezinu wrote:Facts:Show nested quote +On June 09 2016 06:06 Chezinu wrote:Facts:On June 09 2016 06:04 Fecalfeast wrote:Night 1
Kwahamot the VT has been lynched!
until daytime.
KelsierSC is issued a warning for failure to vote. Any further infractions by him will result in a modkill.
Day 1 final VotecountVisceraeyes(0) koshikwahamot(6) rels, damdred lightningstrike koshi koshi sicklucker chezinu rels(1) sicklucker kwahamot Kelsiersc(0) Chezinu, visceraeyesShapelog (0): sicklucker wherebugsgo koshi tumblewood palmar, chezinu lightningstrike koshi sickluckerLightningStrike (0): DamdredPalmar (0): wherebugsgoDamdred (3): Palmar koshi, koshi, Palmar visceraeyes shapelog, Shapelog, tumblewood chezinusicklucker (0): Shapelogtumblewood(0) visceraeyes chezinu Damdredwherebugsgo (1): shapelog not voting , KelsierSC, Analysis:List 2: Lightningstrike nnn_thekushmountainstumblewood rels shapelogkoshi chezinuwherebugsgo visceraeyesKelsierSCdamdredsickluckerkwahamotPalmar Analysis:List 3: Lightningstrike nnn_thekushmountainstumblewood rels shapelogkoshi chezinuwherebugsgo visceraeyesKelsierSC damdredsickluckerkwahamotPalmar Note 19: The host really did neglect to include two votes against a mafia. I didn't want to believe the host was corrupt. But it seems it is true..
this was his most recent list before that. which yes has you as town ve so it is weird for mafia to kill him if you are in fact mafia. after this he talks pretty much just in chezuna code about his reads saynig bff shit if anyone wants to decipher
|
also we have 0 vote logic to go on with this game.. sign..
maybe we can look at who was interested in the day 1 lynch but thats thin
|
as for no sleeping we should probably vote on that before the acual lynch since there seems to be some interest not to sleep from ve and tumble. Yes sleeping is always best but we have also already waited a fucking week and im pretty biased because like tumble said im probably the nk anyway and unlike jat Im not a pussy and I like to decide games and not have other people do it for me. (just keep me out of final 3's mafia fuck that)
|
official sleep or no sleep vote count
sleep - rels
no sleep - ve/tumbles
if you guys acualy want to no sleep make it known asap tho so we have the most time...
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
