EPTNames Are Hard mini mafia - Page 95
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
If VE is town, scum wins because they can force LyLo with LS and VE and win. If he's scum with Rels, he busses Rels and kills LS and forces LyLo with SL and Palmar and wins. If he's with Palmar, they go for the mislynch on Rels and maybe win. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
##vote rels | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
LightningStrike
United States14277 Posts
| ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On June 16 2016 07:26 VisceraEyes wrote: I don't know about Rels. He could be mafia, but Palmar pushing on him is strange. Like if they're partners why? And if they're not I certainly would rather lynch Palmar than Rels. Did you see SL's post about bussing being the best play in 3v2 or 4v2 LyLo? If Palmar busses Rels and it goes through he gets all the cred, if it doesn't he wins on the spot. | ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
| ||
|
VisceraEyes
United States21171 Posts
I can see that maybe - the "case" is literally based on Rels' one post against Kwat or whatever...or rather, the fact that he doesn't let it go all game. Problem is people were ALREADY looking at Rels...it doesn't make sense to make ANY kind of case against your partner if people are already looking at them UNLESS you intend for them to die. :/ | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On June 16 2016 07:46 Rels wrote: Wow it looks like it's palmar tumble after all. Tumble being so convinced of no lynching then changing his mind because a town said so is pretty scummy Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 16 2016 07:49 Tumblewood wrote: Rels, this is a terrible case because a) I was not "so convinced" of no-lynching, nor did I change my mind for that reason, and b) That's not even scummy if I did. Why did you change your mind then ? | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
On June 16 2016 07:49 Rels wrote: Tumble your take on palmar case on me pretty please ? yeah it's probably correct. I think your push on kwahamot was scummy too. | ||
|
Tumblewood
United States3709 Posts
Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 08 2016 13:49 Tumblewood wrote: tumblewood esteemed 100% accurate sometimes reads list really town sl koshi sorta town kelsier palmar null ls rels done nothing of note ve kwahamot chezinu scum team damdred shape wbg I think I'm done for the night, and the game. my reads can't get any more 100% correct than this. It's pretty unlikely tumble is with both ksc and one of palmar/sl though because he townread then both pretty early for no reason | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On June 16 2016 07:54 Tumblewood wrote: Because in theory no-lynching is always best, but then I thought about it for a moment, and when you add real players who get tunneled it's probably worse than me or SL being there because those are the only ones I trust to finish this game right. Back atcha, Rels: What about that switch made you think I was scum? Scum naturally wants to lynch today and not have to lie during more and more days. So you being OK to no lynch because it's the right thing to do then not doing it looks like you're scum posting the right thing to do at first but going with the natural inclination at the first occasion | ||
| ||
