|
On January 20 2016 11:35 Breshke wrote: TT could you expand on the kita scumlean and why you considered blocking him.
Also I am looking for
1 x Sherlock Holmes
and
1 x Professor Moriarty
Would be willing to be either of those, but I am only 13/22 in the order, so other ppl might want to pick those up. Totally not sure on the picking stuff right now tbh... a lot of ppl haven't talked about their preference, but I would be down for a prot role or one of the trio.
|
On January 20 2016 11:42 Tictock wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 11:32 disformation wrote:On January 20 2016 11:07 Tictock wrote:On January 20 2016 09:43 disformation wrote:Yeah, assign me a role, but be gentle. Still want TT to explain why he felt like picking the same number as me. =/ Tbh it was a bit of a tossup if I wanted to hit 1:1, 4:1, or 8:1 1:1 was mostly just kus. 4:1 was what I was thinking of picking before game started, also I wouldn't have minded blocking Kita. 8:1 was to block you. I went with my gut and blocked you. Both you and Kita are mild scum leans based on what I've been able to read thus far. Largely based on tone and some meta, so eh. mild scum lean, blocks number. "k". not being cooperative. "k". not sure I want to have a town lean on you anymore. Fair enough. I wasn't the biggest fan of your read on me anyhow, and I felt like you were being a little to agreeable.
Dunno, I liked how you started figuring alignments out pretty early, asked you about your reads, was able to agree with them, since the notes I had taken were basically the same. *shrugs* That is probably what gave you this agreeable impression from, so in hindsight I kinda understand.
|
Okay semi-here. What is going on? Catching up in progress. Any questions or hot topics I should look out for?
|
On January 20 2016 12:52 CopCake wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 07:32 disformation wrote: Okay, everyone I am back. Skimmed the pages I missed. Not really liking Vivax and CopCake so far. Both seem rather uncooperative. Excuse me I claimed to have been busy, you mafia looking for someone to blame dude? Nah, town looking for scum. I'll be honest: inactivity is a bit of a turn-off for me. TBH was a bit turned-off that you didn't claim which number you picked, hence the uncooperative bit, but it seems like you didn't even picked one... so nvm for now.
On January 20 2016 21:10 GlowingBear wrote: Do we have a voting thread? I can't find a voting thread voting thread
So being #13 I don't really want to pick something that might be taken. Could go traditional doc or JK. I just hope I don't get weak cop. around 33% or 38% of dying N1, depending on whether we lynch scum D1 seems a bit harsh. :/
|
On January 20 2016 23:39 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 12:52 CopCake wrote:On January 20 2016 07:32 disformation wrote: Okay, everyone I am back. Skimmed the pages I missed. Not really liking Vivax and CopCake so far. Both seem rather uncooperative. Excuse me I claimed to have been busy, you mafia looking for someone to blame dude? Nah, town looking for scum. I'll be honest: inactivity is a bit of a turn-off for me. TBH was a bit turned-off that you didn't claim which number you picked, hence the uncooperative bit, but it seems like you didn't even picked one... so nvm for now. Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 21:10 GlowingBear wrote: Do we have a voting thread? I can't find a voting thread voting threadSo being #13 I don't really want to pick something that might be taken. Could go traditional doc or JK. I just hope I don't get weak cop. around 33% or 38% of dying N1, depending on whether we lynch scum D1 seems a bit harsh. :/
EBWOP: totally meant weak doc at the end not weak cop. xD Need more coffee. xD
On January 20 2016 23:41 kitaman27 wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 23:39 disformation wrote:On January 20 2016 12:52 CopCake wrote:On January 20 2016 07:32 disformation wrote: Okay, everyone I am back. Skimmed the pages I missed. Not really liking Vivax and CopCake so far. Both seem rather uncooperative. Excuse me I claimed to have been busy, you mafia looking for someone to blame dude? Nah, town looking for scum. I'll be honest: inactivity is a bit of a turn-off for me. TBH was a bit turned-off that you didn't claim which number you picked, hence the uncooperative bit, but it seems like you didn't even picked one... so nvm for now. On January 20 2016 21:10 GlowingBear wrote: Do we have a voting thread? I can't find a voting thread voting threadSo being #13 I don't really want to pick something that might be taken. Could go traditional doc or JK. I just hope I don't get weak cop. around 33% or 38% of dying N1, depending on whether we lynch scum D1 seems a bit harsh. :/ I'd rather you picked doc than JK to be honest.
Eh. JK might be a bit iffy in the beginning where I want to use it protectively and end up rb-ing the good townsfolk which is a bit awkward since everyone should have quite good roles and actions they want to do this game... So I get where you are coming from.
Will take a quick look at the list soon(TM) to see if there is something else, but probably going doc and hoping I get the normal/sane/whatever one sounds like a plan.
|
On January 20 2016 23:46 Superbia wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote: Yo real quick before I get back to work:
Gambler is the most hilarious badass role ever that we need to have in the game. Here's the plan:
1. Give gambler to some midling town-lean like kita/obi or maybe keir. 2. We pick a list of 2-3 possible mafia/lurk/bad-town that are not primary lynch candidates for d1 (like Vivax/Alot/Breshke or something, lots to pick from tbh). 2.5) Gambler RNGs a target within this list. 3. We will force these 2 or 3 to vote outside of the primary wagons. 4. The entire list is forced to either: a) Play good town (if they're town) or b) Bus their partners (if they're mafia) due to how the role works (if they vote for mafia they live and we know who was mafia after gambler claims their target, or they die).
Hmmm... sounds like it could work. But of course is still a bit of a gamble. Like we could loose two towns for this. You know in cases where both the gambler and the guy he picked are town and he votes wrong. On the other hand that would also confirm the guy who was voted on? And I think it is "only" 1 KP that gets thrown at the gambler? So we could protect the gambler if we are fairly sure he is town.
TBH would not be too fond of being "motivated" to bring out my A game, because I have a death warrant on me. Seems a bit dick-ish, but yeah that strategy could work out. xD
|
On January 20 2016 23:59 disformation wrote:Show nested quote +On January 20 2016 23:46 Superbia wrote:On January 20 2016 22:09 Superbia wrote: Yo real quick before I get back to work:
Gambler is the most hilarious badass role ever that we need to have in the game. Here's the plan:
1. Give gambler to some midling town-lean like kita/obi or maybe keir. 2. We pick a list of 2-3 possible mafia/lurk/bad-town that are not primary lynch candidates for d1 (like Vivax/Alot/Breshke or something, lots to pick from tbh). 2.5) Gambler RNGs a target within this list. 3. We will force these 2 or 3 to vote outside of the primary wagons. 4. The entire list is forced to either: a) Play good town (if they're town) or b) Bus their partners (if they're mafia) due to how the role works (if they vote for mafia they live and we know who was mafia after gambler claims their target, or they die). Hmmm... sounds like it could work. But of course is still a bit of a gamble. Like we could loose two towns for this. You know in cases where both the gambler and the guy he picked are town and he votes wrong. On the other hand that would also confirm the guy who was voted on? And I think it is "only" 1 KP that gets thrown at the gambler? So we could protect the gambler if we are fairly sure he is town. TBH would not be too fond of being "motivated" to bring out my A game, because I have a death warrant on me. Seems a bit dick-ish, but yeah that strategy could work out. xD
nevermind I think I misremembered the gambler role... -.-
|
Will read that gambler stuff again later. Need to step out and do some rl stuff.
Have a difficult time forming reads so far, since most of the discussion is focused on setup, numbers and roles. IMO most of that stuff is pretty NAI as it can come from both sides.
Some of my notes:
- Vivax
Didn't like his entry. Fairly angry. Could be scum.
- Tictock
Liked him starting to figure out alignments eary, didn't like how uncooperative he was later on. Biased cause he ninjaed my numbers. Is a lemon-tree.
- Rels
Liked some of his posts. E.g. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501883-pick-your-power-intriguing?page=49#962 . The capslock Dreamflower episode seemed a tad forced though.
- Superbia
Still think he is town.
- Koshi
Still think he is town.
- Damdred
hasn't done his special town thing I like to town read him for.
- Palmar
Eh. Yeah, could probably do this as scum, but I am not really sure I can see this. So town lean. At the very least he can be my Führer for now.
Also tons of ppl I can't really remember what they have done/posted so far. Should look at those, when the game starts for real.
|
On January 21 2016 01:08 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 00:17 disformation wrote:Will read that gambler stuff again later. Need to step out and do some rl stuff. Have a difficult time forming reads so far, since most of the discussion is focused on setup, numbers and roles. IMO most of that stuff is pretty NAI as it can come from both sides. Some of my notes: - Vivax
Didn't like his entry. Fairly angry. Could be scum.
- Tictock
Liked him starting to figure out alignments eary, didn't like how uncooperative he was later on. Biased cause he ninjaed my numbers. Is a lemon-tree.
- Rels
Liked some of his posts. E.g. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/501883-pick-your-power-intriguing?page=49#962 . The capslock Dreamflower episode seemed a tad forced though.
- Superbia
Still think he is town.
- Koshi
Still think he is town.
- Damdred
hasn't done his special town thing I like to town read him for.
- Palmar
Eh. Yeah, could probably do this as scum, but I am not really sure I can see this. So town lean. At the very least he can be my Führer for now.
Also tons of ppl I can't really remember what they have done/posted so far. Should look at those, when the game starts for real. Why did you force the "capslock episode" forced ?
The capslock level in those posts is so ridiculous high that I can't help but feel like you are overexaggeratating and trying to force the "lord am I excited bout this!" tone.
|
On January 21 2016 03:29 GlowingBear wrote: I mean, obviously, but I choose only one role?
On January 13 2016 05:45 GreYMisT wrote: Role Selection
After the 24 hours, the pick order list will be revealed (I will Not include what numbers everyone chose), and all players will have 24 hours to select a role from the below list. Selections must, again, be messaged to me and Half the Sky.
If a player tries to select a role that has already been picked by someone with a higher pick order than them, they will receive the Mysterious Challenger role. The Mysterious Challenger is a role option that, when chosen, randomly gives the selector a role from the Mysterious Challenger list.
If the Mysterious Challenger is picked voluntarily, the selector can designate ½ of the options that he does not want, and the role he gets will be randomized between the remaining roles. Roles that have already been selected from the list will be removed from the list. If for some reason all of the roles get removed from the list, all roles will be added back to the list.
After 24 hours, role PMs will be sent out and Day 1 will begin. Added some bold. That plus the mysterious challenger rules highly suggest that you only can submit one role.
|
Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal.
Can I can I can I? :D
|
On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D
On January 20 2016 11:14 Breshke wrote: So I am suggesting that i should pick Dr. John Watson
I'm happy to pick a protective role which this is and as I am not a high priority NK I will be able to confirm sherlock and moriartys checks.
Discuss
Seems like Watson is already taken. =/
|
On January 21 2016 04:23 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 04:17 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D On January 20 2016 11:14 Breshke wrote: So I am suggesting that i should pick Dr. John Watson
I'm happy to pick a protective role which this is and as I am not a high priority NK I will be able to confirm sherlock and moriartys checks.
Discuss Seems like Watson is already taken. =/ Wait. How did you find out ?
Huh? As I said here:
On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D Additionally there is tons of upside if Holmes and Moriarty are in the game and they should be imo.
So I kinda love the idea of being Holmes and was about to submit that pick, when I decided to double check and make sure that no one else wanted to be watson. You know since I kinda don't want to end up as mysterious challenger. So I did a Strg+F on Watson and found out Breshke wanted him.
|
On January 21 2016 04:35 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 04:30 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:23 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:17 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D On January 20 2016 11:14 Breshke wrote: So I am suggesting that i should pick Dr. John Watson
I'm happy to pick a protective role which this is and as I am not a high priority NK I will be able to confirm sherlock and moriartys checks.
Discuss Seems like Watson is already taken. =/ Wait. How did you find out ? Huh? As I said here: On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D Additionally there is tons of upside if Holmes and Moriarty are in the game and they should be imo. So I kinda love the idea of being Holmes and was about to submit that pick, when I decided to double check and make sure that no one else wanted to be watson. You know since I kinda don't want to end up as mysterious challenger. So I did a Strg+F on Watson and found out Breshke wanted him. I need you to be around for a question, tell me when you're ready.
sure.
Also trying to catch up but the thread moves faster than I can read.
@Palmar's plan: there are a few points where picks are like contested? Like breshke wanting to pick Watson, which could lead to FF being an ever doper MC.
|
On January 21 2016 05:57 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 05:34 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:35 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:30 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:23 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:17 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D On January 20 2016 11:14 Breshke wrote: So I am suggesting that i should pick Dr. John Watson
I'm happy to pick a protective role which this is and as I am not a high priority NK I will be able to confirm sherlock and moriartys checks.
Discuss Seems like Watson is already taken. =/ Wait. How did you find out ? Huh? As I said here: On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D Additionally there is tons of upside if Holmes and Moriarty are in the game and they should be imo. So I kinda love the idea of being Holmes and was about to submit that pick, when I decided to double check and make sure that no one else wanted to be watson. You know since I kinda don't want to end up as mysterious challenger. So I did a Strg+F on Watson and found out Breshke wanted him. I need you to be around for a question, tell me when you're ready. sure. Also trying to catch up but the thread moves faster than I can read. @Palmar's plan: there are a few points where picks are like contested? Like breshke wanting to pick Watson, which could lead to FF being an ever doper MC. Still there ?
Yeah. What's up?
|
On January 21 2016 06:00 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 05:59 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 05:57 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 05:34 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:35 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:30 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:23 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:17 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D On January 20 2016 11:14 Breshke wrote: So I am suggesting that i should pick Dr. John Watson
I'm happy to pick a protective role which this is and as I am not a high priority NK I will be able to confirm sherlock and moriartys checks.
Discuss Seems like Watson is already taken. =/ Wait. How did you find out ? Huh? As I said here: On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D Additionally there is tons of upside if Holmes and Moriarty are in the game and they should be imo. So I kinda love the idea of being Holmes and was about to submit that pick, when I decided to double check and make sure that no one else wanted to be watson. You know since I kinda don't want to end up as mysterious challenger. So I did a Strg+F on Watson and found out Breshke wanted him. I need you to be around for a question, tell me when you're ready. sure. Also trying to catch up but the thread moves faster than I can read. @Palmar's plan: there are a few points where picks are like contested? Like breshke wanting to pick Watson, which could lead to FF being an ever doper MC. Still there ? Yeah. What's up? What was my reaction to Breshke wanting to take Watson ?
Uh... I think you didn't like that idea at all first, cause you had a scum read on Breshke. Then you realized that it would be really easy to figure out if would be lying about the sanities of holmes and mortuary.
Do you still think Breshke is scum?
|
On January 21 2016 06:05 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On January 21 2016 06:03 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 06:00 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 05:59 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 05:57 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 05:34 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:35 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:30 disformation wrote:On January 21 2016 04:23 Rels wrote:On January 21 2016 04:17 disformation wrote: [quote] [quote]
Seems like Watson is already taken. =/ Wait. How did you find out ? Huh? As I said here: On January 21 2016 03:51 disformation wrote:Hmm... would actually be really glad to take Watson instead of the traditional doctor. Saves me the trouble of figuring out if I am paranoid/weak/normal. Can I can I can I? :D Additionally there is tons of upside if Holmes and Moriarty are in the game and they should be imo. So I kinda love the idea of being Holmes and was about to submit that pick, when I decided to double check and make sure that no one else wanted to be watson. You know since I kinda don't want to end up as mysterious challenger. So I did a Strg+F on Watson and found out Breshke wanted him. I need you to be around for a question, tell me when you're ready. sure. Also trying to catch up but the thread moves faster than I can read. @Palmar's plan: there are a few points where picks are like contested? Like breshke wanting to pick Watson, which could lead to FF being an ever doper MC. Still there ? Yeah. What's up? What was my reaction to Breshke wanting to take Watson ? Uh... I think you didn't like that idea at all first, cause you had a scum read on Breshke. Then you realized that it would be really easy to figure out if would be lying about the sanities of holmes and mortuary. Do you still think Breshke is scum? OK good p: checking if you really read the thread Yep I still think Breshke is scum
Fair enough. TBH I more like went STRG+F "Watson" on the thread, as implied earlier. Good thing you asked me about Watson related stuff then. xD
Probably need to take a look at Breshke's filter. He is one of the guys I don't really remember so far.
|
Is there one or two hours left? I though DL would be in two hours from now, but:
On January 21 2016 06:07 GreYMisT wrote: Reminder, 2 hours remain to send your role choice to both me and half the sky. Once those 2 hours are up Day 1 will begin! So in one hour? starting to get confused here. one sec.
|
"Recent" role claims:
Vayne: Hero Damdy: Nigella Lawson Me: Doc Koshi: Werner von braun kitman: Dr. Sy N. Tist shining: TTV or yu not sure? cephiro: dreamflower
|
On January 21 2016 07:11 disformation wrote: "Recent" role claims:
Vayne: Hero Damdy: Nigella Lawson Me: Doc Koshi: Werner von braun kitman: Dr. Sy N. Tist shining: TTV or yu not sure? cephiro: dreamflower
Keirathi: house
kinda sucks I cant edit posts -.-
|
|
|
|