EPTPick Your Power: Intriguing - Page 39
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:32 disformation wrote: mild scum lean, blocks number. "k". not being cooperative. "k". not sure I want to have a town lean on you anymore.  Fair enough. I wasn't the biggest fan of your read on me anyhow, and I felt like you were being a little to agreeable. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:36 kitaman27 wrote: Right now the only people that I'd say warrant assigned picks are Vivax, AlotSomuch and mayyybe The Shining. Vivax seems mafia because he shows up with this post to complain about the number claiming, but doesn't suggest a better strategy or show interest in planning things out. AlotSomuch had a really weak intro post. Something about trying to take notes, but not having any reads. Then the way he mentions VA's supsicions of him seem....awkward? Seems fine with being assigned too. The Shining also a mafia lean for similar reasons to Alot. A few posts on numbers and then accepting a role assignment with little sign of interest of abusing the setup or anything. Gambler, Doctor, and kitaman27 would probably be my three preferences for the assigned roles. Mostly beneficial for town and not a ton of use for mafia. Another thing with the kita role is that if one of the doctor trio slips through, we could use it to make sure all three are in the game and then use a wall of protects/watchers/trackers to make sure they are able to pull of their checks. why are 2/3 of your pics from your medium tier? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:35 Breshke wrote: Also I am looking for 1 x Sherlock Holmes and 1 x Professor Moriarty I've gone back and forth in my head about whether the investigative power roles should be public to ensure that they are picked. It's tempting to throw several medics or a watcher on Holmes to ensure he lives and things go through, but there are a bunch of roles that could potentially mess with his actions. Right now I'm leaning towards keeping them hidden and relying on them getting picked by the crowd because of this. | ||
|
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:35 Breshke wrote: TT could you expand on the kita scumlean and why you considered blocking him. Also I am looking for 1 x Sherlock Holmes and 1 x Professor Moriarty Would be willing to be either of those, but I am only 13/22 in the order, so other ppl might want to pick those up. Totally not sure on the picking stuff right now tbh... a lot of ppl haven't talked about their preference, but I would be down for a prot role or one of the trio. | ||
|
Fecalfeast
Canada11355 Posts
| ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:43 Breshke wrote: why are 2/3 of your pics from your medium tier? For the assigned roles? Well those were the ones that seem pro-town low risk that I'd want in the hands of mafia suspects. Ideally the townies grab the higher priority ones. Thoughts on those three? | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
I kinda thought his big list was a little suspect, both a few of the things he suggest and the way it was setup. Tbh though some of what I've read from him lately give me mixed feelings. I've seen some decent thinking, but also some posts suggesting that he's looking at the game from a mafia win perspective (I'm not sure how to say it better, just like looking at mechanics from a mafia pov). He's someone I intend to filter dive tomorrow. | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
| ||
|
disformation
Germany8352 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:42 Tictock wrote: Fair enough. I wasn't the biggest fan of your read on me anyhow, and I felt like you were being a little to agreeable. Dunno, I liked how you started figuring alignments out pretty early, asked you about your reads, was able to agree with them, since the notes I had taken were basically the same. *shrugs* That is probably what gave you this agreeable impression from, so in hindsight I kinda understand. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:45 kitaman27 wrote: For the assigned roles? Well those were the ones that seem pro-town low risk that I'd want in the hands of mafia suspects. Ideally the townies grab the higher priority ones. Thoughts on those three? Sorry im really not thinking clearly for some reason because the role kitaman was in there I for some reason thought those are the ones you wanted. But yes those three roles are very good for assigned. Is the benefit of keeping investigative roles private outweigh the chance that multiple townies wont fuck up and pick the same thing? I'm not disagreeing with you this is a genuine question. | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
That dude is totally scum. | ||
|
AlotSomuch
95 Posts
| ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:53 Keirathi wrote: Someone talk to me about Damdred. That dude is totally scum. I doubt it, but could look through his filter. What makes you think this? | ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:55 Tictock wrote: I doubt it, but could look through his filter. What makes you think this? Mostly the fact that he's been here posting but hasn't actually said anything. Threw out a list of town reads without any explanations. Etc. I mean, I just did some periphery glancing through his recent games and it seems pretty not-Damdred like. | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:53 Keirathi wrote: Someone talk to me about Damdred. That dude is totally scum. I had a slight town read because he brought up to super thing with dreamflower. He misread the post, but the idea seemed towny with suspicion over a player who discussed an obviously pro-town role without showing much intention to actually pick it as if he was making a play for town cred. I'd think that was a valid reason to suspect super, if it weren't for the fact that his other actions make him look pretty townie. Damdred's content is lackluster otherwise though. What makes you so sure? | ||
|
kitaman27
United States9245 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:51 Breshke wrote: Is the benefit of keeping investigative roles private outweigh the chance that multiple townies wont fuck up and pick the same thing? I'm not disagreeing with you this is a genuine question. Not sure there is really a correct answer here. I'd lean towards yes, but then again Murphy's law..... XD | ||
|
Tictock
United States6052 Posts
I see nothing that would make me suspect him though. | ||
|
ObiWanShinobi
United States8089 Posts
| ||
|
Keirathi
United States4679 Posts
On January 20 2016 11:58 kitaman27 wrote: I had a slight town read because he brought up to super thing with dreamflower. He misread the post, but the idea seemed towny with suspicion over a player who discussed an obviously pro-town role without showing much intention to actually pick it as if he was making a play for town cred. I'd think that was a valid reason to suspect super, if it weren't for the fact that his other actions make him look pretty townie. Damdred's content is lackluster otherwise though. What makes you so sure? Fair point. I'm not actually really sure or anything, my gut just says Damdred generally oozes townie to me and I'm not feeling it this game. | ||
| ||
