On December 22 2015 10:33 Holyflare wrote:
/in
/in
Finally!!!!
/obs
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 22 2015 10:33 Holyflare wrote: /in Finally!!!! /obs | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 24 2015 01:32 rsoultin wrote: /in ![]() Jeez Okay /in | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 24 2015 17:29 Rels wrote: Epic! How large can we make this grow ? ##pardon moosy That's what she said | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 24 2015 12:05 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Okay, so.../in? ERMAGEHRD CAVALINHO | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 24 2015 06:02 rsoultin wrote: i'd rather not leave anyone out lol ^^ -throws <3s @ lexy and gb- <3333 | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 25 2015 07:58 disformation wrote: so... this now starts when i am back from my parents... still feel like not joining would be the reasonable/sensible thing to do as i have a bunch of rl stuff to sort out. /in might not have time new years eve though. Oh I remember the game I've played last New Year's Eve. I almost got mislynched because I was inactive | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 25 2015 09:14 Chromatically wrote: /in Fixed | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I can smell the modkills | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 26 2015 01:01 Vivax wrote: /in This game is going to be a shitfest It definitely will | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 00:20 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 26 2015 13:14 N e s s wrote: Balanced? What the heck is balenced? Lol if only the mafia games i host would get this many players, you guys should play mafia on The Bell Tree forums or you should host here. This | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I'm mafia! Lynch me ##Vote: GlowingBear | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? Why do you think this makes him mafia? It doesn't unless he can't explain what he expects from questions like these | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:17 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? It actually can be used later on in game, collecting answers usually helps me. I understand asking questions, I'm asking why these particular questions are relevant? How will any answer from these questions help you solve the game? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:21 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:20 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? Why do you think this makes him mafia? It doesn't unless he can't explain what he expects from questions like these Yes, glowing bear you haven't played any games with me before, so i'm just going to assume you're town right now. But you jumping to me as mafia for asking questions...? Tell me, why do you think i'm mafia in a logical manner. Because trying to look contributive without wing contributive at all is something a Mafia will do. For example, asking questions that lead nowhere | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:32 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:29 ritoky wrote: On December 27 2015 08:26 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:24 ritoky wrote: On December 27 2015 08:21 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:20 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:17 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? Why do you think this makes him mafia? It doesn't unless he can't explain what he expects from questions like these Yes, glowing bear you haven't played any games with me before, so i'm just going to assume you're town right now. But you jumping to me as mafia for asking questions...? Tell me, why do you think i'm mafia in a logical manner. cuz you asked useless personal questions most of which can be answered by looking @ the DB that don't lead to mafia in any obvious way. tho town GB mostly just calls you dumb or worthless there instead of mafia, so GB might be mafia; juzzayin. Mafia experience? Thats not a personal question. It shows how experienced someone is. Thats why i asked it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/390080-tl-mafia-database you can look up everyone's names! see how many games on these forums they have played, get the results of those games, and even view their filters for said games. it answers almost all of your questions. I'm new to team liquid, so i guess my questions strategie doesn't work here. But i didn't know that, but what i meant was mafia experience as a whole. Not just their TL mafia, but on other forums as well. I know for an absolute fact there has to some veteran mafia players in here. I guess my forums can't exactly help with that, i'll look up names later. but in the mean time, who do you guys think is town aligned? Do you have any town read? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:55 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:51 Tictock wrote: On December 27 2015 08:11 GlowingBear wrote: OHAI I'm mafia! Lynch me ##Vote: GlowingBear Is nobody gunna discuss this obvious legit very real claim and self vote? Personally, I could Snap, i didn't even see that :o I'll look into it, but self voting is odd. Unless she(or he idek) is jester or...? Although jester is an unlikely/bastard role, so probably not. I'm a man and this is an open setup, which means all the roles are public. There is no jester in the game | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel Lol you're Mafia | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:05 Damdred wrote: Here's the deal we need to establish that we are going to lynch me never and never putting me under suspicion. That way I can give you great reads like this: Town: Trfel, ritoky, arty, Ness, Damdred and somewhat ticktock (slight lean) Can you explain these? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:11 Damdred wrote: Ness is pretty much the easiest town read in the game atm. He's super town. Tt made a joke that made me laugh, mafia almost never make me laugh, Art is doing things that make him town. Rit is meta meta meta but he's town. Truffle is tone. Yeah, no | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:13 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: 1) Show nested quote + If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. Furthermore I have qualms with the second half of the statement: You have a list of four questions and they are all designed as you have said: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 08:17 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:12 N e s s wrote: Alright, i'm just going to assume this started for now. Also, i can't understand why lynching Mooseydoosey is a good idea what so ever. Why would you lynch someone not even an hour into Day 1? But, nevertheless heres a few questions to get the ball rolling. Answer these questions. How much mafia experience do you have? I have played atleast 10 games up to this point. How many times have you been mafia in your mafia meta? twice, won both times. If you had to choose one person to lynch right now, who would it be? Honestly most of you are doing moose for reasons i can't understand, but right now basically nobody. I haven't read back. If you saw 3 buttons, 1 being green, 1 being yellow, and 1 being red, which would you push? I'd push green. 1) 2 years of experience, basically 2) 8 times I think 3) ness 4) I'd push triangle Question: how do you expect these questions will help you to find mafia? It actually can be used later on in game, collecting answers usually helps me. but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. Can you please answer the following for me? 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? THANK GOD someone gets what I'm saying. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:22 ritoky wrote: are you really scum reading the guy with 0 posts prior to this game who posted useless stuff and did a jester speculation in an open setup? REALLY? dumb=/=scum; that guy is ML bait for days. The questions aren't dumb. They just lead nowhere. Which means he is asking just to have something to post. Trying to be contributive without being contributive. Which is a Mafia trait. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:28 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 09:22 ritoky wrote: are you really scum reading the guy with 0 posts prior to this game who posted useless stuff and did a jester speculation in an open setup? REALLY? dumb=/=scum; that guy is ML bait for days. The questions aren't dumb. They just lead nowhere. Which means he is asking just to have something to post. Trying to be contributive without being contributive. Which is a Mafia trait. It is a mafia trait if you are a couple days into the game. Asking people their scumreads after 1 page into the game is just dumb. Asking which button to press isn't dumb tho. It's pointless. This isn't Mass Effect 3. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:32 Vivax wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote: Because rit is obvious town if you pay attention even if he a wrong. Mixture of tone posts and a couple of things To me he still is pretty null, easy to make posts He actually made a very scummy post | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel Why is Artanis town? Why is slam buddying you (where did you get that idea?)? Do you think the guys that are buddying you are Mafia? Why am I Mafia? Why truffle is Mafia? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:47 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel Why is Artanis town? Why is slam buddying you (where did you get that idea?)? Do you think the guys that are buddying you are Mafia? Why am I Mafia? Why truffle is Mafia? artanis is freely posting thoughts instead of releasing them in blocks of text. artans waits, sounds calculated, and posts in paragraphs/walls when he is scum. slam and rsoul are doing things that aren't alignment indicative but make me like them; plus slam is just hot irl. you're mafia because town GB calls that guy an idiot or worthless, town GB doesn't call him mafia. trfel is mafia cuz he sounded whimpy. having played with trfel as mafia recently, i think his biggest tell is that he sounds meek and whimpy as mafia. we done with your shitter read? ![]() Meh... I like your answer but I think the wording is very weird. When you said "buddying me" it sounded like you were talking about rsoul throwing hearts at you. So saying slam was also buddying you doesn't make sense since he didn't say a thing about you. I don't know what is good on slam that makes you like him? Can you tell me what it is, specifically? I call people Mafia all the time. Saying that I couldn't call him Mafia for that post as town is really contrived. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:44 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm Actually this post of yours seems pretty townie to me | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 1) The person that can see the 2 hats in front of him yells a color. If he gets it wrong, it means he was already seeing two different colors. This confirms his color as the opposite. Then the middle guy yells another color based on the color he is seeing in front on him and the other color that is confirmed. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:16 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:02 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 09:44 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm Actually this post of yours seems pretty townie to me I don't get your initial reply though. -Presumably, Rsoul is the GB whisperer. -She reads you as scum. -You don't have a read on her. -Instead of finding this suspicious, you waiver it off as "Eh, I have no reason to read you as scum." Only now do you actually think her reply was town, so you didn't there at first which makes it even scummier. I thought about her queation later, and I could see a thought process that led her to inquire me about that. She is going after a thing she found suspicious, reacting to the information (or lack of it) accordingly to how it gets dropped in the thread. This is townie. If she is really town, tho, she will know I'm town later. It's not the first time she starts the game believing I'm scum | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) how many hats are there for each color? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
[QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:21 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:16 Artanis[Xp] wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:02 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 09:44 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm[/QUOTE] Actually this post of yours seems pretty townie to me[/QUOTE] I don't get your initial reply though. -Presumably, Rsoul is the GB whisperer. -She reads you as scum. -You don't have a read on her. -Instead of finding this suspicious, you waiver it off as "Eh, I have no reason to read you as scum." Only now do you actually think her reply was town, so you didn't there at first which makes it even scummier.[/QUOTE] I thought about her queation later, and I could see a thought process that led her to inquire me about that. She is going after a thing she found suspicious, reacting to the information (or lack of it) accordingly to how it gets dropped in the thread. This is townie. If she is really town, tho, she will know I'm town later. It's not the first time she starts the game believing I'm scum[/QUOTE] which game are you referring to?[/QUOTE The game where you and Rayn were about to kynch me and I had to scream my lungs off to prove I'm town | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:23 rsoultin wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:21 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:16 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 27 2015 10:02 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 09:44 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm Actually this post of yours seems pretty townie to me I don't get your initial reply though. -Presumably, Rsoul is the GB whisperer. -She reads you as scum. -You don't have a read on her. -Instead of finding this suspicious, you waiver it off as "Eh, I have no reason to read you as scum." Only now do you actually think her reply was town, so you didn't there at first which makes it even scummier. I thought about her queation later, and I could see a thought process that led her to inquire me about that. She is going after a thing she found suspicious, reacting to the information (or lack of it) accordingly to how it gets dropped in the thread. This is townie. If she is really town, tho, she will know I'm town later. It's not the first time she starts the game believing I'm scum which game are you referring to? The game where you and Rayn were about to kynch me and I had to scream my lungs off to prove I'm town EBWOP | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
[QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:24 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:23 rsoultin wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:21 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:16 Artanis[Xp] wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 10:02 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 09:44 GlowingBear wrote: [QUOTE]On December 27 2015 09:43 rsoultin wrote: hey gb i think you're mafia you think i can read you well you're not calling me mafia what do you think of that? ![]() I just think you're wrong. I have no reason to think you're scum atm[/QUOTE] Actually this post of yours seems pretty townie to me[/QUOTE] I don't get your initial reply though. -Presumably, Rsoul is the GB whisperer. -She reads you as scum. -You don't have a read on her. -Instead of finding this suspicious, you waiver it off as "Eh, I have no reason to read you as scum." Only now do you actually think her reply was town, so you didn't there at first which makes it even scummier.[/QUOTE] I thought about her queation later, and I could see a thought process that led her to inquire me about that. She is going after a thing she found suspicious, reacting to the information (or lack of it) accordingly to how it gets dropped in the thread. This is townie. If she is really town, tho, she will know I'm town later. It's not the first time she starts the game believing I'm scum[/QUOTE] which game are you referring to?[/QUOTE The game where you and Rayn were about to kynch me and I had to scream my lungs off to prove I'm town [/QUOTE] you do know i said d1 right? -flicks viva- it's not infallible obviously. i've already admitted that, mr. snarky. i've been wrong (unless i'm misremembering) on an early d1 scumread exactly once before (jat) and i corrected it before EoD so...i know that may not mean a lot to some but it does make me more inclined to trust it when i really think someone is scum d1 you're not my biggest fan, so even though this feels like an attempt to discredit i'm going to give you the benefit of the doubt and see what else you do. just be aware that you're on my radar now ^^[/QUOTE] It's not an attempt to discredit, dear. I think you are wrong instead of Mafia, and knowing that you were wrong on me before reinforces the perspective where you're town here. And, since you usually can read me well, I'm not worried about a read you have on the first hours of the game. There is plenty of time until you can correctly read me. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:39 rsoultin wrote: @rit - i haven't ![]() re: vivax, he frequently says i'm obstructive as town etc. etc. so specifically with him he could just be a dick, but given how little he's posted so far, it's interesting that he attacks me slantways that way. he doesn't have a read on me (though he does give a weak townread on gb) and instead just mocks my way of getting reads -shrugs- if gb's mafia that's not a bad tactic for a scum-mate to employ and i've seen nothing from viva to make me think that he's town @gb - everything below -flicks viva- is directed at him and not you Oh Okay | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Also, if you were Mafia, I don't think you would risk getting tunneled by me like that. You could simply town read me and go after a better target. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:49 Vivax wrote: Koshi's riddle #1 If the guy in the middle says the opposite of what he sees in front of him, and then the guy behind him too, the third should know his own color? 1 in front. 3 in back. #2: I am black -> #1 knows he white #3: I am white -> # 2 knows he black #1: knows from #2 hes white in any other case #3 knows what he is just from the 2 colors in front. My try I guess White/black/white If first says black and fails, 2 and 3 knows the guy is white If second is seeing a white hat in front of him, he knows his hat is black. Puzzle solved. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:54 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:49 Vivax wrote: Koshi's riddle #1 If the guy in the middle says the opposite of what he sees in front of him, and then the guy behind him too, the third should know his own color? 1 in front. 3 in back. #2: I am black -> #1 knows he white #3: I am white -> # 2 knows he black #1: knows from #2 hes white in any other case #3 knows what he is just from the 2 colors in front. My try I guess White/black/white If first says black and fails, 2 and 3 knows the guy is white If second is seeing a white hat in front of him, he knows his hat is black. Puzzle solved. Even if you make it white/white/black First one says "black" and fails, confirms a white Then middle says "black" and fails, confirms another white Since first saw two different colors, the third knows he is the opposite color from the Middle, so he will always say "black", also because two whites were confirmed lol | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:57 nooniansoong wrote: Hi everybody. I'm a kush smurf. This game I am going to try hard to work on read accuracy. I just did a quick read through. Exo gave me mafia feels in his few posts, but that doesn't mean much. I liked hf's first post. Then ness said he needed to write a lot in defense. Ness, I urge you to write as little as possible while still honestly addressing hf's concerns. Why are you blowing your smurf? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 10:56 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 1) The person that can see the 2 hats in front of him yells a color. If he gets it wrong, it means he was already seeing two different colors. This confirms his color as the opposite. Then the middle guy yells another color based on the color he is seeing in front on him and the other color that is confirmed. The first person who yells out a color needs to be correct. Otherwise they all die. Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:23 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) how many hats are there for each color? This is unknown to the players. Could be 0-9 of each color. Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:49 Vivax wrote: Koshi's riddle #1 If the guy in the middle says the opposite of what he sees in front of him, and then the guy behind him too, the third should know his own color? 1 in front. 3 in back. #2: I am black -> #1 knows he white #3: I am white -> # 2 knows he black #1: knows from #2 hes white in any other case #3 knows what he is just from the 2 colors in front. My try I guess In the first riddle the first person who says a color needs to be correct. If he is correct they all are spared. Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:51 Vivax wrote: And in riddle #2 they get told apparently? Or is it a fake tell? In riddle 2 they don't get told anything except that they have a black or white hat. Puzzle can't be solved if they can only say black or white and never move | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:00 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:25 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) + Show Spoiler + 1) If the back person sees two of the same colour hat then the puzzle is easy and he can say the opposite. If he sees two different colours such as the picture then he should stay silent which indicates to the second person that there are two different colours. The person in front will be able to see the colour and so can yell out the colour on the top of his head easily. In your picture it would be: Back person: *Silence* Middle person: "Hmm the person in front of me is a white hat which must mean my hat is black!" 2) Are they allowed to formulate a plan beforehand? Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. ![]() Oh, duh. Got it. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:03 ExO_ wrote: I'd like to know what the fuck I'm doing that gives everyone such mafia feels. Pressuring 1 guy for info and saying that tomorrow my posting will be limited b/c im going to my brothers wedding makes me scum? Do you want pictures of me at the wedding? I'll give them to you if you really want them. I'm not scum and once again I see that not being a regular here means I'm going to be scum read for stupid ass reasons. Honestly the first day here on TL sucks every time I've played here :/ lol actually you look kinda townie to me | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:04 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:02 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:56 Koshi wrote: On December 27 2015 10:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 1) The person that can see the 2 hats in front of him yells a color. If he gets it wrong, it means he was already seeing two different colors. This confirms his color as the opposite. Then the middle guy yells another color based on the color he is seeing in front on him and the other color that is confirmed. The first person who yells out a color needs to be correct. Otherwise they all die. On December 27 2015 10:23 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) how many hats are there for each color? This is unknown to the players. Could be 0-9 of each color. On December 27 2015 10:49 Vivax wrote: Koshi's riddle #1 If the guy in the middle says the opposite of what he sees in front of him, and then the guy behind him too, the third should know his own color? 1 in front. 3 in back. #2: I am black -> #1 knows he white #3: I am white -> # 2 knows he black #1: knows from #2 hes white in any other case #3 knows what he is just from the 2 colors in front. My try I guess In the first riddle the first person who says a color needs to be correct. If he is correct they all are spared. On December 27 2015 10:51 Vivax wrote: And in riddle #2 they get told apparently? Or is it a fake tell? In riddle 2 they don't get told anything except that they have a black or white hat. Puzzle can't be solved if they can only say black or white and never move That is incorrect ![]() Yeah, Ive read HF's answer. I got the basic reasoning right, just didn't reached the conclusion that the first guy could communicate he was seeing two colors by just being silent :/ | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:05 nooniansoong wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:59 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:57 nooniansoong wrote: Hi everybody. I'm a kush smurf. This game I am going to try hard to work on read accuracy. I just did a quick read through. Exo gave me mafia feels in his few posts, but that doesn't mean much. I liked hf's first post. Then ness said he needed to write a lot in defense. Ness, I urge you to write as little as possible while still honestly addressing hf's concerns. Why are you blowing your smurf? Because I'm scum and it makes an easier scumgame for me. Is that what you are hinting at? No, I'm asking why. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:06 sicklucker wrote: vivax is such a bad day 1 wagon. im usually 99% sure of his alignment on day 2 or 3. such a garbage day 1 lynch and whoever does it is against town winning Explain to me how his meta can only be defined in day2 or 3. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:09 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:50 sicklucker wrote: On December 27 2015 08:51 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:49 sicklucker wrote: On December 27 2015 08:32 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:29 ritoky wrote: On December 27 2015 08:26 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:24 ritoky wrote: On December 27 2015 08:21 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 08:20 GlowingBear wrote: [quote] It doesn't unless he can't explain what he expects from questions like these Yes, glowing bear you haven't played any games with me before, so i'm just going to assume you're town right now. But you jumping to me as mafia for asking questions...? Tell me, why do you think i'm mafia in a logical manner. cuz you asked useless personal questions most of which can be answered by looking @ the DB that don't lead to mafia in any obvious way. tho town GB mostly just calls you dumb or worthless there instead of mafia, so GB might be mafia; juzzayin. Mafia experience? Thats not a personal question. It shows how experienced someone is. Thats why i asked it. http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/mafia/390080-tl-mafia-database you can look up everyone's names! see how many games on these forums they have played, get the results of those games, and even view their filters for said games. it answers almost all of your questions. I'm new to team liquid, so i guess my questions strategie doesn't work here. But i didn't know that, but what i meant was mafia experience as a whole. Not just their TL mafia, but on other forums as well. I know for an absolute fact there has to some veteran mafia players in here. I guess my forums can't exactly help with that, i'll look up names later. but in the mean time, who do you guys think is town aligned? this is a dumb angle since we all know each other and dont. Here is a smart angle, what is your mafia experience? You didn't even read the questions post, hun <3 10 games c: but that sudden attack on me? Its interesting, for numerous reasons. how in gods name can that be interpreted as an "attack" #YouCalledMeDumb And goodness gracious you annoy me. Welcome to the club | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:12 Koshi wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:11 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 11:00 Koshi wrote: On December 27 2015 10:25 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) + Show Spoiler + 1) If the back person sees two of the same colour hat then the puzzle is easy and he can say the opposite. If he sees two different colours such as the picture then he should stay silent which indicates to the second person that there are two different colours. The person in front will be able to see the colour and so can yell out the colour on the top of his head easily. In your picture it would be: Back person: *Silence* Middle person: "Hmm the person in front of me is a white hat which must mean my hat is black!" 2) Are they allowed to formulate a plan beforehand? Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. ![]() Since they can come up with a plan beforehand and I presume that they can hear every other person's response then they should formulate the plan that the person with the perfect information (Number 1 in the picture) should sacrifice himself to relay that information to everyone else. The strategy should be that player 1 says "Black" if he can see an even amount of black hats or "White" if he can see an odd amount of black hats. This way if person 1 is wrong then everyone else can determine the colour of their hat based on how many of each colour they can see and the person 1's fate. The situation would go as follows: As person 1 can only see 5 black hats then he should exclaim the aforementioned planned phrase of, "White". Person 1 does not explode as he has a white hat. Person 2 now knows there are an odd amount of black hats as Person 1 did not die but can only see 4 black hats, he therefore knows that he has a black hat and shouts, "Black". !!! That one was really hard. I wish I had Holyflare's intelligence | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:14 sicklucker wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:59 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 10:57 nooniansoong wrote: Hi everybody. I'm a kush smurf. This game I am going to try hard to work on read accuracy. I just did a quick read through. Exo gave me mafia feels in his few posts, but that doesn't mean much. I liked hf's first post. Then ness said he needed to write a lot in defense. Ness, I urge you to write as little as possible while still honestly addressing hf's concerns. Why are you blowing your smurf? wait a minute... you guys do remember the sicklucker rule right? Wait until he answers | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:14 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:11 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 11:00 Koshi wrote: On December 27 2015 10:25 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler + On December 27 2015 10:05 Koshi wrote: To honor the last good big game I played I will post 2 riddles here as well. The first one to get both answers right will never be voted by me (till D4) and gets 1 wish to be used during the game. Wishing for multiple wishes is not allowed. Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. 1) First riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People got told there are 2 black hats and 1 white hat OR there are 2 white hats and 1 black hat. goal: - A person needs to correctly yell out the color of his hat. If he can do that all 3 are spared. (so black or white is the first word anybody can say) ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) 2) second riddle setup: - People can only look forward. - People cannot move/speak/signal each other in a "cheaty" way. (your guts should tell you what is allowed) - People get told they have either a black hat or a white hat on their head. goal: - Yell out the color of your hat. Out of the 9 people max 1 person can be wrong. In this riddle person 1 starts, then 2, 3, 4, etc till 9. ![]() question: - How will they solve it? (Let's assume the picture has the randomized set-up which the players didn't know beforehand obviously) + Show Spoiler + 1) If the back person sees two of the same colour hat then the puzzle is easy and he can say the opposite. If he sees two different colours such as the picture then he should stay silent which indicates to the second person that there are two different colours. The person in front will be able to see the colour and so can yell out the colour on the top of his head easily. In your picture it would be: Back person: *Silence* Middle person: "Hmm the person in front of me is a white hat which must mean my hat is black!" 2) Are they allowed to formulate a plan beforehand? Alliens have conquered the earth and decided to eat the dumb people first and finish with the smartest people. To decide the order in how they eat people they invented a couple of test. If a group succeeds to solve the riddle within 3 minutes they are spared, otherwise they get eaten. Let's assume the group gets told the rules of the riddle before and then can come up with a plan together. So that they only need 1 smart person in each group to survive another day. ![]() Since they can come up with a plan beforehand and I presume that they can hear every other person's response then they should formulate the plan that the person with the perfect information (Number 1 in the picture) should sacrifice himself to relay that information to everyone else. The strategy should be that player 1 says "Black" if he can see an even amount of black hats or "White" if he can see an odd amount of black hats. This way if person 1 is wrong then everyone else can determine the colour of their hat based on how many of each colour they can see and the person 1's fate. The situation would go as follows: As person 1 can only see 5 black hats then he should exclaim the aforementioned planned phrase of, "White". Person 1 does not explode as he has a white hat. Person 2 now knows there are an odd amount of black hats as Person 1 did not die but can only see 4 black hats, he therefore knows that he has a black hat and shouts, "Black". ^^your long posts remind me a bit of someone i play with Town reads-HolyFlare, Aramis or whoever you say his username. But Ness! Shouldn't there be more town reads? To be blunt, i'm lazy. I'm diabetic and i'm at 340 (which is bad.) I'll go back and do more later, thats just the majority of whom i think is town atm. Much more important than who is town Who is Mafia? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:26 N e s s wrote: tbh i'll leave ya'll with this~ I'm not going to vote for who i think is scum right now. I have standards, i'm not going to vote for anyone with little reasons to lynch. Dude if you're town, calm down. Peoole here will call you Mafia for a big range of reasons, and we usually call each other stupid/dumb in a regular basis without actually having the intention to offend or to really mean you are an overall stupid person It's just the way these forums are | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:36 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:30 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 11:26 N e s s wrote: tbh i'll leave ya'll with this~ I'm not going to vote for who i think is scum right now. I have standards, i'm not going to vote for anyone with little reasons to lynch. Dude if you're town, calm down. Peoole here will call you Mafia for a big range of reasons, and we usually call each other stupid/dumb in a regular basis without actually having the intention to offend or to really mean you are an overall stupid person It's just the way these forums are Calm down? I don't know if you misinterpreted that or not no, i'm not upset. It looked like you were upset | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:37 Holyflare wrote: I think the best players to lynch today are Vivax for my preceding posts: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:52 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 09:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote: HF why do you make a massive case on town, then vote Vivax? I'm going to ignore your wording there but the reason is quite simple, I haven't heard a response from the player I'm questioning yet and he's new whereas Vivax is someone I have played with and his responses or lack thereof are far more concerning. On December 27 2015 09:26 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:25 Damdred wrote: Hi rit can we be town bros this game? Why would he be town with his posts so far On December 27 2015 09:32 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote: Because rit is obvious town if you pay attention even if he a wrong. Mixture of tone posts and a couple of things To me he still is pretty null, easy to make posts They are both posts that say absolutely nothing and weigh in to no debate whatsoever, I don't see Vivax sidelining in this situation at all I'd at least expect a reaction to something or an inquisitive line of thought. He has been present since then and is only concerned with Koshi's riddle in the meantime. As another candidate I also think GB could be mafia; His posts towards N E S S were barebones and unable to really follow up on anything meaningful and his suspicion has seemingly been dropped off the planet since then, he was in fact more concerned with being accused by rsoultin and trying to get her to change her mind rather than following up with N E S S: Show nested quote + It's not an attempt to discredit, dear. I think you are wrong instead of Mafia, and knowing that you were wrong on me before reinforces the perspective where you're town here. And, since you usually can read me well, I'm not worried about a read you have on the first hours of the game. There is plenty of time until you can correctly read me. Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 10:47 GlowingBear wrote: Like, dear, the way you inquired me about my lack of reaction in you scum reading me felt townie. You call me Mafia, I don't OMGUS, you find it weird and you decide to investigate this better. I can see a person trying to confirm suspicions on my alignment rather than trying to force a wagon on me. Also, if you were Mafia, I don't think you would risk getting tunneled by me like that. You could simply town read me and go after a better target. The rest of his posts are very empty and just questions that do not lead anything such as: "Why do you think that?" "Elaborate," "Calm down." This speaks of a GB who wants to be friends with everyone rather than a GB that wants to solve the game IMO. Things may change, they may not, GB I am on to you. Oh boy. I'm feeling it. It's coming. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 11:52 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:45 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 11:37 Holyflare wrote: I think the best players to lynch today are Vivax for my preceding posts: On December 27 2015 09:52 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 09:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote: HF why do you make a massive case on town, then vote Vivax? I'm going to ignore your wording there but the reason is quite simple, I haven't heard a response from the player I'm questioning yet and he's new whereas Vivax is someone I have played with and his responses or lack thereof are far more concerning. On December 27 2015 09:26 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:25 Damdred wrote: Hi rit can we be town bros this game? Why would he be town with his posts so far On December 27 2015 09:32 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote: Because rit is obvious town if you pay attention even if he a wrong. Mixture of tone posts and a couple of things To me he still is pretty null, easy to make posts They are both posts that say absolutely nothing and weigh in to no debate whatsoever, I don't see Vivax sidelining in this situation at all I'd at least expect a reaction to something or an inquisitive line of thought. He has been present since then and is only concerned with Koshi's riddle in the meantime. As another candidate I also think GB could be mafia; His posts towards N E S S were barebones and unable to really follow up on anything meaningful and his suspicion has seemingly been dropped off the planet since then, he was in fact more concerned with being accused by rsoultin and trying to get her to change her mind rather than following up with N E S S: It's not an attempt to discredit, dear. I think you are wrong instead of Mafia, and knowing that you were wrong on me before reinforces the perspective where you're town here. And, since you usually can read me well, I'm not worried about a read you have on the first hours of the game. There is plenty of time until you can correctly read me. On December 27 2015 10:47 GlowingBear wrote: Like, dear, the way you inquired me about my lack of reaction in you scum reading me felt townie. You call me Mafia, I don't OMGUS, you find it weird and you decide to investigate this better. I can see a person trying to confirm suspicions on my alignment rather than trying to force a wagon on me. Also, if you were Mafia, I don't think you would risk getting tunneled by me like that. You could simply town read me and go after a better target. The rest of his posts are very empty and just questions that do not lead anything such as: "Why do you think that?" "Elaborate," "Calm down." This speaks of a GB who wants to be friends with everyone rather than a GB that wants to solve the game IMO. Things may change, they may not, GB I am on to you. Oh boy. I'm feeling it. It's coming. Are you or are you not concerned about the responses of your initial scum read? To me it looks like you want to take him to a nice spa and give him a massage while you regale him with tales of your youthful antics. You haven't questioned N E S S at all. I didn't? I am questioning and I'm also letting you question him and evaluating what has been said. I asked him for his scum reads, he picked sicklucker. He said he was going to give his town reads later, and you asked a good question about his defense which has yet to be answered. I'm waiting for it. Meanwhile I am trying to gather informstion about other players. So what if I ask him to calm down? I don't know his alignment and he has a chance on being town legit upset. I don't understand why I can't be kind to a newbie even when I have a slight scum read on him | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 12:03 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 12:01 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 11:52 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 11:45 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 11:37 Holyflare wrote: I think the best players to lynch today are Vivax for my preceding posts: On December 27 2015 09:52 Holyflare wrote: On December 27 2015 09:40 Artanis[Xp] wrote: HF why do you make a massive case on town, then vote Vivax? I'm going to ignore your wording there but the reason is quite simple, I haven't heard a response from the player I'm questioning yet and he's new whereas Vivax is someone I have played with and his responses or lack thereof are far more concerning. On December 27 2015 09:26 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:25 Damdred wrote: Hi rit can we be town bros this game? Why would he be town with his posts so far On December 27 2015 09:32 Vivax wrote: On December 27 2015 09:29 Damdred wrote: Because rit is obvious town if you pay attention even if he a wrong. Mixture of tone posts and a couple of things To me he still is pretty null, easy to make posts They are both posts that say absolutely nothing and weigh in to no debate whatsoever, I don't see Vivax sidelining in this situation at all I'd at least expect a reaction to something or an inquisitive line of thought. He has been present since then and is only concerned with Koshi's riddle in the meantime. As another candidate I also think GB could be mafia; His posts towards N E S S were barebones and unable to really follow up on anything meaningful and his suspicion has seemingly been dropped off the planet since then, he was in fact more concerned with being accused by rsoultin and trying to get her to change her mind rather than following up with N E S S: It's not an attempt to discredit, dear. I think you are wrong instead of Mafia, and knowing that you were wrong on me before reinforces the perspective where you're town here. And, since you usually can read me well, I'm not worried about a read you have on the first hours of the game. There is plenty of time until you can correctly read me. On December 27 2015 10:47 GlowingBear wrote: Like, dear, the way you inquired me about my lack of reaction in you scum reading me felt townie. You call me Mafia, I don't OMGUS, you find it weird and you decide to investigate this better. I can see a person trying to confirm suspicions on my alignment rather than trying to force a wagon on me. Also, if you were Mafia, I don't think you would risk getting tunneled by me like that. You could simply town read me and go after a better target. The rest of his posts are very empty and just questions that do not lead anything such as: "Why do you think that?" "Elaborate," "Calm down." This speaks of a GB who wants to be friends with everyone rather than a GB that wants to solve the game IMO. Things may change, they may not, GB I am on to you. Oh boy. I'm feeling it. It's coming. Are you or are you not concerned about the responses of your initial scum read? To me it looks like you want to take him to a nice spa and give him a massage while you regale him with tales of your youthful antics. You haven't questioned N E S S at all. I didn't? I am questioning and I'm also letting you question him and evaluating what has been said. I asked him for his scum reads, he picked sicklucker. He said he was going to give his town reads later, and you asked a good question about his defense which has yet to be answered. I'm waiting for it. Meanwhile I am trying to gather informstion about other players. So what if I ask him to calm down? I don't know his alignment and he has a chance on being town legit upset. I don't understand why I can't be kind to a newbie even when I have a slight scum read on him I am placated by your response for now and question why you are not lynching Vivax with me or Ticktock with Rayn. What does placated means? I have no reason to vote any of them. Maybe Tictock, but Vivax is most likely a null atm than a scum read | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel This post of him felt really scummy to me. I kinda liked his answer but I asked more questions and I don't remember him answering it yet. What do you think of it? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:47 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel Why is Artanis town? Why is slam buddying you (where did you get that idea?)? Do you think the guys that are buddying you are Mafia? Why am I Mafia? Why truffle is Mafia? artanis is freely posting thoughts instead of releasing them in blocks of text. artans waits, sounds calculated, and posts in paragraphs/walls when he is scum. slam and rsoul are doing things that aren't alignment indicative but make me like them; plus slam is just hot irl. you're mafia because town GB calls that guy an idiot or worthless, town GB doesn't call him mafia. trfel is mafia cuz he sounded whimpy. having played with trfel as mafia recently, i think his biggest tell is that he sounds meek and whimpy as mafia. we done with your shitter read? ![]() | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 12:42 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 12:39 GlowingBear wrote: @Rayn On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel This post of him felt really scummy to me. I kinda liked his answer but I asked more questions and I don't remember him answering it yet. What do you think of it? I don't think the "pocketing me" category can be considered non-joke, at least i consider it as a semi-joke at least. I can see why he thinks you are / were mafia when he made the post. I can also understand the town reads. The only thing i don't really get is the Trfel read, which gives me a pause on ritoky. I heavily disagree with that read. Hmm... Okay | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 12:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Hi. ERMERGERD | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Show nested quote + Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 Show nested quote + At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. Show nested quote + but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Show nested quote + Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Show nested quote + Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. Show nested quote + If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. Show nested quote + 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:10 Holyflare wrote: + Show Spoiler [N E S S post] + On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Show nested quote + Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 Show nested quote + At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. Show nested quote + but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Show nested quote + Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Show nested quote + Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. Show nested quote + If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. Show nested quote + 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. + Show Spoiler [My response] + I like these responses. No further questions your honor. To answer some of your queries though, I mentioned MoosyDoosy because you had bolded 4 questions but seemed concerned about why people were voting Moosy (game relevant information), I would have thought that question would have been a 5th bolded question since it was game relevant and not an afterthought in one of your bolded questions or later. Also at the time there were no answers to it you just said you use the information later and I couldn't see how you would use the colour of someone's choice over the game relevant information. And while yes your first two questions were "analytical" they were questions that anybody could ask and weren't showing insight into information that had popped up. GB can you elaborate on why you refuse to want to lynch Vivax? He has dodged every situation and game relevant scenario to do nothing and somehow that makes you not want to lynch him, the player who doesn't really play as mafia? Lately, Vivax gameplay has been uninspiring as either alignment. There was a game he was mislynched day1 because he played somehow similar like this. Which makes him more null than scummy. I'm not saying he couldn't be Mafia. I'm just saying that there is nothing that scummy in his filter that makes him deserve to be the lynch | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:14 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 12:23 rsoultin wrote: On December 27 2015 12:19 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 27 2015 12:16 rsoultin wrote: @rayn im not here to argue. i was just trying to understand your perspective and get a read on you. i get what youre saying about gb but im not sure that it makes him town? Is this a firm read of yours, cause you were pretty sure in drams. It's quite firm. I don't know what you are referring with the bolded part? IS it on D1 (when i considered him town), if so, yes i was -- until D3 (or N2 idk) when he said something super unbelieveable that had no thought behind it. D1 you were quite adamant when i couldnt see it. The problem is gb is posting but not being ADD at all...which is how i read him. like he seems pretty focused on a limited number of things rather than being volatile bear. if youre sure i can drop him for a day cause i like a viva lynch too pretty much that, he hasn't spazzed out and yelled at me for calling him mafia or tried to make love to me. he is just calm and focused posting. i may be slightly biased because he appears to be tunneling on me and it's pretty w/e. I'm actually trying to further evaluate you. I didn't like that post I've quoted earlier but I was ok with your answer, and it seems people don't agree with me. I'm still waiting for your answer tho | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:32 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Gb are we gonna be battle buddies this game? I'll always be your buddy | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to? It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 09:54 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 09:47 ritoky wrote: On December 27 2015 09:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 08:58 ritoky wrote: town: artanis, ness pocketing me: slam, rsoul mafia lean: gb, trfel Why is Artanis town? Why is slam buddying you (where did you get that idea?)? Do you think the guys that are buddying you are Mafia? Why am I Mafia? Why truffle is Mafia? artanis is freely posting thoughts instead of releasing them in blocks of text. artans waits, sounds calculated, and posts in paragraphs/walls when he is scum. slam and rsoul are doing things that aren't alignment indicative but make me like them; plus slam is just hot irl. you're mafia because town GB calls that guy an idiot or worthless, town GB doesn't call him mafia. trfel is mafia cuz he sounded whimpy. having played with trfel as mafia recently, i think his biggest tell is that he sounds meek and whimpy as mafia. we done with your shitter read? ![]() Meh... I like your answer but I think the wording is very weird. When you said "buddying me" it sounded like you were talking about rsoul throwing hearts at you. So saying slam was also buddying you doesn't make sense since he didn't say a thing about you. I don't know what is good on slam that makes you like him? Can you tell me what it is, specifically? I call people Mafia all the time. Saying that I couldn't call him Mafia for that post as town is really contrived. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to? It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from Food for thought~ Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is? I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum. Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum? It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to? It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from Food for thought~ Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is? I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum. Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum? It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment. mmmm on the contrary that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you. Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game. please answer my question now. You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 14:18 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 14:15 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 14:12 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 14:07 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 14:03 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 13:57 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 13:45 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 13:41 GlowingBear wrote: On December 27 2015 12:56 N e s s wrote: Alrighty! So, heres my defense. First off i’d like to clarify that this is in no way meant to make anyone look like scum. Can you explain what you hoped to get out of these questions? I understand the first two purely from an analytical standpoint but the last two: Alright, you really want to know what i hoped to get out of these questions? Some future feedback, a guide to these players thoughts. If you feel like knowing where i originally found this strategy, heres one of the forums i play mafia on. http://www.belltreeforums.com/showthread.php?323476-1984-Mafia-Day-One/page7 At this point in the game there had been about half a page of useless posts, if you yourself could not really come up with a person to lynch and your answer provides nothing in terms of a progressive thought what did you hope to achieve by asking people this same question? In your eyes this question should lead to nothing but redundant statements since you yourself could not see anything. You’re right here, me not being able to come up with a logical lynch reading? Thats true. Honestly i should have thought that question out a bit more. But, wanna know something? Its also true in it of itself. There was no backbone to call someone scum at the time. but you have currently exclaimed (in fact multiple times) that you are bemused by the fact that people are voting for MoosyDoosy yet this is not a feature in your questions at all. ...smh you know why i didn’t include MoosyGoosey in my questions? No reason to, like i just said. Also when i said “i can’t understand why you guys are lynching mooseygoosey” How does that give you qualms? Hell, in it of itself its me trying to ask everyone WHY they were doing going to lynch mooseygoosey. Might i remind you of this- Band wagoning early? Thats suspicious. Why would you band wagon this early with no reads? Even though i didn’t explicitly say moose in the quote, its still me asking why would you band wagon this early with no reads. Supporting me not wanting to lynch anyone in my questions thread. To which, i recieved this which discontinued me being sus of why people wanted to lynch moose. Though it's tempting to play with you a little longer, I'll let you in on a secret. On teamliquid, we usually just banter around a little at the start to get the ball rolling. It gets serious when there's reason to get serious. If I were to purely judge your game plan by this post alone it would appear that you are trying to ask questions purely for the sake of asking questions (blending in) while not asking the intuitive questions that one in your position should be asking (why are people voting for Moosy?). This speaks to me as a mafia agenda and one which I am inclined to vote for. this. this rubs me the wrong way. 1)Again, if you don’t understand what i was trying to receive from those questions (which, again, i’ve said if you don’t know click that link above.) Why would you state this when theres already been answers to it? 2)Blending in? How is that blending in when i’ve been active in the thread? I’m posting and asking questions, defending myself and giveing my opinions. Yet, if you think i have a mafia agenda like you say i do(Plus at the time i made the questions was litterally my ONLY post) why are you not voting to lynch me? 3)You say i’m not making intuitive questions when you said my first 2 questions were analytical. 1) Why did you not ask why people were voting for Moosy if you were concerned about this and instead ask people redundant questions? 2) What did you hope the answers from people would reveal? 3) If it was raining on a Tuesday in Spain what shape would a crocodile be if it was square? Smh answered those first 2 already. but that 3rd one is a bit of you saying my questions are stupid. Sarcasm at its finest. But regardless, i don’t think you’re scum flare. You remind me a bit of a friend i have who plays much like you. So, do i think you’re scum? Not at all. Let me ask you something What did you not understand on the wagoning on Moosy doosy? Um, that we were lynching someone with no reason to? It amuses me that you don't understand the reason behind it when the concept of RVS is well known in the forums you come from Food for thought~ Does it really, really matter in the end weather i know or not why were lynching him? If you're so amused by it, could you tell me what the reasoning behind it is? I'm thinking of you as a lynch candidate. You've been on me since the begining with little reasons, and weather you think i'm scum or not the way you post is making me lean towards you being scum. Also, i haven't seen any reads from you yet, Who do you think is scum? It matters because if you ask something you already know the answer, it is, again, you posting just to post, and not actively trying to solve the game. Basically, you are here posting but not towards unveiling people's alignment. mmmm on the contrary that is invalid, i just said i didn't know the answer and just asked you. Did i not just ask you who you think is scum? That's me asking you a question trying to solve the game. It helps to know the opinions of others to know the insight to the game. please answer my question now. You know what RVS is but you couldn't that's exactly what moosy's was? I find hard to believe I find you being town hard to believe. Nobody's even told me why we were band wagoning Moose jesus christ. *sighs* Us arguing won't contribute to anything anyway, i'm done with you for now. I have bigger fish to fry then you, my friend c: You said I was town for the way I was pushing you. What changed? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 15:19 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 15:13 Alakaslam wrote: On December 27 2015 15:08 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 15:06 Alakaslam wrote: And clever hints are still omgus if they're baseless, so back it up. Why'm I scum bro? Besides pointing out what you do as scummy? That post is scummy as all hell ![]() Never said you were scum..."bro". This is even worse. If you are going to parse implications with emotes into posts and then back out when called out, you are playing textbook scum that has been caught here before. So As either alignment you should rethink these ones. Why am I scum? Because as much as I H8 rayn ( ![]() So You're next on my list unless you can prove that I have 1. Been asserting you were 100% scum before the 2. That you must prove, which is that the read I draw from your emotes and implications is based on a misunderstanding. So You have to prove that I was actually calling you scum before misunderstanding you later and calling you scum because you were backing out of implications. Jeez, case proven. I'm not even gonna bother with you saying i'm scum right now, TL mafia is more annoying to me then other forums i've played on. Also, that scum traits guide is pointless. Keep reading those guide tho. I'll help you ##Vote: Ness | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 17:08 rsoultin wrote: throw oneg into the no lynch category hrum Why?? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 18:27 sicklucker wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 13:49 N e s s wrote: Just curious, is there a way to know if someone is viewing the thread or no? if you want more proof this guy is town. he would have asked his mafia qt this first. Also hf is still mafia trying to fit in now n shit This actually makes sense... | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 21:29 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Have a random read list cause they're fun. 100% Town forever Artanis[Xp] N e s s Town Damdred Trfel Rsoultin Alakaslam Town by association of people I think are town reading them as town and me being a lazy shit Raynpelikoneet Onegu Weak Town HF Ritoky ExO_ Koshi TickTock Null Anyone not in other categories Weak Mafia Boxerfred - Made one post and it was bad. GB - Development on Rso was meh. Seems to be thread cop more than all over the place. Way he engages N e s s doesn't really make much sense to me. Leaning Mafia Vivax - doing fuck all, not being remotely tinfoil. Very much out of the ordinary for Vivax. Any read of your own, Artanis? I don't remember you going after Vivax for yourself, and I also remember you being directed by someone to check boxerfred's filter | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 27 2015 22:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 22:18 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 27 2015 22:17 raynpelikoneet wrote: Because it looks like you are both reading the thread and not. That's probably kinda true in the sense that there were like 17 pages to read when I woke up and I kinda read them but did it pretty fast so it's likely not everything actually registered. So like... the first thing you usually do in any game is to form a read on me. Here you "form" a read on me due to... association?!?!? You completely ignore my scumread however... Then you have this weird read progression on Exo, where you first call him scum but then, idk why, you suddenly don't call him scum anymore but null and in the next post he is even a town lean. Then i have absolutely no idea why you (or anyone -- but anyone is not as good as you are) would ever think Koshi is town because he hasn't actually done jack shit in this game. There is no Koshi-passion to solve the game, which is actually really characteristic to his townplay regardless of how much he yells he won't play before the game... And to the first part, you claim TT's posting is bad but hey let's ignore the case on him completely and just call him town instead... And HF is town but GB is scum... Did you forget HF did the exact same thing GB did regarding Ness?? Just because HF posts more words about it and is generally capable of producing better looking posts does not mean the motivation is/was the same.. But GB is scum for what he did? And HF is town, for calling Vivax scum? Or what, because that would be everything else HF basically did. Do you realize even if Vivax is mafia here it's not out of question at all HF is also mafia? I think you at least should, and if you srsly consider GB as scum for why you do, your townread on HF makes absolutely zero sense at all. I really really do not understand any of that. This! I think you're town, rayn | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I think Rayn is town. I think Exo is town. I think sicklucker might be town. I'm not sure on Ness. I have plenty of suspicions on him but I think that thing Sicklucker said about asking questions in the QT actually makes sense. I have to decide whether it is fakeable or not. I'm also not sure on Ritoky, I've been reevaluating and I believe I may have been nitpicking him for that particular post, which brings him back null Artanis looks scummy, I hated his list post. Tictock looks scummy for his lack of pushes + his joke on hammering me and going after me felt pretty off. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT. Let's do it ##Vote: Tictock | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 00:35 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 00:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT. Let's do it ##Vote: Tictock Ooh ooh let's test the chart! ##Unvote ##Vote TicTock ROFL it won't work | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 00:56 Vivax wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 00:56 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 28 2015 00:55 Vivax wrote: On December 28 2015 00:51 sicklucker wrote: well have fun lynching the obvious town newbie and null vivax like you guys do everygame and lose audios That sounds like the mafia strat to go for this game Could you play the game instead of moping around please? Wake me up when we're lynching HF You're making it difficult to defend you, Vivax | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 01:52 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote: Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around. Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open. No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything. This post is scummy imo. Scum Ticktock Exo Ticktock isn't focused in the game at all, he even said it as a post, and that post of his above is making me think he's scum. And Exo because i thought he was town earlier in game, but to me him getting mad is more of him going all Gung Ho on everybody. But if vivax ever makes a defense, i'm going to change my vote to TickTock. What's your read on Sicklucker atm? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 02:34 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 02:28 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 01:52 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote: Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around. Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open. No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything. This post is scummy imo. Scum Ticktock Exo Ticktock isn't focused in the game at all, he even said it as a post, and that post of his above is making me think he's scum. And Exo because i thought he was town earlier in game, but to me him getting mad is more of him going all Gung Ho on everybody. But if vivax ever makes a defense, i'm going to change my vote to TickTock. What's your read on Sicklucker atm? Nothing anymore, i think i just scum read him because i was frustrated at the time. Ok What's your read on me? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 02:35 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 02:34 N e s s wrote: On December 28 2015 02:28 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 01:52 N e s s wrote: On December 27 2015 11:35 Tictock wrote: Caught up with the game, but I'm prob not hanging around. Could get behind lynching Ness or noonian atm. Exo seems ok despite his open. No real strong town feels from anyone yet, maybe a little from Koshi I kinda like GB's posts thus far, I prob won't hammer him today. Tone feels different from past couple games, though... not sure it means anything. This post is scummy imo. Scum Ticktock Exo Ticktock isn't focused in the game at all, he even said it as a post, and that post of his above is making me think he's scum. And Exo because i thought he was town earlier in game, but to me him getting mad is more of him going all Gung Ho on everybody. But if vivax ever makes a defense, i'm going to change my vote to TickTock. What's your read on Sicklucker atm? Nothing anymore, i think i just scum read him because i was frustrated at the time. Ok What's your read on me? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:05 N e s s wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture apparently every time i play mafia people call me out and fuck with me until i get pissed, case proven right now. At least you're getting laid ![]() | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:07 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. His play would be extremely suicidal if mafia. And don't even say WIFOM because there's no way to predict that, let alone for a new player. Which part is suicidal? I actually see a player trying to look better instead of just doing what he wants | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:08 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:08 N e s s wrote: Just fucking lynch me i give up on fucking TL mafia ##Vote N e s s Please don't these people are just arse holes and don't know how to behave with basic manners in a human interaction. I'm actually politely calling him Mafia I thought this was expected in a Mafia game | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:12 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. Frankly put because nobody seems to know how to behave in a civilised manner and it's clearly aggravating the guy and stopping him from doing shit and that in turn makes the people with no manners behave worse towards A NEW PERSON THAT SHOULD BE TREATED WITH RESPECT BECAUSE WE WANT PEOPLE TO STAY ON THIS FORUM. Everything he says kind of doesn't make any sense but at the same time it looks like honesty, it's kind of like how I treat sicklucker because everything that guy says is gibberish. If you really think he's mafia give him some space ask for his mafia reads and for them to explain it and if you don't like that ask him simple questions that he can respond to and treat him nicely. Don't do what rayn and exo are doing and calling the guy a moron and treating him like a dick. That's exactly what I'm doing. I mean, EXACTLY. You either called me out for being nice with him in the beginning of the game | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 03:13 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:12 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:08 Holyflare wrote: On December 28 2015 03:08 N e s s wrote: Just fucking lynch me i give up on fucking TL mafia ##Vote N e s s Please don't these people are just arse holes and don't know how to behave with basic manners in a human interaction. I'm actually politely calling him Mafia I thought this was expected in a Mafia game yes but you're not the only person in this game my friend ![]() Alright ![]() I'll take a step back and reevaluate things later. This game is kinda intense right now and I could be tunneled on the new guy. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Save your offenses to when you play Dota, please. Let's try to play a nice game with good behaviour | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote: If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo. If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 28 2015 05:55 The Shining wrote: Honestly I'm probably going to lose my mind reading everything so I'm just going to post random things I pick up on. Reading filters intermittently while fighting off a headache. I've read GB so far because familiar names are familiar. Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 04:18 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote: If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo. If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today You thought you might be tunneled on Ness and decided to reevaluate at a later time. Now you're sheeping HF. Does this mean you're dropping your News read? Because you're voting together. ![]() I'll go read Ness next. ROFL I've just realised that. How am I supposed to not scum read the guy when he says both Exo an Tictock are Mafia (and have said Sicklucker and me also were before), then proceeds to vote Vivax ROFL it is beyond me | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? This guy probably mafia too tbh. Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
You're mafia | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 02:48 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? This guy probably mafia too tbh. Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed? So you're accusing me of making Vivax claim when Vivax has been calling me mafia all game? Are you okay in the head? regarding N E S S ^ I'm accusing you of pushing a guy solely on inactivity to the point he had to claim without caring for other inactives that are as bad as him. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 02:50 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 02:48 GlowingBear wrote: Fucking lots of people not playing and you tunnel Vivax and just say "oh lol this guy can be Mafia" "oh kush can be Mafia because his read took a big leap" "but I just want to lynch Vivax anyway ROFL" You're mafia It's actually more characteristic to town Holyflare than mafia... He had a very similar behaviour in Carol's and he was Mafia. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 02:54 Holyflare wrote: Yup classic GB fake mafia anger. Not only are your points illogical (I couldn't have made Vivax claim, I said I don't really want to lynch Ness straight away after etc etc) but they are ones that you yourself FOLLOW IN SENTIMENT. Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? This guy probably mafia too tbh. Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed? Let's look at this post as a classic example of a wtf he's mafia moment. GB is calling me out for: A) Being suspicious of Vivax which is weird as fuck because: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 04:18 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote: If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo. If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today B) Being suspicious of TickTock: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 00:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT. Let's do it ##Vote: Tictock C) Being suspicious of N E S S: Show nested quote + On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. D) Being suspicious of Kush: -absent because GB has been afk for ages- So, what do we see here ladies and gentleman? Glowingbear is accusing me of calling all his mafia reads mafia and then using it to call me mafia. /case get rekt GB Yeah, you're mafia. You're completely twisting my argument here. You can call all my scum reads scum and do nothing about it. Yes, I've said after a long time that Vivax might be the best lynch because there was enough time for him to react and he didn't. But you have been pushing him since the beginning of the game while calling everyone else suspicious but doing nothing about it. And about "D", I think kush is more likely to be town than mafia here, out of tone basically. I remember very well his mafia play in avogadro's mini mafia and it's nothing like this. Plus I think him going against Palmar was an okay play. Also, why would he come back to the thread like that, drawing all attention he can? Pretty much suicidal. I'm voting you | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:05 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:01 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:54 Holyflare wrote: Yup classic GB fake mafia anger. Not only are your points illogical (I couldn't have made Vivax claim, I said I don't really want to lynch Ness straight away after etc etc) but they are ones that you yourself FOLLOW IN SENTIMENT. On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? This guy probably mafia too tbh. Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed? Let's look at this post as a classic example of a wtf he's mafia moment. GB is calling me out for: A) Being suspicious of Vivax which is weird as fuck because: On December 28 2015 04:18 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote: If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo. If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today B) Being suspicious of TickTock: On December 28 2015 00:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT. Let's do it ##Vote: Tictock C) Being suspicious of N E S S: On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. D) Being suspicious of Kush: -absent because GB has been afk for ages- So, what do we see here ladies and gentleman? Glowingbear is accusing me of calling all his mafia reads mafia and then using it to call me mafia. /case get rekt GB Yeah, you're mafia. You're completely twisting my argument here. You can call all my scum reads scum and do nothing about it. Yes, I've said after a long time that Vivax might be the best lynch because there was enough time for him to react and he didn't. But you have been pushing him since the beginning of the game while calling everyone else suspicious but doing nothing about it. And about "D", I think kush is more likely to be town than mafia here, out of tone basically. I remember very well his mafia play in avogadro's mini mafia and it's nothing like this. Plus I think him going against Palmar was an okay play. Also, why would he come back to the thread like that, drawing all attention he can? Pretty much suicidal. I'm voting you Wait, you think HF is mafia because he pushed his main suspect whilst pushing others as well? No, Artanis, I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie while mildly throwing suspicions everywhere and not further investigating it even when me and sicklucker kept saying that he should give Vivax more time. It's not about WHO he said is scum, it's about HOW he is throwing suspicions everywhere while doing nothing with them. He agrees that Tictock is scum and there are two cases on him, but then decided to go against kush for a "leap of read" that doesn't make anyone scum. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:10 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:08 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:05 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:01 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:54 Holyflare wrote: Yup classic GB fake mafia anger. Not only are your points illogical (I couldn't have made Vivax claim, I said I don't really want to lynch Ness straight away after etc etc) but they are ones that you yourself FOLLOW IN SENTIMENT. On December 29 2015 02:47 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? This guy probably mafia too tbh. Who's not Mafia in this game? All you have been doing is pushing a guy that people are telling you you should give him more time for his recent plays, and you keep pushing him until he claims. Then you want to lunch Tictock and ness, who you have been townreading. Why do you want to lynch ness now, Holyflare? What changed? Let's look at this post as a classic example of a wtf he's mafia moment. GB is calling me out for: A) Being suspicious of Vivax which is weird as fuck because: On December 28 2015 04:18 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 04:08 Vivax wrote: If you're town and know you're never going to read this game gtfo. If you're mafia just wait until i lynch you thats okay too And now I agree with you HF, Vivax might be the best lynch today B) Being suspicious of TickTock: On December 28 2015 00:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 00:32 raynpelikoneet wrote: Well i really think TT is scum because everyone and their mother is willing to lynch Vivax at least on some level but everyone and their mother also refuses to commit on even giving a read on TT. Let's do it ##Vote: Tictock C) Being suspicious of N E S S: On December 28 2015 03:06 GlowingBear wrote: On December 28 2015 03:03 Holyflare wrote: can we leave ness alone, I'm pretty sure he's town at this juncture Why is that? The only thing that is giving me pause to call him Mafia is that thing Sicklucker said. The early arguments I've brought on him + his reads not making much sense (calling me town, Mafia, then town again, and now suddenly calling Tictock and Exo Mafia out of the blue, especially when Exo looks pretty fownie to me) pretty much sells him out to me as scum. D) Being suspicious of Kush: -absent because GB has been afk for ages- So, what do we see here ladies and gentleman? Glowingbear is accusing me of calling all his mafia reads mafia and then using it to call me mafia. /case get rekt GB Yeah, you're mafia. You're completely twisting my argument here. You can call all my scum reads scum and do nothing about it. Yes, I've said after a long time that Vivax might be the best lynch because there was enough time for him to react and he didn't. But you have been pushing him since the beginning of the game while calling everyone else suspicious but doing nothing about it. And about "D", I think kush is more likely to be town than mafia here, out of tone basically. I remember very well his mafia play in avogadro's mini mafia and it's nothing like this. Plus I think him going against Palmar was an okay play. Also, why would he come back to the thread like that, drawing all attention he can? Pretty much suicidal. I'm voting you Wait, you think HF is mafia because he pushed his main suspect whilst pushing others as well? No, Artanis, I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie while mildly throwing suspicions everywhere and not further investigating it even when me and sicklucker kept saying that he should give Vivax more time. It's not about WHO he said is scum, it's about HOW he is throwing suspicions everywhere while doing nothing with them. He agrees that Tictock is scum and there are two cases on him, but then decided to go against kush for a "leap of read" that doesn't make anyone scum. and then notice where my vote was and how I was exploring the other avenues at the time, I've said I've wanted to lynch TT since rayn first talked about it on like page 10 EXACTLY! And yet you never voted Tictock. You just decided kush was scum for bullshitty reasons, then you throw suspicions at me while twisting my arguments, and now you're voting me. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 01:34 Half the Sky wrote: Vote Count - Day 1 Tictock (5): raynpelikoneet, ObiWanShinobi, Vivax (3): Holyflare, N e s s (2): GlowingBear, Tictock nooniansong (2): sicklucker (1): Onegu Trfel (1): boxerfred ObiWanShinobi (1): Artanis[Xp] ExO_ (1): Coagulation boxerfred (1): Alakaslam (1): nooniansoong Palmar (0): Artanis[Xp] (0): rsoultin (0) ExO_ (0): MoosyDoosy (0): Koshi (0): Coagulation (0): Not Voting (7): Rels, Damdred, Waylanner, rsoultin, MoosyDoosy, The Shining, Vivax At this time, Tictock is slated to be lynched. Day 1 ends in on Monday, Dec 28 11:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00). The voting thread is here. Only votes there will be counted. Latest vote count. You only voted Tictock an hour ago. Now you're pushing a mislynch on me ROFL | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:19 Damdred wrote: Tbh what hf says makes a lot of sense here its not shit and it does show a interesting thing. GB tell me when did you first suspect hf Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:19 Damdred wrote: Tbh what hf says makes a lot of sense here its not shit and it does show a interesting thing. GB tell me when did you first suspect hf Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) He asked when you first started to. Was it literally when he posted his case on you? I was iffy when he started pushing kush, but it was basically when he called me and Ness scum, especially when he calls me scum when I ask a question on Palmar. It was clear he was throwing suspicions everywhere | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. So your main case on him is association based on TT being mafia. TT has a lot of votes. HF had none. Why did you vote HF instead of TT? It's not actually based on association. If someone calls a case "good" and that "that player might be mafia", but refuses to go on it and starts throwing suspicions everywhere by twisting arguments and going against NAI things, it doesn't fit a town perspective. Why would a townie behave this way? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:32 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. So your main case on him is association based on TT being mafia. TT has a lot of votes. HF had none. Why did you vote HF instead of TT? It's not actually based on association. If someone calls a case "good" and that "that player might be mafia", but refuses to go on it and starts throwing suspicions everywhere by twisting arguments and going against NAI things, it doesn't fit a town perspective. Why would a townie behave this way? Why would a mafia behave that way if TT is town? It would make it NAI. TT might be mafia, and he has a very good shot at being mafia. I don't know why would a mafia behave like that if TT is town. IF TT is town. I don't know if he is, so I can't say how a mafia would behave now. I can, however, work with the facts in the thread, and I don't see a townie behaving the way I described HF is. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:32 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. If I think a person is mafia and have a history of lynching that person as mafia then why would I stop wanting to lynch that person because sicklucker who I don't listen to a word of says otherwise? What logical nonsense is that GB? Not to mention if you start to think Vivax is mafia then why is it bad that I keep pushing that guy? I was too lazy to move my vote and just did so as soon as rayn posted an updated case on TT because I liked it and thought about how shit TT's catch up posts were. I still think that leap in logic is suspicious as fuck when he had no information at all about anyone else and he still jumped to a guy being town after presenting a logical explanation of why he could be mafia, it still doesn't make sense. There's like a million mafia and you're suspicious that I'm looking for other mafia after Vivax claimed a role? JESUS CHRIST THATS NOT WHAT IM SUSPICIOS OF IM SUSPICIOUS OF YOU CALLING TICTOCK MAFIA BUT REFUSING TO VOTE HIM FOR A LONG TIME AND GOING AGAINST OTHER PEOPLE (KUSH, WHO I THINK IS TOWN - ME, WHO IS TOWN) | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:37 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:30 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:19 Damdred wrote: Tbh what hf says makes a lot of sense here its not shit and it does show a interesting thing. GB tell me when did you first suspect hf Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) He asked when you first started to. Was it literally when he posted his case on you? I was iffy when he started pushing kush, but it was basically when he called me and Ness scum, especially when he calls me scum when I ask a question on Palmar. It was clear he was throwing suspicions everywhere And have you asked me why I think those people are suspicious? I have a thought process of "People that think that Vivax wasn't a good lynch or were behaving weird around Vivax" -Alakaslam - weird ness interaction and then weird Vivax reaction - Ness - weird as fuck posts all game and he posted something really weird about Vivax "I'll unvote him when he defends himself" <-- I almost instantly changed my mind based solely on his filter length which is probably a mistake but then I got lazy and didn't check his filter in his off site game - GB - just shit and afk for a while and then comes back and posts that trash about how did palmar know about coag and rsoultin when palmar already linked his source for info - gb's filter is like 3 full pages of one liner questions saying nothing and when I remembered his earlier interactions with ness and how he just copied my questions it added up to mafia-ish, now combined with my slam dunk case which you guys seem to dislike for no reason he's pretty definitely mafia ^ there is the combined reasoning for the brief section of time ROFL I COPIED YOUR QUESTIONS??? I WAS THE FUCKING FIRST ONE TO SUSPECT HIM | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:33 Vivax wrote: Time to play a bit with HF: Im not actually JK Oh boy, here we go Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:32 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: [quote] "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. So your main case on him is association based on TT being mafia. TT has a lot of votes. HF had none. Why did you vote HF instead of TT? It's not actually based on association. If someone calls a case "good" and that "that player might be mafia", but refuses to go on it and starts throwing suspicions everywhere by twisting arguments and going against NAI things, it doesn't fit a town perspective. Why would a townie behave this way? Why would a mafia behave that way if TT is town? It would make it NAI. TT might be mafia, and he has a very good shot at being mafia. I don't know why would a mafia behave like that if TT is town. IF TT is town. I don't know if he is, so I can't say how a mafia would behave now. I can, however, work with the facts in the thread, and I don't see a townie behaving the way I described HF is. Let me get this straight if TT is town, you don't understand HF's behaviour as either alignment. if TT is mafia, you think it strongly implicates HF. Regardless, you believe the chance of TT being mafia is lower than that of HF being mafia. Am I correct? No Artanis, my logic is: if I see a behaviour that doesn't fits any town perspective, the said person is mafia. I didn't think of it more than this | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:42 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:39 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:37 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 03:30 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:19 Damdred wrote: Tbh what hf says makes a lot of sense here its not shit and it does show a interesting thing. GB tell me when did you first suspect hf Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) He asked when you first started to. Was it literally when he posted his case on you? I was iffy when he started pushing kush, but it was basically when he called me and Ness scum, especially when he calls me scum when I ask a question on Palmar. It was clear he was throwing suspicions everywhere And have you asked me why I think those people are suspicious? I have a thought process of "People that think that Vivax wasn't a good lynch or were behaving weird around Vivax" -Alakaslam - weird ness interaction and then weird Vivax reaction - Ness - weird as fuck posts all game and he posted something really weird about Vivax "I'll unvote him when he defends himself" <-- I almost instantly changed my mind based solely on his filter length which is probably a mistake but then I got lazy and didn't check his filter in his off site game - GB - just shit and afk for a while and then comes back and posts that trash about how did palmar know about coag and rsoultin when palmar already linked his source for info - gb's filter is like 3 full pages of one liner questions saying nothing and when I remembered his earlier interactions with ness and how he just copied my questions it added up to mafia-ish, now combined with my slam dunk case which you guys seem to dislike for no reason he's pretty definitely mafia ^ there is the combined reasoning for the brief section of time ROFL I COPIED YOUR QUESTIONS??? I WAS THE FUCKING FIRST ONE TO SUSPECT HIM And look how your logic of me being mafia because I have no reason to mafia read those people is bypassed to the view of your self defence. It's silly, I am disproving your flawed logic of me being mafia and you're twisting it to make me mafia. I didn't understand what you meant here | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:45 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:43 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:42 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 03:39 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:37 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 03:30 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:23 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:19 Damdred wrote: Tbh what hf says makes a lot of sense here its not shit and it does show a interesting thing. GB tell me when did you first suspect hf Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) He asked when you first started to. Was it literally when he posted his case on you? I was iffy when he started pushing kush, but it was basically when he called me and Ness scum, especially when he calls me scum when I ask a question on Palmar. It was clear he was throwing suspicions everywhere And have you asked me why I think those people are suspicious? I have a thought process of "People that think that Vivax wasn't a good lynch or were behaving weird around Vivax" -Alakaslam - weird ness interaction and then weird Vivax reaction - Ness - weird as fuck posts all game and he posted something really weird about Vivax "I'll unvote him when he defends himself" <-- I almost instantly changed my mind based solely on his filter length which is probably a mistake but then I got lazy and didn't check his filter in his off site game - GB - just shit and afk for a while and then comes back and posts that trash about how did palmar know about coag and rsoultin when palmar already linked his source for info - gb's filter is like 3 full pages of one liner questions saying nothing and when I remembered his earlier interactions with ness and how he just copied my questions it added up to mafia-ish, now combined with my slam dunk case which you guys seem to dislike for no reason he's pretty definitely mafia ^ there is the combined reasoning for the brief section of time ROFL I COPIED YOUR QUESTIONS??? I WAS THE FUCKING FIRST ONE TO SUSPECT HIM And look how your logic of me being mafia because I have no reason to mafia read those people is bypassed to the view of your self defence. It's silly, I am disproving your flawed logic of me being mafia and you're twisting it to make me mafia. I didn't understand what you meant here Show nested quote + Right now, after seeing him throwing suspicions everywhere (GB might be mafia, Ness might be mafia), and the more I think of it the more things fits (his push on kush, his reluctancy from not lynching Tictock and keeping on Vivax) This has been completely disproved because I had a thought process for each of these people being mafia that revolved around the thought process that Vivax was a town JK and so your accusations become baseless since I am not throwing around calling people mafia everywhere for no reason. If you call a case a good case and the second wagon mafia, why not going against the second wagon, try to interact with him, re read his filter, instead of pushing a lot of other people that are most likely town (IMO)? That's exactly what you're doing right now. Instead of going against a case you called good, you're going after me right after I came back to the thread, reluctant to go against Tictock AGAIN. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:48 Holyflare wrote: And yes I still think my piece on Kush is good and it didn't get traction so I decided to back off a bit and observe some more to either confirm or deny my theory. I was hesitant to vote TickTock at that time because my ego is quite large and if Kush was TMI-ing on TT then it would be a redundant vote. People didn't like it so my ego wavered and Rayn posted his case and I agreed with it and remembered the TT catch up and so my mind decided to push my ego out of the way for a bit and sheep a good case. Now that you have been destroyed, good day to you. You didn't destroy me, you've just twisted every single argument I've wrote so you can throw it against me. Fits your job pretty well | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:51 Damdred wrote: I sorta agree with art I can see town GB acting this dumb over nai things. I hate this. It's always this "GB you're dumb", "GB your argument doesn't make sense", then the guy flips mafia. You guys just don't want to lynch Holyflare because he is Holyflare. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:54 raynpelikoneet wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:13 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:11 raynpelikoneet wrote: I think Holyflare is mafia because he kept pushing a townie....[...] GB saying things like this only makes you look terrible. If you don't understand why, then i can't help you. "WHILE" is the most important word here, that you kept out. Pushing a townie is okay. Pushing a townie while throwing suspicions everywhere and doing nothing with them while people kept saying he should backoff and agreeing Tictock is scummy while not even trying to vote him once is not. This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. So that would only make HF mafia if TicTock is scum right? Because otherwise he is refusing to vote for a townie -- which is not scummy. I am not going to check rn if your story stands up or not, because i don't think that makes HF mafia even if it does. I think you are exaggerrating the "reluctant to lynch" thing. On December 29 2015 03:41 GlowingBear wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:37 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:33 Vivax wrote: Time to play a bit with HF: Im not actually JK Oh boy, here we go On December 29 2015 03:35 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:32 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:32 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:28 Artanis[Xp] wrote: On December 29 2015 03:27 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:20 raynpelikoneet wrote: On December 29 2015 03:17 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:15 raynpelikoneet wrote: [quote] This is a really shitty case GlowingBear..... Tell me what's wrong with it Because you are literally saying HF should not have pushed his main scumread over other people (which is stupid). If HF thinks Vivax is more likely to be mafia it only makes sense for him to NOT vote for TT and push Vivax instead. Also after Vivax claimed HF made the only logical thing and moved his vote to his #2 scumread, TT. There is absolutely nothing wrong in his play or what he has done, if this is your case, which it seems to be. Especially if take account the fact you YOURSELF scumread the SAME people he does.... Again, it's not about who he scumreads. It's about HOW he does it. He kept on Vivax. People said he shouldn't. He threw suspicions everywhere without going anywhere with those suspicions. Vivax claimed. Holyflare agreed Tictock was scum. Never votes Tictock and pushes kush for something that doesn't make kush scum. Finally votes Tictock one hour ago. I post and he finds me suspicious. I say he is scum, he twists my arguments to start a wagon on me. My main argument is: he keeps saying Tictock is a good lynch but is reluctant to lynch him (never really interacts much with Tictock), when he sees himself out of options he throw suspicions everywhere and starts a wagon on me while twisting my arguments. So your main case on him is association based on TT being mafia. TT has a lot of votes. HF had none. Why did you vote HF instead of TT? It's not actually based on association. If someone calls a case "good" and that "that player might be mafia", but refuses to go on it and starts throwing suspicions everywhere by twisting arguments and going against NAI things, it doesn't fit a town perspective. Why would a townie behave this way? Why would a mafia behave that way if TT is town? It would make it NAI. TT might be mafia, and he has a very good shot at being mafia. I don't know why would a mafia behave like that if TT is town. IF TT is town. I don't know if he is, so I can't say how a mafia would behave now. I can, however, work with the facts in the thread, and I don't see a townie behaving the way I described HF is. Let me get this straight if TT is town, you don't understand HF's behaviour as either alignment. if TT is mafia, you think it strongly implicates HF. Regardless, you believe the chance of TT being mafia is lower than that of HF being mafia. Am I correct? No Artanis, my logic is: if I see a behaviour that doesn't fits any town perspective, the said person is mafia. I didn't think of it more than this | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:55 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 03:52 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 03:48 Holyflare wrote: And yes I still think my piece on Kush is good and it didn't get traction so I decided to back off a bit and observe some more to either confirm or deny my theory. I was hesitant to vote TickTock at that time because my ego is quite large and if Kush was TMI-ing on TT then it would be a redundant vote. People didn't like it so my ego wavered and Rayn posted his case and I agreed with it and remembered the TT catch up and so my mind decided to push my ego out of the way for a bit and sheep a good case. Now that you have been destroyed, good day to you. You didn't destroy me, you've just twisted every single argument I've wrote so you can throw it against me. Fits your job pretty well Please, please, please break down my arguments and my reasoning and thought process and explain how I've twisted this. You laid out points on why I am mafia and I've explained them FULLY with all the reasoning and logic behind it and outlined my entire thought process. You can ignore the case on you I'm solely talking about your case on me. If you think kush TMIng on TT would be a redundant vote you could've simply vote TT and keep pushing kush. If your ego is so big you should've vote kush and try to get people to lynch him. You never did any, you just saw kush's lynch not getting traction and started throwing suspicions on me and Ness, then you saw the possibility of forming a wagon on me and started it. IF you're voting me solely for ego, why weren't you voting kush before? Your story just not compute. You either have that big ass ego and go against kush full throttle and me full throttle, or you think TT might be mafia with kush and me and just vote TT because the vote is redundant. In other words, if your ego is so big you should have similar behaviours against me and kush, yet they were different accordingly to the possibility of a wagon getting traction or not. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 03:57 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Palmar, if you hadn't read anything and you didn't catch up, how do you know coag and rsoultin are masons? How can you not know the answer to this when the argument That followed was literally about the very source of my info Sorry, I didn't see it | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I agree that it doesn't make sense Mafia holyflare doesn't vote Tictock if Tictock is town. I'm voting Tictock then. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 06:06 The Shining wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote: I'm back I agree that it doesn't make sense Mafia holyflare doesn't vote Tictock if Tictock is town. I'm voting Tictock then. Are you saying if TT flips scum, HF is scum? Because if TT was town, scum HF would have kept his vote on him? Yes | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 06:18 The Shining wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 06:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 06:06 The Shining wrote: On December 29 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote: I'm back I agree that it doesn't make sense Mafia holyflare doesn't vote Tictock if Tictock is town. I'm voting Tictock then. Are you saying if TT flips scum, HF is scum? Because if TT was town, scum HF would have kept his vote on him? Yes So HF is scum, no matter what? Or does TT flipping town make you think HF is town? Regardless, you're going to vote TT to find out, which feels like really bad unflipped association to vote off of. =/ I have a scum read on Tictock for a long time. Lynching him might prove I'm right on Holyflare. If he flips town then it means I could be wrong. Still, I think I'm not wrong and both will flip mafia | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 06:55 nooniansoong wrote: @gb can you address your unsound logic? Sorry, I don't know what you're referring to | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:01 nooniansoong wrote: @GB see this quote tree Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 06:26 nooniansoong wrote: On December 29 2015 06:16 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 06:06 The Shining wrote: On December 29 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote: I'm back I agree that it doesn't make sense Mafia holyflare doesn't vote Tictock if Tictock is town. I'm voting Tictock then. Are you saying if TT flips scum, HF is scum? Because if TT was town, scum HF would have kept his vote on him? Yes That is bad logic. That logic actually means if TT is town, HF cannot be scum. Not that I agree with the premises. It means my argument on him being Mafia is moot | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:02 sicklucker wrote: Gb your willing to vote hf? I'd rather have Tictock flipping to see if I am right | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:19 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:17 sicklucker wrote: On December 29 2015 07:16 ritoky wrote: the fuck are you doing SL? trying to get the most likely mafia flip lynched you? tt is a good flip too which makes this a hard battle getting the guy i made a case on lynched and if not, then shennanying onto actual mafia, not town hf. I have no idea why you think I'm Mafia, then, and how you can't at least be a little suspicious of HF for everything I have said | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:25 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:23 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:19 ritoky wrote: On December 29 2015 07:17 sicklucker wrote: On December 29 2015 07:16 ritoky wrote: the fuck are you doing SL? trying to get the most likely mafia flip lynched you? tt is a good flip too which makes this a hard battle getting the guy i made a case on lynched and if not, then shennanying onto actual mafia, not town hf. I have no idea why you think I'm Mafia, then, and how you can't at least be a little suspicious of HF for everything I have said How on earth are you still going on about this, you posted your concerns about me being mafia which I have fully addressed and eliminated, what more is there to call me mafia for? You have my perfect thought process outlined right there for you in the thread. This is getting stale and just increases the likelihood of you being actually mafia. HF I really don't see how you've deconstructed the arguments I wrote. But I can see that if Tictock is town, my argument is moot. But I can't believe someone who scum reads Tictock isn't at least wary you could be scum. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:25 ritoky wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:23 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:19 ritoky wrote: On December 29 2015 07:17 sicklucker wrote: On December 29 2015 07:16 ritoky wrote: the fuck are you doing SL? trying to get the most likely mafia flip lynched you? tt is a good flip too which makes this a hard battle getting the guy i made a case on lynched and if not, then shennanying onto actual mafia, not town hf. I have no idea why you think I'm Mafia, then, and how you can't at least be a little suspicious of HF for everything I have said because HF was white knighting then got all pissy and fought with you; which falls in line with my: when HF is town he can't help himself read. plus you just lynch his ass if he is alive like 3 days in and hasn't lynched a million mafia in a row. Considering the amount of games holyflare won as Mafia, you know this argument doesn't hold water | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:31 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:30 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:25 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 07:23 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:19 ritoky wrote: On December 29 2015 07:17 sicklucker wrote: On December 29 2015 07:16 ritoky wrote: the fuck are you doing SL? trying to get the most likely mafia flip lynched you? tt is a good flip too which makes this a hard battle getting the guy i made a case on lynched and if not, then shennanying onto actual mafia, not town hf. I have no idea why you think I'm Mafia, then, and how you can't at least be a little suspicious of HF for everything I have said How on earth are you still going on about this, you posted your concerns about me being mafia which I have fully addressed and eliminated, what more is there to call me mafia for? You have my perfect thought process outlined right there for you in the thread. This is getting stale and just increases the likelihood of you being actually mafia. HF I really don't see how you've deconstructed the arguments I wrote. But I can see that if Tictock is town, my argument is moot. But I can't believe someone who scum reads Tictock isn't at least wary you could be scum. Where can you not see? You think I've blindly been pushing people for no reason, I outline all the reasons I pushed those people which lines up nicely with a new revelation of information (Vivax revealing he is JK), it's a perfect thought process that eliminates your case entirely and I know that TT is gonna flip mafia and you're just setting it up to push me for it, you've been angling at this for hours. HAHAHAHA so YOU know that Tictock IS going to flip Mafia but I am setting this up to prove my theory ROFL | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:34 Holyflare wrote: Ok GB I want a compendium of all your accusations on me this night phase and I'll squash them for you all over again, how is that? Let's talk about the rest of the game, why are you ok with Ness disappearing and not saying a word about it? HF, my only accusation is that you were throwing suspicions everywhere (if them followed a thought process it doesn't matter - your argument on kush followed a thought process, but its grounds are weak as hell) and did not proceed to go against Tictock (while agreeing he was scum and that the case on him is good) to pursue these suspicions. When kush wagon didn't get traction, you saw an opportunity when I came back and started pushing me. Your argument for voting me was ego. But you said you are fairly sure kush is Mafia (and you say you still are) but not react the same way to vote him and keep calling him scum like you're doing with me. You either display the same behaviour regarding me and kush (in regards of your ego "I like to be right") or your ego excuse is bullshit. I had another suspicion but I forgot what it was right now | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:44 Palmar wrote: On phone don't think I'll be at a computer before deadline. Very willing to shennie onto gb or kush Of course! Why not saving Tictock? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 07:51 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 07:47 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 07:34 Holyflare wrote: Ok GB I want a compendium of all your accusations on me this night phase and I'll squash them for you all over again, how is that? Let's talk about the rest of the game, why are you ok with Ness disappearing and not saying a word about it? HF, my only accusation is that you were throwing suspicions everywhere (if them followed a thought process it doesn't matter - your argument on kush followed a thought process, but its grounds are weak as hell) and did not proceed to go against Tictock (while agreeing he was scum and that the case on him is good) to pursue these suspicions. When kush wagon didn't get traction, you saw an opportunity when I came back and started pushing me. Your argument for voting me was ego. But you said you are fairly sure kush is Mafia (and you say you still are) but not react the same way to vote him and keep calling him scum like you're doing with me. You either display the same behaviour regarding me and kush (in regards of your ego "I like to be right") or your ego excuse is bullshit. I had another suspicion but I forgot what it was right now I said do it at night and I also said I don't think Kush is mafia that much anymore since people didn't like my reason and I backed off and it got overtaken by TT case. Learn to read fool. None of this answers anything about the actual question on N E S S. I still think ness is Mafia, I just think Tictock is a better lynch than him today because his flip will help me with my read on you | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
Makes so much sense | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
See you tomorrow. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:20 Holyflare wrote: I think we just lynch slam and shoot tt the night after or something or the other way around probably better HAHAHA SURE HF LET'S KEEP THAT GUY ALIVE FOR MORE TIME ROFL | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:32 Tictock wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 08:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:20 Holyflare wrote: I think we just lynch slam and shoot tt the night after or something or the other way around probably better HAHAHA SURE HF LET'S KEEP THAT GUY ALIVE FOR MORE TIME ROFL Why not? I'm likely to keep posting and reading the game. Besides you're being silly that HF and I could be on a team and he tried to get me killed during super last min shenanigans. 1) Did he really try to kill you tho? His vote was made after Rels got 9 votes 2) If he was so certain you should be killed because you are Mafia (and the fact that a shenanigans out of you actually occurred reinforces that you're most likely Mafia), why is he suggesting you should be shot (something that may or may not occur) instead of killing you day2? It doesn't make sense | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:39 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 08:38 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:32 Tictock wrote: On December 29 2015 08:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:20 Holyflare wrote: I think we just lynch slam and shoot tt the night after or something or the other way around probably better HAHAHA SURE HF LET'S KEEP THAT GUY ALIVE FOR MORE TIME ROFL Why not? I'm likely to keep posting and reading the game. Besides you're being silly that HF and I could be on a team and he tried to get me killed during super last min shenanigans. 1) Did he really try to kill you tho? His vote was made after Rels got 9 votes 2) If he was so certain you should be killed because you are Mafia (and the fact that a shenanigans out of you actually occurred reinforces that you're most likely Mafia), why is he suggesting you should be shot (something that may or may not occur) instead of killing you day2? It doesn't make sense How can you take a post where I say that we should actually lynch TT tomorrow and twist it into me saying that we shouldn't lynch TT tomorrow? I just have no words for that at all, it's just hilarious. Not to mention like I said and can be seen in the vote thread I thought the vote was 7-7 and complained to the hosts that my vote was not counted and thus would have killed TT. Get gud GB. To be fair, you're right regarding the votes. Looking at the vote count again it was impossible to know who was leading. I'll give you that But I don't understand why you consider just shooting Tictock at night 2 instead if lynching him? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:51 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 08:20 Holyflare wrote: I think we just lynch slam and shoot tt the night after or something or the other way around probably better | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:50 GlowingBear wrote: [/big]Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 08:39 Holyflare wrote: On December 29 2015 08:38 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:32 Tictock wrote: On December 29 2015 08:22 GlowingBear wrote: On December 29 2015 08:20 Holyflare wrote: I think we just lynch slam and shoot tt the night after or something or the other way around probably better HAHAHA SURE HF LET'S KEEP THAT GUY ALIVE FOR MORE TIME ROFL Why not? I'm likely to keep posting and reading the game. Besides you're being silly that HF and I could be on a team and he tried to get me killed during super last min shenanigans. 1) Did he really try to kill you tho? His vote was made after Rels got 9 votes 2) If he was so certain you should be killed because you are Mafia (and the fact that a shenanigans out of you actually occurred reinforces that you're most likely Mafia), why is he suggesting you should be shot (something that may or may not occur) instead of killing you day2? It doesn't make sense How can you take a post where I say that we should actually lynch TT tomorrow and twist it into me saying that we shouldn't lynch TT tomorrow? I just have no words for that at all, it's just hilarious. Not to mention like I said and can be seen in the vote thread I thought the vote was 7-7 and complained to the hosts that my vote was not counted and thus would have killed TT. Get gud GB. To be fair, you're right regarding the votes. Looking at the vote count again it was impossible to know who was leading. I'll give you that But I don't understand why you [big[consider just shooting Tictock at night 2 instead if lynching him? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:56 Holyflare wrote: because either way you net the same result you tool So you will definitely lynch TT tomorrow? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 08:57 Holyflare wrote: no I won't definitely do anything Lol ok HF I will stop going against you because I am just cluttering the thread to keep pushing the same old information. People already know what I find scummy in you so there's that. Let's assume we are both town. If that's so, who's more likely to be Mafia? I know you've posted a list but I'm asking you to work under this assumption | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 09:40 Holyflare wrote: like wtf kind of question is that "I know you made a list of mafia but if I'm not in it then who is mafia?"???????????? Step 1) Take your name off the list. Step 2) ??????????????????? What kind of redundant question are you asking? Considering I'm not Mafia, your perspective of the game could change???? Jesus... | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 18:31 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On December 29 2015 15:51 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Personal lynch candidates for tomorrow:
I don't really have good reasons to want to lynch HF yet other than him being the strongest active player I'm not townreading and some tone shit yet. Also need to go through Palmar a bit better. Personal don't ever lynch list:
Probably also don't lynch Vivax, GB and Ness though I'm getting a bit less sure of the latter. I kind of agree with the town part of this list, the exceptions being Damdred and SL. I think Koshi is very likely to be town, I know he can do the spiteful thing against Vivax as both alignments, but it seems more likely he's town because he genuinely doesn't give a fuck. Trfel said something I liked, I can't remember exactly what, but I remember him talking when I came to the thread yesterday. Rayn seems agitated/interested enough and I've already explained why ExO is town. I haven't really read Damdred, it feels like he's been sort of background-y throughout the game, and I just ignore everything SL says because he's bad. As for the mafia part, it's really 4 people I haven't read that much. If HF is calling me mafia he might be one though. TickTock I'd sheep for rayn if he asked me. OWS I haven't read but I can't remember a single thing he posted so he could very well be mafia. Or well, he said he liked me, I like that. I think I saw ritoky make a huge case on someone though I didn't read it in detail. I thought that in general tryhard ritoky is town, but it's not really a read, more of an assumption You don't portray this scum read on me in this post. What happened? Did you forget your read on me? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 29 2015 23:59 Palmar wrote: Did you intend to follow up on that GB? Actually, after I saw your response, it could be possible that you ignored that last part and it makes no sense to pursue anything out of that. I still can't understand how you can find me Mafia while not reading the game | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 02:08 rsoultin wrote: Town v town heard it here first :-) I prefer Hunter x Hunter Who are you talking about? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 02:38 rsoultin wrote: anywho i'll post reads either here or with coag before EoN, but we're leaving my brother off at the airport today so yeah i'm out again also @rayn...if my reads turn out to be better than yours when i'm not putting nearly as much effort into the game because of family time and whatnot, you really need to stop saying i'm playing bad meanie :/ You're not, you keep me calling scum even after the whole day1 went by. You should know better that I'm town | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 02:39 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 02:37 GlowingBear wrote: Why are you answering it in his place??? Because this is the THIRD time you've returned to this game and asked a question that has an answer a few pages before. It's just terrible. So what? What if he fabricated that read on you and post something conpleteky different from that post you've quoted? Why do you have to interfere when I try to get more information from palmar? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 02:41 Artanis[Xp] wrote: Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote: On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote: On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote: from HF: GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote: GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? Not Voting (24): Artanis[Xp], sicklucker, HolyFlare, Onegu, nooniansong, raynpelikoneet, Damdred, Waylanner, ExO_, Koshi, ritoky, rsoultin, MoosyDoosy, boxerfred, GlowingBear, Coagulation, Trfel, ObiWanShinobi, The Shining, Palmar, Tictock, Ness, Vivax, Alakaslam LMAO | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 02:51 boxerfred wrote: Show nested quote + On December 30 2015 02:49 nooniansoong wrote: On December 30 2015 02:47 boxerfred wrote: On December 30 2015 02:46 nooniansoong wrote: On December 30 2015 02:45 boxerfred wrote: On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote: On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote: On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote: On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote: from HF: GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote: GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33% You said HF is scum if GB flips town. That would imply that town/town is unlikely right? Yep, however when I said that, I didn't even consider town/town possibility, so I mentioned it in my follow up. So you changed your mind about wanting to lynch HF if GB flips town? Hm, hard to answer. I'd at least moderately consider a HF lynch as a consequence of a green GB flip. So you think HF is Mafia and I'm town, but would rather make me flip before you lynch HF?? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I'm lynching no one other than him | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 09:22 sicklucker wrote: Idk its probably the right play but at the same time we can just wait a day for the real gunsmith to claim and just lynch palmer and then be 100% sure. Might give are cop another check since onegu is pretty wifmo as well. i asked the mod something that should confirm him as mafia thats not in the op Why would a Mafia come to the thread day2 and claim a red check on someone? If he manages to lynch the guy, the guy flips town and a 1v1 trade happens. It doesn't make sense at all | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I was against a Hunter. I'm Paladin. He had Explosive Trap and I used Truesilver Champion. I had 2 health. I attacked him, activated the secret, then I've reached 0 health. Then my hero attacked him and gained +2 health and I won the game. WAT | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
I've been thinking and rethinking HF, and I think he is probably Mafia for his play on day1, scumreading Tictock but not going for his lynch, only when people decided to do the shenanigans. This play of taking the risk of hammering his scum partner to get towncred makes sense if you think about it. It's exactly the argument he is bringing to the table ("why would I try to hammer my partner at the EoD?"). + there was this point where he said I was setting up a lynch on him because Tictock was going to fljp Mafia. He KNEW Tictock was going to flip Mafia and used this to pre-emptively defend himself and fabricate a reason to go against me. There was also a post where he said "should I continue calling GB Mafia or stick to pushing the TMI reasons? Decisions decisions" which felt completely off. Palmar also came to the thread out of nowhere and had this unreasoned scum read on me reinforcing bad suspicions on me. It made no sense at all. His play has been extremely lackluster also, with apparently 0 interest in solving the game. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 02:33 Holyflare wrote: I thought your earliest presumption was that if TT was town I was mafia and now it's switched? Not to mention I correctly called out TT's alignment but didn't want to claim any credit for it throughout the whole game? Does that sound like mafia me? I don't think so. What you're also saying is that not only did I call TT mafia through the day and not voting him (but was telling people to stay on TT) I was successfully predicting shenanigans just so I could look good and be the hammer vote but just in time not to be. That's a lot of assumptions of me being prophetic. My presumption was that it doesn't make sense, from a townie perspective, to agree that someone is most likely mafia but not vote him when you have no other better target to pursue (Vivax claimed at that moment). So you've said Tictock was mafia but kept looking elsewhere to try and form a wagon on a townie (that townie = me). What gave me pause was that you actually couldn't possibly know if you did hammer Tictock or not. But again, since you've never voted him before, why deciding to hammer him at that moment? Well, if you hammer him, you gain towncred for killing a partner, if you don't, you can argue this exact thing you're arguing right now. And come on, you don't need to foresee the shenanigan's to do this. If you see it happening and you know you will look bad once TT flips, you go to the voting thread and hammer him. You don't have to plan this before hand and you know it. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 08:03 sicklucker wrote: im pretty sure the only reason they were not modkilled was because ff fucked off for new years and its just the assisstant mods doing the flip. but ya assisant mod you kill them here we had a fucking extended day no excuses. I have been mod killled THREE TIMES for forgetting to vote with no warning its fucking bad Each host treat it differently, SL. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 08:06 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On January 02 2016 08:05 sicklucker wrote: holyfalre i dont even care that your mafia im just siding with you this game. who we lynching first? Damdred and then onegu and I don't even care about their alignments. One | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 08:09 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On January 02 2016 08:09 GlowingBear wrote: Onegu should be shot tonight. Then we decide about Damdred. No you shoot damdred and lynch onegu. I don't have a gun. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 09:15 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On January 02 2016 09:12 Koshi wrote: I like how hf is pushing mafia agenda like a mad man in case onegu is mafia. He takes all the risk starting the fake claim shit and hf looks everywhere but at Onegu. Hilarious. At least Damdred is going full emo on him so hf needs to find another townie to lynch. Onegu needs to be lynched first. Always. I said none of them are mafia but you can somehow extrapolate random things from coherent sentences. You are GB tier. Funny thing coming from the guy who twists what I say 100% of the games we play together | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 02 2016 11:19 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On January 02 2016 11:15 GlowingBear wrote: On January 02 2016 09:15 Holyflare wrote: On January 02 2016 09:12 Koshi wrote: I like how hf is pushing mafia agenda like a mad man in case onegu is mafia. He takes all the risk starting the fake claim shit and hf looks everywhere but at Onegu. Hilarious. At least Damdred is going full emo on him so hf needs to find another townie to lynch. Onegu needs to be lynched first. Always. I said none of them are mafia but you can somehow extrapolate random things from coherent sentences. You are GB tier. Funny thing coming from the guy who twists what I say 100% of the games we play together I like how you haven't mentioned a single player in this game but me since day 1. You are almost certainly mafia based on your play and choice of posts the past few days. I cannot believe you did not mention TT or BF's posts from n1 once. I just cannot believe. I don't know what you mean, why should I have to mention any of their posts now? I've spoke way more that you guys make it sound. I've said I think Exo and SL are town. I've just retracted my scum read on Ness, and you, since, in fact, Tictock flipping town makes all my points against you moot again. I think we should shoot Onegu and discus Damdred tomorrow. If we keep thinking "oh, these guys might be town because it is too suicidal to do as Mafia" we open space to Mafia do anything that they want. Especially, if something is "too suicidal to be coming from Mafia", it turns out to be not suicidal at all, isn't it? I don't have a good idea about anyone else in the game. I've been skimming a lot through posts. I might take a better look at the thread tomorrow | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
It's so boring to come to the thread to see if there is something new to work with and actually see people arguing who's ego is bigger. Get over it and play the game, who cares who is better and who is worse | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 03 2016 04:11 Holyflare wrote: Show nested quote + On January 03 2016 04:01 GlowingBear wrote: Oh god guys, grow some balls. Game isn't over yet and we still can win unless you keep this boring show of "you're arrogant" "I'm not guilty" "I hate being in here" It's so boring to come to the thread to see if there is something new to work with and actually see people arguing who's ego is bigger. Get over it and play the game, who cares who is better and who is worse You know it would help if you posted content ![]() I've already put thoughts on what I think. Do you have anything specifically you want me to talk about? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
IM DRUNK OWS PALMAR AND SLUM SEE YOU TOMORROW | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 00:38 sicklucker wrote: wow im confirmed town. j/k needs to be on me or palmar tonight Why is palmar town? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 00:42 sicklucker wrote: Here ill do your jobs on reading me for you Show nested quote + On January 03 2016 11:09 sicklucker wrote: Also those nks are amazing. I probably would have considered lynching alot of them. like mafia killed vivax? I was gonna lynch him he didnt give any town tells in like 3 days Show nested quote + On January 03 2016 11:14 sicklucker wrote: someone should try to find out who was rolereading vivax. becuase that shot was out of nowhere I dumbtelled myself town here your welcome SL this can be easily faked and you know it. Also, I don't understand why is slam being voted over palmar. Actually, I don't even understand why is slam being scum read. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 06:48 Damdred wrote: Inb4claim | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 01:27 Damdred wrote: Show nested quote + On January 05 2016 00:58 GlowingBear wrote: On January 05 2016 00:42 sicklucker wrote: Here ill do your jobs on reading me for you On January 03 2016 11:09 sicklucker wrote: Also those nks are amazing. I probably would have considered lynching alot of them. like mafia killed vivax? I was gonna lynch him he didnt give any town tells in like 3 days On January 03 2016 11:14 sicklucker wrote: someone should try to find out who was rolereading vivax. becuase that shot was out of nowhere I dumbtelled myself town here your welcome SL this can be easily faked and you know it. Also, I don't understand why is slam being voted over palmar. Actually, I don't even understand why is slam being scum read. This implies that GB is town reading slam. There is no reason what so ever at this junction to be reading slam as anything but null to scum. GB says he has read the thread as he is commenting on present things so he should know this. It is more scum motivated of GB to act like this then town. I don't have a town read on slam Damdred, but I've also never seen a convincing argument on him. Why are people voting slam? Because he is slam? Because he can't be read? There are way more people that are in the shadows like slam and people simple seems to give townreads to them. Why the double standards? They didn't try since the beginning of the game. I came to the thread, decided to read filters today, but I was exhausted and slept all day long. I couldn't do it. I came to the thead and voted palmar because I think palmar is a way better lynch than slam, but I was also going to reevaluate this because part of my argument was associative with him being scum with HF and TT, and both flipped town. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 07:03 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Why is Palmar a better lynch than Slam? Palmar came to the thread very uninspiring pushing a lynch on me for God knows what reasons. He is way more insightful when he is town. Here he just came by the thread, agreed with HF and said I was a good lynch with no reason whatsoever. I fail to see him playing like this as town, I haven't seen him reevaluating me once. He never engaged me, he never commented on my stuff when I engaged a shitfight with HF. Just kept calling me scum. It doesn't make sense at all. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 07:13 Damdred wrote: You have read the thread right GB? I haven't been reading the thread closely, only skimmed from times to times. | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 07:22 Trfel wrote: Meh, I guess it'll have to do. Do I need to stick around or can I worry about this game later? Dude you've been reading me as town almost the entire game and now you're okay I'm gettinf lynched???? | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On December 30 2015 07:30 Artanis[Xp] wrote: + Show Spoiler [Lynch Palmar] + Town Rso Coag Rayn Damdred Trfel ExO_ Sicklucker Koshi Vivax Leaning Town N e s s GB Slam Kush Null MoosyDoosy Onegu ObviousOne Boxerfred The Shining Should be sorted out by night actions TicTock I should be more confident that you're town given what you've posted but I'm not and that worries me even more HolyFlare Ritoky You're supposed to be scum but I don't think you can be scum with Palmar so what are you ObiWanShinobi Lynch Palmar Palmar OWS has been just skating by and following thread sebtiment without putting any real input. He simply followed people into my lynch today. Note how quickly my wagon piled up and how quickly he was into putting his vote on me. So he has a good shot at being Mafia. I'm votinf him. ##Vote: OWS | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 05 2016 07:47 Palmar wrote: Show nested quote + On January 05 2016 07:46 ExO_ wrote: On January 05 2016 07:44 nooniansoong wrote: fuck meetings so hard. now i have to drive home. See how easy it was to get a majority on GB? That's because he's town. Ask yourself, who is the scumteam? Most of them are on GB. Switch to alakaslam. This is the last plea I will make. we dont have time/people to switch to slam. either switch to Palmar or we're gonna be stuck with GB We're not fucking switching to me. We're switching to slam if anything. Maybe NM or OO What the hell is your problem man. I'm not mislynching OO | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 17 2016 09:50 Palmar wrote: There is a lot of dumb rage in the Obs QT. People seem to forget that watching isn't the same as engaging. When Damdred is alive and Koshi isn't, I'll try to build my "towniness" in a way that I think will persuade damdred, and not give a fuck what might persuade koshi. I didn't just kill people who were right, I killed people who were right or I had little chance of convincing based on the state of the game. It's about systematically destroying leadership and initiative in town. I'm actually sort of more proud of this performance than when I just get everyone to townread me, because it's a more roundabout way of winning as mafia. My team played very well, thanks for a fun team guys. GG everyone Exactly, more than playing well, we had lots of fun and that was what made this game enjoyable for me. Thank you guys, thanks ritoky for awesome blue hunting partner, thanks slam for being slam <3, thanks onegu for the most awesome dumb fake claim of all times, and thanks Palmar for carrying. Gg town, games are like this, we can't win everytime no matter how good we play. Carry on. Let's have fun! | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 18 2016 00:26 justanothertownie wrote: Btw. you said the same things in your scum qt so I don't know what you are even talking about. Impressive btw. - that's how a mafia qt should look like. Good teamwork. The scum QT was the shit. Reminds me of the time me Damdred and ritoky were scum together. Onegu's fake claim gave all the excitement we needed to keep playing. It was cool. Also, discussing strategy is way more enjoyable than applying the strategy | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 18 2016 02:16 Holyflare wrote: Moral of this game just like every other. Stop fucking fake claiming. And no damdy yours wasn't bad tbh but if no one fake claimed in general shit like this game wouldn't happen. Well, Vivax claiming did fool Mafia | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 18 2016 10:54 sicklucker wrote: na are other scum team is still best scum team. We had a much harder draw that time around Palmar said best scum team 2016, not all times best | ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
| ||
GlowingBear
Brazil12446 Posts
On January 18 2016 11:33 disformation wrote: Palmar was nice enought to point it out here: Listen/Watch for like 30secs. ![]() EDIT: NEVERMIND I'VE SAW IT ROFL | ||
| ||
![]() StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Super Smash Bros Other Games Organizations Other Games StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War
StarCraft 2 • Berry_CruncH234 StarCraft: Brood War• AfreecaTV YouTube • intothetv ![]() • Kozan • IndyKCrew ![]() • LaughNgamezSOOP • Migwel ![]() • sooper7s League of Legends |
Sparkling Tuna Cup
AllThingsProtoss
WardiTV Spring Champion…
Fire Grow Cup
Online Event
BSL
Afreeca Starleague
Soulkey vs Scan
Barracks vs Light
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
PiGosaur Monday
[ Show More ] Afreeca Starleague
Sharp vs Speed
Jaedong vs BeSt
Rex Madness
Dark vs Bunny
Cure vs Zoun
Replay Cast
The PondCast
Replay Cast
Rex Madness
MaxPax vs Ryung
ByuN vs Rogue
Replay Cast
Korean StarCraft League
CranKy Ducklings
Replay Cast
|
|