|
oh also I think GB not reading the thread is NAI for him.
|
|
|
On December 30 2015 02:41 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? This isn't why I scum read him and it sure as shit isn't a soft push.
Well that's what I quoted from your huge list post. why do you scumread him then and why isn't it a soft push? lemme know I'm dumb
|
On December 30 2015 02:42 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
It's night bb
On December 29 2015 08:08 Fecalfeast wrote:
Rels the VT has been lynched!
Night will end in which is Tuesday, Dec 29 11:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00)
please submit all night actions to all three hosts.
Effective immediately Waylanner has been replaced by ObviousOne
this is what I meant it doesn't have a votecount
|
On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum.
hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33%
|
On December 30 2015 02:45 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. Because it's probably town/town and bf is posturing for next plays.
I call bullshit on you since you obviously missed this:
On December 30 2015 02:45 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33%
|
On December 30 2015 02:46 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:45 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33% You said HF is scum if GB flips town. That would imply that town/town is unlikely right?
Yep, however when I said that, I didn't even consider town/town possibility, so I mentioned it in my follow up.
|
On December 30 2015 02:46 Holyflare wrote:
PSA: if you're going to play this game without actually reading it at least put the effort in to read filters instead and fact check please??
Could you please not dodge this:
On December 30 2015 02:42 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:41 Holyflare wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? This isn't why I scum read him and it sure as shit isn't a soft push. Well that's what I quoted from your huge list post. why do you scumread him then and why isn't it a soft push? lemme know I'm dumb
|
On December 30 2015 02:49 nooniansoong wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:47 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:46 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:45 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33% You said HF is scum if GB flips town. That would imply that town/town is unlikely right? Yep, however when I said that, I didn't even consider town/town possibility, so I mentioned it in my follow up. So you changed your mind about wanting to lynch HF if GB flips town?
Hm, hard to answer. I'd at least moderately consider a HF lynch as a consequence of a green GB flip.
|
On December 30 2015 02:49 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:46 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:45 Holyflare wrote:On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. Because it's probably town/town and bf is posturing for next plays. I call bullshit on you since you obviously missed this: On December 30 2015 02:45 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:44 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? why is town/town unlikely? Couldn't HF just have a bad read?? Every time someone gets a read wrong it doesn't mean they are scum. hm? I'm not saying it's unlikely I bolded it for you. If you read it that way, sorry, I'm not thinking it's unlikely. it's prettymuch 33% Not only is the whole premise of your post wrong because that was palmar's list post but you don't have a grasp on the game to see that GB is basically the only person in the game I've made a real case on but you say I've only soft pushed him because for some reason you're pretending to fit in like you've read the game. You can't also call bullshit and say it's 33% when you say this sentence beforehand. It's posturing.
Damn you got me. I just go back into my lurky shadows and plan the night kill, okay?
|
|
|
On December 30 2015 02:52 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:48 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:46 Holyflare wrote:
PSA: if you're going to play this game without actually reading it at least put the effort in to read filters instead and fact check please?? Could you please not dodge this: On December 30 2015 02:42 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:41 Holyflare wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? This isn't why I scum read him and it sure as shit isn't a soft push. Well that's what I quoted from your huge list post. why do you scumread him then and why isn't it a soft push? lemme know I'm dumb I didn't dodge it it's not my list post. Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:43 Holyflare wrote:On December 30 2015 02:42 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:41 Holyflare wrote:On December 30 2015 02:40 boxerfred wrote:On December 30 2015 02:36 nooniansoong wrote:On December 30 2015 02:34 boxerfred wrote:from HF:
GlowingBear: called me out in a really awkward way yesterday and then got into a argument I think. The main thing is that he was reading a conversation about a thing, and then asked about the very thing the conversation was about. It's 100% clear he wasn't actually reading the part of the thread he asked about, he just saw something and ran with it. On December 30 2015 02:33 boxerfred wrote:
GB confirmed not reading but that's NAI for GB if GB flips town we should lynch HF sorry I don't follow. Why;s that? HF scumreads GB with the reason I quoted first ("from HF"), follows up on him just now as GB does not read the thread and asks for HF's read on Palmar. However HF already provided a huge list, containing his read on Palmar. So HF asks for a gun to shoot GB, implying GB is dumb. When asked who he'd shoot, he even says he'd shoot himself, raising irony to sarcarsm. So we have HF pushing GB (soft pushing imho). Good thing for scum. So if HF is right, cool, nice shot, one scum down. If HF is wrong and GB is town, then HF is probably doing a good scum move. So yeah, GB/HF is either town/scum, scum/town or town/town but not scum/scum imho. can we have a vote count? This isn't why I scum read him and it sure as shit isn't a soft push. Well that's what I quoted from your huge list post. why do you scumread him then and why isn't it a soft push? lemme know I'm dumb
Holy fucking shit that is Palmar's list. Like holy fucksicles batman. Come back when you've read this game because you will be lynched soon enough.
Oh oh still no answer  (((((
+ Show Spoiler +
|
|
|
no GB its more like this
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/1bvZXse.gif)
|
On December 30 2015 02:57 Holyflare wrote:
I'm not going to tell you something that you find out from reading the game bf. Or at least my filter since I've been your scum read all game.
"I'm not going to collaborate because you're saying I'm a bad person"
Reminds me of this
+ Show Spoiler +
|
On December 30 2015 02:58 nooniansoong wrote:boxer want to explain this? is it some meta where hf only plays well when she's town?
HF is maybe the best scum player here on TL
|
On December 30 2015 02:59 nooniansoong wrote:edwop boxer want to explain this? is it some meta where hf only plays well when she's scum?
On December 30 2015 02:59 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On December 30 2015 02:58 nooniansoong wrote:On December 28 2015 20:16 boxerfred wrote:
hf seems decent so shes scum boxer want to explain this? is it some meta where hf only plays well when she's town? HF is maybe the best scum player here on TL
|
On December 30 2015 03:00 Coagulation wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ORETsvC.gif?noredirect)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/wZidEWj.gif)
|
why am I read as scum by so few people Oo
|
playing with slam is apeshit
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/7hhIEXo.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/WYOaIgt.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/iXGdFNe.gif)
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/RGFaWYW.gif)
