EPTBack to filtering Rels.
Kita, I have a null to oh-so-slight townread on Superbia.
But Kita, other than me, who else are you scumreading?
[T][M] Resistance V - Section 31 - Page 98
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
Back to filtering Rels. Kita, I have a null to oh-so-slight townread on Superbia. But Kita, other than me, who else are you scumreading? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
ShoCkeyy
7815 Posts
On November 09 2015 05:48 Half the Sky wrote: I am here and I will be here until 11pm. Back to filtering Rels. Kita, I have a null to oh-so-slight townread on Superbia. But Kita, other than me, who else are you scumreading? And me, apparently he has a large list of scum reads. | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
Kita, I have a question. You are aware that sicklucker is tough to follow as either alignment and he contradicts himself a lot as either alignment. And if I recall correctly as town, you made a similar mistake to mislynch him in JOAT, and I did too (granted I was third party but I was looking to lynch mafia that day) we had trouble figuring him out. So how do you know you are not making the same mistake again? Why do you think his contradicting himself is mafia motivated? (or do you?) Or are you also partially scumreading sicklucker on the basis of other things? | ||
|
sicklucker
Canada16987 Posts
| ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 09 2015 05:48 Half the Sky wrote: I am here and I will be here until 11pm. Back to filtering Rels. Kita, I have a null to oh-so-slight townread on Superbia. But Kita, other than me, who else are you scumreading? Cannot wait =D But can you also answer this ? On November 08 2015 16:47 Rels wrote: That's why it sucks to answer a question so long after  the question was made just after your list, during the phase before the failure reveal, whatever the name of the the phase is.So I reformulate: if sl is mafia in this theory, why do you say at least 2 mafias were against the vote ? Here is the post in question: On November 06 2015 08:41 Half the Sky wrote: Ah got it James. <3 I'd say at least 2. I think maayyyybe one was smart enough to suck it up and pass? Could be SL for all we know. And that's a really good question to Shockey, Xata. How can you consider 2 mafia voting against the team AND SL being mafia, so the team being infiltrated, in the same sentence ? OK that's two sentences but I have no idea what the word is for that. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
| ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
And no I think I understood what you were trying to ask. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:34 Half the Sky wrote: Rels I mentioned disassociation to Xatalos earlier when he asked me a similar question but in case you think that's too tinfoily it's possible they might have had the room to do that if they could tell from others reads a flawed team would go through. And no I think I understood what you were trying to ask. OK basically you're saying that's possible two mafias are voting no because they know two townies that are not on the team will vote YES, so they can disassociate; in this case, you're saying they knew you and Arta would vote YES. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 03 2015 01:01 Rels wrote: I'm not sure you are. You're attacking people over small logical things and you are thinking about the game as a whole; that is town indicative, but I know you can replicate that as town; at least that what you and several other people claimed before. (I'm going to assume you actually meant "mafia" by the bolded and that was a mistake) On November 03 2015 01:37 Rels wrote: Cause he's attacking people over logical things, has hard townreads and is trying to solve the game as a whole. That's his town meta. I'm OK with him being part of the first team. Regarding your read progression on rayn, how were you sure day 1 that the above was town indicative (and not mafia) and how were you sure enough that "hard townreads" however they were, weren't mafia indicative? It is quite possible IMO for mafia to have hard townreads. (Now I realise you said meta, but how do you know - and especially for a player of that calibre - he's not breaking meta?) Post references - 448/496. (pages 5-6 of your filter) | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:40 Rels wrote: OK basically you're saying that's possible two mafias are voting no because they know two townies that are not on the team will vote YES, so they can disassociate; in this case, you're saying they knew you and Arta would vote YES. This is correct. I won't speak for Artanis but I thought I was pretty clear where I stood with who and how I'd vote certain teams. I mentioned at least twice this game (not sure if it was before or after the second mission vote tbh) that I was more concerned about being transparent as well. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
You said that Superbia lurking was akin to his town meta? Can you name any other games offhand that this would apply? I remember you said sometime in another game (campus mafia) he played a cancerous game but was he inactive in that game or any other you can remember? His posting as far as I can see - and with Xatalos discouraging his inclusion day 1 - I am pretty sure he's town. Where are you seeing his inactivity as alignment indicative? | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:40 Half the Sky wrote: (I'm going to assume you actually meant "mafia" by the bolded and that was a mistake) Regarding your read progression on rayn, how were you sure day 1 that the above was town indicative (and not mafia) and how were you sure enough that "hard townreads" however they were, weren't mafia indicative? It is quite possible IMO for mafia to have hard townreads. (Now I realise you said meta, but how do you know - and especially for a player of that calibre - he's not breaking meta?) Post references - 448/496. (pages 5-6 of your filter) 'cause that's how he has always played with me as town, and he didn't the one time I played with him as mafia. Everybody said he scum game is good and that one game was an exception though, that's why I was not sure. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:43 Half the Sky wrote: sicklucker are you here? You said that Superbia lurking was akin to his town meta? Can you name any other games offhand that this would apply? I remember you said sometime in another game (campus mafia) he played a cancerous game but was he inactive in that game or any other you can remember? His posting as far as I can see - and with Xatalos discouraging his inclusion day 1 - I am pretty sure he's town. Where are you seeing his inactivity as alignment indicative? EBWOP. Yikes, the bolded should actually be mafia not town. You said that Superbia lurking was his mafia meta....etc. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:41 Half the Sky wrote: This is correct. I won't speak for Artanis but I thought I was pretty clear where I stood with who and how I'd vote certain teams. I mentioned at least twice this game (not sure if it was before or after the second mission vote tbh) that I was more concerned about being transparent as well. Yep you were quite explicit about your vote. Not sure Arta was that transparent though. You might want to check that out before suggesting this hypothesis. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:43 Half the Sky wrote: sicklucker are you here? You said that Superbia lurking was akin to his town meta? Can you name any other games offhand that this would apply? I remember you said sometime in another game (campus mafia) he played a cancerous game but was he inactive in that game or any other you can remember? His posting as far as I can see - and with Xatalos discouraging his inclusion day 1 - I am pretty sure he's town. Where are you seeing his inactivity as alignment indicative? Pretty sure he said it was his scum meta. Like 90% sure. | ||
|
Rels
France13467 Posts
Artanis; that's two times you postponed something to talk the day after. You better explain your thought process the minute you come back to the thread after voting is done. | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:45 Rels wrote: Pretty sure he said it was his scum meta. Like 90% sure. Yeah I know I actually corrected myself (#1955)  | ||
|
Half the Sky
Germany9029 Posts
On November 09 2015 06:47 Rels wrote: Alright going to sleep now. Have fun with my filter. (= Artanis; that's two times you postponed something to talk the day after. You better explain your thought process the minute you come back to the thread after voting is done. Could it be because he's scumreading you? IDK. | ||
| ||
