Student Mafia XVI

On October 16 2015 02:03 Half the Sky wrote:
/out

Two-week travel coming up, and unlikely I'll be able to keep up with things, even as a coach.

On October 17 2015 05:48 MoosyDoosy wrote:
I worry that when Eversince rolls Mafia, it'll be a bit too easy to know. I just can't see her replicating her town style. o.O

On October 18 2015 11:35 The Shining wrote:
And yay GB is trying to get the game started. Let's see...

I agree with the Farah read. I agree that that question would've been better off in the scumQT if she rolled scum and it is a WIFOM argument but the timing of it seemed genuinely curious and not holding back in her questioning of Moosy and GBs jokes is another town point. As far as the tunneling goes, keeping in mind she's a newer player, I could understand the hesitance to look more broadly because she's being asked to do so by GB, who she suspected could be scum. I wouldn't want to cooperate with someone I think is scum, either.

Sigh. My openings are always horrendous, especially in town games. Thanks for noticing. The joke phase isn't something I've ever really been apart of and not something I'm a huge fan of, but seeing as how it was the only thing going on, I didn't want to just sit around and not post. I find it a little odd, though, that you pick on my horrendous opening but then find my Scott post very okay. I guess it makes sense if you still have me at null, though.

Moosy is pretty null to me right now. His banter is NAI to me and the picking a meta talk seemed like it was just more of him trying to keep the joke phase up but the longer he does things like that without actually scum hunting, the more I'll suspect him. I didn't like the threatening to not care, either, but knowing he has double bussed to win a game before(meaning he cared enough to do so) makes it NAI, as well.

Not sure about Kels, either. You might be right but before I go into it, I'd like to know if he was actually serious about that post. Kelsier can you answer this for me?

I'd like Vonthin to answer what I asked, too, before I go too in-depth on him but from what I've seen so far, he could just be frustrated town not knowing how to deal with a slow day start.

Overall I'd give GB a slight townlean just for making this post and trying to push discussion, as I agree with a few things in the post. GB what do you think of boxerfreds entrance? Why wasn't he included in your list?

On October 19 2015 05:13 FarahBlackwing wrote:


Why not explain a bit more?

On October 19 2015 05:17 The Shining wrote:


Oh this ought to b fun. Please do explain my 180 on GB since I have no idea what you're talking about.

On October 19 2015 05:20 Fecalfeast wrote:

Is KSC the lynch? He's actually trying to play this game

On October 19 2015 05:23 Fecalfeast wrote:
Ok so playing traffic cop between farah and moose is which? (filler/mucking up the thread)

On October 19 2015 05:38 FarahBlackwing wrote:


Town:
Ksc
Fatah

Null
GB

Scum
Sl
The other newb

On October 19 2015 05:40 Fecalfeast wrote:



You ignored my request for actual scummy posts

On October 19 2015 05:45 Fecalfeast wrote:

Why don't you ask him?

On October 19 2015 05:56 Fecalfeast wrote:
Ok and does my not explaining my reads to your satisfaction make me scum?

On October 19 2015 02:06 KelsierSC wrote:





I get the impression you are more concerned with reading Rels town than you are finding scum here.

On October 19 2015 02:11 KelsierSC wrote:


I don't remember asking you a god damn thing

On October 19 2015 02:15 KelsierSC wrote:


There was actually no question involved , the impression I got from your posting is you were more concerned with letting people know you think Rels is town than actually hunting scum. which is an incorrect priority.

like bf is weird and probably, scum , yeh scott could be scum. BUT FUCKING RELS IS TOWN HOLY COW.

maybe but idgaf

On October 19 2015 02:19 KelsierSC wrote:
for an actual question, what's your opinion of the new guy, vonthin?

On October 19 2015 02:44 KelsierSC wrote:


well just to speed things up for you or jog your memory.
you asked him this. along with a lot of other stuff you typed.



In his response he gave a big list of everyone as promised.



Most of this disagrees with your reads.

So asking for someones opinion on the entire game, having them disagree with you, call you scum.

I think "null someone said something" is a lame response. Unless you just asked the question without caring for the response

On October 19 2015 02:47 KelsierSC wrote:


i already said this response is inadequate. it doesn't make sense to have just "null someone said stuff" when YOU are asking him questions.

i don't see where you townread him?

On October 19 2015 02:53 KelsierSC wrote:


who is he?

On October 19 2015 02:57 KelsierSC wrote:


oh right i just didn't see his name.

My issue is you asked him a pretty big question, literally "what is your opinion on everyone so far" clearly because you want to develop a read on the guy. Then he makes his big list post, which totally disagrees with a lot of your reads, calls you scum in it.
And rather than actually follow up or make any specific noise , i have to ask you about him and you respond just like "yeh he's null i guess but some guy said something else i should check"

for someone who is so keen on "getting a town circle" and how important that is to you it doesn't fit at all and to me it looks like you were just spamming to spam and not actually caring.

On October 19 2015 03:02 KelsierSC wrote:


you splurge pretty much everything else.

So just to have your story down, you asked a guy to give his entire list of reads, when he did and they didn't line up with anything you had, rather than say anything you just moved on, said "eh he's null i guess I will check out what that other guy said"

On October 19 2015 03:03 KelsierSC wrote:


so why ask him to give an entire list of reads if you aren't going to bother looking through it?

On October 19 2015 03:06 KelsierSC wrote:


nah i got what I needed.

On October 19 2015 03:07 KelsierSC wrote:


well to be honest the list is more important to you than anyone since you were the person who asked for it.
I shouldn't have to command you to do it.

On October 19 2015 03:10 KelsierSC wrote:


I mean he did it 14 hours ago I thought you might have given it more than a cursory glance. considering you asked him for it to start with.
when you get a moment then i will await your thoughts I don't want to stop you doing whatever it is you are doing.

On October 19 2015 03:20 KelsierSC wrote:
just to speed this along

Farah is saying "you shouldn't have strong scum reads based on no interaction

not "you should have no scum reads"

moosy disagrees with you Farah

in general as a new who hasn't played in lots of games with moosy or anyone using meta from past games wont help you well.

On October 19 2015 06:13 Fecalfeast wrote:

'kind of bad'

come on give it to me! I want something with real emotion! Why am I scum? You started posting right around the same time as I came back to thread, why is my inactivity with NAI excuses worse than your inactivity? Why is my goading you for fun scummy when I missed the fun joke around phase?


Who would you kill if you had a gun right now?

On October 19 2015 06:19 KelsierSC wrote:
so every post I made is mafia?

On October 19 2015 06:21 Fecalfeast wrote:

I did it already though

On October 20 2015 04:02 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Its the only case in this thread that's any substantial length, but you can post.

Gi read it now or you are throwing the game basically.

On October 20 2015 00:52 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Hello and good morning, I believe that Eversince is the best lynch today and here are the reasons why.

Firstly we look at the entrance post that he makes about TheShining.



Seems a bit interesting on the surface except shining has been getting a bit of attention from most of the thread. It also lacks some of the context that is going on at that time in the thread. On its own its not a big deal and with follow up it could be good. [green] Yeh, and I noticed it too. Sorry it took me until yesterday to start reading the game. I didn't have internet at my house so I went to the library to avoid getting modkilled for not doing so.



And then Eversince immediately jumps to putting some shade onto FecalFeast. But then does ask Shining about his 180 on GB.

Shining answers and this is the response



After this shining answers again but Eversince ignores him and never even goes back to his scum read on him instead choosing to focus on FF and Kelsier. In context and with shinings answer it does seem like Eversince isn't reading the thread as thoroughly as they could be.

His tift with me comes down to how he is reading FecalFeast, when pressed for a better explanation these posts were the response.
I missed Shinings post entirely because I was busy trying to type my butt off because people wanted my explanation on Kelsier. Now I must admit I think I may have just taken the interaction wrong, is it impossible to believe why I'd think that way? I will be more than happy to expand on my thought process, in the night, at the time if I'm still alive.

+ Show Spoiler +

Now in this mess of quotes is the sequence of events. Tries to put scum on FecalFeast for unexplained reads does not seek to understand where the reads come from only try to make him look scummy, when he is confronted/pressured to explain his stance he does to some degree. Still thinks FecalFeast is scummy by the end of interactions but thinks that FecalFeast isn't worth a lynch because he isn't "playing".

Fecal had 3 post at the time. 2 complete filler. 1 naming random people for seemingly no better reason than to say their names. How is that me painting him as scum? It looked terrible. He was obviously in the thread, so calling him out to get him talking so I can expand on it to adjust my reads makes me anti town in what way?

His interactions with Kel are just as strange, loads up the argument he has with moosdoosy and writes a narrative to explain why it is scummy but when hes confronted by Kelsier if all of his posts are scummy he is answered that some of his posts Eversince likes, but votes him anyway.

Re previous statement about Kelsier. I'm not sure anymore but at the time I had very little time to work with, posting my thoughts about who my top mafia reads and trying to explain on how I came to them is strange how?

I think hes scum but heres a condensed version.

TLDR:
1) Only comes into the thread to fling discord and soft push people to see what would take off. You can see this within the posts on Shining, FecalFeast and Kelsier (who he settles on)

Only came into the thread from p8 after a 30 minute walk to the library to play the game. Reads the entire game. Makes deductions and shared them.

2) There is a lack of curiosity and trying to figure out peoples alignments, we see this with how he reacts to FF reads instead of trying to figure out why he has the reads that he does. Instead he latches on and tries to paint him as scummy as can be without even asking why until all the people who are active including FecalFeast tells him to ask Fecal why he had those reads.

Lack of time... I made my decisions, picked my top reads at the time and choose one to run for. It was either this or no vote which seemed real stupid, but in hindsite I'm getting lynched anyway so yeh, sorry town. I played bad. Fecal is explained above.

3) Seems to not be reading the thread at a decent clip, for example his ribbing of shining about the generic read on myself. He was one of the first people to post that reasoning so it can't really be generic. It also seems like he didn't read FecalFeast read post or some of the context in the kelsier posts.

Openly admitted to not reading the thread in my first post.Missed Shining responses, I'll go back later if I'm not toast. Thanks for thinking my thought process wasn't trash though..

4) Forgetting scum reads to move onto another, look at how he handles the shining and it seems like hes coming out of the gates to scum him, but has no real interaction with him to a point. And even though shining is here ignores him after one response when there is valuable information to be gained. Does nothing with the scum lean but settle on other people.

Not forgot, just didn't have time to write two things, whilst talking, and trying to digest everything I had just read.

5) Uneven treatment of Kelsier posting, He weighs the "fight" or questioning of Moosdoosy by Kelsier heavier than the rest of the filter trying to make him look like scum.

I picked 1 out of my top 3 guesses and wrote a case. Lynch me for it I suppose.

I think we have found scum and I invite everyone to vote Eversince with me

##Vote Eversince

On October 20 2015 04:35 sicklucker wrote:


its the two people who always get lynched

On October 20 2015 04:41 sicklucker wrote:
oh wow im def voting eversince now

On October 20 2015 04:51 FarahBlackwing wrote:
My case is good could sheep me

On October 20 2015 05:02 MoosyDoosy wrote:
LoneMeow comes off looking gross from this but I don't know why he voted for scott and not Eversince in this situation unless they're scum buddies or if both scott and Eversince were town.

On October 20 2015 05:11 KelsierSC wrote:


right...so you thought moosy and I were having this massive "shitfight" as mafia partners? because your whole argument against me, and to a lesser extent scum read of shining sort of shows you were town reading him.

On October 20 2015 05:21 FarahBlackwing wrote:
What's the point of blindly trusting thread instead of pushing any of your own reads that others share.

Or you obviously got up to the point in the thread where I had my case, or you were lurking and saw me push you. So you wasted your time instead of catching up.

so yesh

On October 20 2015 05:22 KelsierSC wrote:


if you didn't scumread him why did you post that you would have lynched him?

On October 20 2015 05:11 KelsierSC wrote:


right...so you thought moosy and I were having this massive "shitfight" as mafia partners? because your whole argument against me, and to a lesser extent scum read of shining sort of shows you were town reading him.

On October 20 2015 05:36 KelsierSC wrote:


I guess I would like some kind of concise and clear train of thought that makes this happen.

So you don't really play the game to start with then you say you managed to catch up with the whole thread. After that you say shining is scum for his opening post and ff is scum for giving his list of reads. Then you decide that I was the biggest scum of the game but rather than actually having a reason you then go and dig back through my filter trying to find things to call me scummy for, you take almost each post I do and call me mafia, which you now admit were all bad reasons. After I dispute all those reasons you just disappear. But this was all an attempt to make it seem like you were contributing?

You don't say anything about moosy even though he was the biggest spammer who you didnt't like.

You then return around deadline time to shove a vote on scott.

Perhaps you can see why i'm "confused" and i'd probably ask why I shouldn't lynch you.

On October 20 2015 06:25 MoosyDoosy wrote:

Why didn't you post anything about me at all when you were so willing to lynch me?

On October 19 2015 06:33 KelsierSC wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

I don't really know you that well and you have never seen me play town so let me just explain what is happening as you seem to be having a lot of trouble with a coherent thought.

I was asking moosy questions because I felt his response was inadequate and I was pushing him for it. His play didn't make sense to me and I wanted him to answer for it. I believe you said this



The post you are referencing there is actually the first time I brought this issue up so I don't really see how this says "everything i've already said again".
Entirely true. I misremembered stuff while I was reading vs tpying.
I wanted moosy to give more. I am still waiting on him to give more. I would counter and ask how questioning moosy and forcing him to give more on vonthin is in anyway different to you forcing FF to give more on his reads.
Yeh, but compare the methods here. You two ate up pages of the thread over something that wasn't going to happen. My prod of Fecal was entirely justified in comparison as he had 4 (Been confusing this for three. Correcting myself since I've gone through the thread again.) post since the game started. 3 complete filler post, and one post where he randomly list off names with no premise. I understand I think I misjudged, over emphasized and took your two conversations in a really bad light, but my exchange with Fecal (who's literally posted nothin' at this point) and Moosy (who I assume to have a big post count (granted most of his at this point is pointless)) isn't comparable. Moosy either will eventually respond or you can make conclusions for why he's not.
moving on, I believe you also made points about "forced rage" or something like that, the "i don't remember asking you a god damn thing" is a movie quote. the capitalisation in the other post is a paraphrase of moosy's post. In either case you haven't explained how this rage is forced or even if it really exists. but i suppose it's a nice buzzword to throw in.
You seemed upset for the purpose of continueing an agenda. I think its more that you were frustrated at not getting an answer. I may of been guilty of doing exactly the same thing honestly if Fecal had not updated about his reads. I probably would have hard tunneled him then and there.
I believe next you called me mafia for traffic copping but not traffic copping. Simply put farah and moosy were not understanding points and I clairified it to move things along, I then explained to Farah why using meta on someone you have never played with is a bad idea. ok maybe he has a coach who gave him this advice, maybe not. I feel it needed to be said. is my advice bad? why does this make me mafia?
At best, asumming I'm right in guessin' that I was entirely wrong, you stopped Farah/Moosy from mucking up the thread. That's good. I can get that now. Following up by mucking up the thread with You/Moosy just didn't seem right to me. Giving Farah advice is NAI I guess
so to sum up. your push on me comes down to you thinking I "faked rage", that I pushed on moosy too much, and I clarified a situation and gave some advice to a newbie. Apparently this is

"JUST TOO MUCH" and so you feel you have to vote me.

Interesting.

On October 20 2015 23:25 GlowingBear wrote:


Sicklucker scumreading lone meow and wasting his vote on him without trying to convince people to vote with him was scummy. He coming back to the thread and voting scott instead of Eversince may imply he was saving his scum partner by hammering town scott. Or he simply saw me criticising him for wasting his vote and voted one of the main wagons to look good.

My point on sicklucker is: if he really thought lone meow was mafia to the point of keeping his vote on him until the very end, he should've be trying to convince people to vote lone meow. If his scum read on lone meow wasn't that strong, he should've used his time to evaluate the main wagons instead of not caring for the lynch the major part of the day.

On October 21 2015 05:03 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Lm wasn't a bad shot at all good ml target taken off the board.

On October 21 2015 05:10 boxerfred wrote:

I don't even get half of what you're saying because it's really annoying to read through a quoted post with strangely placed spoilers. Point out what you want me to answer and I'll answer.

On October 21 2015 05:13 Rels wrote:

Vig used his shot. He is not a power role anymore. He is just a named VT.
There is no need to protect a names VT.
Die.

On October 21 2015 06:46 FarahBlackwing wrote:
Tired of sending stuff in to early.

The easiest answer is von is the disinterested scum at this juncture with how he came in voted left little on the table and seems to not care. But this could come just as easily from town it seems (lonemeow) as it could from scum. So I would probably suggest not lynching von today and looking elsewhere. However if von is scum it's highly probable that eversince is town.

The second easiest thing (and what I think we should do) is lynch moos. He didn't really care who got lynched yesterday as evidenced by not really pushing his preference of boxer past a point and then saying well I'll just sheep onto Scott who his top scum read was in. This is highly suspicious and his other play during the game seems scum indicative and his pushing off of ever will shed light on her alignment if he flips scum.

I've said plenty about ever before now so just read my case. But there is a direct possibility that it was a town v town wagon and scum just didn't care where votes went.

I'm not sure about fecal or boxer I have t read more.

But that's where I am atm

On October 22 2015 03:55 GlowingBear wrote:


It's not about WHAT you said, it is about the initial disinterest you had on the claim.

I mean, there was a claim AND a counter claim but instead of dropping any discussion you were having to give thoughts about it, you kept pushing Boxerfred. I would expect a townie to immediately react to the claims. Unless you know both their alignmebts, so it is disinteresting

On October 22 2015 03:58 Eversince wrote:


I didn't know what the claim vs the counter claim meant. So I tried to think about what it could mean, then brought what my thoughts to the thread. I put a confirmed town on Sick when he claimed, changed it to a confirmed mafia read when Rels countered and Sick admitted to not being the vig. Then everyone said the claim is NAI so I tried to think on why you would do it as town and couldn't figure it.

On October 22 2015 06:19 Fecalfeast wrote:
Can you provide a sample of what you mean? I feel the exact same as last game.

On October 22 2015 06:41 Rels wrote:

Is this true ?

On October 22 2015 09:20 sicklucker wrote:
as in stfu im not telling you my role pm

On October 22 2015 09:32 sicklucker wrote:


i have a role pm that says i am either a vet/vt or cop im not going to help mafia know...

On October 22 2015 10:10 The Shining wrote:
So Eversince once again completely ignores my response to her and just comes off of me to vote SL for some weird sorting BS. When the way it looks like to me is just trying to wifom the scumteam.

Also this is why I really don't give two shits about this game. Every time I'm in this thread I either get scummed or ignored. It's quite fun.

On October 22 2015 10:11 sicklucker wrote:


when theres a close vote its common sense to check the players alignments involved so we can solve the game with vote logic. Knowing your alignment is the most important peice of information town can have in this game. im glad I have it

On October 22 2015 10:23 The Shining wrote:


I freaking voted you. I shouldn't have to ask you to interact with me after you vote me and I vote you for the same reasons I voted you D1. You should be noticing and doing this on your own, not just slamming a vote on me and then moving onto a completely different topic and vote RE: SL

On October 20 2015 05:00 Blazinghand wrote:


scott31337 (7): KelsierSC, Rels, boxerfred, MoosyDoosy, GlowingBear, Fecalfeast, Eversince, Lonemeow
Eversince (5): FarahBlackwing, The Shining, scott31337, Vonthin, GlowingBear
LoneMeow (1): sicklucker, boxerfred
KelsierSC (0): GlowingBear, LoneMeow, Eversince
Vonthin (0): Fecalfeast
sicklucker (0): GlowingBear
boxerfred (0): MoosyDoosy
GlowingBear (0): MoosyDoosy

Not voted (0):

Currently, scott31337 is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends at Monday, Oct 19 8:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in .

Voting is mandatory! Voting is done here in this thread. PM the hosts if the vote count is not correct.

On October 22 2015 05:38 Eversince wrote:
+ Show Spoiler +

Progression is you obviously are mafia reading him before lynch. Change votes but still are questioning him. Vote with him anyway, even as a mafia read. Can't be bothered to even read the thread. Then give him a town read. Right then.

Combine that on top of this:
Spamming a bunch, gets into a big fight with Kelsier over not fleshing out why he has a read that he had.
Didn't seem to care about the lynch.
Never ends up answering Kelsier.
Changes out spamming for one liners and never does follow up.
Drops his main scum read and can't even be bothered to properly read the thread. Ignoring is previous mafia post is just curious.
His vote on me is is a meta read.
Continuing to do nothing so far.

##Vote: MoosyDoosy

On October 23 2015 03:00 Rels wrote:

No. Townies do not forget their scumreads. He was one of your two scumreads. He answered directly to you, saying he would answer your question later and didn't.
Find me a town game where you forgot about a scumread please. Quotes would be appreciated.

On October 23 2015 03:25 GlowingBear wrote:


But you have to show us you have being convinced by something reasonable. Because we need to see your thought process behind it.

What convinced you Vonthin could be mafia?

On October 23 2015 03:27 Fecalfeast wrote:

Rels' team

On October 19 2015 17:57 Fecalfeast wrote:
##vote vonthin

His filter is the worst out of all the filters.

Runners up:
scotty
Lonemeow
Eversince


I'd like you to elaborate on what makes this post so bad that KDC is scum for it please

On October 23 2015 03:28 Fecalfeast wrote:

I don't. I'm sheeping baaa

On October 23 2015 03:44 sicklucker wrote:


you cant say I didnt push my scum read.. I was lobbying for shennanies but no one was biting and I even still voted him in protest ( and because my vote didnt matter)

On October 23 2015 03:50 Rels wrote:

I really really really want to lynch that

On October 23 2015 04:05 FarahBlackwing wrote:
And why is ever being town read now?

On October 23 2015 04:40 The Shining wrote:


Moosy posted some BS about asking to be 3rd lurker out of the woods.

On October 23 2015 04:49 Rels wrote:

I kinda think that too.

On October 23 2015 05:07 Rels wrote:

Association if Vonthin is scum.

D1:

On October 23 2015 05:58 The Shining wrote:
SL/Boxerfred/prob ES

On October 23 2015 06:06 The Shining wrote:


Not completely. You were abrasive and aggressive last game and you've been a pretty much non factor this game. SL hard towns you and you keep saying SL is scum but youve done nothing about it. Note that the last time we went head to head as town, you had some support and not many ppl believed I was town. And you hammered it into oblivion. This time around, you backed off and yet you still think I'm scum with weak to no proof. It's like you want someone else to push my mislynch so you can jump on it and say you thought I was scum all along.

Boxer I shouldn't have to repeat myself. I said why he could be scum before the flip even happened. He was an off wagon voter and did nothing to save his "townread" in Moosy, even though now he says he had Moosy as a townlean early into D2. Which means he had more time to convince himself Moosy was town and more time to defend him. But he chose to just waste his vote instead.

On October 23 2015 06:27 sicklucker wrote:
i woulda voted scott d1 if it was a closer vote. i said this in thread

On October 20 2015 05:00 Blazinghand wrote:


scott31337 (7): KelsierSC, Rels, boxerfred, MoosyDoosy, GlowingBear, Fecalfeast, Eversince, Lonemeow
Eversince (5): FarahBlackwing, The Shining, scott31337, Vonthin, GlowingBear
LoneMeow (1): sicklucker, boxerfred
KelsierSC (0): GlowingBear, LoneMeow, Eversince
Vonthin (0): Fecalfeast
sicklucker (0): GlowingBear
boxerfred (0): MoosyDoosy
GlowingBear (0): MoosyDoosy

Not voted (0):

Currently, scott31337 is set to be lynched. Day 1 ends at Monday, Oct 19 8:00pm GMT (GMT+00:00) in .

Voting is mandatory! Voting is done here in this thread. PM the hosts if the vote count is not correct.

On October 25 2015 02:13 GlowingBear wrote:
I'll sheep you Rels. I'm burned out and I have no motivation to put more effort here. I'll whoever you want to lynch today

On October 25 2015 02:13 GlowingBear wrote:
I'll sheep you Rels. I'm burned out and I have no motivation to put more effort here. I'll whoever you want to lynch today

On October 26 2015 00:36 FarahBlackwing wrote:
I'm not Really discrediting you rels, if I'm to be honest I just don't have a great faith in you being able to get off tunnels.

On October 26 2015 01:33 FarahBlackwing wrote:
The funny thing is I'm not jumping on boxer because it's the wrong play lol.

His claim is obviously false but it is what it is.

And I'm probably to harsh on rels, which I apologize for. But you do have a tunnel problem that the slightest thing make you initiate and ignores everything else.

On October 26 2015 01:33 FarahBlackwing wrote:
The funny thing is I'm not jumping on boxer because it's the wrong play lol.

His claim is obviously false but it is what it is.

And I'm probably to harsh on rels, which I apologize for. But you do have a tunnel problem that the slightest thing make you initiate and ignores everything else.

On October 26 2015 01:55 Vonthin wrote:
There is no reason for the doctor to counter role claim in this situation. If you really are the doctor and we end up lynching FF then scum just kill you at night and they will most likely win after that. FF is town even without the claim, he has been playing the game and making good reads. You have been scumming it up for the whole game.

Also ES you have been just counter tunneling Farah the whole game so I don't know how you can say that lol

Farahs point is correct about lynching the RB but I think the chances are just as good for GB to be the RB as ES

On November 01 2015 05:40 MoosyDoosy wrote:

You were right tho. Your game was totes different from your town game. XD

On November 01 2015 06:34 KelsierSC wrote:
pretty clutch plays in the final day good job guys.

Was a pretty fun game overall even though I only got to play one day. Vonthin's bus D1 really threw me off.

I hope everyone sticks around and plays more games on the site.

On November 01 2015 06:38 KelsierSC wrote:


well it was D1 so i'm not sure what information you are talking about but I don't think that lynch was bad, disregarding the fact he was town.

On November 01 2015 06:58 KelsierSC wrote:


I know you couldn't help it in this game but AFK'ing is generally a bad idea.

On November 01 2015 08:35 KelsierSC wrote:


yeh she probably thought I was mafia even though she knew everyone's alignment