[M][T] Crossfire Mafia - Page 29

On October 14 2015 23:42 MoosyDoosy wrote:
The thing that all of you seem to have difficulty understanding - is that there are 3 factions here. So using standard lists like narrowing it down to a few scum is useless. What you have to do - is find other people not in your faction and lynch them. There's no point in lists saying these people are Mafia because there is 3rd party here. Night will be interesting but it unfortunately looks like I won't be around for it. The thing is that I'm plenty sure that Superbia isn't town. And everyone that I've listed otherwise is probably 3rd party or Mafia. That's how I've been formulating my reads. I listed a bunch of people I didn't like because this isn't a 3 man team we have to kill, it's two different teams. On that note, the reason why I've been buddying with a bunch of different people is because they're useful even if they're not town with me. Even if we convince 3p to kill Mafia or Mafia to kill 3p it's still a gain for town. This is the correct mindset to have.

Which is why it's infinitely worse for those people who are trying to treat this like your classic game and try to act as townie as possible with standard lists (Superbia).

On October 14 2015 22:15 GlowingBear wrote:
Everyone NOT scum reading cop cake, please explain so.

She scum reads Rels for no good reason, proceeds to scum read me with the basis on an unflipped association with Rels, then forgets Rels and push me instead of, you know, going against her main scum read (which, under her logic, his flip would confirm my alignment, and not the opposite).

I see no townie following this logic

On October 15 2015 01:25 Xatalos wrote:
Btw I'm not sure how strict the rules for non-voting are, but CopCake's vote didn't count because it was only something like "#name". Or was it even a vote? Anyways, people should probably vote correctly before the deadline hits...

Tictock: I'm not really sure about you yet. Maybe a part of it could be the contradictory feelings about your push on me. On the other hand, it's hard to feel it being town-motivated when I'm town, but when you think about it, it's not like I'm a very good target to push for anti-town. The reasons also aren't absolute trash like some players (CopCake, MoosyDoosy etc.) have presented. Still I feel there's definitely a bias to present null-leaning things more negatively than they should be, but it's hard to say if that's town or anti-town tunneling for the time being.

The list's value isn't great right now, but I just wrote it down for later. At LYLO it could prove to be crucial, for example (as a piece to the puzzle of figuring out the factions).

On October 14 2015 21:45 MoosyDoosy wrote:

I really really want to be. Also with you. We should totally make rayn give us a game where we're all scum again. This time I prmise not to double bus. maybe.~~

On October 15 2015 03:19 CopCake wrote:
The fuck I am town, you fucktards.

I already explained my reads but I wont make a "fancy post" about them, I do say I feel this is "carefree" or like if the post doesnt seem like it doesn't have a mafia agenda or a third party one.

WHO THE FUCK SAID THAT I DONT GO FOR LURKERS?

I HAVE SUPERBIA AS SCUM, DUH!!! you are lying.

I also never said that rels is town, where do you get that idea rels? you are mafia or third party with Glowing Bear

##Glowingbear

On October 15 2015 03:42 CopCake wrote:
Hey rels, where I said YOU ARE TOWN? huh huh huh?

On October 14 2015 23:26 Rels wrote:

This is a super good idea.


Fuck I misread this! I thought Copcake said "I think Rels is town though", and that was a ridiculous switch.
OK so she's actually saying "GB is scum because he thinks Rels is scum". That's still super bad:
- why is she not voting me
- why did she doubt it was a unflipped association
- it wasn't her original case; her original idea was "Rels suspects GB => Rels answers GB's questions => they're scum together", which is false since when I answered GB's questions, I wasn't suspecting him anymore
- it doesn't explain why I am mafia, which is the center of her accusation

On October 15 2015 03:25 Rels wrote:
No shit. Once again you're not reading.
You said I was suspecting GB but I was answering his questions, when I rescinded my suspicions two posts after raising them
You said I said you townread me, when I also already realized that mistake
YOU should be reading my fucking posts