Do you have any reasons to scum read Scott other than reasons you aren't allowed to talk about?
Newbie Student Mafia XIV: Firefly - Page 161
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
Do you have any reasons to scum read Scott other than reasons you aren't allowed to talk about? | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
| ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
| ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
On September 19 2015 23:42 MoosyDoosy wrote: So you're saying you're not taking something into account that could have been a slip? Hm...I'll stop pressing the topic if it makes you that uncomfortable. Someone please explain to me how this post comes from anyone other than Mafia. There is 0 reason for town MD to make this post. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
| ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
That makes so much sense to me. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:18 MoosyDoosy wrote: I just don't see why you wouldn't take into account something that could have been a possible slip. O.O Are you actually trying to get yourself modkilled? | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
??? Your latest posts also bring up things I already answered. And if you don't recall, that's basically how I saw CopCake as Mafia this whole time. I think you'll understand if i'm immediately suspicious about people bringing up answered issues because it seems to be happening an awful lot this whole game. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
| ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:20 Fidei86 wrote: From my view this is actually quite straightforward. Slam moves onto Scott. I make noises about how it could be Scott. Moosy, out of literally nowhere, says it could be Scott. His only reasons are things he is literally forbidden by the rules from talking about or taking into account. He NKs me, then gets on the Scott wagon and wins. That makes so much sense to me. Again, I already shared my suspicions on scott early on. Just because the reasons are "forbidden" doesn't mean that they're still not suspicions lol. In fact, I was the first person to be suspicious of scott. THEN it was NocturneMage, THEN Alakaslam, THEN you. There's a reason why I was so skeptical about Slam being suspicious of scott in the first place BECAUSE I saw it as an attempt as Mafia taking a suspicion that I pointed out and trying to use that to force a mislynch. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:22 Fidei86 wrote: I actually think you should be modkilled, tbh. Whatever your alignment. The rules in this game aren't that complicated, and we've been warned twice now. The above not a criticism at all of Tina by the way. This isn't an easy call, and I obviously respect your decision. Sorry if it comes across as otherwise. | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:22 Fidei86 wrote: I actually think you should be modkilled, tbh. Whatever your alignment. The rules in this game aren't that complicated, and we've been warned twice now. Okay, well, this is pretty clear. You say you want to win the game and now you're saying you want me to be modkilled? The game is over if I'm modkilled and town loses the game. I'm actually not so sure where your drive to win disappeared to unless you're Mafia and trying to close the game as quickly as possible. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:23 MoosyDoosy wrote: Again, I already shared my suspicions on scott early on. Just because the reasons are "forbidden" doesn't mean that they're still not suspicions lol. In fact, I was the first person to be suspicious of scott. THEN it was NocturneMage, THEN Alakaslam, THEN you. There's a reason why I was so skeptical about Slam being suspicious of scott in the first place BECAUSE I saw it as an attempt as Mafia taking a suspicion that I pointed out and trying to use that to force a mislynch. I actually don't think this is true. I think this is a lie. But I can't prove it because I'm going to the rugby game. If I live through the night, I'll look into it. If I don't live, Scott and Slam need to consider this post VERY CAREFULLY. Also saying we shouldn't consider earlier parts of the game is stupid. What are we supposed to consider? Things in the future? | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:25 Fidei86 wrote: I actually don't think this is true. I think this is a lie. But I can't prove it because I'm going to the rugby game. If I live through the night, I'll look into it. If I don't live, Scott and Slam need to consider this post VERY CAREFULLY. Also saying we shouldn't consider earlier parts of the game is stupid. What are we supposed to consider? Things in the future? Yes we consider earlier parts of the game. And if you look back, I was the first person to place suspicion on scott. | ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
On September 20 2015 02:24 MoosyDoosy wrote: Okay, well, this is pretty clear. You say you want to win the game and now you're saying you want me to be modkilled? The game is over if I'm modkilled and town loses the game. I'm actually not so sure where your drive to win disappeared to unless you're Mafia and trying to close the game as quickly as possible. Let's talk about this part after the game. I shouldn't have said anything. | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
A. Get me killed to end the game. This can only come from a Mafia mindset. B. Bringing up things I already explained which is a tactic that CopCake actually very frequently used and which is becoming very annoying. C. Taking my questions and saying they're needling you? I don't see how you all of a sudden take offense from my questions when I've been asking them this whole game. | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
D. Clearly not paying attention to parts of the thread or not even reading it out outright. | ||
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
Fidei86
United Kingdom2116 Posts
*facepalm* | ||
| ||