I have to be fair, I'm very clueless right now, although that kill was foreseeable.

I just remembered hopeless is in the game and it bothers me that he is so forgettable.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 22:15 GMT

#832

On July 28 2015 07:13 boxerfred wrote:
also I'm kind of confident in my GB read, especially since there wasn't anything constructive that would make me not think he's scum.

##vote GlowingBear

Your read on me is basically associative. Do you have anything you find scummy in my play?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 22:15 GMT

#834

And if I am Mafia, who is the last one, boxer?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 22:21 GMT

#836

obi
Rsoultin
Onegu
Kelsier
Boxer

Palmar
Hopeless

Clarity
Scott

Am I forgetting someone?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 22:28 GMT

#841

On July 28 2015 07:24 scott31337 wrote:
Snickers.

So you believe both wagons were mafia D1 at the end - is that correct?

I try not to rely on associative reads. I just post that list to tell who I think are acting scummy and should be lynch targets

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 22:37 GMT

#842

You see, Scott, there is this scum team that can't get out of my mind which involves you, Palmar and tofu. And it makes complete sense to me.

But when I consider that you both votes tofu, I get a little... wary.

I mean, it totally makes sense that you were soft bussing and he was trying to go against clarity, and totally denied a lynch on you because you "used excel" so people would focus between firm and clarity. I really can see a standard scum play in that.

But those are information I CAN'T rely on unless one of you flip. Why didn't he advocate harder a lynch on clarity or on Kelsier if he really thought tofu was town?

His reaction to my suspicions on him are so off too... When I scum read him on previous games, he NEVER overreacted like that.

But I'm afraid I'm confirmation biased. That's why I think you OR clarity is a better lynch. Both of you are playing scummy and I trust rsoultins read

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:02 GMT

#846

Snickers, I can see where you're coming from but you're reading his posts and fitting it to a prior scum read instead of reading it and getting the read from the post.

I mean, although it could sound that he made a big post (that you didn't even read cause it was on me) to avoid a cop check, you can't assume that he did it for that because it's not a fact. It's a FEELING you're having.

I think boxerfred is town for how freely he started posting and for a post that somehow it felt very genuine (I'll find it and quote it). I'm pretty sure there are better targets to lynch. Even hopeless is better

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:06 GMT

#850

On July 28 2015 08:04 Snickers wrote:

Show nested quote +

so we have to decide if scott is mafia not reading the game or town not reading the game.

i lean more to scum.

You're clearly not reading the game since he was asking me.

I'm starting to want to lynch you

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:08 GMT

#851

On July 28 2015 08:05 Snickers wrote:
i really dont get how you are ignoring his multiple lies either

I didn't see a lie?

The guy clearly said he could see you coming from scum perspective, which doesn't necessarily means he is implying you're certainly scum.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:49 GMT

#858

On July 28 2015 08:15 Snickers wrote:
and since people want to defend boxer let me be extra fucking clear.

the only additional reason you would post that case post in the middle of the night is to respond to what people are saying to it before the day post which he never did.

so make you choice is boxer

a. bad town
b. naive town
c. scum
d. paranoid town

Snicker, as far as I knoe, boxer is a new player. He doesn't have to wait until close to end of night. Do you really think he was at any risk of dying??

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:53 GMT

#860

On July 28 2015 07:14 boxerfred wrote:
Why is there an edited out vote from scott?

I can't explain because my read on him is very tonal, but this post seems like coming from town. It's because he is paying attention to what's happening and reacting to things that are weird to him. I don't think Mafia play like that. He says he is gonna vote me, sees something wrong and comment it here.

It, in the very least, shows that boxer AND Scott are never Mafia together, which means that, if one is scum, the other will never be.

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 27 2015 23:54 GMT

#862

On July 28 2015 08:52 Snickers wrote:
no but he said he thought he was lol

##vote:GlowingBear

Ok, why am I mafia?

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 28 2015 00:44 GMT

#878

On July 28 2015 09:00 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

##vote Glowingbear

Because my red check said so.

Delicious to have you have you fake claiming like this

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 28 2015 00:48 GMT

#882

On July 28 2015 09:47 Palmar wrote:

Show nested quote +

You might still be mafia.

Turns out I'm not

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 28 2015 00:51 GMT

#884

Palmar, if I'm Mafia and I see a red check on a townie, I will instantly jump on the wagon and disrupt any further discussion.

Which means your argument here is WIFOM for both sides

GlowingBear

Brazil12446 Posts

July 28 2015 00:53 GMT

#885

I think we have plenty of mislynches and all we need to do is to have the cop checking the difficult people to read and kill the impossible people to read, and I believe clarity is the best target here