|
On July 27 2015 06:06 Palmar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:55 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:53 Palmar wrote:
Like technically I'm okay with you guys lynching FT so one of the following scenarios happen:
1) he flips mafia, yay!
2) he flips town, I can call all of you bad AND he gets punished for his shitty push on me. Let's do better: Who do you think would be the best lynch today and why? clarity Because he is not a dumbass and he is not trying to solve the game.
Palmar, you know, there is this little imp on my shoulder saying "don't trust palmar, he is likely to be Mafia!" and I keep saying that it doesn't seem so but he keeps saying that you would be trying to convince people that someone is Mafia and moving them to your target instead of saying that you don't think firm tofu is Mafia but that you are ok with tofu being lynched.
And I say "stop that, I don't have a solid meta on palmar" but he is now humping my ear lobe and I can't think properly
|
Scotty, in sorry if you're town, but I don't trust anything you say and I think you're totes Mafia but I can't explain why properly.
Like, I hate your flip on clarity. You say Mafia is trying to take the wagon out of Mafia tofu. Then you say clarity is an okay lynch? And you don't actually think that people that tried to switch the wagon off of tofu onto clarity are Mafia? Just boxerfred and a random vet???
That's bullshit, scotty :/
|
On July 27 2015 05:40 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 04:44 KelsierSC wrote:
I thought scott was scummy, I posted a quote of his that was scummy.
Yes superb evidence, it really makes me look "terrible"
can we lynch tofu already. Why do I get this feeling we are right on Tofu and mafia are trying to get us to swap?
On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him.
On July 27 2015 05:57 scott31337 wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? I do not know if you are mafia but you seem to be fighting his lynch pretty strongly (posted your case on Kelsier a couple hours ago when it looked like Tofu's getting the noose when maybe it would be better for day 2, asked rayn to vote me, asked palmar to vote me, etc.)
On July 27 2015 06:14 scott31337 wrote:
I have just re-read Clarity's filter, never mind it's really bad - a vote on me and a comment on Hopeless's post (although Hopeless did a bit better) and nothing much else.
I could vote for him too.
Thought process does not compute.
You think Tofu is Mafia
Then you say Mafia is trying to take people out of the tofu wagon.
The alternate wagon is clarity. I suppose you may think Mafia could be there.
But you call Mafia people that were in other wagons and does not consider people that moved to the clarity wagon.
You even raise suspicions on me but you don't call me Mafia (?), what's the point then?
Then you dive clarity and suddenly he is bad? What about Mafia protecting tofu by forming another wagon?????
Your thought process makes no sense and it completely fits Mafia perspective
GUYS VOTE SCOTT PLEASE
|
I mean, if you THINK Mafia is trying to take votes off of Mafia!Tofu you MUST consider they are forming the alternate wagon INSTEAD of ignoring people forming the alternate wagon and placing votes somewhere else. There is no other option
EVEN if you believed in what you just said, it would make me completely Mafia, and not just something you would say "I don't know you're Mafia". Then other Mafia are boxerfred (?) and PROBABLY A VET? Why a vet, which vet, why not me.
Then you simply say you could lynch clarity, man. You just said Mafia was taking votes off of tofu.
You can't me town.
PEOPLE PLEASE, SCOTT CAN'T BE TOWN
|
On July 27 2015 06:36 rsoultin wrote:good god gb >< he only had clarity at null/slight scum and said his vote was suspicious -_- Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:11 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:57 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? I do not know if you are mafia but you seem to be fighting his lynch pretty strongly (posted your case on Kelsier a couple hours ago when it looked like Tofu's getting the noose when maybe it would be better for day 2, asked rayn to vote me, asked palmar to vote me, etc.) Cool What about the people you think are Mafia? Boxerfred - His vote/post on me was pretty bad, I don't see his town direction - and he wants the Clarity lynch, who I think is town (or at least townier than these two, tofu and boxer) The third I have no idea on - prby a vet. I'd switch to boxer instead of Tofu - I'm just not seeing the Clarity points others are showing. then this, and he goes into clarity's filter and changes his mind? that doesn't seem so horrible? scott, what was townie about clarity when you said the post i quoted?
It is horrible when he says Mafia is taking votes off of tofu but does not consider people forming the clarity wagon?
It is horrible because if he thinks tofu is mafis he should instantly believe clarity is town under that circumstances, but he dives and say he could lynch clarity but does not reevaluate his read on tofu?
In a vacuum, his flip isn't horrible. What is problematic is his thought process
|
On July 27 2015 06:35 GlowingBear wrote:
I mean, if you THINK Mafia is trying to take votes off of Mafia!Tofu you MUST consider they are forming the alternate wagon INSTEAD of ignoring people forming the alternate wagon and placing votes somewhere else. There is no other option
EVEN if you believed in what you just said, it would make me completely Mafia, and not just something you would say "I don't know you're Mafia". Then other Mafia are boxerfred (?) and PROBABLY A VET? Why a vet, which vet, why not me.
Then you simply say you could lynch clarity, man. You just said Mafia was taking votes off of tofu.
You can't me town.
PEOPLE PLEASE, SCOTT CAN'T BE TOWN
Rsoultin, dear, I think this post shows what I'm talking about in a more clear way
|
On July 27 2015 06:42 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Yeah we don't have the people to switch to scott.
Even then I still want to lynch FT.
Let's go with that.
This is bullshit, we only need 3 more votes on scott
|
Kelsier, I know you're ignoring me but please read what I've brought on Scott
|
On July 27 2015 06:46 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 06:40 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 06:36 rsoultin wrote:good god gb >< he only had clarity at null/slight scum and said his vote was suspicious -_- On July 27 2015 06:11 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:58 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:57 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:51 GlowingBear wrote:On July 27 2015 05:49 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 05:25 Snickers wrote:
unless you have a very very very very strong read as scott mafia get off of him and vote clarity.
unless you have a very strong read on tofu get off of him.
if you have a smidgen of thought that clairty could possibly be scum vote him. Tofu is waffling pretty badly right now and I get this mafia feeling to try to pull off of him - so I do have a pretty strong (or strongest) at this time on him. I must say I also think it could be possible Scott, who are the Mafia doing that? I do not know if you are mafia but you seem to be fighting his lynch pretty strongly (posted your case on Kelsier a couple hours ago when it looked like Tofu's getting the noose when maybe it would be better for day 2, asked rayn to vote me, asked palmar to vote me, etc.) Cool What about the people you think are Mafia? Boxerfred - His vote/post on me was pretty bad, I don't see his town direction - and he wants the Clarity lynch, who I think is town (or at least townier than these two, tofu and boxer) The third I have no idea on - prby a vet. I'd switch to boxer instead of Tofu - I'm just not seeing the Clarity points others are showing. then this, and he goes into clarity's filter and changes his mind? that doesn't seem so horrible? scott, what was townie about clarity when you said the post i quoted? It is horrible when he says Mafia is taking votes off of tofu but does not consider people forming the clarity wagon? It is horrible because if he thinks tofu is mafis he should instantly believe clarity is town under that circumstances, but he dives and say he could lynch clarity but does not reevaluate his read on tofu?In a vacuum, his flip isn't horrible. What is problematic is his thought process ummm why does him thinking clarity could be mafia mean he has to think tofu is town? i get the other way around but it's like you took this an extra step without thinking it through if he thinks clarity could be mafia then it doesn't matter who is trying to lynch clarity, and it doesn't mean he can't think that tofu is scum, too? it just means it doesn't make sense to pursue who is "scum" trying to switch the lynch to clarity?
If he thinks clarity is Mafia, the hypothesis of Mafia desperately trying to switch off of tofu is wrong, which would cause some reevaluation.
If he thinks both firm tofu and clarity are Mafia, he needs to believe everyone pushing other wagon is Mafia under the scenario he brought. He did. He called boxerfred Mafia and raised faint suspicions on me. But it was PRIOR from him calling clarity possible Mafia. He was townreading clarity before.
|
God!!! It's so clear his thought process is fabricsted!!!!! Fucking vote him!!!!!
|
I'm out of posts. If someone could give me more, I'd appreciate.
|
Now we lynch Scott
|
On July 27 2015 07:21 boxerfred wrote:
Good job. That puts a really bad light on Kelsier now, given his last minute "let's get on scott" stuff.
Nope
Kelsier is almost confirmed town after tofu tried to lynch him
|
On July 27 2015 07:23 scott31337 wrote:You can't be serious?
Yes I can. Your thought process still doesn't make sense and you were okay to move to clarity anyway
|
Kelsier is town, guys. I was wrong on him. Tofu wouldn't try to jump on his wagon if he was Mafia.
I think a team of Palmar and Scott is very very likely to be honest
|
On July 27 2015 08:20 scott31337 wrote:
@GB if you pretend I am town, who are the other two mafia?
If you're town I think we should go against Clarity
Clarity because he does look scummy and his flip will be very informational.
Then maybe boxer cause his play is very uninspiring
But yeah, clarity.
|
Anyway, to the cop, if there is one.
Best check is clarity. Second best is rsoultin.
Bye.
|
That big post from Rsoultin is extremely townie, especially the part where she townreads obi for saying clarity is an objectively bad cop check. I had the same feeling regarding that post.
This is good because it clears two problematic people I had in mind.
I think people we should look at tomorrow should be clarity, boxer, palmar and Scott. I don't think remaining Mafia is outside these.
I'm really suspicious of Palmar. Him saying that he would lynch Kelsier and clarity over tofu but not being very much against it raises some red flags. His hammer on tofu doesn't align to his discourse.
I never played much with boxerfred but there was a game where he looked very scummy and it turned out he was town. Out of those in that list, he is the one I'm most insecure.
|
Lol
And palmar, stop overreacting?
You guys are too over sensitive with people calling you suspicious. The game gets unpleasant.
Well, this is my last post and I know I'll be alive in the next day so, that's it.
To the thread: listen to rsoultin as she probably is town. If she wants to lynch clarity, lynch clarity.
You guys have plenty of mislynches by now.
Palmar COULD be Mafia but that's something you should look after only in later days. He had the opportunity to lynch clarity and he didn't. He could've tried to lynch Scott and he didn't. Palmar could be Mafia only if scott is Mafia imo.
What I'm trying to advise is: don't take Palmar's hammer as a sign of him being town. Also, there isn't much to call him town either. So, just keep an eye on him
Rayn is probably town. Onegu is probably town. Kelsier is probably town. Snickers is probably town.
No townie asks to me shot at night like clarity did. If he is busy he would ask a replacement, but not do that. Trust rsoultin. Shoot him or lynch him day2.
That's it. I'll see you until tonight.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
