EPTAlthough I might expect this out of Rels because he tends to get tunneled and ruXxar who's just dumb, I did not expects this at all from rayn.
Newbie Student Mafia XIII - Page 9
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
Although I might expect this out of Rels because he tends to get tunneled and ruXxar who's just dumb, I did not expects this at all from rayn. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
##Vote MoosyDoosy All of you are fucking tools. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 07:51 disformation wrote: Back. sry 4 being late. I dislike a lot of posts from today evening. I go like "I am not sure if all 2 mafia are in NM/Sulf/Breshke. Maybe 1 of MD or n00bKing is scum." This post has 0 content. Of course it is possible for him to be scum. I could be scum, too. Damdred could be scum. Will add disappointment to my sig.  Tempted to ask LS to give you a warning for the first line of the post. What is the point of this posts? Tempted to lynch you, so I don't have to read high quality posts like these again. Go ahead. Vote for me for my "high quality posts". Because that's exactly what they are but none of you will read them. *shrugs* Let's see where this gets you all. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
(Hint: 100% incorrect!) This also means that you all actually listened to ruXxar after he clearly demonstrated throughout the thread that he doesn't know what he's doing. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 28 2015 12:50 MoosyDoosy wrote:This basically leaves us just scott. But as someone pointed out, rayn's claim as Veteran leaves us with a Vigi. Which means we either have a dumb Vigi who didn't shoot N1 or scott as Vigi which makes me reluctant to lynch him because of this fact. Here we see me saying with complete confidence that we have a Vigi. I say this a couple of times as well and n00bKing is the only one who picks up on it and does this: On July 29 2015 02:39 n00bKing wrote: Decided my response to this post is counter-productive. Flagging just so I'll have it in my own filter to remind me later. So he's the only one who saw this while the rest of you were blind and running around like headless chicken. And you're all STILL telling me you want to lynch him? right... | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
"They thought that far ahead which is why Moosy is able to pull it up so easily! aha!" ^ This is a full case of confirmation bias. And should i point out Tictock's post outlining exactly WHY he's not Mafia? If you have confirmation bias, you would also read it as a Mafia doing things differently on purpose. "But no! But no!" says ruXxar, "Moosy thought that easily ahead and planned it all out! He's matching his play to be like Tictocks when he saw the mislynch coming throught! Yeah!" ^ And here, folks, is why ruXxar is dumb. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
After re-reading through n00bKing's and mine's filters do you REALLY think that either of us can be Mafia? Sure n00bKing has been wrong about Rels and has tunneled a bit but his play is clearly townie in the way he's trying to catch scum. As for me, there's definitely no way for you to say I'm Mafia other than the fact that I do "weird shit". My reads have been right AND I'm trying to catch scum. If you really think Mafia will so brazenly act in this manner then proceed with your lynches and drink your salty tears later. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:28 scott31337 wrote: Who do you think are the last two mafia then? Me and n00bKing. If I'm being serious, then you all already know how I do my lynches. The people I am currently suspecting are: NocturneMage/Breshke/Sulfurus. I don't think of associative cases which is more n00bKing's thing but just narrow my list through town reads for a townie circle before looking at people outside of the circle and lynching the one that seems most scummy. However, I will definitely bet that there HAS to be at LEAST one Mafia in these 3. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:29 ruXxar wrote: @moosy 1) your explanation of n00bkings statement failed to explain why rels isn't the cop and also failed to explain why he wouldn't check n00bking. Would you like to try again? 2) you're claiming that n00bking knew that Scott was a cop before he claimed, yet n00bking wanted to lynch Scott after his claim because his claim was illogical. Do you see how that doesn't make sense? What's up ruXxar old buddy? | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:29 ruXxar wrote: @moosy 1) your explanation of n00bkings statement failed to explain why rels isn't the cop and also failed to explain why he wouldn't check n00bking. Would you like to try again? 2) you're claiming that n00bking knew that Scott was a cop before he claimed, yet n00bking wanted to lynch Scott after his claim because his claim was illogical. Do you see how that doesn't make sense? To be serious, I already explained #1 but you just haven't wrapped your brain around it. As for #2, it's very simple. scott had a likely chance of being PR BEFORE he claimed. However, afterwards, he claimed he said that he had a green check on me. Now the strange thing about this is when you look at the timeline of things. Flexes said he'd make a post then went afk for more than 24 hours. HOWEVER, this means that he had to have put in an action without having followed up on his promise to post reads and not having been active for 24 hours. Which we all found strange because he was replaced by scott. EVEN RAYN pointed this out and we can see his flip flopping before the vote went through. n00bKing also pointed this out (like rayn) which is why he was saying that scott's claim was illogical. So for your simple brain to process #2: BEFORE CLAIM: - scott has likely chance of being PR AFTER CLAIM: - scott says he has green check on me - It's weird that Flexes was able to put in an action because he was inactive for more than 24 hours - scott could have been lying - n00bKing and rayn point this out AFTERWARDS: - no one counter claims -> means that scott has to be cop as weird as it may seem | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:38 MoosyDoosy wrote: However, note that there's a very simple explanation for it all. Before night time ended, Flexes comes back into the game after being inactive, hurriedly told host that he couldn't play, asked for a replacement, and inserted an action before leaving. However, even this has its problems. This explanation relies on Flexes having asked the host for a replacement. On the other hand, if the host instead replaced Flexes automatically due to inactivity then we have a problem. Because this then means that scott is lying and that the real cop is not counter claiming. But i don't personally think that this is the case because it's strange for the cop to not be counter claiming if scott is lying because it would be a really easy Mafia lynch. Unless it's a weird scenario where the cop wants to check more people under relative safety before going to end game where he can then counter claim and flip the tables on Mafia's heads. This is possible as well. But before your brain implodes from too much thinking ruXxar, I'll keep it simple and say this: for now we have to believe that scott is cop because no one counterclaimed. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
Him basically asking about whether or not Flexes got replaced automatically due to inactivity or whether Flexes asked for it. On July 29 2015 06:09 raynpelikoneet wrote: Waitwaitwiat. if a power role gets replaced while having not sent in an action, what happens? Is there no action or what? rayn's flip flopping after initially realizing that scott's vote made no sense. On July 29 2015 06:22 raynpelikoneet wrote: I dont care. It doesnt make any sense at all. The dude is in the middle of writing a reads post. He disappears, as a cop. He never comes back, gets replaced. BUT HE HAS SOMEHOW SENT IN A COP CHECK?!?!?! rofl On July 29 2015 06:24 raynpelikoneet wrote: NOBODY SENDS A COP CHECK 24H INTO DAY FUCKING ONE. On July 29 2015 06:26 raynpelikoneet wrote: Whatever. Lets not lynch scott then unless cc. ##unvote ##vote tictock And n00bKing did the same thing but you want to lynch him? Right....smart thinking man. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
| ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:56 n00bKing wrote: Not sure. Hey Moosy, was I roleblocked? If Moosy says I was roleblocked, I'll probably believe him. I don't know man. You might want to ask ruXxar since he's clearly right about his reads. I'm not sure if I was roleblocked either. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 08:57 n00bKing wrote: It's Cuz WIFOM, Moosy! Just like a million zillion other things I've posted in this game that fail to further a Scum agenda, I must have done it Cuz WIFOM. On July 30 2015 08:21 MoosyDoosy wrote: Oh wait oh wait. Let me guess what ruXxar is thinking: "They thought that far ahead which is why Moosy is able to pull it up so easily! aha!" ^ This is a full case of confirmation bias. And should i point out Tictock's post outlining exactly WHY he's not Mafia? If you have confirmation bias, you would also read it as a Mafia doing things differently on purpose. "But no! But no!" says ruXxar, "Moosy thought that easily ahead and planned it all out! He's matching his play to be like Tictocks when he saw the mislynch coming throught! Yeah!" ^ And here, folks, is why ruXxar is dumb. Here ya go man. | ||
|
MoosyDoosy
United States4519 Posts
On July 30 2015 09:08 ruXxar wrote: Except according to you(n00bking has yet to confirm that what you're saying is correct) noob already thought that Scott was cop, so why would he then say his claim is illogical? He should've been expecting it and be happy to see that he was right. This has both rayn AND n00bKing in it for your benefit. | ||
| ||
