|
On July 29 2015 23:18 ruXxar wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 22:53 Rels wrote:A weird thing: in this post, ruxxar voted moosy (changing from TT) by mistake, and never corrected it, as if he never checked a votecount. In the final votecount he is still voting moosy. I didn't vote for moosy. I'm not going to re-vote just to fix broken vote tool. I told the mod that I didn't switch and I expect him to count my vote properly.
Yeah my argument is that it was weird that you didn't see it. So you actually saw it and posted to the mod to correct it ? I'm reading EOD atm so I will eventually find your post then.
|
On July 29 2015 05:26 scott31337 wrote:Fuck looks like votes are on me - I guess I have to do this now. I'm the cop and have a green check on MoosyDoosy.My crumb in this message - Show nested quote +On July 28 2015 03:16 scott31337 wrote:On July 27 2015 18:50 Rels wrote:Why Sulfurus has to be mafia: the easiest case in the world1. Did nothing for half of day 1Yes. In spoiler you will find the only post Sulfurus made D1. Not even good apparently. + Show Spoiler +On July 24 2015 15:23 Sulfurus wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2015 10:34 n00bKing wrote:
I'll be interested to see what Sulfurus brings to the table in this game. I felt like it was pretty easy to distinguish his scum game from his Town game I could say the same about you. Sulfurus played three games prior to this one: newbie X, XI and XII. He was lynched in all three. In the first he was VT (see? I'm learning). In the other two he was GF. He had the same playstyle that is displayed is this game; very few posts, not much explanations, sudden attacks on people. I just can't believe he would keep this style if he was townie. 3. Voting on BarakosSulfurus voted on Barakos after half of D1, clearly sheeping the thread sentiment. While voting for a mafia is never scum indicative, the way he did it is not town indicative either because: - Barakos hadn't posted for 8 hours at the time. - He almost only talked about Barakos. In fact, he only made two meaningful post: one case on Barakos, and one case on noobking. We'll talk about the noobking's post later, no worries. 4. No explanation on his listSulfurus posted this: On July 25 2015 09:54 Sulfurus wrote:
And feel free to ask any questions you have about the list (somthing which ruXxar has already taken the initiative on). But he only explained a few of his reads, ignoring these posts: On July 25 2015 08:58 disformation wrote:
5) General lack of explanation for anything. On July 25 2015 10:32 disformation wrote:
I'd like to hear your reasons for your townread on Damdred and your reasons for your #1 scum read on barakos, who you are currently voting for. And the reasons for your #2 scum read of MoosyDoosy would also be nice. On July 25 2015 21:18 disformation wrote:
Didn't like how Sulfurus only gave 1/3 reads I asked him about. He even quoted this last post but never answered: On July 26 2015 03:22 Sulfurus wrote:On July 25 2015 21:18 disformation wrote:okay phone post time. lemme throw out some thoughts. Didn't like how Sulfurus only gave 1/3 reads I asked him about. Liked TT being suspicious of Sulfurus. Though I am not sure what I my conclusion on Sulfurus is. Def. want him to come back and post more. such Rayn. very town. much wow. Town lean on Damdred. Will reread him and post proper reasons when I am at home. Need to look st Rels filter. While I didn't mind NocturneMages questions in the beginning I think it is time for him to come back here and at least try to put out some reads. also: a lot of ppl haven't voted yet, right? should get to that.  Did you notice our reads are similar, or does that not change anything? Plus, in his Barakos post he said: On July 25 2015 14:02 Sulfurus wrote:
I'll start with my read on Barakos since it was the easiest to figure out, just look at this post. So he "started" and never continue. 5. He voted moosy with no explanationMoosy was number 2 on his list, and he never explained his read of him. Just voted him off. 6. His case on noobking is badnoobking's defense was good so I have nothing to add here. + Show Spoiler +On July 26 2015 11:28 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 26 2015 10:35 Sulfurus wrote:n00bKing was the second to last player to vote on Barakos, he even admits in the same post that he would rather have lynched Rels today. Which I probably wouldn't say, if I were Scum, and knew that Barakos was about to flip Red. Like, you're defeating your own argument, without me needing to do anything. Show nested quote +On July 26 2015 10:35 Sulfurus wrote:And some particular posts that I think are quite damning Rels is not even trying to scumread me in that post. He's just defending himself. (As he should. I'm not saying it was scum indicative for him to be defending himself, or for him to ONLY be defending himself. I'm just saying he wasn't trying to indicate that anything I said made me Scum at that time.) Uhhh, you are misrepresenting my position. Read what the quote actually says. I did not ever try to say that rayn gave a scum read to Rels. I said that rayn refused to defend Rels. If you doubt that I'm right, ask rayn yourself, I expect he remembers. Keep grasping at those straws. I said he was unmemorable right before saying I was going to look at his filter from that game. After looking at the filter, he has at least 50 posts in that game that are not in the format you were talking about. The fact that I found him to be unmemorable before looking at his filter means nothing. I don't even know what you're trying to say. How is that post from ruXxar a "gem" and how is it supposed to make me look bad? Mafia. ##Vote Sulfurus Pretty decent case, I could sheep this.. ##Vote SulfurusI'm still not caring for TT or n00bking either, n00b is really defensive and doesn't look like his town game. Pretty sure two of the mafia are in these three. I'm doing some research on Chronic kidney disease, lipids and apolipoproteins so I'll be on and off today. If you look up "Chronic kidney disease, lipids and apolipoproteins" the first link is http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/24607852If you look up TL's post 24607852 http://www.teamliquid.net/forum/viewpost.php?post_id=24607852Is Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 13:10 raynpelikoneet wrote:
We most likely have a cop and a green check on moosy. So get your votes off of me NOW PLEASE!
DIDNT READ THAT YESTERDAY
IM IMPRESSED
|
On July 29 2015 05:29 Damdred wrote:
Basically only bresh, mages, tt can be scum to me. Noob has an outside shot maybe ruxx.
we lynch mages today
My god that's exactly my brain if you switch noob and breshke.
|
On July 29 2015 15:25 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 09:13 disformation wrote:
So Breshke I have a hard time getting where your reads are currently.
Your #1 scum is still MoosyDoosy even with green check?
Your #2 scum was Flexes/Scott? You never really said so, but it is implied in your filter. What do you think of the claim?
Your #3 scum was TT. If Scott goes uncountered on Day 3, then Breshke's suspect list becomes: #3 - The guy you people just lynched, who flipped Town #2 - The Cop #1 - The Cop's green check I'm not sure how alignment-indicative that is, but it's too funny for me not to comment on it.
héhé
On July 29 2015 16:36 n00bKing wrote:
Overall: I think Sulfurus is going to remain in my Top 2 suspects, in a game where there are 2 Scum to find.
Can't remember who is your top 1 ?
|
Sometimes I read news posts and I just want to lynch him.
|
Alright finished reading EOD2. A few thoughts:
- scott's breadcrumb was siiiick!
- the people instantly switching from scott when he claimed are town I'm pretty sure: TT(-_-), moosy, disfo.
- on the other hand, noobking's position is so weird. A little bit of sceptisism is OK, but saying he's willing to lynch scott over TT 10 minutes before deadline (which would mean NocturneMage is cop BTW) is super suspicious. Plus when I asked him his reasons, he said scott's claim was "illogical" ... WTF
- wow these 3 posts-then-leave by NocturneMage were so scummy. In retrospect, with that + TT immediately switching from scott, we should have lynched him
- Damdred reacting to those 3 posts-then-leave is so town indicative
|
On July 29 2015 06:58 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:55 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 06:55 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 06:48 n00bKing wrote:
Would lynch Sulfurus. Would also lynch Mage or Breshke, to save Ticktock. Would not be happy about lynching Scott without a CC, but...might still do it, to save Ticktock. That Night Action appeared by magic.
Can any of these things happen? Rayn was just called bad to entertain the idea of lynching a UN cc cop. And you would lynch UN cc cop over another player ? Actually tell me why we should lynch Scott over TT I'm interested. Because Scott's Cop claim is illogical, and I know Ticktock is Town. Have you not been reading the thread?
Why is scott's cop claim illogical ?
|
On July 30 2015 00:34 Damdred wrote:
Sometimes I read news posts and I just want to lynch him.
news posts ?
|
Alright it is not time for cases ... yet. But I will say a bunch of stuff I will reuse later when the time to make cases comes. You can comment or not, there is no accusation at the moment.
|
noobking may have TMI slipped
On July 29 2015 06:58 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 06:55 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 06:55 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 06:48 n00bKing wrote:
Would lynch Sulfurus. Would also lynch Mage or Breshke, to save Ticktock. Would not be happy about lynching Scott without a CC, but...might still do it, to save Ticktock. That Night Action appeared by magic.
Can any of these things happen? Rayn was just called bad to entertain the idea of lynching a UN cc cop. And you would lynch UN cc cop over another player ? Actually tell me why we should lynch Scott over TT I'm interested. Because Scott's Cop claim is illogical, and I know Ticktock is Town. Have you not been reading the thread?
|
NocturneMage doesn't write much but he sure reads a lot
On July 24 2015 22:58 NocturneMage wrote:Show nested quote +On July 24 2015 07:54 ruXxar wrote:On July 24 2015 07:41 NocturneMage wrote:On July 24 2015 07:24 disformation wrote:
Hm I would read ruxxars posts so far as NAI.
Not alignment indicative. The poetry stuff could have been preplanned. The tone is all fluff. *shrugs*
But then again, breaking the ice on D1 is kinda hard. xD It would seem like it. I don't know if I should make anything the way he's addressing people, ignoring his poetry, that could come from town or mafia. I'm assuming no ill-will means a town read? or a null read? I can't tell actually. ruxxar is that even a read on noobking? A read from a sentence? What do I analyze, the tone, the cadence, the befriending emoticon? The timing, his motivation, his meta? A sentence says so little yet says so much if you but know what to look for. I will not pass judgement on n00b yet, but you nocturne, you have showed your true colors. The natural curiosity, the spontaneous doubt, your inquisitive nature and your non-hesitation to share with us of your life. I read you clear as a book. Your alignment is town. I'm looking through ruXxar's posts and just ignoring his poetry for now.
On July 26 2015 04:25 NocturneMage wrote:
I'm back. I am looking through Barakos/Moosy since they are the more debated at the moment.
On July 27 2015 22:31 NocturneMage wrote:
I'm back and (obviously) catching up.
[...]
First few comments just reading a few filters, so I can understand some arguments better -
On July 27 2015 23:56 NocturneMage wrote:
Looking through Breshke now, I could see him being either alignment.
On July 28 2015 05:44 NocturneMage wrote:
Re-reading the last page, there are few things that are of concern to me.
On July 29 2015 04:04 NocturneMage wrote:
So people don't want to lynch Sulfurus - reading his last few posts and I have some questions.
[...]
Reading a few filters...
On July 29 2015 04:23 NocturneMage wrote:
Ahhh okay. I read that quote again, now I see how I misunderstood. That really was confusing.
On July 29 2015 04:27 NocturneMage wrote:
Reading through Scott's filter, [...]
|
noobking's explanation on me if cop not checking him is late and makes no sense
noobking said I'm probably not cop, and even if I'm cop I wouldn't check him.
On July 27 2015 17:59 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 17:57 n00bKing wrote:On July 27 2015 17:50 Rels wrote:On July 27 2015 17:47 n00bKing wrote:On July 27 2015 17:26 Rels wrote:
Wow this is ridiculous. That is WIFOM, not worse than WIFOM. Look at these possibility:
1
noobking is a mafia (not GF). Rels said he was going to check noobking. The mafia team has to roleblock Rels to avoid a red check.
2
Flexes is mafia. Rels said he was going to shoot Flexes. The mafia team has to roleblock Rels to avoir a mafia kill. Those are not reasonable "possibilities." If Flexes is Scum, and knows there is a Vigilante in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be shot by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Vigilante, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town). If n00bKing is Scum, and knows there is a Cop in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be checked by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Cop, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town). The second scenario is particularly ludicrous, because you're trying to tell me that after I spent Day 1 and Night 1 painting you as a suspect, I then up and ROLEBLOCKED you, in a game where there is a guaranteed Scum roleblocker but no possibility of a Town roleblocker. ??? I agree that if you are mafia, it's bad for you to roleblock me (or kill me). BUT if you know there is a cop in the setup, you have no choice but to do that. Bad situation but wifomable > red check. lol, NONSENSE. What didn't you understand about "If n00bKing is Scum, and knows there is a Cop in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be checked by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Cop, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town)."? I don't understand. You are saying: - I'm probably not the cop - On the off-chance I'm the cop, I won't check you I don't understand why you are saying that. Especially the second part.
He refused to explain to me:
On July 27 2015 18:03 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 17:59 Rels wrote:On July 27 2015 17:57 n00bKing wrote:On July 27 2015 17:50 Rels wrote:On July 27 2015 17:47 n00bKing wrote:On July 27 2015 17:26 Rels wrote:
Wow this is ridiculous. That is WIFOM, not worse than WIFOM. Look at these possibility:
1
noobking is a mafia (not GF). Rels said he was going to check noobking. The mafia team has to roleblock Rels to avoid a red check.
2
Flexes is mafia. Rels said he was going to shoot Flexes. The mafia team has to roleblock Rels to avoir a mafia kill. Those are not reasonable "possibilities." If Flexes is Scum, and knows there is a Vigilante in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be shot by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Vigilante, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town). If n00bKing is Scum, and knows there is a Cop in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be checked by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Cop, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town). The second scenario is particularly ludicrous, because you're trying to tell me that after I spent Day 1 and Night 1 painting you as a suspect, I then up and ROLEBLOCKED you, in a game where there is a guaranteed Scum roleblocker but no possibility of a Town roleblocker. ??? I agree that if you are mafia, it's bad for you to roleblock me (or kill me). BUT if you know there is a cop in the setup, you have no choice but to do that. Bad situation but wifomable > red check. lol, NONSENSE. What didn't you understand about "If n00bKing is Scum, and knows there is a Cop in the game, he can be very confident that he will not be checked by Rels (even on the off chance that Rels is that Cop, which is already unlikely for reasons that I can't explain without damaging the Town)."? I don't understand. You are saying: - I'm probably not the cop - On the off-chance I'm the cop, I won't check you I don't understand why you are saying that. Especially the second part. HOW CAN YOU NOT UNDERSTAND THAT?? Again, Show nested quote + Seriously, your refusal to use reason and common sense is driving me crazy. Just STOP posting for a little while, THINK about what you've just said, and come back later.
Then muuuch later he posted an explanation on why I wouldn't check him if I was cop:
On July 28 2015 04:20 n00bKing wrote:So, not a lot of motivation for me to still answer ruXxar, when Rels himself is not even trying to push me into a Noose today. First he said this: Show nested quote +Rels wrote: I wrote a big post saying how he was mafia for a tons of reasons, and when I reread it before posting I realize most of it was nonsense. I'm pretty happy I did not post it And then he gave us his latest scum reads, and it looks like this: Show nested quote +Rels wrote:
For now my scumteam is Sulfurus + Flexes/scott. Maybe Breshke instead of one of those two.
And if I'm wrong on one those three, mayyyyyyybe MD, TT or NM, though I will really need some rock solid cases to consider voting them. There's a certain someone by the name of "n00bKing" who doesn't appear anywhere in there. But I said I would answer ruXxar, so I'll still go ahead and do it. Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 19:56 ruXxar wrote:
Why would rels not check n00nking if rels is cop.
Explain like I'm 5. Okay, I'm going to try to imagine that ruXxar is 5. ruXxar is 5...let's see if...oh, done! Wow, that was surprisingly easy. Hmm, this kind of explains a lot, actually! If Rels were the Cop, he would not check me, because during the Night Phase, he posted suggestions to the power roles, and he gave only ONE name to the Cop, and that name was MINE. Children have wondrous imaginations, so use yours, and put yourself in the shoes of a Rels who is the Cop. Imagine you're the Cop, and during the Night Phase, you suggest who the Cop should target. Imagine you give only one name. Then imagine that you...go ahead and turn in a check on that name. Did you notice how your brain stopped you and said "No, no, that's stupid"? Okay then. If it becomes necessary later, I will also be ready to provide additional reasons why people can know that: 1) I can't be Scum 2) Even if I were Scum, my team would never have roleblocked Rels 3) Even if I were Scum, I wouldn't play this way if I was the roleblocker instead of the Godfather (which is what is required, for me to be afraid that Rels is the Cop and will turn in a check on me. Otherwise, I want that check to get turned in.)
I DONT understand how that explain the fact that I wouldn't check him if I was the cop. Can you (yes, you, reading this) read the quote above, then tell me if it made sense to you ? That would be much appreciated.
|
On July 30 2015 00:55 Rels wrote:NocturneMage doesn't write much but he sure reads a lotShow nested quote +On July 24 2015 22:58 NocturneMage wrote:On July 24 2015 07:54 ruXxar wrote:On July 24 2015 07:41 NocturneMage wrote:On July 24 2015 07:24 disformation wrote:
Hm I would read ruxxars posts so far as NAI.
Not alignment indicative. The poetry stuff could have been preplanned. The tone is all fluff. *shrugs*
But then again, breaking the ice on D1 is kinda hard. xD It would seem like it. I don't know if I should make anything the way he's addressing people, ignoring his poetry, that could come from town or mafia. I'm assuming no ill-will means a town read? or a null read? I can't tell actually. ruxxar is that even a read on noobking? A read from a sentence? What do I analyze, the tone, the cadence, the befriending emoticon? The timing, his motivation, his meta? A sentence says so little yet says so much if you but know what to look for. I will not pass judgement on n00b yet, but you nocturne, you have showed your true colors. The natural curiosity, the spontaneous doubt, your inquisitive nature and your non-hesitation to share with us of your life. I read you clear as a book. Your alignment is town. I'm looking through ruXxar's posts and just ignoring his poetry for now. Show nested quote +On July 26 2015 04:25 NocturneMage wrote:
I'm back. I am looking through Barakos/Moosy since they are the more debated at the moment.
Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 22:31 NocturneMage wrote:
I'm back and (obviously) catching up.
[...]
First few comments just reading a few filters, so I can understand some arguments better -
Show nested quote +On July 27 2015 23:56 NocturneMage wrote:
Looking through Breshke now, I could see him being either alignment.
Show nested quote +On July 28 2015 05:44 NocturneMage wrote:
Re-reading the last page, there are few things that are of concern to me.
Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 04:04 NocturneMage wrote:
So people don't want to lynch Sulfurus - reading his last few posts and I have some questions.
[...]
Reading a few filters... Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 04:23 NocturneMage wrote:
Ahhh okay. I read that quote again, now I see how I misunderstood. That really was confusing. Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 04:27 NocturneMage wrote:
Reading through Scott's filter, [...]
LOL rereading it I thought I posted the same post two times. "Reading a few filters" should be the new mafia meme.
|
On July 29 2015 23:53 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 05:29 Damdred wrote:
Basically only bresh, mages, tt can be scum to me. Noob has an outside shot maybe ruxx.
we lynch mages today My god that's exactly my brain if you switch noob and breshke.
lol @ how amazed you are that you only had to make one (terrible) change, for your list to match with Damdred's. And Moosy's. And mine. And disformation's.
|
On July 30 2015 00:30 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 16:36 n00bKing wrote:
Overall: I think Sulfurus is going to remain in my Top 2 suspects, in a game where there are 2 Scum to find. Can't remember who is your top 1 ?
Might still end up being him. Him being Top 2 doesn't mean he isn't Top 1. The other in the Top 2 is NocturneMage. I need to read back through a couple of parts of the game that he backreferences in his Day 2 posts. I don't expect Breshke to be able to knock either of these out of the Top 2. (Though again, Scott would, if he's counter-claimed.)
|
On July 29 2015 15:55 ruXxar wrote:
Last mafia N00b + moosy.
It makes too much sense.
N00b insisted he would've gotten moosy lynched for sure if he was mafia.
Not so easy when moosy is your partner.
Also he was scared as shit of getting cop checked because he's the role blocker.
Moosy is the god father.
He admitted several times in the thread that he is mafia and doesn't give a shit about the game in general.
His day 1 was atrocious and he had no opinion of anyone all day.
He was paying 0 attention to the thread and threw ad hom attacks en masse after me.
He was figuratively begging to be cop checked by his play.
Moosy, get dunked. Your "hurr durr I'm mafia" play isn't going to work any longer.
These are my thoughts as well at the moment.
I think we lynch n00b tomorrow.
|
On July 30 2015 01:09 n00bKing wrote:Show nested quote +On July 29 2015 23:53 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 05:29 Damdred wrote:
Basically only bresh, mages, tt can be scum to me. Noob has an outside shot maybe ruxx.
we lynch mages today My god that's exactly my brain if you switch noob and breshke. lol @ how amazed you are that you only had to make one (terrible) change, for your list to match with Damdred's. And Moosy's. And mine. And disformation's.
Don't be jaleous I posted it first.
|
On July 30 2015 01:14 Rels wrote:Show nested quote +On July 30 2015 01:09 n00bKing wrote:On July 29 2015 23:53 Rels wrote:On July 29 2015 05:29 Damdred wrote:
Basically only bresh, mages, tt can be scum to me. Noob has an outside shot maybe ruxx.
we lynch mages today My god that's exactly my brain if you switch noob and breshke. lol @ how amazed you are that you only had to make one (terrible) change, for your list to match with Damdred's. And Moosy's. And mine. And disformation's. Don't be jaleous I posted it first.
YOU DIDN'T. I posted that my list is a match for Damdred's before you made that post. You just DON'T READ.
|
On July 30 2015 00:37 Rels wrote:
- scott's breadcrumb was siiiick!
Did you fail to notice that it is no less sick if he's Scum than if he's Town? (Probably. Failing to notice stuff has kinda been your thing in this game.)
On July 30 2015 00:37 Rels wrote:- the people instantly switching from scott when he claimed are town I'm pretty sure: TT(-_-), moosy, disfo.
Dumb thing to say, when you've even admitted that Scott's allegiance isn't known, and have told the Vigilante to shoot him. (Which is indeed the correct play for the Vigilante.)
On July 30 2015 00:37 Rels wrote:- on the other hand, noobking's position is so weird. A little bit of sceptisism is OK, but saying he's willing to lynch scott over TT 10 minutes before deadline (which would mean NocturneMage is cop BTW) is super suspicious. Plus when I asked him his reasons, he said scott's claim was "illogical" ... WTF
It does NOT mean NocturneMage is the Cop. You are wrong, as usual. Breshke could just as easily be the Cop, as he was afk during that same time-frame. This has already been mentioned before, but you DON'T READ.
And there is NOTHING weird about my position. I said Scott's claim was "illogical" for all of the reasons that it WAS illogical.
It is hilarious (pathetic, but hilarious) that this is like the 5th different time now that you've tried to bash me for having skepticism about Scott's claim.
Yet you don't have A THING to say to this guy:
On July 29 2015 06:19 raynpelikoneet wrote:
##unvote
##Vote scott31337
There is no way flexes has sent in a check.
Impossible.
On July 29 2015 06:22 raynpelikoneet wrote:
It doesnt make any sense at all.
The dude is in the middle of writing a reads post.
He disappears, as a cop. He never comes back, gets replaced.
BUT HE HAS SOMEHOW SENT IN A COP CHECK?!?!?!
rofl
On July 29 2015 06:28 raynpelikoneet wrote:
I dont believefor a second scott is cop.
You are allowing your intense bias to blind you every step of the way. Identical behavior from two players, and you jump all over it from one of them, yet have no reservations continuing to consider the other confirmed Town.
You are also failing to notice that (just like everything else I've done the entire game) there is NO scum motivation for me to try and get Scott lynched there, even if he's the real Cop. A lynched Cop is not any better for the Mafia than an outed Cop. There is no reason at all to work so hard to try and save Ticktock when he turned out to be Town. The Scum would probably be better off having Ticktock out of the game than Scott out of the game, because Ticktock is more active. Right?
Me trying to save a now-confirmed-Town Ticktock over a suspicious Cop (who is ZERO threat to the Scum team once he's outed anyway) is TOWN-INDICATIVE for me. Get it?
|
On July 29 2015 10:44 MoosyDoosy wrote:
Thanks. At least someone is more or less on the same page as me.
Not sure why MoosyDoosy singled me out like this when like half the players have a list very similar to mine. Like Damdred just posted his version 1 page ago. Pocketing/Buddying attempt? Prolly getting paranoid.
Getting less sure about Breshke and Sulfurus.
Is it NocturneMage and 1 of n00bKIng or MoosyDoosy?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
