|
Also I kinda believe marv's reason for voting ritoky so he's ok for now.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
thank goodness
i await your later hand-wringing with anticipation
|
On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today.
strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim?
|
On July 06 2015 19:59 marvellosity wrote:
thank goodness
i await your later hand-wringing with anticipation
Oh don't worry I'll waffle later.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 06 2015 20:16 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim?
i'm confused why you are asking about the first post clarity made now
when you have already commented on this point which came afterwards
On July 06 2015 16:54 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 08:28 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:15 Clarity_nl wrote:
[quote]
I think geript probably wouldn't just vote and then ignore me as scum, so there's that.
trfl's first post to me is totally null, either alignment could start by saying they will only be active at certain times
Don't really have anyone I want to lynch yet do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on. If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"? What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me. overly defensive shit plus attentionshift on rsoulting not liking that
|
On July 06 2015 20:19 KelsierSC wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:16 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim? i'm confused why you are asking about the first post clarity made now when you have already commented on this point which came afterwards Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 16:54 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 08:28 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:16 KelsierSC wrote:
[quote]
do you have anymore town? Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on. If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"? What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me. overly defensive shit plus attentionshift on rsoulting not liking that
that came to my mind when someone said he's needlessly sheeping people, on the last page. i remembered his entry post, reread it and decided to not like it.
##vote clarity_nl
|
On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
here this one
|
On July 06 2015 20:21 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:46 Oatsmaster wrote:
What a needless sheep post clarity. None of those are serious questions lol.
here this one
I still don't know what this post is referring to.
|
to this one:
On July 06 2015 19:43 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv??
Do you have any reads at all?
Read the thread please? I came back, commented on trfl and then marv showed up so I said hi. Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote:
I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel? I think self-aware wandered claim is fine. The cop claims were obviously just people being silly,
|
##vote clarity_nl
Now that we're ganging up on you, how do you feel clarity?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
I'm not ganging up on him.
|
On July 06 2015 20:24 marvellosity wrote:
I'm not ganging up on him.
why not
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
i don't see any reason to
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 06 2015 20:21 boxerfred wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 20:16 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 07:20 Clarity_nl wrote:
Hype! And already information.
Holyflare claiming VT is interesting. Doesn't seem something scum would do or think of this quickly after PMs went out/daypost went up.
Not lynching him today. strange entry post, why would you believe a first-post-of-the-day-VT-claim? i'm confused why you are asking about the first post clarity made now when you have already commented on this point which came afterwards On July 06 2015 16:54 boxerfred wrote:On July 06 2015 08:28 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:26 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:24 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:23 rsoultin wrote:On July 06 2015 08:21 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 08:19 KelsierSC wrote:On July 06 2015 08:17 Clarity_nl wrote:
[quote]
Don't really see the point in giving a ton of townreads, but no, no strong reads. ok, it just confuses me because you gave a townread on hf after 1 post, then you haven't established reads on other people. I suppose if you haven't played with hf then maybe you can meta out a reason but it feels inconsistent. what is the answer to your hf and I (grammar) can't be scum? I said we can't both be scum Seems like a really weird thing for two scum to do early on, no? I just realized it after I made my first post and figured it's a good way to start talking about something useful. -squints at- lol you do realize how little sense this actually makes, right? You're replying a lot to me rsoultin but saying very little. I think it makes sense. If HF and me are both scum, I feel we would basically never have that interaction a few minutes into day 1. Do you disagree? what do you mean by interaction though you called hf town and then you reference how because of this "interaction" you cant both be scum OK I want to move past this as it's not really worth spending a lot of time on. If me and HF both roll scum, and HF enters the game going "Lol I thought I rolled cop but it's just the VT flavor" do you think I, as scum, would call my scum partner "totes town not lynching today"? What do you think of rsoultin? Specifically the way she's replied to me. overly defensive shit plus attentionshift on rsoulting not liking that that came to my mind when someone said he's needlessly sheeping people, on the last page. i remembered his entry post, reread it and decided to not like it. ##vote clarity_nl
so to confirm, you read the first post by clarity and the resulting discussion and decided it was NIA, then later on you saw the comment he made which you called
overly defensive shit plus attentionshift on rsoulting not liking that
but at this point you decided not go and read clarity again..but only waited until prompted by oats and then deciding not to like it.
|
Back from holiday, and now catching up.
Also I'm a miller this game, take that as you will.
|
On July 06 2015 20:23 Palmar wrote:
##vote clarity_nl
Now that we're ganging up on you, how do you feel clarity?
Not really bothered. I thought you said you were undecided on me, what changed your mind?
|
On July 06 2015 20:23 boxerfred wrote:to this one: Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 19:43 Clarity_nl wrote:On July 06 2015 19:14 Oatsmaster wrote:
Out of everything that has happened in the thread so far clarity, you mention marv??
Do you have any reads at all?
Read the thread please? I came back, commented on trfl and then marv showed up so I said hi. On July 06 2015 19:40 boxerfred wrote:
I dont like first day claims at all. just creating more confusion and more "maybes". how serious were the cop claims btw? pure lel? I think self-aware wandered claim is fine. The cop claims were obviously just people being silly,
So your problem is that I answered Oats' questions and that I told you the cop claims were obviously silly?
|
On July 06 2015 20:35 Clarity_nl wrote:Show nested quote +On July 06 2015 20:23 Palmar wrote:
##vote clarity_nl
Now that we're ganging up on you, how do you feel clarity?
Not really bothered. I thought you said you were undecided on me, what changed your mind?
opportunism
|
well kelsier it was like this:
I read up to page 20
I skimmed through the rest till 40
I did not like the sheep that was pointed out
I remembered the first post (which I did not read too deep into before), read it and was not liking that he instabelieved the VT claim.
the overly defensive + attentionshift post was not taken into consideration for my vote. thanks for reminding me, makes me dislike him even more.
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
