|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On July 07 2015 23:30 Harkon wrote:This post is definitely a pretty bold statement especially since it isn't paired with any reason as to why. Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 11:37 milo109 wrote: Meh. I think LS is a better lynch. Your case is unconvincing. i thought the same about that comment
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 07 2015 23:45 Holyflare wrote:still want more people to do this (it's more than just the page i linked, it's like 2 or 3 pages)
|
On July 08 2015 00:11 Holyflare wrote: like "hf looks weird for name dropping the people he thinks are scummy when asked for a list of people he thinks are scummy"
is that what you're saying obi?
Too many names for not enough reasons.
But if you feel like dumbing down my argument and saying that it's about you responding about scumlists, then sure.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
On July 07 2015 23:46 Damdred wrote: Good morning guys, i've caught up to the thread and would like to push you all to kill clarity today.
I'm not going to bother posting tons of quotes so you should fact check yourself after you get done reading.
The first thing of note to look at when it comes to clarity is his weird way of reading HF at the start of the game. Something that is really Non alignment indicative gets him to totally town read HF and say that in no way would he lynch HF today and he would totally fight against his lynch today. To me this is extremely odd, openings are usually not really that important and when informed that HF is the best (arguably) scum player on this site, the stance never changed and no fear is shown at all towards HF.
The next thing that really bugs me about Clarity is lack of follow up and ignoring of questions. I think that is extremely scummy behavior, if you look in his filter you will see that multiple times I asked him questions about the town read he gave HF, any more reads and his reasoning behind voteing wave and open ended questions. He ignores them until I continue to push them down his throat. He has no real follow up which I think is damning.
The weird vote and unvote has been talked about a bit by Marv as being really strange. Wave really really hasn't done jack all this game so not sure why he would unvote as it feels sorta like hes just going with thread sentiment to an extent and going where its safe. HF pushes wave goes to wave, thread goes against ritoky jumps to ritoky. Now is trying to get marv to tell him where to go. And has no real reads at this point.
TLDR Has no fear of people he says are town, ie HF after one post Lacks follow through on some posts/questions Lacks scum reads Follows thread sentiment and jumps to another when its available instead of pushing what he thinks.
This guy is scum vot ehim.
you know the third reason marv has already said was incorrect. clarity seemed to put thought into his wave read imo.
there's like 3 people who have jumped onto this clarity thing, you, HtS and Boxer. Boxer already had clarity as scum so that's ok but you and Hts trying to get onto a case that wasn't even correct is scummy imo.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 08 2015 00:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 00:11 Holyflare wrote: like "hf looks weird for name dropping the people he thinks are scummy when asked for a list of people he thinks are scummy"
is that what you're saying obi? Too many names for not enough reasons. But if you feel like dumbing down my argument and saying that it's about you responding about scumlists, then sure.
and how have my reads got no reasons? did you even ask for my reasons? i think i've explained pretty much that entire list during my filter
|
Marv talk to me about EBH and his more recent posts. Specifically the ones where he fencesits on the whole "Trfel/LS" fight and adds both to his lynch list.
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On July 08 2015 00:07 geript wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 00:05 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Hf's giant list of people he has no idea about really bothers me. Same thing when geript does it. I agree. Seeing HF in a nighty and pink frilly panties is quite disturbing. this is so amusing to me right now.
|
On July 07 2015 22:58 Holyflare wrote: but in general I'd say it's a lot of responding to points about things and not really having the motivation to do it any further. It's like giving the answers about what people normally do and making no conclusions. The one person she did it on was Milo and that looked a bit meh to me.
Distinctly false. I pushed ritoky as well, and I still think he's scum now. This is part of what I mean about selective reasoning. Also the point on BM, he didn't do jack all in Himalayas, but in this game, he posted the wanderer claim and then AFKed. That's the difference here. I was willing to believe it when he first posted but I also had an expectation there'd be more from him.
I don't even know what disingenuous even means but there's a difference here that is worthy being pointed out - if he is going to claim a town role, does he have the behaviour to back it up or is he just skating by? Marv is saying (from prior knowledge) it's possible. So calling that read poor is also pretty selective reasoning on HF's end. If he had posted nothing at all then HF might have a valid point against me.
Obviously BM runs the risk of being modkilled but seeing this I needed to respond. That also said, I do agree that a BM lynch, if town, will also gain no information.
|
On July 08 2015 00:14 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 00:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On July 08 2015 00:11 Holyflare wrote: like "hf looks weird for name dropping the people he thinks are scummy when asked for a list of people he thinks are scummy"
is that what you're saying obi? Too many names for not enough reasons. But if you feel like dumbing down my argument and saying that it's about you responding about scumlists, then sure. and how have my reads got no reasons? did you even ask for my reasons? i think i've explained pretty much that entire list during my filter
I didn't say no reasons. I don't particularly care about your reasons. Too many scummy people for not enough reasons.
I don't understand why you're so concerned about this. It's something that's resolved with time either way and it's not even a high priority for me.
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
Oh. And I still don't have a townread on Damdred. So I could definitely lynch him.
|
United Kingdom10443 Posts
Damdred what is your opinion of lightning strike now?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On July 08 2015 00:14 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Marv talk to me about EBH and his more recent posts. Specifically the ones where he fencesits on the whole "Trfel/LS" fight and adds both to his lynch list. his was one of the filters i looked at earlier and came away thinking that i didn't really know either way, let me go refresh myself
|
At this point I've gone extensively over a couple of people and I just really don't know at the moment so I will in fact end up sheeping whatever case pops up.
People I would be okay with consolodating on in no particular order:
Vivax BM Bluehunter <- I don't buy the whole "scum wouldn't bluehunt in thread" milo and maaaaybe ruxxar, I felt he was townie for the first half of day 1 but looking at him again I just don't really see
If I need to I would consolidate on trfel but I'm not happy about it. Like I've said I like HF's arguments but his defense I find very towny.
Oh and WIFOM ALERT why would I unvote WoS when I could have easily jsut sat on him?
|
On July 08 2015 00:15 geript wrote: Oh. And I still don't have a townread on Damdred. So I could definitely lynch him. who do you have a townread on?
why is damdred's case on clarity bad?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On July 08 2015 00:15 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 22:58 Holyflare wrote: but in general I'd say it's a lot of responding to points about things and not really having the motivation to do it any further. It's like giving the answers about what people normally do and making no conclusions. The one person she did it on was Milo and that looked a bit meh to me. Distinctly false. I pushed ritoky as well, and I still think he's scum now. This is part of what I mean about selective reasoning. Also the point on BM, he didn't do jack all in Himalayas, but in this game, he posted the wanderer claim and then AFKed. That's the difference here. I was willing to believe it when he first posted but I also had an expectation there'd be more from him. I don't even know what disingenuous even means but there's a difference here that is worthy being pointed out - if he is going to claim a town role, does he have the behaviour to back it up or is he just skating by? Marv is saying (from prior knowledge) it's possible. So calling that read poor is also pretty selective reasoning on HF's end. If he had posted nothing at all then HF might have a valid point against me. Obviously BM runs the risk of being modkilled but seeing this I needed to respond. That also said, I do agree that a BM lynch, if town, will also gain no information.
Yes, none of those pushes were distinctly inspiring and you say things that you think several times (in regards to me specifically) that you never have any intention of ever following up on so in all honestly it looks like you're adding fuel to the fire whenever someone mentions my name just for the sake of doing it. It also doesn't align with what's been happening in the thread at all. As for BM:
On July 07 2015 23:05 Holyflare wrote: oh right yeh bm posted
On July 07 2015 23:06 Holyflare wrote:but yeh hts' read is still super disingenuous after himalayas where bm just didn't play and was town Show nested quote +On July 07 2015 23:04 Harkon wrote:On July 07 2015 23:04 Holyflare wrote: towny attitude with scummy posts and thought processes which is pretty similar to carnival so maybe mafia but also maybe not :D Towny attitude means...? annoyance at being marginalised and wanting to be heard, which is also just a trait of being stubborn and having an ego which is why combined with her actual content and posts might be mafia but also might be not
BM posted shit all in himalayas and was town, BM has posted shit all in this game and has a claim and could be town. I'm not going to say someone is burnt out mafia when their meta is to sometimes not play as town compared to Trfel whose meta is post logical thoughts a lot of the time.
|
On July 08 2015 00:17 Clarity_nl wrote: At this point I've gone extensively over a couple of people and I just really don't know at the moment so I will in fact end up sheeping whatever case pops up.
People I would be okay with consolodating on in no particular order:
Vivax BM Bluehunter <- I don't buy the whole "scum wouldn't bluehunt in thread" milo and maaaaybe ruxxar, I felt he was townie for the first half of day 1 but looking at him again I just don't really see
If I need to I would consolidate on trfel but I'm not happy about it. Like I've said I like HF's arguments but his defense I find very towny.
Oh and WIFOM ALERT why would I unvote WoS when I could have easily jsut sat on him? Nobody went with you on WoS. Hardly an easy vote to keep.
FINALLY SOMEONE DOESNT SCUMREAD ME.
Why are you scumreading vivax?
|
United Kingdom36160 Posts
On July 08 2015 00:16 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 00:14 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Marv talk to me about EBH and his more recent posts. Specifically the ones where he fencesits on the whole "Trfel/LS" fight and adds both to his lynch list. his was one of the filters i looked at earlier and came away thinking that i didn't really know either way, let me go refresh myself Yeah, there was this part of his original post that i liked:
Palmar - not much to say here I can just tell he's town. Finding the loophole in geript's logic and posting about him looking for his name are both reasons to townread him but I won't be surprised if i get roasted for this read. I also thought the Vivax/geript thing was a little weird to be mafia in the same post.
maybe the Trfel/LS stuff is weird but i don't know if or why it's scummy weird. feel free to tell me why you think so
|
On July 08 2015 00:16 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On July 08 2015 00:14 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Marv talk to me about EBH and his more recent posts. Specifically the ones where he fencesits on the whole "Trfel/LS" fight and adds both to his lynch list. his was one of the filters i looked at earlier and came away thinking that i didn't really know either way, let me go refresh myself EBH made that big post right before I came out with my "not in my town circle" list. I remember reading it a few times and being like 'eh shrug.'
|
On July 08 2015 00:13 KelsierSC wrote: there's like 3 people who have jumped onto this clarity thing, you, HtS and Boxer. Boxer already had clarity as scum so that's ok but you and Hts trying to get onto a case that wasn't even correct is scummy imo.
Read the top of page 98. I backed off once he stated it was correct. That was some confusion on my end. Although Palmar is saying otherwise, still I had him on my list of people to review.
Also HF, re the point on milo being meh, I'm still waiting for the latest round of his answers to my questions whcih he'd say he'd provide.
|
|
|
|