Idk how active I'll be though.
Newbie Student Mafia XI
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
geript
10024 Posts
Idk how active I'll be though. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote: I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. people should be talking about this. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 12 2015 10:29 WaveofShadow wrote: I invited you to talk to me but you've given me the cold shoulder thus far. I has a sad Kinda busy dog sitting. Was really sruprised when people didn't jump on that post at all. Like that's a post that mafia would usually be all over if that guy's town. It's so... indecisive... passive... unopinionated... blah. I've only skimmed but that was one of two posts that stuck out to me. Batsnacks weird post stuck out to me too. IDK what he's doing, pulling a chezinu? IDK. I couldn't figure out wtf he was trying to say. I'll look at it again later when I get a full read in, but his post was at least interesting even if it is probably NAI | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 12 2015 10:55 WaveofShadow wrote: On this note though, actually. You expected people to post about that, specifically you expected mafia to jump on that and call him scum for being bad, so what does it mean to you exactly that no one did? (And what is NAI?) nai = not alignment indicative And yes. I was surprised that no one had commented on the post because it's a post that I would expect mafia to push hard if the guy was town. So it's not just the odd post. It's also the fact that it went unnoticed; ie. why wouldu mafia ignore lynchbait post? | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 12 2015 10:12 Sulfurus wrote: I'm starting to really like the case on Kickstarter; he has made a lot of posts that give the illusion of being a helpful towny with his PSA and rule clarifications but they are really just filler and something that the mods already have covered. On top of that I think n00bKing's defense of ruXx is spot on which gives even more validity to the Kickstarter push. ##Vote: Kickstarter (I admit that in a vacuum I would probably scum read Bats more but I've learned my lesson from last game) This post is pretty bad. On June 12 2015 10:30 Kickstart wrote: Because I've had the urge to troll you since I came back to playing mafia Oats. I can't help myself. Don't worry though the 2 scums atm are ruxxar and sulfurus so you are not in my tunnel atm. Decent town tone read. Oats might actually be town. IDK. Haven't had a great read on him in a while. But I'm ok with his ruxxar read. I kinda think Rels is town. His push based on confirmations is bad, but the initial reasoning isn't awful. Boxerfred might be town. I don't think he'd try to cut out of playing after his last game if he rolled mafia. Not 100% but maybe don't lynch him d1. The only thing I think I can remember about noobking is that he's only like posted on random bullshit. Like lying or whatever. He's meh at best. Moose is maybe town. His posting is confidentish and I can understand how his thought process moves around. Wubbybumpkins is pretty weird. I'm tempted to try and get him lynched, but I haven't gotten to play with him in a while. Besides I like how the carpet matches the drapes LOL wave. I can always be mafia, but that's because Prome isn't around Oooh Damdred replaced in. That guy's town 100%. ezpz. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:12 WaveofShadow wrote: You wish you could get me lynched bbygrl. I like your 'everyone is town' list. Especially the part where you exclude me from it. It's only like 5 people which makes me really sad. I want another 2-3. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:13 Damdred wrote: I'll take all the free town reads and get shot tonight. That would be boss. You've activated my trap card Scumdred | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:17 scott31337 wrote: And how he obviously hasn't read the whole thread. Nah I have. I was going through and put my thoughts in somewhat along as I was reading. But it kinda turned into commenting on people who made a post I liked. I saw your initial post. It seemed ok ish iirc. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:20 MoosyDoosy wrote: geript basically contributed nothing with that post. All he did was reiterate everything we said in the previous pages and banter a bit. Would also appreciate it if you explained your absence and why you left after WaveofShadow called you out @geript. dogsitting, job hunting, drinking, getting food, talking with my sister in prep for my trip to see her next week, watching LPL, taking the dogs out to pee, watching LCK, taking the dogs out on a walk, watching EU LSC, watching porn, feeding the dogs, jerking off, jerking the dogs off. You know the usual. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
Clearly that guy is 3P. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:22 WaveofShadow wrote: Geript I don't understand how you go from seemingly town-->scum-->town on moosy without any real change in anything he has done. Not following thought processes with you at all, though I think that actually might be standard for you and it annoys me. Never assumed he was town to start w/ babycakes. Moreso: 1. Moosy makes a god awful post --> I think he's scum 2. No one pushes Moosy --> If he's town I'd expect someone to have jumped on him therefore scum 3. Posts a shit ton --> Probably just nubian with bad opening and mafia afk or otherwise engaged | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 03:43 WaveofShadow wrote: And yet you did anyway. Well Dear. Why don't you explain how someone can be lynch bait and expected to be jumped on by mafia (if they're town) if said person has posted AND hasn't posted something terrible? | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 04:14 WaveofShadow wrote: You'd have to explain that yourself since it was the basis of you voting him in the first place. Am I in the fucking twilight zone here? I clearly called out his bad post. So how do you get this idea that I somehow didn't think his opener was a shitty mafia post? | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 04:28 WaveofShadow wrote: Because as can be seen very clearly from my opening posts towards you, it looks like at first like you were town attempting to bait 'other scum' into voting with on someone you felt was town, that scum should have jumped on. Only later do I see that you call out his bad post while at the same time saying that scum didn't jump on him for the bad post while this is EXACTLY WHAT YOU DID. You literally called yourself scum. Not even close. Try again wubby. There's literally zero reason to expect me to be townreading him at that point. My argument is pretty clear: 1. His opener was an awful post 2. *If* he's town, then mafia would normally be all over that shit 3. He's likely mafia because of both bad post and the fact that no one is jumping all over that shit Yet, you've twisted this into: Moose is town. Mafia should be jumping all over him. Geript is jumping all over him. Geript is mafia. The thing about it is though that I didn't even push that shit hard. Like I didn't make a big case or stink about it when I easily could have. I made like a handful of posts on him which like half of them have been in response to you. Rather I've been pretty succinct on him and pretty meh. I can't even understand how you're approaching the game at all Wave. So esplain where you're at and why you're there. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 13 2015 04:37 Sulfurus wrote: @geript That's good that you no longer scum read Moosy but Bats hasn't made the same realization you have and you townread two of the people voting on him. So what do you think of him? I'd rather lynch you. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote: I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. Did you look at this post at all? He's commenting about things that don't really matter in a way that he's seemingly had some interesting thought on it. He asks a question that's essentially a statement. He meanders through potentially interesting topics while giving no opinion on anything. Then he plays the dumbtell card. It's a big post that literally offers nothing while commenting on things in a way that confer a formed opinion. It almost can be boiled down to: "I've been thinking about this game, but I won't really comment on it at all. What do you guys think about this random stuff?" I don't see even newer town players do that often. | ||
| ||