| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
On June 23 2015 09:20 geript wrote: You realize I'm going to lynch you on D1 for being useless to town right? The game hasn't started yet so your claims about what you will/won't do d1 are purely wifom and can not be trusted. Just join you'll have a good time and maybe if your ass is still sore enough you can get me lynched d1. Anything is possible! | ||
|
Oatsmaster
United States16628 Posts
Like even in lylo I got caught up with rels, maybe if I actually went and looked at what trfel said when he called wave town, I could've made a better read. Cause that's totally the connection. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
A mafia will actually have put more thought into not slipping anything in their posts, so their posts will be a lot more polished and thought through than town. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
His play was just too perfectly aligned with town play. The attacks he made on sulfurus totally convinced me he was town. Also when he was so distraught that I called out moosys blue role convinced me doubly of that. You could say I'm easily fooled  | ||
|
geript
10024 Posts
On June 23 2015 09:24 Oatsmaster wrote: Actually I think the main mistake town made this game, including me, was being way too trigger happy at "bad" posts because as it turns out, only one mafia had bad posts but like almost all the town did. Like even in lylo I got caught up with rels, maybe if I actually went and looked at what trfel said when he called wave town, I could've made a better read. Cause that's totally the connection. This is actually a really good point. And it's something that you kinda just have to learn. For example, look at how I attacked Moosy early on. His opener was really really bad. Like really, really bad. You still have to take that in context of his whole filter. Early on, he's really fucking scummy. But around mid D1 he was super towny. I probably should explain that read but I'm feeling lazy. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
It looked like just an excited newbie like me. | ||
|
batsnacks
United States4466 Posts
| ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On June 23 2015 09:29 ruXxar wrote: Damnit oats, I really wanted to believe your claim, but I needed something more substantial against wave if you wanted to take him down. His play was just too perfectly aligned with town play. The attacks he made on sulfurus totally convinced me he was town. Also when he was so distraught that I called out moosys blue role convinced me doubly of that. You could say I'm easily fooled Read the bolded :D | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
| ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
Too perfect play => mafia. | ||
|
Trfel
7015 Posts
On June 23 2015 09:39 ruXxar wrote: His post was doing a whole lot of nothing.Yeah.. I didn't understand your mafia read on moosy's first post at all. It looked like just an excited newbie like me. On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote: The first two sentences are useless. He's overwhelmed, and he is looking forward to the game. This doesn't help us find mafia.I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. Down to business. This also doesn't help us find mafia. He then asked two questions which didn't go much of anywhere, and he took guesses at the answers, like he's already trying to justify asking the questions or show that he's trying to think about the game. This really doesn't help with doing anything other than saying "Ha, I got it right!" later, which doesn't fit a mindset of actually solving the game. Then he asked about the number of mafia in the game (which is clearly stated in the OP), and gave an unflipped association argument that didn't go anywhere. While in the same post (I think) saying that the association analysis is overwhelming him. Anyway, I think that's what makes it scumy. I was going to question MoosyDoosy about this myself, later, but I wanted to push my points on ruXxar to their conclusion (whatever that would be) first. On June 23 2015 09:55 ruXxar wrote: Also, LOL I think that's going to be my new mafia tell from now on. Too perfect play => mafia.  Have fun with that  | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
I mean analysis is basically just selecting quotes from people, putting them in order and trying to read between the lines. Not much chance of slipping up there as mafia. It's much harder if you actually engange actively in conversation and get riled up. Which is why I'm actually impressed with how you managed to look so towny wave while actually beeing so actively enganged. Trfel really like like... cold..distant? If I were to put it like that. He was an analysisbeast but he felt sort of disengaged from the game besides that. At the end I actually thought it was more likely trfel could possibly be mafia than you wave, but I couldn't find a likely partner for him. Like I could foresee that either you or trfel were mafia, but that you both were mafia together was just too hard to swallow. BOTH of our 2 towniest peeople as mafia? No.. my world wouldn't make sense like that. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
+ Show Spoiler + On June 23 2015 09:39 ruXxar wrote: His post was doing a whole lot of nothing.Yeah.. I didn't understand your mafia read on moosy's first post at all. It looked like just an excited newbie like me. On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote: The first two sentences are useless. He's overwhelmed, and he is looking forward to the game. This doesn't help us find mafia.I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. Down to business. This also doesn't help us find mafia. He then asked two questions which didn't go much of anywhere, and he took guesses at the answers, like he's already trying to justify asking the questions or show that he's trying to think about the game. This really doesn't help with doing anything other than saying "Ha, I got it right!" later, which doesn't fit a mindset of actually solving the game. Then he asked about the number of mafia in the game (which is clearly stated in the OP), and gave an unflipped association argument that didn't go anywhere. While in the same post (I think) saying that the association analysis is overwhelming him. Anyway, I think that's what makes it scumy. I was going to question MoosyDoosy about this myself, later, but I wanted to push my points on ruXxar to their conclusion (whatever that would be) first. On June 23 2015 09:55 ruXxar wrote: Also, LOL I think that's going to be my new mafia tell from now on. Too perfect play => mafia. Have fun with that I see what you're saying about mooys post, but I still don't agree with it. I think people are just reading too much into it, just like you did into my post at the start | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
On June 23 2015 10:12 ruXxar wrote: On June 23 2015 09:57 Trfel wrote: + Show Spoiler + On June 23 2015 09:39 ruXxar wrote: His post was doing a whole lot of nothing.Yeah.. I didn't understand your mafia read on moosy's first post at all. It looked like just an excited newbie like me. On June 12 2015 08:16 MoosyDoosy wrote: The first two sentences are useless. He's overwhelmed, and he is looking forward to the game. This doesn't help us find mafia.I am just rather overwhelmed by the amount of (cross) analysis occurring right now. ^.^ Although this is my first time around, I can already tell this will be great. Down to business. So @ruXxar, your reasoning for voting for Kickstart is his statement about lying in a game of Mafia? And @Trfel, can you please share why you're suspecting @ruXxar? I would have to agree with ruXxar's point that it is generally annoying when someone answers a question directed at you. Although I don't see why Kickstart went so far as to vote for Oatsmaster right off the bat. Unless he's the Mafia and trying to mislead us. On another note, do we know how many Mafias there are? If there are two Mafias, Oatsmaster and Kickstart may be those two and may have set this up to make everyone confused and make people like you two fight amongst yourselves. Down to business. This also doesn't help us find mafia. He then asked two questions which didn't go much of anywhere, and he took guesses at the answers, like he's already trying to justify asking the questions or show that he's trying to think about the game. This really doesn't help with doing anything other than saying "Ha, I got it right!" later, which doesn't fit a mindset of actually solving the game. Then he asked about the number of mafia in the game (which is clearly stated in the OP), and gave an unflipped association argument that didn't go anywhere. While in the same post (I think) saying that the association analysis is overwhelming him. Anyway, I think that's what makes it scumy. I was going to question MoosyDoosy about this myself, later, but I wanted to push my points on ruXxar to their conclusion (whatever that would be) first. On June 23 2015 09:55 ruXxar wrote: Also, LOL I think that's going to be my new mafia tell from now on. Too perfect play => mafia. Have fun with that I see what you're saying about mooys post, but I still don't agree with it. I think people are just reading too much into it, just like you did into my post at the start O wait you were mafia... nvm. | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
I guess it's my untrained eye and naive gullibility at work there . | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
|
Sulfurus
United States166 Posts
On June 23 2015 10:23 Onegu wrote: So get on TS in the mafia channel in about a half hour or so if you want to talk about the game. We will most likely stream it or record it so people can listen to it later if they dont have time today How do you do that? | ||
|
ruXxar
Norway5669 Posts
Go here | ||
|
Onegu
United States9699 Posts
| ||
| ||
StarCraft 2 StarCraft: Brood War Dota 2 League of Legends Counter-Strike Super Smash Bros Heroes of the Storm Other Games |
|
The PondCast
WardiTV Invitational
Replay Cast
RongYI Cup
herO vs Maru
uThermal 2v2 Circuit
Replay Cast
Wardi Open
Monday Night Weeklies
Sparkling Tuna Cup
|
|
|
EPT
