|
On June 09 2015 19:44 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:41 prplhz wrote:
i only have to talk to jat for a few posts for his dumb bullshit to piss me off so much i can't do anything else.
this boxerfred thing, i sort of get the TMI argument but it's not strong enough. the guy is around and doing tons of shit while getting shat on. again, i totally see where the martyring/frustration after talking to jat comes from. artanis had it, i sort of had it, marv had it? now boxer has it. lynching someone for martyring after they have talked to jat who is a fucking asshole is just not sound.
and i don't want to be in lylo with chez because then i know i'm just going to lynch him over anyone else (i know it's not lylo tomorrow). i don't like his posting after we started pushing him either. At least I am not openly insulting people so I have that going for me. I also wasn't the only one interrogating boxerfred. And saying he is doing tons of shit - where on earth does that come from? Do you think his answers to me and marv made sense? If so - how?
however, you do seem to be pissing everybody off. me? not so much. i guess i have that going on for me. i don't know if his answers made sense, but there was nothing in there i found scummy.
|
On June 09 2015 19:41 prplhz wrote:
and i don't want to be in lylo with chez because then i know i'm just going to lynch him over anyone else (i know it's not lylo tomorrow). i don't like his posting after we started pushing him either.
Btw I agree with this to some degree.
|
On June 09 2015 19:45 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:41 prplhz wrote:
i only have to talk to jat for a few posts for his dumb bullshit to piss me off so much i can't do anything else.
this boxerfred thing, i sort of get the TMI argument but it's not strong enough. the guy is around and doing tons of shit while getting shat on. again, i totally see where the martyring/frustration after talking to jat comes from. artanis had it, i sort of had it, marv had it? now boxer has it. lynching someone for martyring after they have talked to jat who is a fucking asshole is just not sound.
and i don't want to be in lylo with chez because then i know i'm just going to lynch him over anyone else (i know it's not lylo tomorrow). i don't like his posting after we started pushing him either. this makes me sad because you are not reading what i am saying about boxerfred. sigh
i saw you point on how he talked about chez. sometimes people make general observations for no particular reason.
|
On June 09 2015 19:46 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:45 marvellosity wrote:On June 09 2015 19:41 prplhz wrote:
i only have to talk to jat for a few posts for his dumb bullshit to piss me off so much i can't do anything else.
this boxerfred thing, i sort of get the TMI argument but it's not strong enough. the guy is around and doing tons of shit while getting shat on. again, i totally see where the martyring/frustration after talking to jat comes from. artanis had it, i sort of had it, marv had it? now boxer has it. lynching someone for martyring after they have talked to jat who is a fucking asshole is just not sound.
and i don't want to be in lylo with chez because then i know i'm just going to lynch him over anyone else (i know it's not lylo tomorrow). i don't like his posting after we started pushing him either. this makes me sad because you are not reading what i am saying about boxerfred. sigh i saw you point on how he talked about chez. sometimes people make general observations for no particular reason.
That's not the point though.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 09 2015 19:46 prplhz wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:45 marvellosity wrote:On June 09 2015 19:41 prplhz wrote:
i only have to talk to jat for a few posts for his dumb bullshit to piss me off so much i can't do anything else.
this boxerfred thing, i sort of get the TMI argument but it's not strong enough. the guy is around and doing tons of shit while getting shat on. again, i totally see where the martyring/frustration after talking to jat comes from. artanis had it, i sort of had it, marv had it? now boxer has it. lynching someone for martyring after they have talked to jat who is a fucking asshole is just not sound.
and i don't want to be in lylo with chez because then i know i'm just going to lynch him over anyone else (i know it's not lylo tomorrow). i don't like his posting after we started pushing him either. this makes me sad because you are not reading what i am saying about boxerfred. sigh i saw you point on how he talked about chez. sometimes people make general observations for no particular reason.
the point was, if you were reading, it wasn't for no particular reason, it was directly tied in to my questioning him on Vayne, and he was using Chez as a crutch/reason for how he was treating Vayne.
doyousee?
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
|
.... no. okay i'll reread it then.
|
so your point is that he's saying "i'm voting vayne for the same reason you're voting chez" and then that's scummy? hmm
|
anyway
On June 09 2015 19:10 marvellosity wrote:
##unvote
##vote: boxerfred
so bored of your martyring
just die
seems to be the reason i thought you were voting him for martyring
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
On June 09 2015 19:58 prplhz wrote:
so your point is that he's saying "i'm voting vayne for the same reason you're voting chez" and then that's scummy? hmm
not really/quite
but if you can't read/understand it i can't really be bothered to explain at this stage 
|
On June 09 2015 20:00 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:58 prplhz wrote:
so your point is that he's saying "i'm voting vayne for the same reason you're voting chez" and then that's scummy? hmm not really/quite but if you can't read/understand it i can't really be bothered to explain at this stage
it's probably not that important or strong anyway seeing that you've just unvoted him.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
it's both, but never mind.
|
you're just trying to play down the INDISPUTABLE FACT that you just got out argued by me.
anyway i'm leaving now will be back for deadline or maybe earlier. chez is sort of an alright lynch today and i'm glad d2 wasn't gonna be all that boring.
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
no, i've accepted the fact i can't elevate you to my level, so i've given up 
|
|
|
United Kingdom36161 Posts
that's being disputed? :D
|
On June 09 2015 20:00 marvellosity wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 19:58 prplhz wrote:
so your point is that he's saying "i'm voting vayne for the same reason you're voting chez" and then that's scummy? hmm not really/quite but if you can't read/understand it i can't really be bothered to explain at this stage
On June 07 2015 04:56 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On June 07 2015 04:55 prplhz wrote:On June 07 2015 04:54 justanothertownie wrote:On June 07 2015 04:53 prplhz wrote:
and no you didn't say "unclaim immediately"
if you read your post you said "if you unclaim then you should be lynched" You should read and try to understand the whole post before you accuse me of something stupid. it's 1 fucking sentence, there's no hidden meaning. "if you unclaim, you will be lynched". that is what you say. what the fuck? Are you really unable to read?
This guy is still openly stealing my reads.
|
|
|
On June 09 2015 15:40 prplhz wrote:
@Half the Sky I guess you're sort of excused since you just replaced in so I'm just going to give you some leeway. However I don't remember a single post you made so maybe you could write a memorable one about why you're lynching Chezinu?
Stopped in the low 30s of the thread last night, but based on the information I had:
1 Chez hadn't done jack all through the point I stopped reading
2 When he reappeared in thread he and Marv have a dispute on lurkiness which Marv effectively disproves (and happens to be one of the main points why Chez is voting Marv) - I ask him to comment on the part where Marv says he doesn't like the push on Fecalfeast.
So my expectation is that Chez either would have followed up on that comment (I specifically asked Chez why he left that part out) or continue his push on Fecalfeast or try and flesh out his alignment. He did neither from what I could tell.
|
On June 09 2015 22:30 Half the Sky wrote:Show nested quote +On June 09 2015 15:40 prplhz wrote:
@Half the Sky I guess you're sort of excused since you just replaced in so I'm just going to give you some leeway. However I don't remember a single post you made so maybe you could write a memorable one about why you're lynching Chezinu? Stopped in the low 30s of the thread last night, but based on the information I had: 1 Chez hadn't done jack all through the point I stopped reading 2 When he reappeared in thread he and Marv have a dispute on lurkiness which Marv effectively disproves (and happens to be one of the main points why Chez is voting Marv) - I ask him to comment on the part where Marv says he doesn't like the push on Fecalfeast. So my expectation is that Chez either would have followed up on that comment (I specifically asked Chez why he left that part out) or continue his push on Fecalfeast or try and flesh out his alignment. He did neither from what I could tell.
I would advise you to just catch up as soon as possible without feeling the need to give updated thoughts in between. There is no way you are getting lynched today so no need to contribute without being caught up.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
