|
On May 19 2015 12:36 sciberbia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 12:29 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I couldn't the answer to the question I asked Shocky.
@Obi He just said he hasn't played on these forums in ~5 years. I don't think he ever said whether or not he played on other forums. I can only assume he misunderstood your question. So what do you think on Shocky? Want to lynch?
Eh.
I think I'd prefer killing a lurky person at this point like Vivax or smthn. Vivax is the least prone to lurking/being unproductive when he's town and I feel like he'd be trying harder to make this work if he was.
If he isn't still purposefully trying to sink his towngames just so his scumgame is better, that is.
|
Palmar scum. Yup.
[b]##vote Palmar[b]
Also zealos is scum.
Vivax maybe,
On May 19 2015 00:41 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:40 Zealos wrote:
I mean scib is contributing from a towny standpoint so far, I'm just worried that his association with Damred is a bit off The word standpoint exists in english?
On May 19 2015 00:46 Vivax wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:42 GlowingBear wrote:On May 19 2015 00:38 Vivax wrote:
The thing with scib is that he's an amazing player and while I had an agenda-y feeling about him at some point he's definitely nobody I want to lynch today. I actually might just sheep him and see if he wins the game for us or lynch him if he doesn't. Is he? I've never heard of him before. He didn't play many games but for some reason he's super good as either alignment. Safe bet to sheep if you TR him, I still have to decide if I take that risk.
useless posts.
and 'risk''? why does that even mean man.
meh, the only thing stopping me is assassination was similar in terms of activity.
|
On May 19 2015 13:07 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 12:36 sciberbia wrote:On May 19 2015 12:29 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I couldn't the answer to the question I asked Shocky.
@Obi He just said he hasn't played on these forums in ~5 years. I don't think he ever said whether or not he played on other forums. I can only assume he misunderstood your question. So what do you think on Shocky? Want to lynch? Eh. I think I'd prefer killing a lurky person at this point like Vivax or smthn. Vivax is the least prone to lurking/being unproductive when he's town and I feel like he'd be trying harder to make this work if he was. If he isn't still purposefully trying to sink his towngames just so his scumgame is better, that is.
There's nothing stopping me from putting both Shocky and Vivax on my scumlist, actually.
I might roll with that instead.
|
On May 19 2015 13:36 Oatsmaster wrote:Palmar scum. Yup. [b]##vote Palmar[b] Also zealos is scum. Vivax maybe, Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:41 Vivax wrote:On May 19 2015 00:40 Zealos wrote:
I mean scib is contributing from a towny standpoint so far, I'm just worried that his association with Damred is a bit off The word standpoint exists in english? Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:46 Vivax wrote:On May 19 2015 00:42 GlowingBear wrote:On May 19 2015 00:38 Vivax wrote:
The thing with scib is that he's an amazing player and while I had an agenda-y feeling about him at some point he's definitely nobody I want to lynch today. I actually might just sheep him and see if he wins the game for us or lynch him if he doesn't. Is he? I've never heard of him before. He didn't play many games but for some reason he's super good as either alignment. Safe bet to sheep if you TR him, I still have to decide if I take that risk. useless posts. and 'risk''? why does that even mean man. meh, the only thing stopping me is assassination was similar in terms of activity.
Why Palmar?
|
Because just saying "lynch damdred and zealos" is not trying to win the game. And town palmar wants to win the game.
|
On May 19 2015 14:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
Because just saying "lynch damdred and zealos" is not trying to win the game. And town palmar wants to win the game.
iirc he totally has the capability to be lurky and useless as town.
|
Honestly I shouldn't even try to argue: I townread Palmar or back off of him for awful reasons literally all the time and I don't trust myself to read him fairly.
|
On May 19 2015 14:43 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 14:06 Oatsmaster wrote:
Because just saying "lynch damdred and zealos" is not trying to win the game. And town palmar wants to win the game.
iirc he totally has the capability to be lurky and useless as town.
He does...
|
@Obi
So have you finished catching up with the thread?
Are you planning to vote for anyone you want to lynch or what?
|
+ Show Spoiler [Oats] +On May 19 2015 13:36 Oatsmaster wrote:Palmar scum. Yup. [b]##vote Palmar[b] Also zealos is scum. Vivax maybe, Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:41 Vivax wrote:On May 19 2015 00:40 Zealos wrote:
I mean scib is contributing from a towny standpoint so far, I'm just worried that his association with Damred is a bit off The word standpoint exists in english? Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 00:46 Vivax wrote:On May 19 2015 00:42 GlowingBear wrote:On May 19 2015 00:38 Vivax wrote:
The thing with scib is that he's an amazing player and while I had an agenda-y feeling about him at some point he's definitely nobody I want to lynch today. I actually might just sheep him and see if he wins the game for us or lynch him if he doesn't. Is he? I've never heard of him before. He didn't play many games but for some reason he's super good as either alignment. Safe bet to sheep if you TR him, I still have to decide if I take that risk. useless posts. and 'risk''? why does that even mean man. meh, the only thing stopping me is assassination was similar in terms of activity.
@Oats
Why is Zealos scum?
And what happened to me and damdred being scummy?
P.S. please put your vote in the voting thread
|
On May 13 2015 12:58 Fecalfeast wrote:
Activity:
There is no activity requirement for this game. Players will not be modkilled for inactivity. 
|
On May 13 2015 12:58 Fecalfeast wrote:
Play to win.
This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game.
|
On May 19 2015 15:43 sciberbia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 13 2015 12:58 Fecalfeast wrote:
Play to win.
This means you play your best to help your team win while you are alive and in the game. 
|
no one wants to talk to me?
|
>_>
have you read the thread?
who do you think is mafia?
|
On May 19 2015 15:59 sciberbia wrote:
>_>
have you read the thread?
who do you think is mafia? <_<
yes
stutters and onegu for now, still going over other players filters tho
stutters cuz his opening posts sound really bad, and its hard for me to see from a town mindset
onegu because hes been largely serious (suggests he is scum) and he did not mention being sad about rolling town like hes done in his last many town games... also hes just asking questions and generally not taking stances, plus he advocated plynch and he hates plynches
|
On May 19 2015 16:01 Qwerty! wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 15:59 sciberbia wrote:
>_>
have you read the thread?
who do you think is mafia? <_< yes stutters and onegu for now, still going over other players filters tho stutters cuz his opening posts sound really bad, and its hard for me to see from a town mindset onegu because hes been largely serious (suggests he is scum) and he did not mention being sad about rolling town like hes done in his last many town games... also hes just asking questions and generally not taking stances, plus he advocated plynch and he hates plynches
What do you think of Obi, ShoCkey, Palmar, and Vivax?
|
On May 19 2015 16:08 sciberbia wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 16:01 Qwerty! wrote:On May 19 2015 15:59 sciberbia wrote:
>_>
have you read the thread?
who do you think is mafia? <_< yes stutters and onegu for now, still going over other players filters tho stutters cuz his opening posts sound really bad, and its hard for me to see from a town mindset onegu because hes been largely serious (suggests he is scum) and he did not mention being sad about rolling town like hes done in his last many town games... also hes just asking questions and generally not taking stances, plus he advocated plynch and he hates plynches What do you think of Obi, ShoCkey, Palmar, and Vivax? I've only closely looked at Vivax...
i dont want to lynch vivax today cuz the quick read change on shocky was suspicious, the rest of his filter has felt reasonable and tone felt towny to me; plus i doubt mafia!vivax would change read suspiciously like that with no explanation (i know wifom....)
tbh no clue about obi and palmar.... i have a few thoughts about palmar but they are best kept to myself
shockey filter next on my list, but i feel like its really hard to read him... very risky lynch
he's a lesser experienced player, and while his association reads are not very good, that doesnt make him scum... im really surprised by how stubbornly he has been clinging to his reads despite everyone telling him he is wrong, i think that makes him more likely to be town (scum would conform more quickly)
i dont think he's a good lynch at all
|
On May 19 2015 16:01 Qwerty! wrote:Show nested quote +On May 19 2015 15:59 sciberbia wrote:
>_>
have you read the thread?
who do you think is mafia? <_< yes stutters and onegu for now, still going over other players filters tho stutters cuz his opening posts sound really bad, and its hard for me to see from a town mindset onegu because hes been largely serious (suggests he is scum) and he did not mention being sad about rolling town like hes done in his last many town games... also hes just asking questions and generally not taking stances, plus he advocated plynch and he hates plynches
Lol read my first post
|
On May 19 2015 16:13 Qwerty! wrote:
i dont want to lynch vivax today cuz the quick read change on shocky was suspicious, the rest of his filter has felt reasonable and tone felt towny to me; plus i doubt mafia!vivax would change read suspiciously like that with no explanation (i know wifom....)
Just to clarify for everyone else, I'm sure you meant to reference vivax's read change on zealos, not shocky.
On May 19 2015 16:13 Qwerty! wrote:
shockey filter next on my list, but i feel like its really hard to read him... very risky lynch
he's a lesser experienced player, and while his association reads are not very good, that doesnt make him scum... im really surprised by how stubbornly he has been clinging to his reads despite everyone telling him he is wrong, i think that makes him more likely to be town (scum would conform more quickly)
i dont think he's a good lynch at all
@Qwerty
I don't think the problem with shockey is his reads being bad. In fact I agree with you that clinging to bizarre conspiracy theories might be more of a towntell than a scumtell. My problem with shockey is that his first several posts dance around GB, seemingly building up suspicion against him without outright calling him mafia, and then he says he would only vote for Palmar or Obi. He waffles back and forth between implying that GB is mafia and GB isn't mafia. It's just baffling and doesn't seem consistent with a townie mindset. Either you should be suspicious of GB or you should not be.
After you've read his filter, please tell me if you have any thoughts on what I've said here about shockey.
Also, tell me why we should not lynch you today. Are you going to be an asset to the town in future? Are you going to demonstrate your towniness by helping to find mafia? Or are you going to consistently afk for 36 hours randomly?
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
