|
On May 16 2015 02:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Btw, I forgot to mention it last night but I thought that TD looked better in the back-and-forth than Oats. It did kind of seem like Oats was being unreasonable. More like TD is over defensive and doesnt know how to read.
|
Also keep in mind glowingbear, you are voting with someone who shot rsoultin outta the complete fucking blue and never justified it.
|
On May 16 2015 02:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2015 02:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2015 02:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Btw, I forgot to mention it last night but I thought that TD looked better in the back-and-forth than Oats. It did kind of seem like Oats was being unreasonable. More like TD is over defensive and doesnt know how to read. Dnu. Maybe. Specifically I remembered the post where you said he wasn't town, and then he broke it down and why he couldn't argue with it and it reminded me of the position I was in several games in a row. well no, I said he wasnt confirmed town.
He chose to take it like I was saying he was 3p or scum.
|
On May 16 2015 02:44 justanothertownie wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2015 02:25 Oatsmaster wrote: Also keep in mind glowingbear, you are voting with someone who shot rsoultin outta the complete fucking blue and never justified it.
Does that mean if I vote who you vote you will switch? Damn, I am powerful. I am still waiting for anyone to explain how what I did was a good/reasonable move if I was scum btw. No, then you are voting with me, not the other way around.
Dude you are dying anywhere, why do you care.
|
On May 16 2015 02:45 TalkingDead wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2015 02:38 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2015 02:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:On May 16 2015 02:24 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2015 02:13 ObiWanShinobi wrote: Btw, I forgot to mention it last night but I thought that TD looked better in the back-and-forth than Oats. It did kind of seem like Oats was being unreasonable. More like TD is over defensive and doesnt know how to read. Dnu. Maybe. Specifically I remembered the post where you said he wasn't town, and then he broke it down and why he couldn't argue with it and it reminded me of the position I was in several games in a row. well no, I said he wasnt confirmed town. He chose to take it like I was saying he was 3p or scum. After how many tries Oats? Why would I say you are not town rather than you are 3p or scum?
Which one carries the point across better?
I really dont think this is any deal at all.
|
It was so obvious man. Stutters shoot kel. Ez.
Marv and td make me a Mason.
|
Glowing bear, can you give me a scenario in which scum marv manages to trick town ve into believing that he and palmar are different alignments?
|
Oh yeah why does scum marv add palmar into the Mason chat?
How the fuck is it wifom.
Traitor won't have kp and why would he play against his wincon?????
|
Traitors are town who can be recruited right?
Also wasting a mason assuming that one of them will die early is bad. 2 town means 2 people you can convince of your townieness. We should kill ve probably. That's the connection.
|
What. How am I mafia now????? Well not strong if you don't use it properly. Can we lynch kel first though. Then I am open to lynching marv.
|
Glowing bear is ignoring all the claims.
Also ls, it's basically impossible that both of them are scum.
|
Ignoring my defence of marv, why am I scum glowing bear?
|
On May 16 2015 12:28 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2015 12:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Ignoring my defence of marv, why am I scum glowing bear? There's a case written on you with 3 items, oats. None of them were debunked. @obi: because I'm sure he is mafia. If he plays like this as town, he doesn't deserve the OMG IT'S FUCKING GOD MARV aura he has. I fucking answered them man. And it's not a good case. And it was written n1.
Rol, ve confirmed that there was a qt with marv and palmar
|
On May 16 2015 12:51 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On May 16 2015 12:32 Oatsmaster wrote:On May 16 2015 12:28 GlowingBear wrote:On May 16 2015 12:21 Oatsmaster wrote: Ignoring my defence of marv, why am I scum glowing bear? There's a case written on you with 3 items, oats. None of them were debunked. @obi: because I'm sure he is mafia. If he plays like this as town, he doesn't deserve the OMG IT'S FUCKING GOD MARV aura he has. I fucking answered them man. And it's not a good case. And it was written n1. Rol, ve confirmed that there was a qt with marv and palmar You answering them doesn't debunk them. Explaining yourself =/= telling me why my case is wrong. ???????????? 1) unjustified town read. Clearly justified, bh same reasoning as me. 2) weird switches. Bm was scummy as fuck and that didn't need explaining xata wasn't gonna get lynched so vivax is scummier than bh. Ez. 3) don't remember shitty point.
|
Ls there can be more than one town role of the same role. So no counterclaim shit like a normal mini.
|
Let's lynch kel first eh.
|
|
Don't shoot trfel. Do not. Shoot ve, kel, marv
|
Practically everyone's activity in the game has died off, marv /ve/yamato /rol /stutters / kel / ls/trfel.
Not all these people can be scum so the activity dying off isn't a scumtell
|
|
|
|
|