EPTAs for the Breshke vote thing, it's odd but not really scummy at all. He could've gone any which way on Breshke and make up any reason once he found that out. Why would he have a change of heart and go from scumreading to townreading Breshke as mafia?
Noir Mini Mafia: Chapter 3 - Page 24
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Artanis[Xp]
Netherlands12973 Posts
As for the Breshke vote thing, it's odd but not really scummy at all. He could've gone any which way on Breshke and make up any reason once he found that out. Why would he have a change of heart and go from scumreading to townreading Breshke as mafia? | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Gj Artanis any thoughts on BH at all? Did you read what I wrote? | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
Yes a third vote in this type of instant misslynch is even safer but in context it doesn't move towards scums goal of getting a misslynch as a push that early is not likely to be sustained over a 24 hour period. So yes while you are strictly right that the vote was infact safer it can't be seen as pushing for a misslynch as much. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
You at some point said BH was active elsewhere. BH said he wasnt IDK if i should or shouldnt be asking this i ignorant to things but if you can say what you were reffering to that would be great. Secondly you assessed trfels scum meta and said you didn't find his play here similar. What games were you referring too? I think that's it. | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
What's your response? Do you: A) Call BH scum and quote his single post B) Call BH scum and note that he played just as you acted. C) Start asking other players why they're accepted BH's bad excuses, and call him scum. or... D) make some vague noises at BH, but UNVOTE HIM AND VOTE SOMEONE ELSE Bit because it is the part where it most feels like BH is making his own narrative. That being said I do like the part about damdred pushing art and not caring about BH anymore. To add to this damdred hasn't really joined the BH wagon when he pointed out something really good early that basically kicked off the wagon. Like there is three of us that arn't him voting on the BH wagon but he just doesn't seem itnested. The thing that gives me pause though is that, people can correct me on this, but i've seen damdred get demotivated as town before and i understand that because sometimes you just don't feel it and idk if that is what is happening here. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
It was one of the student mafia games, D1 Trfel was much more involved early seemingly trying to contribute without actually doing so. Here its a bit different as he was just afk and null, now hes been acting decently towny. Obviously don't let him know I said so | ||
|
Breshke
Australia3749 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
##Vote BH We need one more for lynch find it | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On April 22 2015 21:12 WaveofShadow wrote: That's your ironclad reasoning palmar? Calling me scum for shit I've already explained in thread and saying 'I don't know what yamato is doing?' Gj Yeah it pretty much is! And thanks  | ||
|
Palmar
Iceland22634 Posts
On April 22 2015 21:18 Breshke wrote: Palmar you are obviously ignoring the context though. From what I understand the thrid vote in IML can be seen as safe for scum as they vote on a misslynch but arnt the creator of the push nor one of the hammers. Therefore one could say that scum might join a wagon at this time to blend into town while still getting the misslynch they need. So while WoS said the vote was safe he ment it was safe way for scum to try and secure a misslynch. Yes a third vote in this type of instant misslynch is even safer but in context it doesn't move towards scums goal of getting a misslynch as a push that early is not likely to be sustained over a 24 hour period. So yes while you are strictly right that the vote was infact safer it can't be seen as pushing for a misslynch as much. I don't even care about the context. He did something because of X Then it turns out X was even more right than he initially thought So he retracts because of X This makes no logical sense, thus he must be mafia. To be precises. He retracted NOT because of this new information he had gained. He retracted BECAUSE HE WANTED TO RETRACT and used this new information as an excuse to do so. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
On April 22 2015 23:28 Palmar wrote: I don't even care about the context. He did something because of X Then it turns out X was even more right than he initially thought So he retracts because of X This makes no logical sense, thus he must be mafia. To be precises. He retracted NOT because of this new information he had gained. He retracted BECAUSE HE WANTED TO RETRACT and used this new information as an excuse to do so. Yeah palmar that's blatantly untrue, you're just as bad as BH inventing your own narrative for why I did what I did. Early votes in what barely amounts to an IML game aren't as indicative as those when every cote counts all the time. 'safety' isn't a factor when the votes 2h into a game generally don't mean shit. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
Just go crawl back under your rock and come out when we're ready to lynch you. | ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
rsoultin
Netherlands15308 Posts
| ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
I'm not getting hung up on wording but at the very least i know BH is capable of all sorts of play as either alignment. If I'm going to lynch him it's not going to be solely for stalling (despite his epic tech in call mafia). Assuming BH is scum think the other scum might be Trfel but I havent had a chance to flesh that out much. Artanis' read on him is OK but relies way too much on meta for my liking. | ||
|
WaveofShadow
Canada31495 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25563 Posts
If I'm alive when I get home I'll save us all. Otherwise, should I die for your ignorance, I will view the departure with as much relief as disgust. | ||
| ||
