Mafia Mini Mafia2: another miniature game of mafia - Page 21

On April 08 2015 04:24 Koshi wrote:
No it isn't. I also have no opinion on Eden. Maybe a slight townread. But hey. Not posting doesn't help him.

On April 08 2015 04:42 Koshi wrote:
##unvote
##vote: Vivax

obv mafia.

On April 07 2015 19:39 Palmar wrote:

Okay clearly you're being affected by a small head syndrome.

HF and Obi were having a shitfest. I'm not arguing that. When this happens there are a few options open to a player not involved. Some of them are useful, some are useless. Here's a few options GB could have taken.

GB could have:

• Ignored it and walked away
  
• Tried to put a stop to it
  
• Tried to change the subject to something more entertaining or useful
  
• Joined in on the fun
  
• Idly complained about it without trying to stop it or change the subject
  
• Tried to glean some information from it
  

You'll notice that he did actually take one of the options. The problem I have is that is by fare the worst option available. By his own admission he wasn't trying to stop them, so what was he trying to achieve? He wasn't being funny, he wasn't being sociable, he wasn't trying to bring up a new subject, he wasn't scumhunting or trying to poke people further.

Why did GB post?

On April 08 2015 04:55 DreadReturn wrote:
I think Palmer's interpretation of GB's early post is pretty weak.
Take the post that Palmer convinces himself with:


Two points here:

"HF and Obi were having a shitfest" - That's not right. They exchanged maybe 5 small one liners and a picture between themselves. It's a very mild scuffle / banter. If GB could be accused of "stopping" anything, it's mild banter.

"The problem I have is that is by far the worst option available" - Palmer isn't actually showing why GB is scum with this. How does this make him scum? He points out things that GB could have done, and then concludes that by act of omission GB must be scum. How? There's a huge logical gap there.

This type of weak reasoning could easily be applied to anyone else on those pages, and again, we are talking about day 1 early game banter here.

Palmer's analysis is weak because he is either exaggerating or misconstruing what GB said and did, and is suggesting GB is scum without actually giving a reason why he is scum.

On April 08 2015 04:23 GlowingBear wrote:
It is also odd that Palmar has no opinion on Eden.

On April 08 2015 04:49 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
I said Eden was scummy too, rsoul.

On April 07 2015 20:44 GlowingBear wrote:
Palmar, being unfunny doesn't make me Mafia
If you think I had the intention of stopping discussion, you basically assume that I was protecting someone. If so, I'm automatically Mafia with one of them.
Thinking through a Mafia perspective, if I see two townies discussing, I won't interfere so they can tunnel each other.

So, you have to tell me who is my partner with them, or your argument simply doesn't hold water

On April 08 2015 05:01 ObiWanShinobi wrote:


Is it though?

On April 08 2015 05:05 yamato77 wrote:

Worst post in the thread award goes to GB for this pile of scummy shit.

On April 08 2015 05:05 yamato77 wrote:

Worst post in the thread award goes to GB for this pile of scummy shit.