|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2015 09:20 sicklucker wrote:
I heard about it somewhere but I never saw the context or the game like when I brought it up I was asking a question . That emocon thing? Because I vaguely heard it (from you) but I dont know anything about it. Once again you guys take the smallest qeustion and turn it into something so annoying.
I dont see what your angle is here this is not something I would lie about as either alignment. Its not alignment indignitive,
also we 100% lynch this guy because he was in horn and read the game so knows everything about what they are saying
|
On March 19 2015 09:20 sicklucker wrote:
I heard about it somewhere but I never saw the context or the game like when I brought it up I was asking a question . That emocon thing? Because I vaguely heard it (from you) but I dont know anything about it. Once again you guys take the smallest qeustion and turn it into something so annoying.
I dont see what your angle is here this is not something I would lie about as either alignment. Its not alignment indignitive,
hmmmmmm
i'm gonna give you the bod right here, cause half that conversation between me and you took place with me thinking you were saying something you weren't
and you probably assuming i was talking about the annoying bit
lol@angle xP
|
On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? ![[image loading]](http://media1.giphy.com/media/5O3k4fxKARpVS/200.gif) Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed.
Apparently it is still going.
Like politics.
Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks.
Not going to fly; who voted first?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On February 06 2015 04:42 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 04:41 Eden1892 wrote:
Who's ready for my incredibly shitty scumtell on rsoultin
She's posted like 5 emoticons the whole game so she's mafia because she's not laid back and postin like she would as town Cool bro? So do I vote her? I would like to know who among my scum reads the vote is most likely to go on so I can go have a nap
no don't give him the benefit of the doubt since this quote proves he is 100% a liar
|
On March 19 2015 09:21 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:20 sicklucker wrote:
I heard about it somewhere but I never saw the context or the game like when I brought it up I was asking a question . That emocon thing? Because I vaguely heard it (from you) but I dont know anything about it. Once again you guys take the smallest qeustion and turn it into something so annoying.
I dont see what your angle is here this is not something I would lie about as either alignment. Its not alignment indignitive, also we 100% lynch this guy because he was in horn and read the game so knows everything about what they are saying
he was in horn? oh modkilled lol i think he was modkilled before eden brought his "amazing" emoticon read xP
|
On March 19 2015 09:21 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:20 sicklucker wrote:
I heard about it somewhere but I never saw the context or the game like when I brought it up I was asking a question . That emocon thing? Because I vaguely heard it (from you) but I dont know anything about it. Once again you guys take the smallest qeustion and turn it into something so annoying.
I dont see what your angle is here this is not something I would lie about as either alignment. Its not alignment indignitive, also we 100% lynch this guy because he was in horn and read the game so knows everything about what they are saying
yessssssssss everybody sheep me
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first?
This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you?
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2015 09:22 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 04:42 sicklucker wrote:On February 06 2015 04:41 Eden1892 wrote:
Who's ready for my incredibly shitty scumtell on rsoultin
She's posted like 5 emoticons the whole game so she's mafia because she's not laid back and postin like she would as town Cool bro? So do I vote her? I would like to know who among my scum reads the vote is most likely to go on so I can go have a nap no don't give him the benefit of the doubt since this quote proves he is 100% a liar
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
|
Rayn you suck this game, you didn't read and it will likely bite your ass if anyone reads the dead. Good job.
|
On March 19 2015 09:22 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On February 06 2015 04:42 sicklucker wrote:On February 06 2015 04:41 Eden1892 wrote:
Who's ready for my incredibly shitty scumtell on rsoultin
She's posted like 5 emoticons the whole game so she's mafia because she's not laid back and postin like she would as town Cool bro? So do I vote her? I would like to know who among my scum reads the vote is most likely to go on so I can go have a nap no don't give him the benefit of the doubt since this quote proves he is 100% a liar
o.0 memory debunked
nice catch HF lol...also light townread to you for looking that one up in the middle of the argument with slam
|
On March 19 2015 09:15 Damdred wrote:
Catch up post for me so I knokw where to start from and other people to talk about
Tentative town:
HF
Slam
Palmar
Rsoultin
Tentative Null/Scum:
Vivax
FecalFeast
Tentative Scum:
SL
Trfel
Tunnel:
Eden
I can only assume that I'm tentative town for my point on Toad, and yet you have no opinion on him?
|
United States21170 Posts
On March 19 2015 09:24 Alakaslam wrote:
Rayn you suck this game, you didn't read and it will likely bite your ass if anyone reads the dead. Good job.
The anger is real. I won't vote slam today.
Or HF. Or Eden.
Today is gonna be really easy.
|
On March 19 2015 09:23 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:46 Artanis[Xp] wrote:
Slam, true or false:
Alakaslam is known for playing in a much more serious manner as mafia than as town. True. And I am smashing that this day. I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first? This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you?
Because there was no need. You are mafia; you are using fallacy and wifom to an excess.
|
On March 19 2015 09:24 rsoultin wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:22 Holyflare wrote:On February 06 2015 04:42 sicklucker wrote:On February 06 2015 04:41 Eden1892 wrote:
Who's ready for my incredibly shitty scumtell on rsoultin
She's posted like 5 emoticons the whole game so she's mafia because she's not laid back and postin like she would as town Cool bro? So do I vote her? I would like to know who among my scum reads the vote is most likely to go on so I can go have a nap no don't give him the benefit of the doubt since this quote proves he is 100% a liar o.0 memory debunked nice catch HF lol...also light townread to you for looking that one up in the middle of the argument with slam
i literally said that before he did .__________.
i didn't cite the exact game but this is MY point and MY lynch 
|
On March 19 2015 09:25 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:24 Alakaslam wrote:
Rayn you suck this game, you didn't read and it will likely bite your ass if anyone reads the dead. Good job. The anger is real. I won't vote slam today. Or HF. Or Eden. Today is gonna be really easy.
vote sl
|
I'm back and my internet seems to be working again o/
|
On March 19 2015 08:50 Half the Sky wrote:
Day 1: Current Vote Count
Alakaslam (4): Holyflare, Artanis, sicklucker, Eden1892
Trfel (1): Artanis, Superbia
Holyflare (1): Alakaslam
Toadesstern (1): Palmar
Not Voting (13): Vivax, rsoultin, Toadesstern, LightningStrike, ExO, Bill Murray, Onegu, Breshke, Fecalfeast, Trfel, raynpelikoneet, Holyflare, VisceraEyes, Damdred
Currently, Alakaslam is set to be executed.
Day 1 ends in at 23:00 GMT (+00:00).
Reminder to make sure to unvote before voting, if you have already voted someone.
Voting is mandatory. You may NOT abstain.
Posting after the deadline and prior to flip is subject to a modkill.
THIRD ON A WAGON YOUR ASS IS SAGGIN
|
On March 19 2015 09:25 Eden1892 wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:24 rsoultin wrote:On March 19 2015 09:22 Holyflare wrote:On February 06 2015 04:42 sicklucker wrote:On February 06 2015 04:41 Eden1892 wrote:
Who's ready for my incredibly shitty scumtell on rsoultin
She's posted like 5 emoticons the whole game so she's mafia because she's not laid back and postin like she would as town Cool bro? So do I vote her? I would like to know who among my scum reads the vote is most likely to go on so I can go have a nap no don't give him the benefit of the doubt since this quote proves he is 100% a liar o.0 memory debunked nice catch HF lol...also light townread to you for looking that one up in the middle of the argument with slam i literally said that before he did .__________. i didn't cite the exact game but this is MY point and MY lynch
>> eeeeden don't be a wet blanket lol who said it first doesn't negate the fact that HF bothered to look it up while otherwise occupied xP
|
United Kingdom30774 Posts
On March 19 2015 09:25 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On March 19 2015 09:23 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:22 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:16 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:08 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 09:03 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 09:01 Alakaslam wrote:On March 19 2015 08:54 Holyflare wrote:On March 19 2015 08:52 Artanis[Xp] wrote:On March 19 2015 08:51 Alakaslam wrote:
[quote]
True. And I am smashing that this day.
I want to see the host QT afterward if they are watching this, but I doubt that. Then why do you scumread HF for using meta that has been correct thus far? Holyflare is scum. He knows this is not why I am scumreading him. I actually wasn't sure earlier now I am. On March 19 2015 08:23 Alakaslam wrote:
So I point out that Holyflare is using wifom, based on my own actions in the past, and I am scum for it?
Scum need to find mislynches, and wifom is their tool. This is why I like wifom so much and will expose it every chance I get.
FITE me palmar, what, are you scum? liar Actually, you lie very descreetly here. You bolded my defense instead of my offense. I do not think you are scum because you used wifom. I do not think you are scum because you claimed confirmation early. I think you are scum because you voted on a very weak premise. This is why o hate RVS on smashboards No. Let's break this down instead of you being an obtuse lying asshole. I post once that you are mafia, highlighting the post that made you look mafia to me based on previous meta and meta that is generally used in finding mafia and townies that I use successfully in almost every game I ever play. I then post again highlighting a post of toad's that looked like a mafia post. THEN you vote me. Highlighting my post of my list of 2 people (you and toad) saying i'm not this bad. I actually misread your post about wifom because I thought you were applying that to me using wifom about yourself instead. So really you misread the entire situation and called me mafia because you thought I was voting you for wifom reasons. I clarify these reasons are because it is about your TONE of seriousness, your over defensiveness and seriousness again. You then update DO NOT UPDATE YOUR SCUM READ TO RECTIFY YOUR ERROR and instead continue on like I initially voted you because of some wifom which is not the case. You can clearly see my error in misreading the highlighted because my post explains that my case is based on your meta and disregarding that is based on seriousness, hence why I agree with artanis post. YOU DO NOT UPDATE ANYTHING EVER. WHy is this slam? Why are you trying to derail any attempt I had at pushing anything and instead fling shit in my direction when I was being the most productive asset here. You don't even comment on the toad thing which is actually very good indeed. Apparently it is still going. Like politics. Repeat that I only am doing what in fact you are doing and hope it sticks. Not going to fly; who voted first? This answers absolutely nothing. If you are trying something new and trying to be productive (what I assume your ramble at me was trying to be) then you should absolutely be up front with me. Why did you not update your first vote when you saw the actual reasons that I was voting for you? Because there was no need. You are mafia; you are using fallacy and wifom to an excess.
Please outline this to absolutely everyone. Where is my wifom? I thought your post was too serious for slam meta which is a useful heuristic and even if it's not anymore it's a valid general heuristic at the start of the game. I vote you. You vote me for a misunderstanding, thinking I'm voting you for you talking about what you do as mafia. When I clarify it you try and shovel more shit on me instead of admitting flat out you were mistaken. You are still trying to do that.
Why.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
