Imperial Mafia
Forum Index > TL Mafia |
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
I'm guessing you'll need more naughty nurse pics hunh. You're so clingy Marv give me some space. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 30 2014 04:25 GlowingBear wrote: Damdy, you'll probably be as good as me as a coach. But you can't deny that there are better suited players here to coach the newbies (Artanis; marv, JAT). You still very good bby Rsoultin, I'm completely okay. Go TEAMbear!! Ahem. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 14:22 Damdred wrote: Why do you care so much that they aren't here when you could be interacting more with myself and Eden who are obviously here Because I can read them better than any of you and I'm far more concerned with them being town than you being town. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 14:27 Damdred wrote: cause of mine and geripts history where he takes mee a bit to serious at points. Like he told me to post seals one time and I did and he went a bit nuts was a bit funny. I think he was scum that game but I think he would do the same as town. Mental note. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 14:54 sicklucker wrote: Mspaint. and No. So like a scum dandred wont make a midnight opening joke post about him being mafia. Like who starts a mafia game at midnight. Scum would be more inclined to lurk untill tomorrow. Im getting a slight town read from it. Dont see how you can get a strong read either way as in to like vote him. Awkward start of the game votes at the first thing they read piss me off. You'll find with most vets, that votes early on really don't mean shit. As far as I'm concerned his unfunny joke is slightly scummy, but nothing I terribly care about. Besides, he's fun to vote for. As for lurking vs not lurking, that's just dumb. He'll post as scum whenever he wants. IIRC he usually tries to get in early as scum but he does that as town too. How lurky or not lurky he is within the first 5 minutes isn't something I'd consider even partially useful for reading him or anyone else. Sidenote to scum: You should probably shoot Damdred. There's like a 40% chance that he's the cop. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
| ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 15:20 Eden1892 wrote: i don't, why do you? i feel like i can just look at a particular situation and decide for myself if someone who was caught lying was town and trying too hard to do something cool or if they're mafia. and i'm putting all my votes on my best mafia read not on any policy. just peeking at the setup real quick i'm almost positive this isn't going to be an issue, not seeing anything to game not to be rude but this all seems obvious to the point of fluff... i rather just put all my votes on best mafia read and attempt to discern b/t town lurkers and mafia lurkers as the game goes along instead of making activity a point of interest. i don't worry about them until i get a vote record unless i'm really stumped verdict: Doc's post seems stiff and awkwardly timed, and I feel like most of the policy discussion that might ensue from this won't really get anywhere, but it beats chasing people up trees for opening game banter. I guess I like Doc as town for now I'm going to go ahead and shut down this line right now. Maybe you get a point for being zealous, but not really. I've played and read a number of games w/ DrH. He doesn't care how discussion gets started up, he just wants the ball to get rolling. He hasn't played in a while. I don't think his post makes him town or scum. It's a bland boring useless post for the most part, but it's one that used to be a more standard way of opening games. I'm more concerned about how you find a post that is "stiff and awkwardly timed," two traits that are more often considered mafia tells, towny? Can you explain that more fully? It's also pretty weird that you reasonably correctly point out that his post is going nowhere while simultaneously responding to it. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 15:27 geript wrote: I'm more concerned about how you find a post that is "stiff and awkwardly timed," two traits that are more often considered mafia tells, towny? Can you explain that more fully? It's also pretty weird that you reasonably correctly point out that his post is going nowhere while simultaneously responding to it. @Eden Explain. | ||
geript
10024 Posts
On December 31 2014 15:35 Eden1892 wrote: just checking, it seemed like a joke but i didn't want to supply that answer in case it weren't~ sure, i'm not sure what you meant by "shut down this line" in the previous part of the post btw so if you want a reply to that please clarify for my addled brain as for why i read it townie, like i said, it seemed like an effort to get discussion somewhere besides early-game banter, which imo wasn't going anywhere. i followed up on the post because even if the object-level discussion ends up being pretty pointless, i can get some possibly useful meta-level reads from it - and hey, maybe it is going somewhere and i miss it, y'know? By shut it down, I mean shut down any further discussion on useless policy. Nobody needs to find policy to find discussion. The problem with your "townread" is that your reasons for finding him town are complete bullshit. That post is a throwaway post that I could recite to newbies to "get discussion going" as either alignment and potentially useful dependent on how it's driven and moved (even moreso to scum imo not that it matters). There actually were things to be talked about in the thread already (my townread on Damdred, the ??? on sicklucker who IIRC also made a passing townread on Damdred, Robik not posting anything while making a few posts, etc.). It's odd that you comment that his post was stiff and awkwardly timed, two bad reasons that people's posts are often called scummy for and then settle on a bad reason to call him town for it. As for meta reads, what type of meta reads do you expect will lead to any sort of meaningful read off of policy discussion? | ||
| ||