|
On November 24 2014 00:57 The_Templar wrote:sickluckerOK, I have a usable meta read on SL now that Campus mafia has finished, so now I'm re-evaluating what I think of him.As town, he was extremely confident in how town he was, and basically used that "fact" in order to make cases and form reads. He also pretty much ignored WIFOM to do this. + Show Spoiler +On November 07 2014 05:24 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 07 2014 02:47 sicklucker wrote: I think sentinal would be a better lynch then ima. He was who I ment when I think there were better targets earlier. He seemed so active in this game before I entered but since I have been I think hes posted once or twice. Hes the likely leader for alot of the mafia teams as he seems more experienced.
I feel like he went mute because he was caught in a bad spot because of kelsiers high risk high reward play and he doesint think hes on the chopping block yet or has just given up.
I think its more likely imma is a bad town then sentinel is a bad town. Maybe someone whos played with him before can give us more ok I misread your message so disregard the second part. Actually the fact sentinel saved cricket from the vote is very town to me Because I know im town. Im gonna have to take another look at sentinel Sentinel where are you???! (Note: he replaced Cricketer12) On November 08 2014 04:01 sicklucker wrote: lol now that was an acual "slip" even tho im town are watcher or medic should come out On November 08 2014 05:03 sicklucker wrote: Im not a good lynch today . Right now in both your mind im just this solo arrogant bad guy but you cant peice together any logical team mates for me because im town. On November 11 2014 09:29 sicklucker wrote: I think if breskes or another longshot is mafia he wins even with 3 lynches. He will just leave serejai me and elvis as the towns and they will just off me.
Infact theres 0% chance I dont get mislynched if this game goes on and I know im town so we really only have 2 chances to hit mafia in this game from my perspective.
I think this next lynch is very important ff and this is not the auto win your making it out to be, but then again you dont belive im town so.. On November 11 2014 15:00 sicklucker wrote: So something we can go on is who do you think, would think that serejai is the medic? Because thats are last mafia. Im sure whoever was deciding who to block is are last one left since kush and sent didnt care about this game.
I know this is gonna get turned on me but im bringing it up anyway (because im town) but who do you think woulda thought serejai was the medic on day 2 and 3? Give a reason.
Im thinking he was targeted because he pushed me for something I said about the medic. The list goes on. He also defended himself by saying "I would never do X if I was mafia so I must be town" in various ways. So basically, he based the entire game on him being town and actually took action based on this. He also read players based on their actions based on their reads instead of commenting that these actions should be looked at by other people. So, his thoughts, however bad they might have been, were at least out there before he asked for opinions, at least when the people he was commenting on were talking about him in some way. Now, let's look at this game. + Show Spoiler +On November 21 2014 20:49 sicklucker wrote: Holy this is my first day one. Im giving my first reaction reads because im trying to help. Im sorry if there not up to your standards. Try to see that im trying with my inexperience I could lurk all day and no one would care. On November 22 2014 07:02 sicklucker wrote: The templars defense has stepped up some, I always sheep rayn its what I do im easily the newest player in the game. That being said his reads after his first 2 I liked really sucked. Sheep mode off On November 22 2014 08:36 sicklucker wrote: Glowingbears reason for voting me over his top scum (ve) is because he wants to get out a lurker. Ive had a slow start im not gonna make excuses but feel free to look at my filter in my other on going game. Im not a lurker I post ALOT probably too much. On November 22 2014 14:01 sicklucker wrote: FF why did you vote me anyway. I basically played the same this game if anyone here knows im a standard terrible town its you... On November 23 2014 07:44 sicklucker wrote: GB is a mafia in so many worlds. He voted for 3 towns or 2 if you dont believe me As you can see, his play has been completely different. He seems to suddenly not confirm he's town all the time, but instead keeps pulling the newbie card. Since he barely did this at all in Campus, it's very suspicious that he would suddenly lose all confidence in his town play as town. He did not re-evaluate for any of the first four after the previous game ended as those four posts were before Campus mafia LYLO was finished. So, my belief is that he has been playing completely differently than how he played in Campus at almost the same time, and is therefore a different alignment. Additionally, I agree with a lot of this case by Damdred, which is a decent scum read on SL. ![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/jWzoBXI.png)
|
|
On November 24 2014 01:15 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 21 2014 08:04 The_Templar wrote:On November 21 2014 02:38 GlowingBear wrote: Hi Rayn I love you Who is scum? How common is sheeping Rayn? I haven't actually seen many of his games. On November 21 2014 02:51 GlowingBear wrote: Ok so we are discussing obs qt posts? Because that's not very accurate instrument to catch mafia. Opinions change from game to game. The solidest proof of what I'm saying was damdreds case on me on Hearthstone. He read me scum for having different opinion from the one I had on FFL 2 mafia, and I was town in both.
Bring me something solid and constant, and thread-only. Reads differ from obs to thread because there is a difference on pressure. I like this post the most, and it's why I don't like meta-reads. People do change ideas, methods of playing, and the players they are playing against (and their opinions of them), sort of every game. I prefer to stay only inside the thread, so I'm ok with most of the reads on me so far. (Although I have a pretty obvious style of play as both mafia and town that I refuse to/can't change). While this isn't particularly relevant, it's how I am viewing the game which is probably important if Rayn fails to lynch me today. On November 21 2014 06:01 GlowingBear wrote:On November 21 2014 05:45 VisceraEyes wrote: Chezinu following the Chezinu Rule is pretty townie Chezinu imo. Anyone disagree? Like yeah, he could do it as both alignments...but if you assume he's mafia then what do you think that means about Hopeless? And why does he unvote Hopeless only to vote sicklucker if he's mafia?
Anyone disagree with my line of thinking here? Like, if Chez is mafia then the assumption is that Hopeless is town (based on Chez voting for him), so Chez voting for sicklucker (also presumably town for Chez vote) doesn't make much sense if he's mafia. It doesn't really make sense from any perspective other than Hopeless/Chez mafia, which if that's the case then why does he vote for him in the first place?
For the moment I'm going to go ahead and say that I'll never lynch Chezinu today. 1st Paragraph) it's easier for mafia to follow a rule (or policy) than actually putting thought on the game. Following rules seems to be more scummy than townie to me. I can't understand your insistence in calling Chezinu town. I also don't understand why you say that Chezinu is probably town and then assumes it's a null tell right after and justifies calling him town using associative reads. Are you calling him town for using a rule or because you're doing associative reads? These are two different sources of read. Unvoting hopeless to vote sicklucker is a null tell. 2nd) Unflipped association. Lol. I prefer to think this way: "can this be done by a mafia? Is it more likely, less likely or equally likely to do as mafia?" And my answer is Yes and Equally likely. 3rd) For the moment or you're never going to lynch Chezinu? VE, you simply repeated your idea on both first and second paragraph. Your writing style doesn't look fluid, but fabricated, full of hesitation ("does anyone agree?" " for the moment I'll say I'll never lynch him) Meh, I found this post horrible. Not much to say other than I completely agree with this post. I like how Rayn completely disagreed, and then read it again and suddenly agreed. What the hell did he misread in order to change his opinion that much? On November 21 2014 06:19 GlowingBear wrote:On November 21 2014 06:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay i misread something. That post from VE is a big pile of ???????????????????????????????????????
VE, wtf? LOL NO. Explain this post (this is the equivalent of getting being a 6 year old getting called to the principal's office) On November 21 2014 06:24 GlowingBear wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Us9aAH8.png) I don't understand this picture. And no there is no vote count. This Chupazi soars above my sight; Chezinu likely has discerned it but I require assistance.
Do you have binoculars?
|
Indeed you now have a flock of three
|
On November 24 2014 01:22 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:15 GlowingBear wrote:On November 21 2014 08:04 The_Templar wrote:On November 21 2014 02:38 GlowingBear wrote: Hi Rayn I love you Who is scum? How common is sheeping Rayn? I haven't actually seen many of his games. On November 21 2014 02:51 GlowingBear wrote: Ok so we are discussing obs qt posts? Because that's not very accurate instrument to catch mafia. Opinions change from game to game. The solidest proof of what I'm saying was damdreds case on me on Hearthstone. He read me scum for having different opinion from the one I had on FFL 2 mafia, and I was town in both.
Bring me something solid and constant, and thread-only. Reads differ from obs to thread because there is a difference on pressure. I like this post the most, and it's why I don't like meta-reads. People do change ideas, methods of playing, and the players they are playing against (and their opinions of them), sort of every game. I prefer to stay only inside the thread, so I'm ok with most of the reads on me so far. (Although I have a pretty obvious style of play as both mafia and town that I refuse to/can't change). While this isn't particularly relevant, it's how I am viewing the game which is probably important if Rayn fails to lynch me today. On November 21 2014 06:01 GlowingBear wrote:On November 21 2014 05:45 VisceraEyes wrote: Chezinu following the Chezinu Rule is pretty townie Chezinu imo. Anyone disagree? Like yeah, he could do it as both alignments...but if you assume he's mafia then what do you think that means about Hopeless? And why does he unvote Hopeless only to vote sicklucker if he's mafia?
Anyone disagree with my line of thinking here? Like, if Chez is mafia then the assumption is that Hopeless is town (based on Chez voting for him), so Chez voting for sicklucker (also presumably town for Chez vote) doesn't make much sense if he's mafia. It doesn't really make sense from any perspective other than Hopeless/Chez mafia, which if that's the case then why does he vote for him in the first place?
For the moment I'm going to go ahead and say that I'll never lynch Chezinu today. 1st Paragraph) it's easier for mafia to follow a rule (or policy) than actually putting thought on the game. Following rules seems to be more scummy than townie to me. I can't understand your insistence in calling Chezinu town. I also don't understand why you say that Chezinu is probably town and then assumes it's a null tell right after and justifies calling him town using associative reads. Are you calling him town for using a rule or because you're doing associative reads? These are two different sources of read. Unvoting hopeless to vote sicklucker is a null tell. 2nd) Unflipped association. Lol. I prefer to think this way: "can this be done by a mafia? Is it more likely, less likely or equally likely to do as mafia?" And my answer is Yes and Equally likely. 3rd) For the moment or you're never going to lynch Chezinu? VE, you simply repeated your idea on both first and second paragraph. Your writing style doesn't look fluid, but fabricated, full of hesitation ("does anyone agree?" " for the moment I'll say I'll never lynch him) Meh, I found this post horrible. Not much to say other than I completely agree with this post. I like how Rayn completely disagreed, and then read it again and suddenly agreed. What the hell did he misread in order to change his opinion that much? On November 21 2014 06:19 GlowingBear wrote:On November 21 2014 06:18 raynpelikoneet wrote: Okay i misread something. That post from VE is a big pile of ???????????????????????????????????????
VE, wtf? LOL NO. Explain this post (this is the equivalent of getting being a 6 year old getting called to the principal's office) On November 21 2014 06:24 GlowingBear wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/Us9aAH8.png) I don't understand this picture. And no there is no vote count. This Chupazi soars above my sight; Chezinu likely has discerned it but I require assistance. Do you have binoculars?
![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/SMuuqZm.png)
Oh sorry. Those are actually plastic titties
|
|
your Country52797 Posts
Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game.
|
Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No.
|
On November 24 2014 01:31 The_Templar wrote: Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game.
Wait, what?
|
On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No.
What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:33 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:31 The_Templar wrote: Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game. Wait, what? Why is doing something I don't like to do extremely scummy?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town? I'm pretty sure you like to lynch lurkers regardless of what alignment you are. And this post is serious bait because you don't actually believe that.
|
On November 24 2014 01:36 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:33 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:31 The_Templar wrote: Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game. Wait, what? Why is doing something I don't like to do extremely scummy?
If you say that you don't like meta reads, it means you think they are flawed and you use different methods. I would expect that you would came with a stronger, objective read, but what you did was exactly calling someone scum for something you believe is not alignment indicative, which is pretty weird.
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:39 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:36 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:33 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:31 The_Templar wrote: Thank god someone actually saw that hole in the logic. It was intentional.
I am not having fun this game. Wait, what? Why is doing something I don't like to do extremely scummy? If you say that you don't like meta reads, it means you think they are flawed and you use different methods. I would expect that you would came with a stronger, objective read, but what you did was exactly calling someone scum for something you believe is not alignment indicative, which is pretty weird. The bolded is wrong because I would not be considering other peoples' meta reads if this was the case. In fact, I generally find it difficult to read someone's past games reliable and I don't bother, but SL was a pretty open book in that area so I gave it a shot. And I called someone scum because I found his play to be COMPLETELY different than the game he just played as town. Not because of something I believe is not alignment indicative.
|
On November 24 2014 01:37 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town? I'm pretty sure you like to lynch lurkers regardless of what alignment you are. And this post is serious bait because you don't actually believe that.
I don't actually believe what?
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:42 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:37 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town? I'm pretty sure you like to lynch lurkers regardless of what alignment you are. And this post is serious bait because you don't actually believe that. I don't actually believe what? That your vote on KillerSOS is scummy.
|
Damdred, I need you to tell me if you think VE is scum.
|
On November 24 2014 01:45 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:42 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:37 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town? I'm pretty sure you like to lynch lurkers regardless of what alignment you are. And this post is serious bait because you don't actually believe that. I don't actually believe what? That your vote on KillerSOS is scummy.
Well, I don't find it scummy because I'm town so, lol. But if I was someone else, I would be suspicious of this.
|
your Country52797 Posts
On November 24 2014 01:47 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:45 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:42 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:37 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town? I'm pretty sure you like to lynch lurkers regardless of what alignment you are. And this post is serious bait because you don't actually believe that. I don't actually believe what? That your vote on KillerSOS is scummy. Well, I don't find it scummy because I'm town so, lol.But if I was someone else, I would be suspicious of this. You literally just said it was scummy.
On November 24 2014 01:34 GlowingBear wrote:Show nested quote +On November 24 2014 01:33 The_Templar wrote:On November 24 2014 01:32 GlowingBear wrote: Also, Templar, I need you to answer this: am I scum for voting for the killer SOS lynch? No. What I did is a pretty scummy thing. What makes you believe I'm town?
|
|
|
|