|
On November 20 2014 19:28 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:25 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 19:17 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 19:05 Holyflare wrote:On November 20 2014 19:00 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 18:56 Holyflare wrote:
I don't understand how you can call someone mafia for defending someone WHEN YOU ADMIT YOU EXAGGERATED EVERYTHING TO PRESSURE HIM. looooooooooool I didn't exaggerate my read Holyflare, I still think he's mafia for it. I was just exaggerating how certain I am of it - I'm NOT certain of it, it's just my read. And further, I'm not saying you're mafia FOR defending Hopeless. My reasoning is clear and explicit. I'm saying your mafia for defending Hopeless FOR BAD REASON (saying that something that IS objectively scummy is NOT objectively scummy) AT A WEIRD TIME (right after you acquired a scumread of him yourself, in response to MY pressure of him) WHILE SCUMREADING HIM! Holyflare Jesus Christ, I never have to spell shit out for you multiple times like this. Maybe you are town. :/ Feigning contribution is scummy yes, but nowhere did he do that at the time you had said he had done that. The start of the game does not count towards feigning contribution when all he's done is comment on a snowflake in the first hour of the game. That doesn't make anyone mafia ever and was a bs EXAGGERATED read that I do not and will not ever agree on. People have done the exact same thing as town in many many many many many more games so it's not OBJECTIVELY scummy at all, it's entirely subjective because it's what you think which goes against the actual facts. There's quite a difference between scum reading someone for what you said and scum reading him for something entirely different. He might not end up being scum and then I can look back and remember that your pressure was far more exacerbated than it should have been in that situation. Telling you that your initial logic for scum reading him was bad has nothing to do with him looking scummy for his reaction. It's an observation. Well bolded is just your opinion just like my opinion is that Hopeless' early posting is scummy. I don't think the read is exaggerated at all, I think the posts I pointed out CLEARLY illustrate Hopeless trying to blend in. But I guess you're right, that's my opinion. But the italicized is obviously an exaggeration because no one has ever made the post Hopeless made in response to Chez because Hopeless has never made that post in any other game in response to Chez. People have done SIMILAR things, but no one has done "the exact same" thing ever. See how easy that is to just switch on? Like, it doesn't matter if you're exaggerating or not, you're just making a point right? My logic wasn't bad - you disagree with the severity of the infringement in the posts I pointed out, but the logic is fucking sound Holyflare. That's why I say you're repeatedly trying to discredit me...because you're saying things that are blatantly untrue in an attempt to make me look bad - WHILE I find someone who YOU find suspicious...suspicious. Why? Why are you doing that? your read is crap VE. because if you actually believe your read then you should have the same one on me; yet i didn't even make the reads post of yours. your read is predicated on HF not finding hopeless scummy for the reasons you pointed out early, but finding him scummy for his reaction to being called out. which is almost the exact same response i had. remember where i was calling you out until hopeless reacted to you and then i rescinded on you cuz i found his post crap? that was the basis or your original read on HF, so it should also be on me. the fact that you don't evenly apply it means you're mafia or you're fabricating to push your OGI feelings. I don't even know what you just said here. Which read are you even referring to? My read of Holyflare? So you think Holyflare is town then I guess? Cool. I disagree. I don't have to think you're the same alignment because you're different players and Holyflare is a MUCH better player than you are. No offense intended. I am saying that your initial holyflare is scum read was: VE thinks hopeless is scum for early posts and reactions. HF thinks hopeless is scum only for the reactions. VE thinks HF is scummy for that. I had literally the exact same process and even argued it with you, but you didn't apply the scum read to me. I am saying that you're not applying your criteria for someone being scum evenly, which is suspect. capital much is a bit much, i will accept lower-case much.
I did though, for a second. Remember back when I asked you if you thought I was mafia and you dodged the question? That happened man. But the way you backed off it after Hopeless' reaction made me lean town on you, where HF deigned to continue to call me scummy for it. See the difference?
|
Anyway for real this time. Peace.
|
On November 20 2014 19:13 ritoky wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:10 liancourt wrote:
i am hard defending hopeless who looks scummy as fuck
does this make me mafia?
i thought there was no reason to vote hopeless, now he looks scummy as fuck? i already want to lynch you cuz you claimed mafia, you're making me think that desire isn't unfounded. and if you think i can't find mafia day 1 thru analysis, you have a very short memory. and maybe even mammary.
put ur money where u mouth is
i quivering in my boots
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player.
I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:32 VisceraEyes wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:28 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 19:25 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 19:17 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 19:05 Holyflare wrote:On November 20 2014 19:00 VisceraEyes wrote:On November 20 2014 18:56 Holyflare wrote:
I don't understand how you can call someone mafia for defending someone WHEN YOU ADMIT YOU EXAGGERATED EVERYTHING TO PRESSURE HIM. looooooooooool I didn't exaggerate my read Holyflare, I still think he's mafia for it. I was just exaggerating how certain I am of it - I'm NOT certain of it, it's just my read. And further, I'm not saying you're mafia FOR defending Hopeless. My reasoning is clear and explicit. I'm saying your mafia for defending Hopeless FOR BAD REASON (saying that something that IS objectively scummy is NOT objectively scummy) AT A WEIRD TIME (right after you acquired a scumread of him yourself, in response to MY pressure of him) WHILE SCUMREADING HIM! Holyflare Jesus Christ, I never have to spell shit out for you multiple times like this. Maybe you are town. :/ Feigning contribution is scummy yes, but nowhere did he do that at the time you had said he had done that. The start of the game does not count towards feigning contribution when all he's done is comment on a snowflake in the first hour of the game. That doesn't make anyone mafia ever and was a bs EXAGGERATED read that I do not and will not ever agree on. People have done the exact same thing as town in many many many many many more games so it's not OBJECTIVELY scummy at all, it's entirely subjective because it's what you think which goes against the actual facts. There's quite a difference between scum reading someone for what you said and scum reading him for something entirely different. He might not end up being scum and then I can look back and remember that your pressure was far more exacerbated than it should have been in that situation. Telling you that your initial logic for scum reading him was bad has nothing to do with him looking scummy for his reaction. It's an observation. Well bolded is just your opinion just like my opinion is that Hopeless' early posting is scummy. I don't think the read is exaggerated at all, I think the posts I pointed out CLEARLY illustrate Hopeless trying to blend in. But I guess you're right, that's my opinion. But the italicized is obviously an exaggeration because no one has ever made the post Hopeless made in response to Chez because Hopeless has never made that post in any other game in response to Chez. People have done SIMILAR things, but no one has done "the exact same" thing ever. See how easy that is to just switch on? Like, it doesn't matter if you're exaggerating or not, you're just making a point right? My logic wasn't bad - you disagree with the severity of the infringement in the posts I pointed out, but the logic is fucking sound Holyflare. That's why I say you're repeatedly trying to discredit me...because you're saying things that are blatantly untrue in an attempt to make me look bad - WHILE I find someone who YOU find suspicious...suspicious. Why? Why are you doing that? your read is crap VE. because if you actually believe your read then you should have the same one on me; yet i didn't even make the reads post of yours. your read is predicated on HF not finding hopeless scummy for the reasons you pointed out early, but finding him scummy for his reaction to being called out. which is almost the exact same response i had. remember where i was calling you out until hopeless reacted to you and then i rescinded on you cuz i found his post crap? that was the basis or your original read on HF, so it should also be on me. the fact that you don't evenly apply it means you're mafia or you're fabricating to push your OGI feelings. I don't even know what you just said here. Which read are you even referring to? My read of Holyflare? So you think Holyflare is town then I guess? Cool. I disagree. I don't have to think you're the same alignment because you're different players and Holyflare is a MUCH better player than you are. No offense intended. I am saying that your initial holyflare is scum read was: VE thinks hopeless is scum for early posts and reactions. HF thinks hopeless is scum only for the reactions. VE thinks HF is scummy for that. I had literally the exact same process and even argued it with you, but you didn't apply the scum read to me. I am saying that you're not applying your criteria for someone being scum evenly, which is suspect. capital much is a bit much, i will accept lower-case much. I did though, for a second. Remember back when I asked you if you thought I was mafia and you dodged the question? That happened man. But the way you backed off it after Hopeless' reaction made me lean town on you, where HF deigned to continue to call me scummy for it. See the difference?
I suppose that is reasonable.
|
|
|
United Kingdom30775 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:39 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:13 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 19:10 liancourt wrote:
i am hard defending hopeless who looks scummy as fuck
does this make me mafia?
i thought there was no reason to vote hopeless, now he looks scummy as fuck? i already want to lynch you cuz you claimed mafia, you're making me think that desire isn't unfounded. and if you think i can't find mafia day 1 thru analysis, you have a very short memory. and maybe even mammary. put ur money where u mouth is i quivering in my boots
All you are doing is making the thread a worse place by antagonising people intentionally. Please stop or just claim mafia.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:41 liancourt wrote:![[image loading]](http://i.imgur.com/ctst7UP.png)
I can't read this
|
On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant.
put ur vote where ur mouth is
stop beating around the bush
|
On November 20 2014 19:41 Holyflare wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:39 liancourt wrote:On November 20 2014 19:13 ritoky wrote:On November 20 2014 19:10 liancourt wrote:
i am hard defending hopeless who looks scummy as fuck
does this make me mafia?
i thought there was no reason to vote hopeless, now he looks scummy as fuck? i already want to lynch you cuz you claimed mafia, you're making me think that desire isn't unfounded. and if you think i can't find mafia day 1 thru analysis, you have a very short memory. and maybe even mammary. put ur money where u mouth is i quivering in my boots All you are doing is making the thread a worse place by antagonising people intentionally. Please stop or just claim mafia.
i thought i just claimed mafia in my first post
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:43 liancourt wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant. put ur vote where ur mouth is stop beating around the bush
I'm busy right now working on the LR for the Hot6ix cup. I'll vote later
|
i'm playing the be the biggest dick in the thread so that everyone votes me meta
is it working guys?
has my douche persona reached ur darling hearts?
|
On November 20 2014 19:44 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:43 liancourt wrote:On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant. put ur vote where ur mouth is stop beating around the bush I'm busy right now working on the LR for the Hot6ix cup. I'll vote later
all words with no back up
ur afraid to vote me first because u know i'm town arent u
mafia want to bandwagon their votes and u want to bandwagon me when there are a few votes on me.
My lynch hasn't gotten traction yet and ur making excuses to postpone ur voting so u dont look suspicious when u vote me
Everyone is shitting themselves because they really have no fucking idea what the fuck I'm doing and u are shitting bricks
|
On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant.
No let me clarify I said your post means nothing to me, as in I dont see it making you town or scum. Thats why I said both rayn and you were null for me. Im just curious what rayn has to say
|
![[image loading]](http://i.gyazo.com/1c56afb8c8e40c02a90f060910feb588.png)
you're the special kind aren't you?
|
u dont even know whats so scummy about me
u just dont understand why i'm doing this so u vote me lol
no wait...ur voting me because i piggy backed on someone calling u salty
stop being salty and play the game
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 19:50 sicklucker wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant. No let me clarify I said your post means nothing to me, as in I dont see it making you town or scum. Thats why I said both rayn and you were null for me. Im just curious what rayn has to say
I'm saying Rayn already saw my post and said I was mafia based on it. Then he started posting everything based on my being mafia.
|
Ya im not giving rayn a walk on it either. Im saying whatever he says is going to be interesting one way or the other. He promised an explination.
|
On November 20 2014 19:58 The_Templar wrote:Show nested quote +On November 20 2014 19:50 sicklucker wrote:On November 20 2014 19:40 The_Templar wrote:On November 20 2014 19:22 sicklucker wrote:
So I think people have jumped on a little quickly at 5am 3 hours into the game for me but ll try to keep up.
VisceraEyes is pretty town here . I dont think someone with 16k posts is going to make a 10 page case right out of the gete with pretty small evidence. I truly believe he thinks what he says.
I didnt think much of templars post but I cant wait to hear what rayn has to say about it because I think hes a pretty good town player, their both null for me now.
liancourt is scummy as hell. But im not sure I would ever come into the game as any alignment make my first post saying I havent read the thread then make a second post voting someone. So im not totally sure what this means is he usually like this?. He even said hes not going to read the thread. But the only game of mafia I ever played, the mafias were super obvious so im in the mindset of guilty untill proven innocent with him.
Rayn confirmed that I am mafia based on that one post because he is such a good town player. I rarely see games where a town will act like liancourt is right now, especially on day 1. Will he really try to contribute to the discussion at all? He doesn't even seem to have a reason for doing this, but he is OK with calling me out for being mafia based on inactivity when I'm trying my best to ask questions that are somewhat relevant. No let me clarify I said your post means nothing to me, as in I dont see it making you town or scum. Thats why I said both rayn and you were null for me. Im just curious what rayn has to say I'm saying Rayn already saw my post and said I was mafia based on it. Then he started posting everything based on my being mafia.
So wrong.
|
your Country52798 Posts
On November 20 2014 18:15 raynpelikoneet wrote:
VE is town. Slam is town.
We can kill Templar because of that mafia post.
ritoky i am the king of vague statements.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
