EPTThe Resistance: Avalon - Page 42
| Forum Index > TL Mafia |
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
yamato77
11589 Posts
Slam is up. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Well, unlike the last few up- I am not going to insta-choose, that is bull. I want opinions backed with reasoning on why my team should be YOUR team. This discussion less town is crap. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
I think you should firstly choose Liam- He has been one of the only people to try his best to give analysis of the situation and whats going on. He was on a team that was a success and failed but I do not think that he is the scum in that pairing. Palmar- I think he has a decent shot at being town he sounds pretty good and doesn't look that scummy hes a bit of a unknown but not sure Bats- This is not scum bats I actually remember what hes talking about so pretty sure hes town | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
IMO Alakaslam you should bring me along. I've done a good job of pushing the conversation forward and trying to discern people's alignments in a public way. Although I haven't been perfect, and I've said things that people think are scummy, I haven't been afraid to say those things. I am not some cringing manservant of the "nay-triarchy" who will dumb down his ideas because the naytriachy says they're not allowed. If I have a reason for someone being scum, even if people think it's dumb, I'll share it. | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
| ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On October 28 2014 08:29 Blazinghand wrote: I'm pretty ok with Liam and Palm. interesting though Damdred that you don't try to get yourself on the team??? IMO Alakaslam you should bring me along. I've done a good job of pushing the conversation forward and trying to discern people's alignments in a public way. Although I haven't been perfect, and I've said things that people think are scummy, I haven't been afraid to say those things. I am not some cringing manservant of the "nay-triarchy" who will dumb down his ideas because the naytriachy says they're not allowed. If I have a reason for someone being scum, even if people think it's dumb, I'll share it. I'll have you know that my team consisted of Alakaslam Blazinghand Palmar Liancourt But I know anything that actually came from me will be nayvoted so I am trying to do something worth considering with my time. So this is town's day; wisdom of the crowds will dictate the team I nominate. This is how it should have been done from the start IMO. We outnumber scum, even if I don't include my own opinion. Surely we can figure this out. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Well | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
Everyone talk about somethin ya? Like I wanna see 5 pages I cba to read before I have to choose a team  | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
If you talk about how scum could potentially Phux up this plan, either you are yourself scum or you need to think about why I would say that kind of hard. Like take a little time just to think. Remember although unskilled at mafia, slam Is Not Actually A Fool | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On October 28 2014 08:34 Damdred wrote: Up to this point I really haven't tried to put myself out their to much so why should I be on a team? I want to win this game even though people have given up its still winnable and the best thing to do is to start getting thoughts out there maybe this isn't the team i should be on but its better to get thoughts out then not yeah ok but look at it this way. if you want to get a team without yourself on it, you have to correctly identify the alignments of every other player in the game (4 town, 3 scum). However, if you include yourself on a team, you only have to identify 3 townies, not 4. So if you see 4 players who are sorta-scummy and you're not sure which one of them is the 4th townie, you can just grab the other team and have a team of 4. Or just in general, it's much lower-risk. I don't see why you wouldn't want yourself on a team | ||
|
Damdred
15669 Posts
Putting yourself in a team is self motivated and scum or town could do it, I have identified three people who I think are pretty towny, I honestly do not know how to read slam if I had another go at creating a team i would put myself and the three listed at this point. | ||
|
Alakaslam
United States17336 Posts
On October 28 2014 08:48 Blazinghand wrote: yeah ok but look at it this way. if you want to get a team without yourself on it, you have to correctly identify the alignments of every other player in the game (4 town, 3 scum). However, if you include yourself on a team, you only have to identify 3 townies, not 4. So if you see 4 players who are sorta-scummy and you're not sure which one of them is the 4th townie, you can just grab the other team and have a team of 4. Or just in general, it's much lower-risk. I don't see why you wouldn't want yourself on a team One reason is you see it as an impossibility. This is the only reason I am not just putting out my own decided team. Town is scumread ing me for bullshit I can't refute because they can't actually put it into coherent words because it actually is just gut bullshit so I am not going to be included on anything nor listened to. So I cannot help solve the game except with my under-informed vote; so I am leaving it in everyone's hands. This should be an informative day or town deserves to lose. | ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
| ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
| ||
|
Blazinghand
United States25558 Posts
On October 28 2014 08:57 liancourt wrote: I m going give out my analysis once we go through a cycle and we go full circle back to palmars team. At the moment giving that analysis seems risky. yeah unless you are like a hundo percent sure palmar is town, you shoud just post now rather than later. Palmar is captain #5 so his team gets automatically accepted if it goes to him. | ||
|
liancourt
1563 Posts
| ||
| ||
