• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 09:23
CEST 15:23
KST 22:23
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
[ASL22] Ro8 Preview: In A Tizzy6[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Holy Diver5[ASL22] Ro16 Preview: Rough Waters10[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Siren's Call8[ASL22] Ro24 Preview: Summer's End9
Community News
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple1BSL Season 235Weekly Cups (Sep 7-12): SHIN, ByuN, MaxPax double down1StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon101Weekly Cups (Aug 30-Sep 7): herO thrives amid growing schism10
StarCraft 2
General
Weekly Cups (Sep 13-20): herO scores triple Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) StarCraft open world shooter announced at BlizzCon SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 8/8 The Death of Cheese: From a Professional Cheeser
Tourneys
2026 GSTL Announcement Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event RSL goes to London! 2026 Offline Finals Nov 21-22 SC2 AI Tournament 2026 Fall
Strategy
[H] ZvP Mid-Late Game: Stalkers Collossi HT
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
Mutation # 544 Double Trouble The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 543 Enhanced Defenses Mutation # 542 The Ascended
Brood War
General
New 3v3 BGH Ladder (and more) on ShieldBattery! Bot on ladder Recent recommended BW games an AI researcher's take on the ladder bot BSL Season 23
Tourneys
[ASL22] Ro8 Day 1 [BSL23] SM: Ret vs TerrOr -> DragOn vs StRyKeR [Megathread] Daily Proleagues [ASL22] Ro16 Group D
Strategy
Cliff Jump Revisited (1 in a 1000 strategy) Replay Review Process - What do you do? Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Warcraft III: The Frozen Throne Nintendo Switch Thread Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread EVE Corporation Diablo IV
Dota 2
Dota 2 Champions League Season 3 Begins April 25! Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Community Thread
Community
General
US Politics Mega-thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine All you football fans (soccer)! Russo-Ukrainian War Thread
Fan Clubs
MarineLorD Fan Club The Creator Fan Club The ShoWTimE Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Movie Discussion! [Manga] One Piece Diablo Animated Series on Netflix
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 MLB/Baseball 2023
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread
TL Community
Recent Gifted Posts
Blogs
Gaming Intensity, Problemati…
TrAiDoS
38 yo Retired SWE loo…
PurE)Rabbit-SF
Can Bots Beat Pros?? Starcr…
namkraft
[meme] I finally understa…
LUCKY_NOOB
Regacy Esports:Our Goa…
regacyesports
Dreaming of BW patches (mod…
c3rberUs
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 11891 users

Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 2

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 19:59 GMT
#278
On October 07 2014 04:54 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 04:52 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Lian are you a smurf?

BH wants to follow RNG but he will do what he can to convince other people to vote for OO. He doesn't care if people lynch OO for other reasons aside from RNG as long as it's OO that is lynched.

BH you said you don't have an opinion on Oats post's. Do you have an opinion on HF's posts attacking Oat's posts?


Would there be any difference if I were a smurf or not? I think I told the mod what I am.

Not particularly but I like trying to guess smurfs Your first post is a post I don't see a new player making.


I am from somewhere else. So in a way I am new but not new. Take what you will. So guess the smurf game is over.

How should a new player post?

Hi i am new here lets be friends?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 20:15 GMT
#281
On October 07 2014 05:12 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 04:59 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:54 Grackaroni wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:52 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Lian are you a smurf?

BH wants to follow RNG but he will do what he can to convince other people to vote for OO. He doesn't care if people lynch OO for other reasons aside from RNG as long as it's OO that is lynched.

BH you said you don't have an opinion on Oats post's. Do you have an opinion on HF's posts attacking Oat's posts?


Would there be any difference if I were a smurf or not? I think I told the mod what I am.

Not particularly but I like trying to guess smurfs Your first post is a post I don't see a new player making.


I am from somewhere else. So in a way I am new but not new. Take what you will. So guess the smurf game is over.

How should a new player post?

Hi i am new here lets be friends?

No they would put a lot of thought into whether they should claim.


I guess so to whoever is new to mafia it would be true. But really is there anything but town you can claim. You cant claim seer for obvious reasons
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 20:44 GMT
#285
On October 07 2014 05:33 ObviousOne wrote:
Lol holy shit self voting is literally against the rules I should have read at some point. Someone asked bout my oats read and it was cuz he stuck to defending his claim as a joke an participated in tomfoolery ironically


I smell fish
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:07 GMT
#329
Although BH's posts seem like town his methods seem questionable. Whether or not there was worthy discussion before the RNG is of no consequence. The fact that he disrupted any sort of discussion and flung the thread into a whole new direction worries me deeply. I can see 1 of 2 scenarios of why this happened.

1. That there were relevant information in the discussion so as to dismiss everything -> RNG

2. The discussion indeed was bollocks so he wanted to renew.

Now I'm inclined to think as mafia you'd want to steer away from discussion involving one of your own.

But as town as long as there is discussion it doesn't really matter whether it's bad or productive so long as you can get some form of information.

I'm still iffy on BH. It's much more plausible for him to be mafia and spin the wheel of fortune as it has a lesser chance of getting a mafia. On the odd chance that it does land on one he doesn't have to push the lynch for it to just dissolve in the discussion but it's strange he keeps pushing OO for the lynch. Yes, he has been acting strangely I do admit that, but I can't help but think it's so convenient for the mafia to use this strategy.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:32 GMT
#341
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:36 GMT
#345
On October 07 2014 08:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:32 Blazinghand wrote:
Are we really talking whether or not I "slipped" that there are 3 mafia in a 14 player game? Again? Do we have to do this every time?


This.

This is an incredibly dumb statement. If BH is actually scum, this is most certainly not why.


Cosidering he said 3/13 before I just overlooked it and took no real meaning to it.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:41 GMT
#347
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:56 GMT
#355
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:09 GMT
#358
On October 07 2014 08:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


This is a fairly relevant question. I'd like to take this moment to note, liancourt, that I do this all the time as town because it is objectively a good strategy. I'm pretty sure I've done it as scum too (Though I can't think of the game where I did it now) but that's cause as scum I try to play to my town meta, not because this is something I do as scum. RNG is, in my personal opinion, very good. You may disagree, but unless you can demonstrate that I personally don't think RNG is good (a hard thing to demonstrate given that I always use it) I don't see how you can paint my choice to use this scumhunting tactic as scum-motivated.


so you do this all the time so I'm meant to believe it's legit?

Ofc I cant demonstrate whether it's a good strat or not but I can only give you the reason I've said before that's it's basically against the town's favor in terms of probability and that I can't see a way you can get any reads using this method. I see more danger following this method if you were scum than doing any good it will come from you being town as I see in my honest opinion more advs for scum than town using this method. If you can convince me otherwise I'm willing to go along with it.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:15 GMT
#359
On October 07 2014 08:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:56 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it


Well you're wrong. It might be a scum-sided strategy but I've seen BH do it as town.

In fact, I'm pretty sure the exact post that he used was pretty much copy pasted from Noir 2, a game that I played with him. So there's no way that post can be purely scum motivated.


If you keep bringing past games up on me I can't exactly empathize with you mate. So I'm solely basing it on this game and how I feel about it. All I'm saying is there's more potential for abuse than it will do good.

It's like a nuclear bomb. It has the potential to do much worse things than being used as a source of peacekeeper device. I hope this analogy is correct
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:31 GMT
#364
On October 07 2014 09:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 09:15 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:56 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it


Well you're wrong. It might be a scum-sided strategy but I've seen BH do it as town.

In fact, I'm pretty sure the exact post that he used was pretty much copy pasted from Noir 2, a game that I played with him. So there's no way that post can be purely scum motivated.


If you keep bringing past games up on me I can't exactly empathize with you mate. So I'm solely basing it on this game and how I feel about it. All I'm saying is there's more potential for abuse than it will do good.

It's like a nuclear bomb. It has the potential to do much worse things than being used as a source of peacekeeper device. I hope this analogy is correct


The issue isn't that you called it a bad strategy, because it is. The issue is that you said he could only be scum for suggesting such a strategy, which is factually incorrect.


In my eyes why would town pick a bad strat to play with. Oh wait BH believes it's a good strat. Bad strats a bad strat and believing it a good strat just makes me wonder. And as mentioned he's played it before as town and as scum so who's to believe he's playing it as town this time around.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:37 GMT
#367
From day 1 what I'm getting is

oats just over reacting

OO acting strangely i admit

hopeless iffy and hasn't responded to HF

I can't seem to get anything else meaningful except for the fact that damdred and gracks seem to be only questioning others and not really saying anything themselves.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:38 GMT
#368
On October 07 2014 09:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Who's to say he's only doing it as scum this time around?

This question goes both ways.


Is the poisoned wine in front of me or you?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 01:00 GMT
#374
If you are argue that it can go both ways then it just goes nowhere.

Much like following the random lynch. You can't really say they are scum or town because they are just following random votes.

But I'm inclined to think those following the random lynch don't want to be read. And I'm almost forced to think that thos epeople who don't want to be read are those that scum.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 01:29 GMT
#376
On October 07 2014 10:27 Oatsmaster wrote:
Who's following the random lynch liancourt?

Batsnacks, I am utterly sorry for the abuse I heaped on you and your plan yesterday. I went on and on and on totally unreasonably. My bad. Your plan was fine.

Hf, I called grack probably town because he's the only other one that jokingly claimed.


Obvious One (3): Blazinghand, Alakaslam, Grackaroni

kinda out there in plain sight
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 07:22 GMT
#517
On October 07 2014 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:
I have seen this same dumb shut storm in 5 games already.

3 in which I played.

Liancourt I now know, you are not a smurf.


Care to elaborate?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 07:54 GMT
#532
On October 07 2014 14:34 Holyflare wrote:
uhhhh something to lian when you wake up, why did you go from town reading bh to thinking his rng thing was actually really scummy?


I think I said his posts seem legit which makes me feel he is town, but his method (RNG)is just meh...a strat more advantageous for scum to be using.

But apparently everyone thinks BH's strat is just his standardized play. I'm at a crossroads here.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:02 GMT
#534
On October 07 2014 14:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On October 07 2014 11:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
This is going to be a really small postcount game. Nobody else seems interested in moving the thread forward which really bothers me.

Bleed towniness.

Yeah this is a really strange post. How can you really say this sincerely from the perspective of somebody who hasn't even read through the thread. For all you knew somebody could have been spewing towniness and you just never read it.


Because we hit 20 pages by the end of the first half of the day, and from the looks of the early game and BH's random lynching, I was under the impression that nothing of great importance happened.

You're acting like one of two good townreads are super important, and they're not. We have 14 players. That's not enough. We need more.

If you're really going to get your panties in a bunch about this, I'll go and reread the entire game and say stuff.


two good town reads? Who are they?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:13 GMT
#537
On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff.
Too bad to be scum is my current read.

Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons.
So is oo.
I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question


Sorry what question was that?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:21 GMT
#539
On October 07 2014 16:17 KelsierSC wrote:
Just to update on HF.

I think his interaction with obi makes him scummy.

Firstly he asked "when are you going to do something" when it seems to me that obi was asking questions and trying to get things done. Then he just votes him out of the blue for the reason of "filter"...ok that is just a terrible explanation. if you are going to vote on someone at least accuse them of something scummy.
Then it turns out his huge reason is because obi hasn't called anyone town or scum instantly . It is reasonable that obi has reads but didn't want to give them yet or he was getting his reads based on questioning dam/lia.
Just felt like HF called him scum and then had to find a reason for it.


Although I do agree HF's coming out seemed abrupt, I can't say obi was asking questions that much. He was mainly talking with me defending BH. And his filter is full of defend the BH posts. I don't think he really accused me of anything either and just defended the RNG strat.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
WardiTV Weekly
11:00
WardiTV Mondays #105
IntoTheiNu 1737
WardiTV720
OGKoka 266
Rex128
Liquipedia
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
OGKoka 266
ProTech132
Rex 128
StarCraft: Brood War
Bisu 3164
Jaedong 1901
Soulkey 733
Shine 696
Larva 411
ggaemo 313
Mini 292
Stork 278
firebathero 213
Barracks 166
[ Show more ]
Hyun 137
Mind 113
hero 94
Snow 87
JYJ 65
Sharp 54
Shinee 42
Sexy 36
ToSsGirL 33
HiyA 30
NaDa 26
Free 16
zelot 14
Noble 14
sorry 14
Terrorterran 13
scan(afreeca) 12
JulyZerg 10
yabsab 10
Icarus 4
NotJumperer 2
eros_byul 1
SilentControl 0
Dota 2
Gorgc7729
Dendi954
qojqva700
BananaSlamJamma117
Counter-Strike
olofmeister1468
edward150
Heroes of the Storm
crisheroes301
Khaldor59
Other Games
singsing2176
B2W.Neo1061
hiko707
Lowko388
XBOCT331
Mew2King130
Liquid`VortiX127
Hui .125
QueenE56
Organizations
Dota 2
PGL Dota 2 - Main Stream13548
PGL Dota 2 - Secondary Stream2266
StarCraft: Brood War
lovetv 10
[ Show 12 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile111
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• Migwel
StarCraft: Brood War
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• C_a_k_e 1719
League of Legends
• TFBlade540
Other Games
• WagamamaTV180
Upcoming Events
Monday Night Weeklies
2h 37m
Sparkling Tuna Cup
20h 37m
Afreeca Starleague
20h 37m
Light vs EffOrt
OSC
22h 37m
PiGosaur Cup
1d 10h
Kung Fu Cup
1d 21h
The PondCast
2 days
Replay Cast
3 days
Korean StarCraft League
4 days
CranKy Ducklings
4 days
[ Show More ]
GSL
5 days
Yamato Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Afreeca Starleague
6 days
WardiTV Weekly
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Super Anchor Qualifying S3
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1

Ongoing

ASL Season 22
CSL 2026 AUTUMN (S22)
Acropolis #5
Acropolis #5 - GSA
Calamity Invitational
Logitech G Play Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #3
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026

Upcoming

Acropolis #5 - GSB
Acropolis #5 - GSC
BSL Season 23
SC4ALL II: Brood War
BSL 23: Non-Korean Championship
HSC XXX
Stellar Fest 2: Lunar Cup
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
RSL Offline Finals
Copium Cup
PGL Major Singapore 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 6
BLAST Rivals Fall 2026
IEM Beijing 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 5
PGL Masters Bucharest 2026
1win Private Club #2
Thunderpick World Champ. '26
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
1win Private Club #1
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.