• Log InLog In
  • Register
Liquid`
Team Liquid Liquipedia
EDT 13:20
CEST 19:20
KST 02:20
  • Home
  • Forum
  • Calendar
  • Streams
  • Liquipedia
  • Features
  • Store
  • EPT
  • TL+
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Smash
  • Heroes
  • Counter-Strike
  • Overwatch
  • Liquibet
  • Fantasy StarCraft
  • TLPD
  • StarCraft 2
  • Brood War
  • Blogs
Forum Sidebar
Events/Features
News
Featured News
Serral wins HomeStory Cup 2914Serral wins Maestros of the Game 243ByuL, and the Limitations of Standard Play3Team Liquid Map Contest #22: Results and Winners7Code S Season 2 (2026): RO4 and Finals Preview12
Community News
Weekly Cups (July 27-Aug 2): SHIN's big week0SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-67SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-64PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August)11Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE17
StarCraft 2
General
Balance hotfix patch 5.0.16b (July 16) Neeb returns to progaming; rejoins ONSYDE SC4ALL II: StarCraft 2 Player Announcement 2/8 August World Ranking: Clem climbs to #2 Daily SC2 Player Grid - feedback wanted
Tourneys
Tasteless Time Warp: SC Evo Showmatch (May 25) SC4ALL II announced - $10,000 prize pool, Dec 5-6 Sparkling Tuna Cup - Weekly Open Tournament PIG STY FESTIVAL 8.0! (13 - 23 August) RSL Revival: Season 6 - Qualifiers and Main Event
Strategy
[G] Having the right mentality to improve
Custom Maps
Nexus Wars 2021 GUIDE [M] (2) Industrial Park
External Content
The PondCast: SC2 News & Results Mutation # 537 Hostile Territory Mutation # 536 Railroad Switch Mutation # 535 Assembly of Vengeance
Brood War
General
ASL22 General Discussion Data needed BGH Auto Balance -> http://bghmmr.eu/ BW General Discussion [Personal Project Share] Terran Defense v0.60
Tourneys
SC4ALL II: Brood War - $2500 - Dec 5-6 2v2v2v2 Tournament [Megathread] Daily Proleagues Escore Tournament - Season 3
Strategy
Any training maps people recommend? Fighting Spirit mining rates Simple Questions, Simple Answers Odyssey Mineral Stack Saturation
Other Games
General Games
Stormgate/Frost Giant Megathread ZeroSpace Early Access is Now Live! General RTS Discussion Thread Nintendo Switch Thread Beyond All Reason
Dota 2
Looking for a Dota Mentor Official 'what is Dota anymore' discussion
League of Legends
[TL LoL EUW IHs] Teemo shall perish TSM pausing esports and CLG Dead
Heroes of the Storm
Heroes of the Storm 2.0
Hearthstone
Deck construction bug
TL Mafia
TL Mafia Power Rank TL Mafia Community Thread NeO.D_StephenKing vs This Guy From 1 Million Dance
Community
General
European Politico-economics QA Mega-thread US Politics Mega-thread Russo-Ukrainian War Thread Artificial Intelligence Thread Things Aren’t Peaceful in Palestine
Fan Clubs
The Clem Fan Club INnoVation Fan Club The Scarlett Fan Club
Media & Entertainment
Anime Discussion Thread Movie Discussion! Series you have seen recently... [Req][Books] Good Fantasy/SciFi books
Sports
Football (Soccer) Thread TeamLiquid Health and Fitness Initiative For 2023 Formula 1 Discussion MLB/Baseball 2023 McBoner: A hockey love story
World Cup 2022
Tech Support
Computer Build, Upgrade & Buying Resource Thread Simple Questions Simple Answers FPS when play League Of Legend on laptop
TL Community
The Automated Ban List Northern Ireland Global Starcraft
Blogs
Please support my new stand…
Peanutsc
What is a Gamer?
TrAiDoS
Hello guys!
LIN1s
ASL S22 English Commentary…
namkraft
Poker (part 2)
Nebuchad
Customize Sidebar...

Website Feedback

Closed Threads



Active: 3396 users

Fantasy Football (FFL) Mini - Page 2

Forum Index > TL Mafia
Post a Reply
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 19:59 GMT
#278
On October 07 2014 04:54 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 04:52 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Lian are you a smurf?

BH wants to follow RNG but he will do what he can to convince other people to vote for OO. He doesn't care if people lynch OO for other reasons aside from RNG as long as it's OO that is lynched.

BH you said you don't have an opinion on Oats post's. Do you have an opinion on HF's posts attacking Oat's posts?


Would there be any difference if I were a smurf or not? I think I told the mod what I am.

Not particularly but I like trying to guess smurfs Your first post is a post I don't see a new player making.


I am from somewhere else. So in a way I am new but not new. Take what you will. So guess the smurf game is over.

How should a new player post?

Hi i am new here lets be friends?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 20:15 GMT
#281
On October 07 2014 05:12 Grackaroni wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 04:59 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:54 Grackaroni wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:52 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 04:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Lian are you a smurf?

BH wants to follow RNG but he will do what he can to convince other people to vote for OO. He doesn't care if people lynch OO for other reasons aside from RNG as long as it's OO that is lynched.

BH you said you don't have an opinion on Oats post's. Do you have an opinion on HF's posts attacking Oat's posts?


Would there be any difference if I were a smurf or not? I think I told the mod what I am.

Not particularly but I like trying to guess smurfs Your first post is a post I don't see a new player making.


I am from somewhere else. So in a way I am new but not new. Take what you will. So guess the smurf game is over.

How should a new player post?

Hi i am new here lets be friends?

No they would put a lot of thought into whether they should claim.


I guess so to whoever is new to mafia it would be true. But really is there anything but town you can claim. You cant claim seer for obvious reasons
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 20:44 GMT
#285
On October 07 2014 05:33 ObviousOne wrote:
Lol holy shit self voting is literally against the rules I should have read at some point. Someone asked bout my oats read and it was cuz he stuck to defending his claim as a joke an participated in tomfoolery ironically


I smell fish
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:07 GMT
#329
Although BH's posts seem like town his methods seem questionable. Whether or not there was worthy discussion before the RNG is of no consequence. The fact that he disrupted any sort of discussion and flung the thread into a whole new direction worries me deeply. I can see 1 of 2 scenarios of why this happened.

1. That there were relevant information in the discussion so as to dismiss everything -> RNG

2. The discussion indeed was bollocks so he wanted to renew.

Now I'm inclined to think as mafia you'd want to steer away from discussion involving one of your own.

But as town as long as there is discussion it doesn't really matter whether it's bad or productive so long as you can get some form of information.

I'm still iffy on BH. It's much more plausible for him to be mafia and spin the wheel of fortune as it has a lesser chance of getting a mafia. On the odd chance that it does land on one he doesn't have to push the lynch for it to just dissolve in the discussion but it's strange he keeps pushing OO for the lynch. Yes, he has been acting strangely I do admit that, but I can't help but think it's so convenient for the mafia to use this strategy.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:32 GMT
#341
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:36 GMT
#345
On October 07 2014 08:33 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:32 Blazinghand wrote:
Are we really talking whether or not I "slipped" that there are 3 mafia in a 14 player game? Again? Do we have to do this every time?


This.

This is an incredibly dumb statement. If BH is actually scum, this is most certainly not why.


Cosidering he said 3/13 before I just overlooked it and took no real meaning to it.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:41 GMT
#347
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 06 2014 23:56 GMT
#355
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:09 GMT
#358
On October 07 2014 08:48 Blazinghand wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


This is a fairly relevant question. I'd like to take this moment to note, liancourt, that I do this all the time as town because it is objectively a good strategy. I'm pretty sure I've done it as scum too (Though I can't think of the game where I did it now) but that's cause as scum I try to play to my town meta, not because this is something I do as scum. RNG is, in my personal opinion, very good. You may disagree, but unless you can demonstrate that I personally don't think RNG is good (a hard thing to demonstrate given that I always use it) I don't see how you can paint my choice to use this scumhunting tactic as scum-motivated.


so you do this all the time so I'm meant to believe it's legit?

Ofc I cant demonstrate whether it's a good strat or not but I can only give you the reason I've said before that's it's basically against the town's favor in terms of probability and that I can't see a way you can get any reads using this method. I see more danger following this method if you were scum than doing any good it will come from you being town as I see in my honest opinion more advs for scum than town using this method. If you can convince me otherwise I'm willing to go along with it.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:15 GMT
#359
On October 07 2014 08:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 08:56 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it


Well you're wrong. It might be a scum-sided strategy but I've seen BH do it as town.

In fact, I'm pretty sure the exact post that he used was pretty much copy pasted from Noir 2, a game that I played with him. So there's no way that post can be purely scum motivated.


If you keep bringing past games up on me I can't exactly empathize with you mate. So I'm solely basing it on this game and how I feel about it. All I'm saying is there's more potential for abuse than it will do good.

It's like a nuclear bomb. It has the potential to do much worse things than being used as a source of peacekeeper device. I hope this analogy is correct
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:31 GMT
#364
On October 07 2014 09:18 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 09:15 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:59 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:56 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:44 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:41 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:32 liancourt wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:29 batsnacks wrote:
On October 07 2014 08:19 Grackaroni wrote:
You're implying that at the start of the post BH was careful not to slip that he had knowledge of the setup. (by pointing out that the number of scum is unknown) and then *slipped* that he was 100% sure there were 3 mafia within like 10 seconds of typing which is really unrealistic.

What I see is BH working off the assumption that random lynch provides at least 22% chance of hitting mafia compared to day 1 analysis which varies (and BH thinks is worse for catching mafia)


I think it's feasible that he slipped.

besides

The TL mafia database disagrees that random lynch is better. So by random lynching we 1) have worse odds of lynching mafia and 2) players who agree with the random lynch have zero accountability for their votes.


exactly 0 accountability.


What angle are you working here, exactly?


I'm on the side that you really can't scrutinize votes if they're random. Whether they follow it and made the RNG vote themselves the reason will be oh it's just random. No backlash.


So you think that BH's RNG lynch strategem can only be purely scum motivated?


nailed it


Well you're wrong. It might be a scum-sided strategy but I've seen BH do it as town.

In fact, I'm pretty sure the exact post that he used was pretty much copy pasted from Noir 2, a game that I played with him. So there's no way that post can be purely scum motivated.


If you keep bringing past games up on me I can't exactly empathize with you mate. So I'm solely basing it on this game and how I feel about it. All I'm saying is there's more potential for abuse than it will do good.

It's like a nuclear bomb. It has the potential to do much worse things than being used as a source of peacekeeper device. I hope this analogy is correct


The issue isn't that you called it a bad strategy, because it is. The issue is that you said he could only be scum for suggesting such a strategy, which is factually incorrect.


In my eyes why would town pick a bad strat to play with. Oh wait BH believes it's a good strat. Bad strats a bad strat and believing it a good strat just makes me wonder. And as mentioned he's played it before as town and as scum so who's to believe he's playing it as town this time around.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:37 GMT
#367
From day 1 what I'm getting is

oats just over reacting

OO acting strangely i admit

hopeless iffy and hasn't responded to HF

I can't seem to get anything else meaningful except for the fact that damdred and gracks seem to be only questioning others and not really saying anything themselves.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 00:38 GMT
#368
On October 07 2014 09:36 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Who's to say he's only doing it as scum this time around?

This question goes both ways.


Is the poisoned wine in front of me or you?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 01:00 GMT
#374
If you are argue that it can go both ways then it just goes nowhere.

Much like following the random lynch. You can't really say they are scum or town because they are just following random votes.

But I'm inclined to think those following the random lynch don't want to be read. And I'm almost forced to think that thos epeople who don't want to be read are those that scum.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 01:29 GMT
#376
On October 07 2014 10:27 Oatsmaster wrote:
Who's following the random lynch liancourt?

Batsnacks, I am utterly sorry for the abuse I heaped on you and your plan yesterday. I went on and on and on totally unreasonably. My bad. Your plan was fine.

Hf, I called grack probably town because he's the only other one that jokingly claimed.


Obvious One (3): Blazinghand, Alakaslam, Grackaroni

kinda out there in plain sight
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 07:22 GMT
#517
On October 07 2014 11:05 Alakaslam wrote:
I have seen this same dumb shut storm in 5 games already.

3 in which I played.

Liancourt I now know, you are not a smurf.


Care to elaborate?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 07:54 GMT
#532
On October 07 2014 14:34 Holyflare wrote:
uhhhh something to lian when you wake up, why did you go from town reading bh to thinking his rng thing was actually really scummy?


I think I said his posts seem legit which makes me feel he is town, but his method (RNG)is just meh...a strat more advantageous for scum to be using.

But apparently everyone thinks BH's strat is just his standardized play. I'm at a crossroads here.
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:02 GMT
#534
On October 07 2014 14:34 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
Show nested quote +
On October 07 2014 14:32 Grackaroni wrote:
On October 07 2014 11:40 ObiWanShinobi wrote:
This is going to be a really small postcount game. Nobody else seems interested in moving the thread forward which really bothers me.

Bleed towniness.

Yeah this is a really strange post. How can you really say this sincerely from the perspective of somebody who hasn't even read through the thread. For all you knew somebody could have been spewing towniness and you just never read it.


Because we hit 20 pages by the end of the first half of the day, and from the looks of the early game and BH's random lynching, I was under the impression that nothing of great importance happened.

You're acting like one of two good townreads are super important, and they're not. We have 14 players. That's not enough. We need more.

If you're really going to get your panties in a bunch about this, I'll go and reread the entire game and say stuff.


two good town reads? Who are they?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:13 GMT
#537
On October 07 2014 15:53 Oatsmaster wrote:
The obi stuff is interesting. He doesn't defend himself in any meaningful, rational way. Just gets irrationally angry and hf and starts a fight. I would expect scum to not be so foolish and actually defend themself with better stuff.
Too bad to be scum is my current read.

Keilsar or whatever his name is is scummy for reasons.
So is oo.
I think there's definitely scum in the lurkers so lynching into there is fine. Liencourt never responded to my question


Sorry what question was that?
liancourt
Profile Joined September 2014
1563 Posts
October 07 2014 08:21 GMT
#539
On October 07 2014 16:17 KelsierSC wrote:
Just to update on HF.

I think his interaction with obi makes him scummy.

Firstly he asked "when are you going to do something" when it seems to me that obi was asking questions and trying to get things done. Then he just votes him out of the blue for the reason of "filter"...ok that is just a terrible explanation. if you are going to vote on someone at least accuse them of something scummy.
Then it turns out his huge reason is because obi hasn't called anyone town or scum instantly . It is reasonable that obi has reads but didn't want to give them yet or he was getting his reads based on questioning dam/lia.
Just felt like HF called him scum and then had to find a reason for it.


Although I do agree HF's coming out seemed abrupt, I can't say obi was asking questions that much. He was mainly talking with me defending BH. And his filter is full of defend the BH posts. I don't think he really accused me of anything either and just defended the RNG strat.
Prev 1 2 3 4 5 9 10 11 Next All
Please log in or register to reply.
Live Events Refresh
Next event in 6h 40m
[ Submit Event ]
Live Streams
Refresh
StarCraft 2
ByuN 296
BRAT_OK 51
CosmosSc2 37
MindelVK 12
StarCraft: Brood War
Britney 28128
Shuttle 916
Dewaltoss 147
hero 132
ggaemo 116
JYJ 110
Zeus 82
Sexy 70
HiyA 53
Hyun 51
[ Show more ]
ToSsGirL 36
Bale 30
PianO 26
Rock 24
Terrorterran 19
zelot 16
Dota 2
Gorgc13750
qojqva1689
420jenkins229
LuMiX1
Counter-Strike
fl0m1718
byalli1525
x6flipin965
Heroes of the Storm
Liquid`Hasu138
Other Games
Grubby3052
FrodaN1739
B2W.Neo683
ceh9347
crisheroes266
elazer220
ArmadaUGS124
C9.Mang0104
XaKoH 98
SteadfastSC59
Trikslyr33
Organizations
StarCraft 2
Blizzard YouTube
StarCraft: Brood War
BSLTrovo
[ Show 15 non-featured ]
StarCraft 2
• mYiSmile115
• AfreecaTV YouTube
• intothetv
• Kozan
• IndyKCrew
• LaughNgamezSOOP
• Migwel
• sooper7s
StarCraft: Brood War
• Pr0nogo 1
• BSLYoutube
• STPLYoutube
• ZZZeroYoutube
Dota 2
• WagamamaTV749
Other Games
• imaqtpie409
• Shiphtur365
Upcoming Events
Replay Cast
6h 40m
The PondCast
16h 40m
OSC
16h 40m
INu's Battles
17h 40m
Percival vs Cure
Classic vs Clem
Replay Cast
1d 6h
Escore
1d 16h
IntoTheTV X SOOP
1d 17h
RSL Revival
2 days
herO vs SHIN
Clem vs Solar
Serral vs Rogue
RSL Revival
3 days
WardiTV Weekly
4 days
[ Show More ]
The Patches Monday
4 days
Sparkling Tuna Cup
5 days
PiG Sty Festival
5 days
PiGosaur Cup
6 days
Replay Cast
6 days
Kung Fu Cup
6 days
Liquipedia Results

Completed

Proleague 2026-08-04
CranK Gathers Season 4: BW vs SC2 Team League
Eternal Conflict S2 Finale

Ongoing

KCM Race Survival 2026 Season 3
K-JUNGMAN
Acropolis #5
RSL Revival: Season 6
BLAST Bounty Summer 2026
BLAST Bounty Summer Qual
Stake Ranked Episode 3
XSE Pro League 2026
IEM Cologne Major 2026
Stake Ranked Episode 2
CS Asia Championships 2026

Upcoming

Escore Tournament S3: W6
Escore Tournament S3: W7
CSLAN 4
ASL Season 22
Escore Tournament S3: W8
Acropolis #5 - TRS
Blizzard Classic Cup 2026
HSC XXX
SC4ALL II: StarCraft II
Kung Fu Cup 2026 Grand Finals
PiG Sty Festival 8.0
Big Dog Cup 2026 Div 1
Thunderpick World Champ.
ESL Pro League Season 24
Stake Ranked Episode 4
Logitech G Connect 2026
SL StarSeries Fall 2026
FISSURE Playground #5
BLAST Open Fall 2026
Esports World Cup 2026
TLPD

1. ByuN
2. TY
3. Dark
4. Solar
5. Stats
6. Nerchio
7. sOs
8. soO
9. INnoVation
10. Elazer
1. Rain
2. Flash
3. EffOrt
4. Last
5. Bisu
6. Soulkey
7. Mini
8. Sharp
Sidebar Settings...

Advertising | Privacy Policy | Terms Of Use | Contact Us

Original banner artwork: Jim Warren
The contents of this webpage are copyright © 2026 TLnet. All Rights Reserved.