|
|
|
it must be because i like vanilla ice cream
plain as can be
|
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people.
|
On October 07 2014 00:55 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim.
But it was a joke claim I dont think you can really read anything into it. Unless he actually claimed something other than vt I might agree with you.
|
On October 07 2014 00:58 batsnacks wrote:
Ebwop also how am I pointing fingers at random people? I'm only pointing fingers at people who claimed. I didn't make them claim. Also, I'm not scum reading anyone for claiming. Grack claimed and I don't scum read him. I am scum reading people for scummy reactions.
Although oats' reaction is slightly over the top which does make me wary and I do agree his reactions compared to gracks is somewhat more lets say lively I dont get the feeling he is scummy. Seems natural for town to react that way when someone questions your joke claim.
|
On October 07 2014 01:07 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 01:05 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 00:55 batsnacks wrote:On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. If I was serious about a mass claim I would have claimed in the same post. I didn't. In the next post I said there is no benefit in mass claiming, something oats agrees with yet he still felt the end to claim. But it was a joke claim I dont think you can really read anything into it. Unless he actually claimed something other than vt I might agree with you. I didn't scum read him for claiming though.
I see you claiming him as defensive and questioning his joke claim. You didnt need to scum read him. You were like the catalyst others did it for you.
|
On October 07 2014 01:07 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On October 06 2014 13:56 liancourt wrote:
it must be because i like vanilla ice cream
plain as can be Hmm claims in first post Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. i don't see why we couldn't read oats for the interaction. I think you can look into it, the he is reacting is very in the opposite direction of his "joke" so much so that its odd he even did the joke in the first place if he really truly feels like that. I disagree that bats looks scummy for something like this. Comes from a town mindset in my eyes, to be catching scum. I think you have actually moved up to my #1 scum
Town mindset? Please explain how its a town mindset that bats has. And why am I scum?
|
On October 07 2014 01:19 batsnacks wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 01:13 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 00:58 batsnacks wrote:
Ebwop also how am I pointing fingers at random people? I'm only pointing fingers at people who claimed. I didn't make them claim. Also, I'm not scum reading anyone for claiming. Grack claimed and I don't scum read him. I am scum reading people for scummy reactions. Although oats' reaction is slightly over the top which does make me wary and I do agree his reactions compared to gracks is somewhat more lets say lively I dont get the feeling he is scummy. Seems natural for town to react that way when someone questions your joke claim. It seems natural to start screaming when someone questions your joke claim? Does it also seem natural to claim and then immediately after say that claiming is "NEVER FUCKING BENEFICIAL [sic]"
Like I said joke claims. If he were serious itd be a different matter
|
On October 07 2014 01:31 Alakaslam wrote:
Holyflare, Storrzerg, batsnacks team calling it nao
Gimme dat baller shot caller épée-
Wait this is not OMGUS.net
Id take out hf because I agree with his points on hopeless.
|
On October 07 2014 02:13 StorrZerg wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 01:27 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 01:07 StorrZerg wrote:On October 06 2014 13:56 liancourt wrote:
it must be because i like vanilla ice cream
plain as can be Hmm claims in first post On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. i don't see why we couldn't read oats for the interaction. I think you can look into it, the he is reacting is very in the opposite direction of his "joke" so much so that its odd he even did the joke in the first place if he really truly feels like that. I disagree that bats looks scummy for something like this. Comes from a town mindset in my eyes, to be catching scum. I think you have actually moved up to my #1 scum Town mindset? Please explain how its a town mindset that bats has. And why am I scum? I find the act of seeking to trap someone town mindset, specially within the start of the game. It generates something to talk about which is good. You. Claimed with your first post in a "cute way" i don't like that. The way you are interacting with the oats/bats situation is weird, sets off my scumdar
That I am not bandwagoning on oats train?
|
On October 06 2014 13:01 Alakaslam wrote:
See I swear I am vt
Other ppl claimed as well
I took it as a joke like all the first page posts. I took every post as fluff until the oats bats interaction.
|
[B]On October 07 2014 02:16 OTE]On October 07 2014 02:16 Alakaslam wrote:
Hello Bamcis chef of the east side of the west.
You said I was skummi earlier with no reasons
I wants your reezinz
you claimed #lynchwithfire
how ever i don't like the smurff more since his claim was his first post + in a cute way[/QUOTE]
So ala did the same and just because I did it in a cute way you think I am scummy? A bit far fetched dont cha think?
|
On October 07 2014 02:19 Alakaslam wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 02:17 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 02:13 StorrZerg wrote:On October 07 2014 01:27 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 01:07 StorrZerg wrote:On October 06 2014 13:56 liancourt wrote:
it must be because i like vanilla ice cream
plain as can be Hmm claims in first post On October 07 2014 00:51 liancourt wrote:
I dont think we can scum read oats based on him agreeing to the mass claim when in the first place it was bats who suggested it. Although his reactions afterwards seems a little over reactive . But I do believe that he was joking when he claimed town. I mean theres no other option but to claim vt. You cant scrutinize him for that.
Also I find it strange everyone agrees on the fact that it was a trap set by bats. Its the perfect excuse for scum to say something was a trap and point fingers at random people. i don't see why we couldn't read oats for the interaction. I think you can look into it, the he is reacting is very in the opposite direction of his "joke" so much so that its odd he even did the joke in the first place if he really truly feels like that. I disagree that bats looks scummy for something like this. Comes from a town mindset in my eyes, to be catching scum. I think you have actually moved up to my #1 scum Town mindset? Please explain how its a town mindset that bats has. And why am I scum? I find the act of seeking to trap someone town mindset, specially within the start of the game. It generates something to talk about which is good. You. Claimed with your first post in a "cute way" i don't like that. The way you are interacting with the oats/bats situation is weird, sets off my scumdar That I am not bandwagoning on oats train? What oats train btw, he has 1 vote?
All the comments earlier were anti oats and then the RNG lynch came
|
On October 07 2014 02:26 KelsierSC wrote:
So I have never played with bh but i really don't like what he just did.
firstly i thought we were looking along some interesting lines with hf and hell, then bh did this huge RNG nothingness that served nothing except to disrupt town.
he then tries to justify his rng like hey this is actually a good idea because he is inactive?
it introduces him to the thread in a splashy way but all it does.is disrupt town.
I agree. And whats more I think bh is serious about it.
Oh wait dont tell me its another trap!
|
On October 07 2014 02:42 Blazinghand wrote:
The only "trap" here to fall into is the trap of not voting for OO
Never like lottery type things so I ll pass on the RNG lynch. I want to choose my own lynchee. In reverse logic theres a 78 percent chance to kill a town than a mafia so its against the odds.
And besides you cant question lynch votes that were RNGed. They will just say oh it was random so it doesnt have any meaning to it. Unreadable.
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it
|
On October 07 2014 03:20 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 02:55 liancourt wrote:
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it You're so incredibly uninformed, it hurts. I made one post, and that post provided the RNG #. How do you think it would look if I said "actually, ignore that post, we're going to use this one instead?" It would look awful, and I have obviously never done that and did not do that this game. If you really think that my RNG system is gameable, you simply don't understand it. Due to your lack of comprehension, you are hereby disqualified from any future discussion of RNG until you apologise for your ignorance.
Oh so you declare the post beforehand. My mistake I just skimmed too much text.
Even so. I dont approve because its random. And just flushes everything we discussed up until now down the drain.
And theres discrepancies in that some people will do it and some people wont.
Town will do it in the off chance they can get a scum. Mafia wont do it in the off chance they they get one of their own but the potential to lynch town randomly and being unreadable at the same time off sets that risk.
|
On October 07 2014 03:26 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 03:21 KelsierSC wrote:On October 07 2014 03:20 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 02:55 liancourt wrote:
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it You're so incredibly uninformed, it hurts. I made one post, and that post provided the RNG #. How do you think it would look if I said "actually, ignore that post, we're going to use this one instead?" It would look awful, and I have obviously never done that and did not do that this game. If you really think that my RNG system is gameable, you simply don't understand it. Due to your lack of comprehension, you are hereby disqualified from any future discussion of RNG until you apologise for your ignorance. I think if you said to ignore your RNG post that would be a really town move. Then you think wrongly. You're a smart guy, you just haven't had the education necessary to understand this. Look at things this way. OO delurked as soon as he got voted, right? And then he self-votes and posts some trolling image thing. Stop thinking about my RNG vote and look at OO's response. OO *knows* I'm 100% serious about RNG and don't back down from it, and I lynch people this way from time to time (people like to resist RNG but it still goes through occasionally). So Basically, OO is facing a couple serious votes on him. If you stop thinking about my RNG vote and look at OO's insta-delurk and weird response, suddenly you start to learn a lot more about OO, don't you. Dang! That sure was useful! It also turns out the thing you learned about OO is that he's pretty obviously scum. So vote him.
So it was a trap basically. I do think you are town based on this post but if you are pushing others to do it I think it all goes to fluff.
|
On October 07 2014 03:41 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 03:38 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 03:20 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 02:55 liancourt wrote:
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it You're so incredibly uninformed, it hurts. I made one post, and that post provided the RNG #. How do you think it would look if I said "actually, ignore that post, we're going to use this one instead?" It would look awful, and I have obviously never done that and did not do that this game. If you really think that my RNG system is gameable, you simply don't understand it. Due to your lack of comprehension, you are hereby disqualified from any future discussion of RNG until you apologise for your ignorance. Oh so you declare the post beforehand. My mistake I just skimmed too much text. Even so. I dont approve because its random. And just flushes everything we discussed up until now down the drain. And theres discrepancies in that some people will do it and some people wont. Town will do it in the off chance they can get a scum. Mafia wont do it in the off chance they they get one of their own but the potential to lynch town randomly and being unreadable at the same time off sets that risk. I'm not sorry to flush the "amazing" discussion of whether it's appropriate to use caps lock down the drain. If Oats is scum or not, whatever, but even you have to admit RNG is a better way of doing things than "did he inappropriately use capslock"
For one thing bats did was get us talking so kudos to him. It may seem meaningless to you since you think both oats and bats are town?
And also hf mentioned hopeless' weird post which seemed weird to me at the time also so while the discussion wasnt amazing I think we got something out of it.
|
On October 07 2014 03:57 Blazinghand wrote:Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 03:44 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 03:26 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 03:21 KelsierSC wrote:On October 07 2014 03:20 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 02:55 liancourt wrote:
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it You're so incredibly uninformed, it hurts. I made one post, and that post provided the RNG #. How do you think it would look if I said "actually, ignore that post, we're going to use this one instead?" It would look awful, and I have obviously never done that and did not do that this game. If you really think that my RNG system is gameable, you simply don't understand it. Due to your lack of comprehension, you are hereby disqualified from any future discussion of RNG until you apologise for your ignorance. I think if you said to ignore your RNG post that would be a really town move. Then you think wrongly. You're a smart guy, you just haven't had the education necessary to understand this. Look at things this way. OO delurked as soon as he got voted, right? And then he self-votes and posts some trolling image thing. Stop thinking about my RNG vote and look at OO's response. OO *knows* I'm 100% serious about RNG and don't back down from it, and I lynch people this way from time to time (people like to resist RNG but it still goes through occasionally). So Basically, OO is facing a couple serious votes on him. If you stop thinking about my RNG vote and look at OO's insta-delurk and weird response, suddenly you start to learn a lot more about OO, don't you. Dang! That sure was useful! It also turns out the thing you learned about OO is that he's pretty obviously scum. So vote him. So it was a trap basically. I do think you are town based on this post but if you are pushing others to do it I think it all goes to fluff. OK you clearly don't understand the purpose of RNG. I am lynching OO regardless of what he does, but I'm gonnas try to make arguments that are also convincing to you. Also, you didn't address whether or not you agree with that argument. Nice doj bro Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 03:49 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 03:41 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 03:38 liancourt wrote:On October 07 2014 03:20 Blazinghand wrote:On October 07 2014 02:55 liancourt wrote:
Also there is a possibility that people will keep posting until they get the number they want. So there is a wayto abuse it You're so incredibly uninformed, it hurts. I made one post, and that post provided the RNG #. How do you think it would look if I said "actually, ignore that post, we're going to use this one instead?" It would look awful, and I have obviously never done that and did not do that this game. If you really think that my RNG system is gameable, you simply don't understand it. Due to your lack of comprehension, you are hereby disqualified from any future discussion of RNG until you apologise for your ignorance. Oh so you declare the post beforehand. My mistake I just skimmed too much text. Even so. I dont approve because its random. And just flushes everything we discussed up until now down the drain. And theres discrepancies in that some people will do it and some people wont. Town will do it in the off chance they can get a scum. Mafia wont do it in the off chance they they get one of their own but the potential to lynch town randomly and being unreadable at the same time off sets that risk. I'm not sorry to flush the "amazing" discussion of whether it's appropriate to use caps lock down the drain. If Oats is scum or not, whatever, but even you have to admit RNG is a better way of doing things than "did he inappropriately use capslock" For one thing bats did was get us talking so kudos to him. It may seem meaningless to you since you think both oats and bats are town I do not have a townread on either oats or bats. Your reading comprehension has failed you once again. I remain hopeful things will improve Show nested quote +On October 07 2014 03:49 batsnacks wrote:On October 07 2014 02:23 batsnacks wrote:
@BH if I claim scum is RNG lynch still better than lynching me? nice b8 m8 i r8 8/8
All I can understand from this is that you voted random he acts strange so others should vote for him too.
The arguement of what? Oats using caps? I said I think he is town. And bats is fishy but apparently using traps is the mindset of a townie so I ll take a step back on my stance if more people agree to this notion.
|
On October 07 2014 04:36 Grackaroni wrote:
Lian are you a smurf?
BH wants to follow RNG but he will do what he can to convince other people to vote for OO. He doesn't care if people lynch OO for other reasons aside from RNG as long as it's OO that is lynched.
BH you said you don't have an opinion on Oats post's. Do you have an opinion on HF's posts attacking Oat's posts?
Would there be any difference if I were a smurf or not? I think I told the mod what I am.
|
|
|
|
|
|
EPT
